Abstract
The “argumentative predicament” is that in every argumentative move strategic manoeuvring has to take place in order to keep the balance between aiming for effectiveness and maintaining reasonableness. In order to do justice to the strategic manoeuvring, next to dialectical insights about maintaining reasonableness also rhetorical insights about achieving effectiveness need to be incorporated in the theorizing. In strategic manoeuvring three aspects can be analytically distinguished: selection from the available “topical potential”, adaptation to “audience demand” and utilizing “presentational devices”. More encompassing argumentative strategies involve coordinated strategic manoeuvring with regard to these three aspects in a succession of argumentative moves. Strategic manoeuvring derails when a rule for critical discussion is violated. As is illustrated in an extension of the reconstruction of an argumentative text provided in the previous chapter, including an account of the strategic manoeuvring results in a richer and more accurate analysis which can be better accounted for and leads to a more pertinent evaluation.
This chapter is primarily based on van Eemeren (2010: 25–212).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Fahnestock, J. (2009). Quid pro nobis. Rhetorical stylistics for argument analysis. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Examining argumentation in context. Fifteen studies on strategic maneuvering (pp. 131–152). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Argumentation in Context 1.
Garssen, B. (2017a). The role of pragmatic problem-solving argumentation in plenary debate in the European Parliament. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.) (2017), Prototypical argumentative patterns. Exploring the relationship between argumentative discourse and institutional context (pp. 31–51). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Argumentation in Context 11.
Garssen, B. (2017b). Argumentative patterns with argumentation by example in legislative debate in the European Parliament. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Prototypical argumentative patterns. Exploring the relationship between argumentative discourse and institutional context (pp. 109–124). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Argumentation in Context 11.
Jackson, S. (1995). Fallacies and heuristics. In F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair & Ch. A. Willard (Eds.), Analysis and evaluation. Proceedings of the third ISSA conference on argumentation, II (pp. 257–269). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
Perelman, Ch., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The new rhetoric. A treatise on argumentation. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press. (English transl. by J. Wilkinson & P. Weaver of Ch. Perelman & L. Olbrechts-Tyteca (1958). La nouvelle rhétorique. Traité de l’argumentation. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. (3rd ed. Brussels: Éditions de l’Université de Bruxelles)).
Rubinelli, S. (2009). Ars topica. The classical technique of constructing arguments from Aristotle to Cicero. Dordrecht / Boston, MA: Springer. Argumentation library 15.
van Eemeren, F. H. (2010). Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse. Extending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Argumentation in Context 2.
van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., Jackson, S., & Jacobs, S. (1993). Reconstructing argumentative discourse. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (2002). Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse. Maintaining a delicate balance. In F. H. van Eemeren & P. Houtlosser (Eds.), Dialectic and rhetoric. The warp and woof of argumentation analysis (pp. 131–159). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. Argumentation Library 4.
van Eemeren, F. H. & Wu Peng (2017). Introduction contextualizing pragma-dialectics. In F. H. van Eemeren & Wu Peng (Eds.), Contextualizing pragma-dialectics (pp. 1–10). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Argumentation in Context 12.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
van Eemeren, F.H. (2018). Strategic Manoeuvring in Argumentative Discourse. In: Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Argumentation Library, vol 33. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95381-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95381-6_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-95380-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-95381-6
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)