Skip to main content

Honour as the (New) Foundational Virtue for Responsible Leadership in the Banking Sector: A Theoretico-Conceptual Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Perspectives on Philosophy of Management and Business Ethics

Part of the book series: Ethical Economy ((SEEP,volume 51))

  • 1171 Accesses

Abstract

This article deals with the question whether the widely accepted integrity can still be seen as the foundational virtue for responsible leadership within the banking sector. This question emerged in the face of the recent public and political outrage concerning an increase in the salaries of the members of the executive board of the ABN AMRO bank in the Netherlands, while apparently there was no breach of integrity. A theoretical/conceptual analysis of the core concepts in this article: responsible leadership (the key factor in sound and virtuous banking), integrity (the current foundational virtue banks act upon) and honour (a virtue related to integrity, but which encompasses it) has been made in order to find an explanation for the public outrage. It is concluded that the virtue of honour – as a foundational virtue – offers a more solid base than integrity in the banking sector, because honour is fundamentally closer related to the public’s ideals, concerns and values, and ascribed virtues to responsible leadership than integrity. It is therefore argued that honour should replace integrity as foundational virtue for responsible leadership in the banking sector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    See the work of Bass (1997); Maccoby (2000); Kets de Vries and Miller (1985) and Yukl (1999) on the weaknesses of transformational leadership.

  2. 2.

    See the work of Cable and Judge (2003) and Smith and Canger (2004) in this regard.

  3. 3.

    Walker and Avant’s model for conceptual analysis has the following steps: (i) determine the aims and purpose of the analysis (ii) identify all uses of the concept (iii) determine the defining attributes (iv) identify a model case or related case or contrary case in order to assess the antecedents and consequences (v) define the empirical referents. Näsi uses a model which analyses a concept on basis of (i) the creation of a knowledge foundation (ii) conducting an external analysis (versus other related concepts) (iii) conducting an internal analysis (breaking the concept into parts and (iv) drawing conclusions.

References

  • ABN AMRO Group N.V. 2014. Sustainability report. Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appiah, K.A. 2010. The honor code. How moral revolutions happen. New York/London: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M.S. 2000. Being human: The problem of agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Audi, R., and P.E. Murphy. 2006. The many faces of integrity. Business Ethics Quarterly 16(1): 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baggini, J., and P.S. Fosl. 2007. The ethics toolkit. A compendium of ethical concepts and methods. Malden/Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, F.J., and T.R. Sarbin. 2008. Honor as a moral category: A historical- linguistic analysis. Theory & Psychology 18(1): 5–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B.M. 1997. Does the transactional and transformational leadership paradigm transcend organizational and national boundaries? American Psychologist 52(2): 130–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B.M., and P. Steidlmeier. 1999. Ethics, character and authentic transformational leadership behaviour. Leadership Quarterly 10(2): 181–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowie, N.E. 2013. Business ethics in the 21st century. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cable, D.M., and T.A. Judge. 2003. Managers upward influence tactic strategies: The role of manager personality and supervisor leadership style. Journal of Organizational Behaviour 24(2): 197–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, D. 2012. Business ethics. How to design and manage ethical organizations. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D., M. La Caze, and M. Levine. 2014. Integrity. In Handbook of virtue ethics, ed. S. Van Hooft, 200–209. Durham: Acumen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crisp, R. 2006. Aristotle on greatness of soul. In The blackwell guide to Aristotle’s Nicomachean ethics, ed. R. Kraut, 158–178. Malden/Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, S.E., A.K. Uskul, B. Gercek-Swing, Z. Sunbay, C. Alözkan, C. Günsoy, B. Ataca, and Z. Karakitapoglu-Aygun. 2014. Cultural prototypes and dimensions of honor. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 40: 232–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwall, S. 2013. Honor, history and relationship: Essays in second-personal ethics II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Demetriou, D. 2013. The virtues of honorable business executives. In Virtues in action. New essays in applied virtue ethics, ed. M.W. Austin, 23–38. New York/London: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • DesJardins, J. 2014. An introduction to business ethics, 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devettere, R.J. 2002. Introduction to virtue ethics. Insights of the ancient greeks. Washington: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dictionary and Thesaurus (online): http://dictionary.reference.com/.

  • Ferrell, O.C., J. Fraedrich, and L. Ferrell. 2015. Business ethics. Ethical decision making and cases, 10th ed. Stamford: Cencage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerra, V.M., V.V. Gouveia, R.C.R. Araujo, J.M. de Andrade, and C.A. Gaudencio. 2013. Honor scale: Evidence on construct validity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 43: 1273–1280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackett, R.D., and G. Wang. 2012. Virtues and leadership. An integrating conceptual framework founded in aristotelian and confucian perspectives on virtues. Management Decision 50(5): 868–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, E.M. 2013. Virtue in business ethics. Conversations with Aristotle. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, L.P., J. DesJardins, and C. MacDonald. 2014. Business ethics. Decision making for personal integrity & social responsibility, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, B., and K. Parry. 2008. A very short, fairly interesting and reasonably cheap book about studying leadership. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karssing, E. 2009. Integriteit. In Bedrijfsethiek een goede zaak, ed. R.J.M. Jeurissen, 47–57. Assen: Van Gorcum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kets de Vries, M.F.R., and D. Miller. 1985. Narcissism and leadership: An object relations perspective. Human Relations 38(6): 583–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luyendijk, J. 2015. Dit kan niet waar zijn: Onder bankiers. 7e druk. Amsterdam/Antwerpen: Uitgeverij Atlas/Contact.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maak, T., and N.M. Pless. 2006. Responsible leadership in a stakeholder society. Journal of Business Ethics 66: 90–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, M. 2000. Narcissistic leaders: The incredible pros, the inevitable cons. Harvard Business Review 78(1): 68–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A.C. 2007. After virtue. A study in moral theory, 3rd ed. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary: http://www.merriam-webster.com/.

  • Michel, J. The 12 virtues of leadership. Retrieved from http://generalleadership.com/the-12-virtues-of-leadership/ on 14 Nov 2015.

  • Näsi, J. 1980. Yrityksen suunnittelun perusteet. Käsitteellis-metodologiset rakenteet ja tieteenfilosofinen tausta. Yrityksen taloustieteen ja yksityisoikeuden laitoksen julkaisuja, Series A 1, Tutkimuksia 15, University of Tampere.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nederlandse Vereniging van Banken. 2010. Code Banken. Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oprisko, R.L. 2012. Honor: A phenomenology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford Online Dictionaries: http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/.

  • Peterson, C., and M. Seligman. 2004. Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pless, N.M. 2007. Understanding responsible leadership: Role identity and motivational drivers. Journal of Business Ethics 74: 437–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rachels, J. 1999. The elements of moral philosophy, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, D. 2009. (Transl.) The Nichomachean ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russel, D. 2005. Aristotle on the moral relevance of self-respect. In Virtue ethics, old and new, ed. S.M. Gardiner, 101–124. New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, C. 2015. The biggest banking challenge is leadership. Financial Services Club Blog, http://thefinanser.co.uk/fsclub/2015/01/the-biggest-banking-is-leadership.html.

  • Smith, M.A., and J.M. Canger. 2004. Effects of superior ‘big five’ personality on subordinates attitudes. Journal of Business and Psychology 18(4): 465–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R.C. 1999. A better way to think about business. How personal integrity leads to corporate success. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stückelberger, C. 2014. Responsible leadership handbook: For staff and Boards. Geneva: Globethics.net.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stückelberger, C., and J.N.K. Mugambi (eds.). 2007. Responsible leadership. Global and contextual ethical perspectives. Geneva: Globethics.net.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanton, C. 2003. Virtue ethics: A pluralistic view. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van Es, R. 2001. Professionele Ethiek. Morele besluitvorming in organisaties en professies. Deventer: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vocabulary (online dictionary). http://www.vocabulary.com/.

  • Walker, L., and K. Avant. 2011. Strategies for theory construction in nursing, 5th ed. New York: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G.A. 1999. An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. Leadership Quarterly 10(2): 285–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johan Bouwer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bouwer, J. (2017). Honour as the (New) Foundational Virtue for Responsible Leadership in the Banking Sector: A Theoretico-Conceptual Analysis. In: Rendtorff, J. (eds) Perspectives on Philosophy of Management and Business Ethics. Ethical Economy, vol 51. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46973-7_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics