Skip to main content

Creating Shared Value. A Fundamental Critique

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Creating Shared Value – Concepts, Experience, Criticism

Part of the book series: Ethical Economy ((SEEP,volume 52))

Abstract

This article offers a fundamental critique of Michael Porter’s and Marc Kramer’s “Creating Shared Value” (CSV) concept. First, the authors summarise the positive and negative criticism which CSV has received since 2011. They then show that CSV falls short of a modern understanding of corporate responsibility which is centred on more adequate ideas about the relationship between business and society. The article concludes with critical comments on the role of scholars in their interaction with practitioners.

This article is based on our contribution „Creating Shared Value: Eine Grundsatzkritik“ (2015), published in the Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik (zfwu) 16 (2): 219–230.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    We therefore characterized CSV in a different publication as a “One-Trick Pony Approach” (cf. Beschorner 2013a).

  2. 2.

    Cf. description and examples of the concept in Hajduk (2014) and a fundamental critique in Beschorner and Hajduk (2012).

References

  • Beschorner, Thomas. 2004. Unternehmensethische Untersuchungen aus gesellschaftlicher Perspektive. Von der gesellschaftsorientierten Unternehmenslehre zur unternehmensorientierten Gesellschaftslehre. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik 5(3): 255–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013a. Creating shared value: The one-trick pony approach – a comment on Michael Porter and Mark Kramer. Business Ethics Journal Review 1(17): 106–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013b. Kulturalistische Wirtschaftsethik: Grundzüge einer Theorie der Anwendung. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik 14(3): 346–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beschorner, Thomas, and Thomas Hajduk. 2012. Vom ehrbaren Kaufmann zur Unternehmensverantwortung. Forum Wirtschaftsethik Online 2: 2–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beschorner, Thomas, and Christoph Schank. 2012. CSR – zur Bürgerrolle und Verantwortung von Unternehmen. In Corporate social responsibility: verantwortungsvolle unternehmensführung in Theorie und Praxis, ed. A. Schneider, and R. Schmidpeter, 155–164. Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Beschorner, Thomas, Thomas Hajduk, and Samuil Simeonov (ed). 2013. Corporate responsibility in Europe. Government involvement in sector-specific initiatives. Gütersloh: Verlag Bertelsmann Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, Andrew, Guido Palazzo, Laura J. Spence, and Dirk Matten. 2014. Contesting the value of the shared value concept. California Management Review 56(2): 130–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curbach, Janina. 2009. Die Corporate-social-responsibility-bewegung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, Thomas. 2014. Shared values that are lost in translation. Financial Times, April 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyllick, Thomas. 2014. The opposing perspectives on creating shared value. Financial Times, April 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, L.B., and M.C. Suchman. 1997. The legal environments of organizations. Annual Review of Sociology 23(1): 479–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. 2011. A renewed EU strategy 2011–14 for Corporate Social Responsibility. Access to European Union law. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52011DC0681&from=EN. Accessed 29 Oct 2015.

  • Friedman, Milton. 1970. A Friedman doctrine – The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, September 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelbman, Ulrike, and Rupert J. Baumgartner. 2012. Strategische implementierung von CSR in KMU. In Corporate Social Responsibility, ed. A. Schneider, and R. Schmidpeter, 285–298. Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hajduk, Thomas. 2014. Stichwort: Ehrbarer Kaufmann. Stichwortverzeichnis: CSR NEWS http://csr-news.net/main/2014/03/23/ehrbarer-kaufmann. Accessed 29 Sep 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajduk, Tomas. 2015. Bei Friedman nichts Neues. Anmerkungen zu einem falsch verstandenen Klassiker der CSR-Diskussion. In Markt und Verantwortung. Wirtschaftsethische und moralökonomische Perspektiven, ed. D. Aufderheide, and M. Dabrowski, 89–98. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajduk, Thomas, and Christoph Schank. 2016. The model of the honourable merchant: Bridging compliance and integrity? In Handbook of virtue ethics in business and management, ed. A.J.G. Sison. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, L.P., and P.H. Werhane. 2013. Shared value as an incomplete mental model. Business Ethics Journal Review 1(6): 36–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonker, Jan, and David Foster. 2002. Stakeholder excellence? Framing the evolution and complexity of a stakeholder perspective of the firm. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 9(4): 187–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorentschitsch, Bettina, and Thomas Walker. 2012. Vom integrierten zum integrativen CSR-Managementansatz. In Corporate social responsibility, ed. A. Schneider, and R. Schmidpeter, 299–316. Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Matten, Dirk, and Andrew Crane. 2005. Corporate citizenship: Toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review 30(1): 166–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palazzo, Guido, and Andreas G. Scherer. 2007. Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review 32(4): 1096–1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E., and M.R. Kramer. 2011. Creating shared value. How to Re-invent capitalism – and unleash a wave of innovation and growth. Harvard Business Review 89(1): 62–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. A Response to Andrew Crane’s et al.’s article. California Management Review 56(2): 149–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, James E., Lee E. Preston, and Sybille Sachs. 2012. Redefining the corporation. Stakeholder management and organizational wealth. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, Walter W., and Paul DiMaggio (ed). 1991/1983. The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, Lee E. 1975. Corporation and society: The search for a paradigm. Journal of Economic Literature 13(2): 434–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmiedeknecht, Maud H., and Josef Wieland. 2012. ISO 26000, 7 Grundsätze, 6 Kernthemen. In Corporate social responsibility, ed. A. Schneider, and R. Schmidpeter, 259–270. Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, Markus. 2014. Stichworte: Creating shared value, shared value. Stichwortverzeichnis: CSR NEWS http://csr-news.net/main/2014/03/23/creating-shared-value-2. Accessed 29 Sep 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, Markus, and Gaston de los Reyes. 2015. Creating shared value – Grenzen und Vorschläge für eine Weiterentwicklung / Creating shared value – limits and suggestions for further development. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts-und Unternehmensethik 16(2): 192-202.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist. 2011. Oh, Mr Porter. The Economist, March 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, Peter. 1997. Integrative Wirtschaftsethik. Grundlagen einer lebensdienlichen Ökonomie. Haupt Verlag: Bern/Stuttgart/Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waxenberger, Bernhard, and Laura J. Spence. 2003. Reinterpretation of a Metaphor: from stakes to claims. Strategic Change 12(5): 239–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wieland, Josef. 1999. Die Ethik der governance. Marburg: Metropolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieland, Josef, and Andreas E.H. Heck. 2013. Shared value durch stakeholder governance. Marburg: Metropolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Creating Shared Value: E-Mail correspondence with Thomas Beschorner and Thomas Hajduk from 7 Jan 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, Klaus D., and Sandra Schwindenhammer. 2011. Vom business case zum public case? Der Beitrag privater Selbstregulierung zu Global Governance. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik 12(1): 10–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadek, Simon. 2001. The civil corporation: The new economy of corporate citizenship. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Beschorner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Beschorner, T., Hajduk, T. (2017). Creating Shared Value. A Fundamental Critique. In: Wieland, J. (eds) Creating Shared Value – Concepts, Experience, Criticism. Ethical Economy, vol 52. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48802-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics