Skip to main content

The Respondent-Generated Intervals Approach to Sample Surveys: From Theory to Experiment

  • Conference paper
New Developments in Psychometrics

Summary

We describe a new method for asking questions involving recall in surveys, called Respondent-Generated Intervals (RGI). We ask respondents for lower and upper bounds for the true answer to a factual question, as well as their best guess. For example, “How many times did you visit your doctor last year?” Also, “What is the largest value the true value is likely to be, and what is the smallest value the true value is likely to be?” Bayesian and other estimators are proposed. We describe several empirical studies that have used, and are using the RGI protocol.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Evans M, Swartz T (1995). Methods for Approximating Integrals in Statistics With Special Emphasis on Bayesian Integration Problems, Statistical Science, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 254–272.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Heeringa SG, Hill, DH, Howell, DA (1995). Unfolding Brackets for Reducing Item Non-Response in Economic Surveys, Health and Retirement Study Working Paper Series, Paper No. 94–029, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, June, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogarth R (1980). Judgment and Choice: The Psychology of Decision, New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennickell AB (1997). Using Range Techniques with CAPI in the 1995 Survey of 80 S. James Press and Judith M. Tanur Consumer Finances, Jan., 1997, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, D.C. 20551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kish L (1965) Survey Sampling. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Marquis KH, Press SJ (1999). Cognitive Design and Bayesian Modeling of a Census Survey of Income Recall, Proceedings of the Federal Committee on Statistical Methodology Conference, Washington, DC, Nov. 16, 1999, pp.51–64 (see http://www.bts.gov/fcsm ).

  • Press SJ (1989). Bayesian Statistics: Principles, Models and Applications, New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Press SJ (1999). Respondent-Generated Intervals for Recall in Sample Surveys, manuscript, Department of Statistics, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521–0138, Jan., 1999. http://www.cnas.ucr.edu/-.stat/press.htm.

  • Press SJ (2002). “Respondent-Generated Intervals For Recall in Sample Surveys”, Technical Report No. 272, July, 2002, Department of Statistics, University of California, Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

  • Press SJ, Marquis KH (2001) Bayesian Estimation in a U. S. Census Bureau Survey of Income Recall Using Respondent-Generated Intervals. Journal of Research in Official Statistics, Amsterdam: Eurostat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Press SJ, Marquis KH (2002) Bayesian Estimation in a U.S. Government Survey of Income Using Respondent-Generated Intervals. Proceedings of the Sixth World Meeting of the International Society for Bayesian Analysis, May, 2000, Crete, Greece; Amsterdam: Eurostat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Press SJ, Tanur JM (2000) Experimenting with Respondent-Generated Intervals in Sample Surveys, with discussion. Pages 1–18 in Monroe G. Sirken (ed.) Survey Research at the Intersection of Statistics and Cognitive Psychology, Working Paper Series #28, National Center for Health Statistics, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Disease Control and Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  • Press SJ, Tanur JM (2001). Respondent-Generated Interval Estimation to Reduce Item Nonresponse, in Applied Statistical Science V,Nova Science Publishers, pp. 39–49, M. Ahsanullah, J. Kennyon, S.K. Sarkar (Eds.). See also, http://cnas.ucr.edu/—stat/press.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Press SJ, Tanur JM (2002). “Cognitive and Econometric Aspects of Responses to Surveys as Decision-Making”, Technical Report No. 271, June, 2002, Department of Statistics, University of California, Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlaifer H (1959). Probability and Statistics for Business Decisions, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

H. Yanai A. Okada K. Shigemasu Y. Kano J. J. Meulman

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Japan

About this paper

Cite this paper

Press, S.J., Tanur, J.M. (2003). The Respondent-Generated Intervals Approach to Sample Surveys: From Theory to Experiment. In: Yanai, H., Okada, A., Shigemasu, K., Kano, Y., Meulman, J.J. (eds) New Developments in Psychometrics. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-66996-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-66996-8_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-66998-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-66996-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics