Skip to main content

Measuring Quality of Life and Inequalities in South America

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Indicators of Quality of Life in Latin America

Part of the book series: Social Indicators Research Series ((SINS,volume 62))

Abstract

This chapter discusses the development of a model to measure quality of life and different forms of inequalities: social, cultural, political, religious, and economic. It emerges as a result of a project conducted by the Research Program on Quality of Life, created in 2004 in the Faculty of Social Sciences, UNICOM and LOMASCyT Universidad Nacional de Lomas de Zamora, Argentina, which has focused on research into quality of life for young people. Our conceptual framework and domains will produce a survey for which a questionnaire will be consistently constructed to measure quality of life and inequalities, by incorporating indicators that respect social, political, economic, religious, and cultural diversities. The core outputs are new, non-traditional quality of life indicators which can be applied to other populations and in other geographical areas, particularly within Latin America.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Research Project: Quality of life and Inequalities: an alternative proposal for the study and measurement. LOMASCyT. Universidad Nacional de Lomas de Zamora.

  2. 2.

    Seewww.sociales.unlz.edu.ar/unicom/

  3. 3.

    The translation of the instrument was made by Tonon and Rodriguez de la Vega (2007). Four national universities worked on the development of this project: UNLAM, UNLZ, UNMdP and UNSA (2008).

  4. 4.

    This Dictionary was made by the Instituto de Estudios Políticos de Madrid, sponsored by UNESCO (Cozzani de Palmada 1991).

References

  • Alkire, S., & Foster, J. (2010). Designing the inequality-adjusted Human Development Index (HDI) (OPHI working paper 37). Oxford: Oxford Poverty & Human Development Initiative (OPHI). Oxford University

    Google Scholar 

  • Anand, P., & Hunter, G. (2005). Capabilities and wellbeing: Evidence based on the Sen-Nussbaum approach to welfare. Milton Keynes: The Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anand, P., Krishnakumar, J., & Bich Tran, N. (2010). Measuring welfare: Latent variable models for happiness and capabilities in the presence of unobservable heterogeneity. Journal of Public Economics, 95(3–4), 205–215. Retrieved May 24, 2014, from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00472727/95/3-4

  • Balta, J., & Pascual, J. (2005). Ciudad y gestion cultural. For: curso a distancia gestion y politicas culturales. Spain: Universidad de les Illes Balears.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, P., & Looby, J. (1998). Defining the nature of spirituality in the context of Maslow’s and Rogers’ theories. Counseling and Values, 42(2), 92–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1980). Le sens pratique. Paris: Editions de Minuit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of cultural production, essays on art and literature. Oxford: Polity Press, Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bramston, P. (2002). Subjective quality of life: The affective dimension. Social Indicators Research, 16, 47–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castel, R. (1995). Les métamorphoses de la question sociale. París: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castel, R., & Haroche, C. (2003). Propiedad privada, propiedad social, propiedad de sí mismo. Buenos Aires: Homo Sapiens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cozzani de Palmada, M. R. (1991). El concepto de medio ambiente humano en Geografia. Revista de Geografia Norte Grande, 18, 75–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez de la Vega, L., & Meza, M. (2009). Comunidad, diversidad y participación. La diversalidad como proyecto. In G. En Tonon (comp.), Comunidad, participación y socialización política (pp. 79–99). Buenos Aires: Espacio Editorial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. (2005, November). Guidelines for national indicators of subjective well-being and ill-being. Documento de Trabajo, University of Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dovidio, J. F., Hewstone, M., Glick, P., & Esses, V. M. (2010). Prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination: Theoretical and empirical overview. In J. F. Dovidio, M. Hewstone, P. Glick, & V. M. Esses (Eds.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 3–28). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. Retrieved December 3, 2013, from http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2008/04/16/business/Easterlin1974.pdf

  • Estes, R. (1999). Hacia un índice de calidad de vida: enfoques empíricos para la evaluación del bienestar humano a nivel internacional.In B. En Klisberg (comp.), Pobreza: un tema impostergable (pp. 131–148). CLAD-Fondo de Cultura Económica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estes, R. (2005). Global change and indicators of social development. Departmental Papers (SPP) School of Social Policy and Practice. University of Pennsylvania. Retrieved May 25, 2014, from http://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1025&context=spp_papers

  • Fitoussi, J., y Rosanvallon, P. (2003). La nueva era de las desigualdades. Bs. As. Manantial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1973/2003). La interpretación de las culturas. Barcelona: Gedisa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giménez, G. (1996). Territorio y cultura. Estudios sobre las culturas contemporáneas, II(4), 9–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giménez, G. (2004). Culturas e identidades. Revista Mexicana de Sociología. Retrieved May 17, 2014, from http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=32109908

    Google Scholar 

  • Giménez, G. (2005). Teoría y análisis de la cultura. México: CONACULTA e Instituto Coahuilense de Cultura.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodenough, W. (1975). Cultura, lenguaje y sociedad. In J. S. Khan (Ed.), El concepto de cultura. Textos fundamentales (pp. 157–249). Barcelona: Anagrama.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, C. (2011). Does more money make you happier? Why so much debate? Applied Research in Quality of Life., 6(3), 219–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heller, A. (1982). La revolucion de la vida cotidiana. Barcelona: Editorial Peninsula.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffres, L., Bracken, Ch., Jian, G., y Casey, M. (2009). The impact of third places on community quality of life. ARQOL, 4(4), 333–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, H. G. (2008). Research on religion, spirituality and mental health: A review. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 54, 283–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, H., McCullough, M., & Larson, D. (2001). Handbook of religion and health. New York: Oxford University.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lamas, M. (2007). El género es cultura. V Campus Euroamericano de Cooperaçao Cultural. Almada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld, P. (1973). De los conceptos a los indices empiricos. In R. Boudon & P. Lazarsfeld (Eds.), Metodologia de las Ciencias Sociales (Vol. I). Barcelona: Editorial Laia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lechner, N. (2002). Las sombras del mañana. La dimensión subjetiva de la política. Santiago de Chile: LOM Editorial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, N., Simeone, N., Ensel, W. N., & Kuo, W. (1979). Social support, stressful life events and illness. A model and an empirical test. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 20, 108–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipiansky, E. M. (1992). Identité et communication. París: Presses Universitarires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maggino, F. (2003). Method effect in the measurement of subjective dimensions paper. Dipartimento di Studi Sociali, Università degli Studi di Firenze.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maggino, F. (2009). Methodologies to integrate subjective and objective information to build well-being indicators. International conference from GDP to well-being: Economics on the road to sustainability, December 3–5, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Naciones Unidas. (2004). Consejo Económico y Social. Recopilación de las observaciones generales y recomendaciones generales adoptadas por órganos creados en virtud de tratados de derechos humanos: 12/05/2004. HRI/GEN/1/Rev.7. (General Comments).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2012). Crear capacidades: propuesta para el desarrollo humano. Barcelona: Paidós.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldenburg, R., & Brisset, D. (1982). The third place. Qualitative sociology 1982. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole F. (2006). Dismantling the barriers to participation in cultural life. National Disability Authority, 5th national research conference, Dublin, 16th November 2006. Retrieved May 25, 2014, from http://www.nda.ie/CntMgmtNew.nsf/dcc524b4546adb3080256c700071b049/5A19C972AF5A7B93802571E60052A06B/$File/3_fintan_otoole.htm

  • Oldenburg, R. (1989). The great good place. New York: Marlowe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascual i Ruiz, J., & Dragojević, S. (2007). Guide to citizen participation in local cultural policy development for European cities. Bucarest: European Cultural Foundation, Interarts Foundation, ECUMEST Association. Retrieved May 18, 2014, from http://www.ecumest.ro/pdf/Guide_to_Citizen_Participation_EN_web.pdf

  • Pérez Agote, A. (1986). La identidad colectiva: una reflexión abierta desde la Sociología. Revista de Occidente, 56, 76–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues. A handbook and classification. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigou, A. (1932). The economic of welfare. London: Macmillan &Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Restrepo, E. (2010). Identidad: apuntes teóricos y metodológicos. In G. En Castellanos Llanos, D. I. Grueso, & M. Rodriguez (coord.), Identidad, cultura y política. Perspectivas conceptuales, miradas empíricas (pp. 61–70). México: Honorable Cámara de Diputados-Universidad del Valle-Miguel Ángel Porrúa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roche, J. (2008, November) Monitoring inequality among social groups: A methodology combining fuzzy set theory and principal component analysis. Journal of Human Development, 9 (3), 427–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothchild, E. (1995). What is security? The quest for world order. Daedalus, 124(3), 53–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, M. C., Castillo Salgado, C., Bacallao, J., Loyola, E., Mujica, O., Vidamise, M., y Roca, A. (2002). Métodos de medición de desigualdades en salud. Revista Panamericana de la salud, 12, N°6. Dic. pp. 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. W (1996). El género: una categoría útil para el análisis histórico. In En Lamas Marta –comp.- El género: la construcción cultural de la diferencia sexual (pp. 265–302). México: PUEG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1990). Development as capability expansion. In K. Keith Griffin & A. Knight (Eds.), Human development and the international development strategy for the 1990s (pp. 41–58). London: Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2000). Desarrollo y Libertad. Bogotá: Editorial Planeta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2002). Porque la equidad en salud. Revista Panamericana de Salud Publica, 11(5–6), 302–309, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, N., & Marks, N. (2004). Well-being manifesto for a flourishing society. London: Nef.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirgy, M. J., Gao, T., & Young, R. (2008). How does residents’ satisfaction with community Services influence quality of life outcomes? ARQOL, 3(2), 81–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. B. (1993). Ideología y cultura moderna. México: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Xochimilco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonon, G. (comp.). (2008). Desigualdades sociales y oportunidades ciudadanas. Buenos Aires: Espacio Editorial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, R., & Walker, M. (2012). Capability, values and educational policy. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities: A Multi-Disciplinary Journal for People-Centered Development, 13(3), 495–512. Special Issue: Education and Capabilities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villalba Quesada, C. (1993). Redes sociales: Un concepto con importantes implicaciones en la intervención comunitaria. Intervencion Psicosocial, 2(4), 69–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vizard, P., & Buchardt, T. (2007). Developing a capability list: Final recommendations of the equality review steering group of measurements (CASE/121). London: London School of Economics and Political Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Graciela Tonon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tonon, G., de la Vega, L.R. (2016). Measuring Quality of Life and Inequalities in South America. In: Tonon, G. (eds) Indicators of Quality of Life in Latin America. Social Indicators Research Series, vol 62. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28842-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28842-0_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28840-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28842-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics