Skip to main content

Private Security Companies and Civil-Military Cooperation

  • Chapter
Private Military and Security Companies

Abstract

Since the end of the Cold War the global security conditions have changed, leading to a continuing increase in the numbers of private suppliers operating in crisis areas and particularly in international interventions. The scope of services offered by private providers in the security sector ranges from consultation, training and logistic support to land mine clearance and combat missions. This results in a blurring of boundaries between military and civil tasks. A rising attention to private security companies (PSCs) cannot only be observed in the media, but also among scientific researchers and — in an early stage - in political debates. The use of PSCs in international interventions by some governments promotes further reflections on this form of security provision. As the war in Iraq has recently shown, the topic is of immediate relevance, supported by the fact that members of the coalition of the willing, and in particular the United States of America (USA), employ nearly 20,000 workers of private security firms. The conjunction of civil — particularly humanitarian — actors and military powers, which is defined by the term civil-military cooperation (CIMIC), entails a bunch of difficulties specifically in the settings of peace support operations (PSOs).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. There is an effort by Spearin (2001), but he only describes the activities of PSCs in the international context, too.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cook (2002), e.g., talks about private military firms, but also means private security firms, and calls them ‘today’s mercenaries’.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See also Schreier/ Caparini (2005) who think that Singers’s typology is a good starting point for their research.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Discussions on the use of PSC on the domestic market for the fulfilment of functions for the interior security are mapped in Schreier/ Caparini (2005: 80–86).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sørensen (2001) analyses the statements of Hobbes on internal security dilemmas and their role in the international relations to offer an introduction to the discussions about the monopoly on the use of force.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Concerning the status of PSCs, Oulton/ Lehmann (2001) give the solution that the so-called SOFAs (Status of Force Agreements) can be extended to PSCs, which would give them the official protection as civilians.

    Google Scholar 

  7. By contrast, Sandoz (1999a, 1999b) sees all private security firms as ‘new mercenaries’.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Thomas Jäger Gerhard Kümmel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Herbst, K. (2007). Private Security Companies and Civil-Military Cooperation. In: Jäger, T., Kümmel, G. (eds) Private Military and Security Companies. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90313-2_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics