Skip to main content
  • 195 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Wenn die Innovationsliteratur den Neuheitsgrad von Produkten bestimmt, steht meist die technische Neuheit im Zentrum des Interesses. Diese Dimension beschreibt unter anderem, wie neu Komponenten, Module und Funktionalitäten eines Produkts sind, ob ein neues technisches Paradigma Anwendung findet, ein deutlicher technologischer Leistungsfortschritt realisiert wird und bestehende Technologien verdrängt werden (z.B. Danneels/Kleinschmidt 2001). Mit diesen Indikatoren wird das „Innere“ eines Produkts beschrieben, also die Neuheit seiner Bestandteile, Funktionen und Wirkungen. Die Neuheit des Äußeren eines Produkts kann damit allerdings nicht erfasst werden. Hierin besteht ein zentrales Versäumnis in der Innovationsliteratur: Bei der Bewertung der Neuheit von Produkten blieb die ästhetische, also die Designperspektive, bisher unberücksichtigt (Talke et al. 2009).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literaturverzeichnis

  • Berkowitz, M. (1987): Product Shape as a Design Innovation Strategy, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 4 (4), 274-283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beverland, M.B. (2005): Managing the Design-Innovation Marketing Interface: Resolving the Tension between Artistic Creation and Commercial Imperatives, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22 (2), 193-207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, P.H. (1995): Seeking the Ideal Form: Product Design and Consumer Response, Journal of Marketing, 59 (3), 16-29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, PH., F.B. Brunel und T.J. Arnold (2003): Individual Differences in the Centrality of Visual Product Aesthetics: Concept and Measurement, Journal of Consumer Research, 29 (1), 551-565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, M. und J. Bessant (2002): Design in Business: Strategic Innovation through Design, Essex: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Candi, M. (2010): The sound of silence: Re-visiting silent design in the internet age, Design Studies, 31 (2), 187-202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carbon, C.C. (2010): The Cycle of Preference: Long-term Dynamics of Aesthetic Appreciation, Acta Psychologica, 134 (2), 233-244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiva, R. und J. Alegre (2009): Investment in Design and Firm Performance: The Mediating Role of Design Management, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26 (4), 424-440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, CM. und A. Di Benedetto (2003): New Product Management, 7. Aufl., New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creusen, M.E.H. und J.P.L. Schoormans (2005): The Different Roles of Product Appearance in Consumer Choice, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22 (1), 63-81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danneels, E. und E.J. Kleinschmidt (2001): Product Innovativeness from the Firm’s Perspective: Its Dimensions and Their Relation with Project Selection and Performance, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18 (6), 357-373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, K., P. Larson, G. Cawood und A. Lewis (2005): National Product Design Identities, Creativity and Innovation Management, 14 (4), 393-404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finn R. (2009): Silicon Valley Design Firm IDEO Rethinks Books, Cars, Businessweek, http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-11-23/silicon-valley-design-firm-ideo-rethinks-books-cars-update1-.html, 10.12.10.

  • Franke, N., P. Keinz, C. Steger und J. Christoph (2009): Testing the Value of Customization: When Do Customers Really Prefer Products Tailored to Their Preferences? Journal of Marketing, 73, (5), 103-121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franke, N. und F. Piller (2004): Value Creation by toolkits for User Innovation and Design: The Case of the Watch Market, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21 (6), 401-415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Füller, J., H. Mühlbacher, K. Matzler und G. Jawiecki (2009): Consumer Empowerment Through Internet-Based Co-creation, Journal of Management Information Systems, 26 (3), 171-102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garber, L.L. (1995): The Package Appearance in Choice, Advances in Consumer Research, 22 (1), 653-660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorb, P. und A. Dumas (1987): Silent Design, Design Studies, 8 (3), 150-156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, U. (1969): Stilbildung als absatzwirtschaftliches Problem der Konsumgüterindustrie, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansgrohe AG (2010): Zahlen, Daten und Fakten zur Hansgrohe AG, http://www.hansgrohe.de/1165.htm, 16.12.2010.

  • Herrmann, A. und F. Huber (2001): Produktdesign, in: Diller, H. (Hrsg.): Vahlens Großes Marketing Lexikon, 2. Aufl., München: Beck/Vahlen, 1393-1394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook, M.B. (1986): Aims, Concepts, and Methods for the Representation of Individual Differences in Esthetic Response to Design Features, Journal of Consumer Research, 13 (3), 337-347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koppelmann, U. (1997): Produktmarketing, 5. Aufl., Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koppelmann, U. und E. Küthe (1990): Wohnen ’90 - Designakzeptanz durch individualisierte Produktpolitik, in: Szallies, R. und G. Wiswede (Hrsg): Wertewandel und Konsum, Landsberg: Verlag Moderne Industrie, 371-423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreuzbauer, R. und A.J. Malter (2005): Embodied Cognition and New Product Design: Changing Product Form to Influence Brand Categorization, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22,165-176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K. (2005): The Semantic Turn: A New Foundation for Design, Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mugge, R. (2007): Product Attachment, Delft, Delft University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, C.H. und M.K. Kumar (2010): Exploring the Appeal of Product Design: A Grounded, Value-Based Model of Key Design Elements and Relationships, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27 (5), 640-657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raghubir, P. and Greenleaf, E.A. (2006): Ratios in Proportion: What Should the Shape of the Package Be? Journal of Marketing, 70 (2), 95-107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramaswamy V. (2008): Co-Creating Value through Customer Experience: The Nike Case, Strategy & Leadership, 36 (5), 9-14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E.M. (1995): Diffusion of Innovations, 4. Aufl., New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roozenburg, N.F.M. und J. Eekels (1991): Product Design: Fundamentals and Methods, Chichester, John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawhney M., G. Verona und E. Prandelli (2005): Collaborating to Create: The Internet as a Platform for Customer Engagement in Product Innovation, Journal of Interactive Marketing, 19 (4), 4-17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoormans, J.P.L. und H.S.J. Robben (1997): The Effect of New Package Design on Product Attention, Categorization and Evaluation, Journal of Economic Psychology, 18 (2-3), 271-287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz-Maibauer, H.H. (1976): Der Stoff als Mittel anmutungshafter Produktgestaltung, Köln: Peter Hanstein Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snelders, D. und P. Hekkert (1999): Association Measures as Predictors of Product Originality, Advances in Consumer Research, 26, 588-593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talke, K., S. Salomo, J. Wieringa und A. Lutz (2009): What about Design Newness? Investigating the Relevance of a Neglected Dimension of Product Innovativeness, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26 (1), 601-615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Typologie der Wünsche (2010): Burda Community Network GmbH (Hrsg.), Offenburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verganti, R. (2008): Design, Meanings, and Radical Innovation: A Metamodel and a Research Agenda, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25, 436-456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verganti, R. (2006): Innovating through Design, Harvard Business Review, 84 (12), 114-122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veryzer, R.W. (1995): The Place of Product Design and Aesthetics in Consumer Research. Advances in Consumer Research, 22 (1), 641-645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veryzer, R.W. (1993), Aesthetic Response and the Influence of Design Principles on Product Preferences, Advances in Consumer Research, 20, 224-228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veryzer, R.W. und B. Borja de Mozota (2005): The Impact of User-Oriented Design on New Product Development: An Examination of Fundamental Relationships, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22 (2), 128-143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, V. (1996): Design, Innovation and the Boundaries of the Firm, Research Policy, 25, 509-529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J. und B. Loken (1988): The Generality of Typicality Effects on Preference and Comparison: An Exploratory Test, Advances in Consumer Research, 15 (1), 55-61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yalch, R. und F. Brunel (1996): Need Hierarchies in Consumer Judgments of Product Designs: Is It Time to Reconsider Maslow’s Theory?, Advances in Consumer Research, 23 (1), 405-410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zec, P. und B. Jacob (2010): Der Designwert: Eine neue Strategie der Unternehmensführung, Ludwigsburg, Av Edition.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Sönke Albers (ist Professor für Marketing und Innovation an der Kühne Logistics University in Hamburg)Oliver Gassmann (ist Professor für Innovationsmanagement sowie Vorsitzender der Direktion des Instituts für Technologiemanagement an der Universität St. Gallen.)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Gabler Verlag | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Talke, K., Fritzmann, K. (2011). Innovation durch ästhetisches Design. In: Albers, S., Gassmann, O. (eds) Handbuch Technologie- und Innovationsmanagement. Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-6746-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-6746-6_11

  • Publisher Name: Gabler

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-8349-2800-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-8349-6746-6

Publish with us

Policies and ethics