Abstract
In this paper, the recent emergence of a professed “experimental” culture in mathematics during the past three decades is analysed based on an adaptation of Hans-Jörg Rheinberger’s notion of “experimental systems” that mesh into experimental cultures. In so doing, I approach the question of how distinct mathematical cultures can coexist and blend into a common understanding that allows for cultural convergence while preserving heterogeneity.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Rheinberger (1997, p. 238).
- 2.
On a similar note, Knorr Cetina defined epistemic cultures as “amalgam[s] of arrangements and mechanisms—bonded through affinity, necessity and historical coincidence—which in a given field, make up how we know what we know” (Knorr Cetina 1999, p. 1).
- 3.
Recently, more work has been devoted to the cultural construction of scientific disciplines (see e.g. Lenoir 1997).
- 4.
The movement to boycott the Elsevier publishing company was initiated by Gowers in 2012 (see Arnold and Cohn 2012; Hassink and Clark 2012). It has received considerable attention in the media, yet the discussions about online publishing dates back two decades, at least (see also Odlyzko 1995; Quinn 1995).
- 5.
- 6.
Jaffe and Quinn (1993) as referred to above.
- 7.
The statements in parentheses are quotations from Borwein and Bailey (2004, pp. 2–3).
- 8.
- 9.
Horgan would also publish the similarly provocative and controversial book “The End of Science” (Horgan 1996). In many disciplines in the natural sciences (such a climate science), the computer has made substantial shifts in epistemic practice, sometimes leading to entire new disciplines or new standards of data and explanation.
- 10.
Using the BBP formula, extensive computations have determined individual digits of π using, for instance, approximately 140 CPU years during 1998–2000 to determine that the quadrillionth binary digit of π is 0, a record which was surpassed in 2010 when a 1000-node cluster used 500 CPU-years to determine that the two quadrillionth bit was also 0 (Sze 2010).
- 11.
http://oeis.org/, see also Sloane (2003).
- 12.
- 13.
One study which takes a commendable inclusive survey of actual practice is Colton (2007).
References
Andersen, L. E., Sørensen, H. K. and the PCSP group. (2014). Contemporary mathematics in practice: Social epistemology in the light of unsurveyability in mathematics. In preparation.
Andrews, G. E. (1994). The death of proof? Semi-rigorous Mathematics? You’ve got to be kidding! The mathematical intelligencer, 16(4), 16–18.
Appel, K., Haken, W., & Koch, J. (1977). Every planar map is four colorable. Part II: reducibility. Illinois Journal of Mathematics, 21(3), 491–567.
Arnold, D. N., & Cohn, H. (2012). Mathematicians take a stand. Notices of the AMS, 59(6), 828–833.
Atiyah, M., et al. (1994). Responses to “theoretical mathematics: Toward a cultural synthesis of mathematics and theoretical physics”, by A. Jaffe and F. Quinn. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 30(2), 178–207.
Avigad, J. (2008). “Computers in mathematical inquiry”. In P. Mancosu (Ed.), The philosophy of mathematical practice (Chap. 11, pp. 302–316.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bailey, D. H., & Borwein, J. M. (2011). Exploratory experimentation and computation. Notices of the AMS, 58(10), 1410–1419.
Bailey, D. H., Borwein, J. M., et al. (August 28, 2014). Opportunities and challenges in 21st century experimental mathematical computation: ICERM workshop report. URL http://www.davidhbailey. com/dhbpapers/ICERM-2014.pdf (visited on 10/19/2014).
Baker, A. (2008). Experimental Mathematics. Erkenntnis, 68(3), 331–344.
Billey, S. C., & Tenner, B. E. (2013). Fingerprint databases for theorems. Notices of the AMS, 60(8), 1034–1039.
Borwein, J. M. (2012). Exploratory experimentation: Digitally-assisted discovery and proof. In G. Hanna & M. de Villiers (Eds.), Proof and proving in mathematics education. The 19th ICMI study (Chap. 4, pp. 69–96). New ICMI Study Series 15. Berlin: Springer.
Borwein, J., & Bailey, D. (2004). Mathematics by experiment: Plausible reasoning in the 21st century. Natick (MA): A K Peters.
Borwein, J., Bailey, D., & Girgensohn, R. (2004). Experimentation in mathematics: Computational paths to discovery. Natick (MA): A K Peters.
Borwein, J., Borwein, P., et al. (1996). Making sense of experimental mathematics. The mathematical intelligencer, 18(4), 12–18.
Borwein, J. M., & Jungić, V. (2012). Organic mathematics: Then and now. Notices of the AMS, 59(3), 416–419.
Britz, T., & Rutherford, C. G. (2005). Covering radii are not matroid invariants. Discrete Mathematics, 296, 117–120.
Campbell, D., et al. (1985). Experimental mathematics: The role of computation in nonlinear science. Communications of the ACM, 28(4), 374–384.
Colton, S. (2007). Computational discovery in pure mathematics. In S. Dz̆eroski & L. Todorovski Computational discovery (pp. 175–201). Heidelberg: Springer.
Cox, D. A. (1985). Gauss and the arithmetic-geometric mean. Notices of the AMS, 32(2), 147–151.
Cranshaw, J., & Kittur, A. (2011). The polymath project: Lessons from a successful online collaboration in mathematics. In Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1865–1874). CHI ’11. Vancouver, BC, Canada: ACM.
Detlefsen, M., & Luker, M. (1980). The four-color theorem and mathematical proof. The Journal of Philosophy, 77(12), 803–820.
Epple, M. (2001). Matematikkhistoriens former: Genier, ideer, institusjoner, matematiske verksteder - et metahistorisk essay. ARR Idéhistorisk Tidsskrift, 1–2, 94–108.
Epple, M. (2004). Knot invariants in Vienna and Princeton during the 1920s: Epistemic configurations of mathematical research. Science in Context, 17(1/2), 131–164.
Epple, M. (2011). Between timelessness and historiality: On the dynamics of the epistemic objects of mathematics. Isis, 102(3), 481–493.
Epstein, D., & Levy, S. (2000). To the reader. Experimental Mathematics, 9(1), 1.
Epstein, D., Levy, S., & de la Llave, R. (1992). About this journal. Experimental Mathematics, 1(1), 1–3.
Gieryn, T. (1996). Review of Andrew Pickering, ‘The Mangle of Practice’, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995. American Journal of Sociology, 102(2), 599–601.
Goldstein, L. J. (1973). A history of the prime number theorem. The American Mathematical Monthly, 80(6), 599–615.
Gowers, W. T. (2000). The two cultures of mathematics. In V. Arnold et al. [s.l.] (Ed.), Mathematics: Frontiers and perspectives (pp. 65–78). American Mathematical Society.
Gowers, T., Nielsen, M. (October 15, 2009). Massively collaborative mathematics. Nature, 461, 879–881.
Hacking, I. (1992). ‘Style’ for historians and philosophers. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 23(1), 1–20.
Haspel, C., & Vasquez, A. (1982). Experimental mathematics using APL and graphics. APL ’82: Proceedings of the international conference on APL (pp. 121–127). Heidelberg, Germany: ACM.
Hassink, L., & Clark, D. (2012). Elsevier’s response to the mathematics community. Notices of the AMS, 59(6), 833–835.
Heintz, B. (2000a). Die Innenwelt der Mathematik. Zur Kultur und Praxis einer beweisenden Disziplin. Wien and New York: Springer.
Heintz, B. (2000b). In der Mathematik ist ein Streit mit Sicherheit zu entscheiden. Perspektiven einer Soziologie der Mathematik”. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 29(5), 339–360.
Horgan, J. (1993). The death of proof. Scientific American, 269(4), 74–82.
Horgan, J. (1996). The end of science: Facing the limits of knowledge in the twilight of the scientific age. Helix Books. Reading (Mass) etc.: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.
Jaffe, A., & Quinn, F. (April 1994). Response to comments on “Theoretical mathematics”. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 30(2), 208–211.
Jaffe, A., & Quinn, F. (1993). “Theoretical mathematics”: Toward a cultural synthesis of mathematics and theoretical physics. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 29(1), 1–13.
Kitcher, P. (1985). The nature of mathematical knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Knorr Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures. How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge (Mass) and London: Harvard University Press.
Kohlhase, M. (2014). Mathematical knowledge management: Transcending the management: Transcending the one-brain-barrier with theory graphs. Newsletter of the European Mathematical Society, 92, 22–27.
Lam, C. W., Thiel, L., & Swiercz, S. (1989). The non-existence of finite projective planes of order 10. Canadian Journal Mathematics, 41(6), 1117–1123.
Lenoir, T. (1997). Instituting science. The cultural production of scientific disciplines. Writing Science. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
MacKenzie, D. (2005). Computing and the cultures of proving. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society, A, 363, 2335–2350.
Mancosu, P. (2010). Mathematical style. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Spring 2010. URL http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2010/entries/mathematicalstyle/
Mandelbrot, B. B. (1982). The fractal geometry of nature. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company.
Marden, A. (1997). Fred Almgren and the geometry center. Experimental Mathematics, 6(1), 11–12.
Mayhew, D., & Royle, G. F. (2008). Matroids with nine elements. Journal of Combinatorial Theory. B, 98, 415–431.
McEvoy, M. (2008). The epistemological status of computer-assisted proofs. Philosophia Mathematica (3), 16, 374–387.
McEvoy, M. (February 2013). Experimental mathematics, computers and the a priori. Synthese, 190(3), 397–412.
Medawar, P. B. (1979). Advice to a Young scientist. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
Nathanson, M. B. (2011). One, two, many: Individuality and collectivity in mathematics. The mathematical intelligencer, 33(1), 5–8.
Odlyzko, A. M. (1995). Tragic loss or good riddance? The impending demise of traditional scholarly journals. Notices of the AMS, 42(1), 49–53.
Pease, A., & Martin, U. (2012). Seventy four minutes of mathematics: An analysis of the third Mini-Polymath project. In Proceedings of AISB/IACAP 2012, Symposium on Mathematical Practice and Cognition II.
Pickering, A. (Ed.). (1992). Science as practice and culture. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.
Pickering, A. (Ed.). (1995). The mangle of practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Pólya, G. (1957). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method (2nd ed.). New York: Garden City Doubleday Anchor Books.
Quinn, F. (1995). Roadkill on the electronic highway: The threat to the mathematical literature. Notices of the AMS, 42(1), 53–56.
Rheinberger, H.-J. (1997). Toward a history of epistemic things. Synthesizing proteins in the test tube. Writing science. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Rheinberger, H.-J. (October 2012). From experimental systems to cultures of experimentation: Historical reflections. Unpublished manuscript of talk given in Aarhus, September 24, 2012.
Sarvate, D., Wetzel, S., & Patterson, W. (2011). Analyzing massively collaborative mathematics projects. The Mathematical Intelligencer, 33(1), 9–18.
Sloane, N. J. A. (2003). The on-line encyclopedia of integer sequences. Notices of the AMS, 50(8), 912–915.
Snow, C. P. (1959/1993). The two cultures. In S. Collini (Ed.), With an intro. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sørensen, H. K. (2010a). Experimental mathematics in the 1990s: A second loss of certainty? Oberwolfach Reports, No., 12, 601–604.
Sørensen, H. K. (2010b). Exploratory experimentation in experimental mathematics: A glimpse at the PSLQ algorithm. In B. Löwe & T. Müller (Eds.), PhiMSAMP. Philosophy of mathematics: Sociological aspects and mathematical practice. Texts in philosophy 11 (pp. 341–360). London: College Publications. URL http://www.lib.uni-bonn.de/PhiMSAMP/Book/.
Sørensen, H. K. (2013). Er det matematiske bevis ved at dø ud? In O. Høiris (Ed.), Fremtiden (pp. 99–132). Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
Stöltzner, M. (2005). Theoretical mathematics: On the philosophical significance of the Jaffe-Quinn debate. In G. Boniolo, P. Budinich, M. Trobok (Eds.), The role of mathematics in the physical sciences. Interdisciplinary and philosophical aspects (pp. 197–222). Dordrecht: Springer.
Swart, E. R. (1980). The philosophical implications of the four-colour problem. The American Mathematical Monthly, 87(9), 697–707.
Sze, T.-W. (2010). The two quadrillionth bit of Pi is 0! Distributed computation of Pi with Apache Hadoop”. CoRR, vol. abs/1008.3171. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1008.3171
The flyspeck project fact sheet. URL http://code.google.com/p/flyspeck/wiki/FlyspeckFactSheet (visited on October 23, 2014).
Tymoczko, T. (February 1979). The four-color problem and its philosophical significance. Journal of Philosophy, 76(2), 57–83. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/2025976.
Van Kerkhove, B., & Van Bendegem, J. P. (2008). Pi on earth, or mathematics in the real world. Erkenntnis, 68(3), 421–435.
Zeilberger, D. (1994). Theorems for a price: Tomorrow’s semi-rigorous mathematical culture. The mathematical intelligencer, 16(4), 11–14, 76.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sørensen, H.K. (2016). “The End of Proof”? The Integration of Different Mathematical Cultures as Experimental Mathematics Comes of Age. In: Larvor, B. (eds) Mathematical Cultures. Trends in the History of Science. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28582-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28582-5_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28580-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28582-5
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)