Skip to main content

Abstract

Kurt Lewin (1948) famously observed, “there is nothing so practical as a good theory.” This simple statement captures a truism regarding the interplay of understanding, prediction, and control that characterizes every area of science. Predicting how a phenomenon will be manifest under different conditions, let alone controlling the process, is intimately linked to a coherent and generalized understanding of the phenomenon at issue. Humans, after all, did not land on the moon or send satellites to other planets by focusing on how to do these things. Space exploration would have remained a flight of fancy had it not been for several centuries of scientific concern with basic principles of physics and chemistry. This realization is relevant to the understandable concern people have for resolving the difficult and protracted conflicts that characterize interpersonal, inter-group, and international relations in today’s world. Practitioners are motivated to tackle such conflicts head-on, but their likelihood of success is ultimately constrained by the degree of scientific understanding concerning far more basic and mundane aspects of psychology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Axelrod, R., Riolo, R. L., & Cohen, M. D. (2002). Beyond geography: Cooperation with persistent links in the absence of clustered neighborhoods. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 341–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azar, E. E. (1990). The management of protracted social conflict. Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bargh, J. A. (1996). Automaticity in social psychology. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 169–183). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, B., & Oliver, R. L. (1996). Affect in dyadic negotiation: A model and propositions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70, 175–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, D. S. (1996). Security, bargaining, and the end of interstate rivalry. International Studies Quarterly, 40, 157–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bercovitch, J. (2005). Mediation in the most resistant cases. In C. A. Crocker, F. O. Hampson, & P. Aall (Eds.), Grasping the nettle: Analyzing cases of intractable conflict. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blalock, H. M. (1989). Power and conflict: Toward a general theory. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, J. (1987). Resolving deep-rooted conflict: A handbook. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., & Bernston, G. G. (1994). Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: A critical review with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates. Psychological Bulletin, 15, 401–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, P. T. (2003). Characteristics of protracted, intractable conflict: Towards the development of a meta-framework—I. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 9, 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, P. T. (2006). Conflict, complexity, and change: A meta-framework for addressing protracted, intractable conflicts—III. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 12, 325–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, P. T. (2011). The five percent: Finding solutions to seemingly impossible conflicts. New York, NY: PublicAffairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, P. T. (2012). The Essence of Peace? Toward a comprehensive and parsimonious model of sustainable peace. In P. T. Coleman & M. Deutsch (Eds.), Psychological Contributions to Sustainable Peace. New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, P. T., Bui-Wrzosinska, L., Vallacher, R. R., & Nowak, A. (2006). Protracted conflicts as dynamical systems. In A. K. Schneider & C. Honeyman (Eds.), The negotiator’s fieldbook: The desk reference for the experienced negotiator (pp. 61–74). Chicago: American Bar Association Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, P. T., Fisher-Yoshida, B., Stover, M., Hacking, A., & Bartoli, A. (2008). Reconstructing ripeness II: Models and methods for fostering constructive stakeholder engagement across protracted divides. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 26(1), 43–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, P. T., Goldman, J. S., & Kugler, K. (2009). Emotional intractability: Gender, anger, aggression and rumination in conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 20, 113–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, P. T., Vallacher, R. R., Bartoli, A., Nowak, A., & Bui-Wrzosinska, L. (2011). Navigating the landscape of conflict: Applications of dynamical systems theory to addressing protracted conflict. In D. Korppen, N. Ropers, & H. J. Giessmann (Eds.), The non-linearity of peace processes: Theory and practice of systemic conflict transformation (pp. 39–56). Opladen, Germany: Barbara Budrich Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1995). Domains and facets: Hierarchical personality assessment using the revised NEO personality inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64, 21–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deihl, P., & Goertz, G. (2001). War and Peace in International Rivalry: How do enduring rivalries between states affect international relations? Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J., Goertz, G., & Diehl, P. F. (2006). The new rivalry data set: Procedures and patterns. Journal of Peace Research, 43, 331–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M., Coleman, P. T., & Marcus, E. C. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diehl, P. F., & Goertz, G. (2001). War and peace in international rivalry. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijksterhuis, A., & Nordgren, L. F. (2006). A theory of unconscious thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 95–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorner, D. (1996). The logic of failure: Why things go wrong and what we can do to make them right. New York, NY: Holt and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. J., & Keashly, L. (1991). The potential complementarity of mediation and consultation within a contingency model of third party intervention. Journal of Peace Research, 28, 29–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goertz, G., & Diehl, P. F. (1993). Enduring rivalries: Theoretical constructs and empirical patterns. International Studies Quarterly, 37, 147–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J., Swanson, C., & Swanson, K. (2002). A general systems theory of marriage: Nonlinear difference equation modeling of marital interaction. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 326–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. H. (1995). Emergence: From chaos to order. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelso, J. A. S. (1995). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriesberg, L. (2005). Nature, dynamics, and phases of intractability. In C. A. Crocker, F. O. Hampson, & P. Aall (Eds.), Grasping the nettle: Analyzing cases of intractable conflict. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, R., Literer, A. J., Minton, J., & Saundars, D. M. (2004). Negotiation (3rd ed.). Boston: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of topological psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1948). Resolving social conflicts. New York, NY: Harper & Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, M. G., & Gurr, T. R. (2005). Peace and conflict. College Park, MD: Center for International Development and Conflict Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNulty, J. K., O’Mara, E. M., & Karney, B. R. (2008). Benevolent cognitions as a strategy of relationship maintenance: “Don’t sweat the small stuff”…but it is not all small stuff. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 631–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, S. T., & Zajonc, R. B. (1993). Affect, cognition, and awareness: Affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 723–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nan, S. A., Mampilly, Z. C., & Bartoli, A. (Eds.). (2012). Peacemaking: From practice to theory (Vol. 2). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, A., Bui-Wrzosinska, L., Coleman, P. T., Vallacher, R. R., Bartkowski, W., & Jochemczyk, L. (2010). Seeking sustainable solutions: Using an attractor simulation platform for teaching multi-stakeholder negotiation in complex cases. Negotiation Journal, 26, 49–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, A., & Lewenstein, M. (1994). Dynamical systems: A tool for social psychology? In R. R. Vallacher & A. Nowak (Eds.), Dynamical systems in social psychology (pp. 17–53). San Diego: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, A., & Vallacher, R. R. (1998). Dynamical social psychology. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, W. B., & Littlejohn, S. W. (1997). Moral conflict: When social worlds collide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Praszkier, R., Nowak, A., & Coleman, P. T. (2010). Social entrepreneurs and constructive change: The wisdom of circumventing conflict. Peace and Conflict, 16, 153–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruelle, D. (1989). Elements of differentiable dynamics and bifurcation theory. New York, NY: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandole, D. J. D. (1999). Capturing the complexity of conflict: Dealing with violent ethnic conflicts in the post-cold War Era. New York, NY: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, H. G. (1984). Deterministic chaos: An introduction. Weinheim, Germany: Physik-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P., Steen, T. A., & Park, N. (2005). Positive psychology progress: Empirical validation of interventions. American Psychologist, 60, 410–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staub, E. (2011). Overcoming evil genocide, violent conflict, and terrorism. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallacher, R. R., Coleman, P. T., Nowak, A., & Bui-Wrzosinska, L. (2010). Dynamical foundations of intractable conflict: Introduction to the special issue. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 16, 113–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallacher, R. R., & Selz, K. (1991). Who’s to blame? Action identification in allocating responsibility for alleged rape. Social Cognition, 9, 194–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1987). What do people think they’re doing? Action identification and human behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (2012). Action identification theory. In P. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 327–348). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Bertalannfy, L. (1968). General system theory. New York, NY: Braziller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegner, D. M. (1994). Ironic processes of mental control. Psychological Review, 101, 34–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wegner, D. M., Vallacher, R. R., Macomber, G., Wood, R., & Arps, K. (1984). The emergence of action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 269–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, T. D. (2002). Strangers to ourselves: Discovering the adaptive unconscious. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zartman, I. W., & Faure, G. O. (2005). Escalation and negotiation in international conflicts (1st ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vallacher, R.R. et al. (2013). Escape: How Conflicts Can Be Transformed. In: Attracted to Conflict: Dynamic Foundations of Destructive Social Relations. Peace Psychology Book Series. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35280-5_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics