Skip to main content

Socio-Environmental Regionalism in South America: Tensions in New Development Models

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Rise of Post-Hegemonic Regionalism

Part of the book series: United Nations University Series on Regionalism ((UNSR,volume 4))

Abstract

The argument put forward is that regional integration in natural resources is causing and exacerbating socio-environmental conflicts in ways that undermine ongoing efforts to build more cohesive regional governance. Socio-environmental conflicts present new sources of development tensions related to the asymmetrical distribution of benefits and liabilities of natural resource extraction often at the expense of poor rural communities. In many ways this dimension regionalism contradicts the significant advancement reached in terms of political coordination, raising important questions about current limits to the transformative potential of regionalism in South America.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    UNASUR was a key stabilizing factor in offsetting attempts to destabilize democratic order in Bolivia and Ecuador, and in resolving diplomatic conflicts between Colombia, Ecuador, and Venezuela. It also adopted a common position to support Argentina’s demands of UK compliance with UN resolutions over the Malvinas/Falkland Islands dispute; cooperation over the earthquake in Haiti; condemnation of the coup in Honduras followed by diplomatic actions that aimed to isolate the illegitimate government in international fora.

  2. 2.

    IIRSA website: http://www.iirsa.org/ (Retrieved February 2, 2011).

  3. 3.

    Ibid.

  4. 4.

    http://www.minem.gob.pe/minem/archivos/file/Electricidad/acuerdo%20junio%20%202010.pdf (Retrieved February 4, 2011).

  5. 5.

    http://www.cipamericas.org/archives/3596 (Retrieved February 1, 2011).

  6. 6.

    See Table 7.1 for nationally disaggregated list of socio-environmental conflicts related to mining in Latin America.

  7. 7.

    http://www.somosmercosur.net/

  8. 8.

    “CLOC ratifica compromiso con ALBA de los Pueblos”, V Congreso de la Coordinadora Latinoamericana de Organizaciones del Campo, Quito, Ecuador, 8 al 16 de octubre del 2010, http://www.movimientos.org/noalca/albasi/show_text.php3?key=18360.

  9. 9.

    OCMAL has roots in the work started by the Ecuadorian organization Acción Ecológica in the mid-1990s. Its member organizations come from Ecuador, Argentina, El Salvador, Bolivia, Guatemala, Brazil, Honduras, Chile, Mexico, Colombia, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, and Perú. Additionally, there are also two regional networks members, the Central American Alliance against Mining and the Latin American Network of Women for the Defence of Social and Environmental Rights. See OCMAL, http://www.conflictosmineros.net (Retrieved February 5, 2011).

  10. 10.

    Binational Declaration of indigenous communities of Peru and Ecuador affected by mining enterprises Piura, Peru, July 2–4, 2010, http://www.conflictosmineros.net/contenidos/19-peru/5661-declaracion-binacional-de-comuniddes-afectadas-por-mineria (Retrieved February 5, 2011).

  11. 11.

    Declaración del Foro Andino frente a la Gran Minería: Alternativas de las Comunidades, Pueblos Indígenas y Trabajadores: http://www.asc-hsa.org/node/651 (Retrieved February 5, 2011).

  12. 12.

    CONACAMI: http://www.conacami.org (Retrieved February 5, 2011).

  13. 13.

    RECLAME: http://www.reclamecolombia.org/ (Retrieved February 5, 2011).

  14. 14.

    Indictment Declaration of the Ethical Tribunal on Transnational Mining, http://www.olca.cl/oca/mineras/fallo_tribunal_etico_a_mineria_de_frontera.pdf (Retrieved February 5, 2011).

  15. 15.

    REDLAR: http://www.redlar.org/ (Retrieved February 5, 2011).

  16. 16.

    http://www.cipamericas.org/archives/3596 (Retrieved February 1, 2011).

References

  • Bebbington, A. (2009). The new extraction: Rewriting the political ecology of the Andes? NACLA Report on the Americas, 42(5), 12–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengoa, J. (2000). La emergencia Indígena en América Latina. Santiago de Chile: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridge, G. (2004). Mapping the Bonanza: Geographies of mining investment in an era of neoliberal reform. The Professional Geographer, 56(3), 406–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broederlijk Denle & ALAI. (2008). Territorios y recursos naturales: el saqueo versus el buen vivir. Quito: Broederlijk Denle & ALAI/Agencia Latinoamericana de Información.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carranza, M. E. (2006). Clinging together: Mercosur’s ambitious external agenda, its internal crisis, and the future of regional economic integration in South America. Review of International Political Economy, 13(5), 802–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carranza, M. E. (2010). Mercosur, the global economic crisis, and the new architecture of regionalism in the Americas. New Orleans, LA: International Studies Association Annual Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceceña, A. E., Aguilar, P., & Motto, C. (2007). Territorialidad de la dominación. Integración de la Infraestructura Regional Sudamericana (IIRSA). Buenos Aires: Observatorio Latinoamericano de Geopolítica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaparro, E. (2006). ‘Industrias Extractivas y Desarrollo Sostenible en América Latina’, Cepal, Chile y Propuesta Ciudadana y Revenue Watch, Lima.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIDSE/ALAI. (2009). América Latina: Riqueza privada, pobreza pública. Quito: CIDSE/Alianza de organizaciones católicas para el desarrollo & ALAI/Agencia Latinoamericana de Información.

    Google Scholar 

  • CLAES. (2010). Tendencias en ambiente y desarrollo en América del Sur. Cambio climático, biodiversidad y políticas ambientales. Montevideo: CLAES/Centro Latino Americano de Ecología Social. Retrieved August 1, 2011, from http://www.ambiental.net/reporte2010/TendenciasAmbientalesClaes10.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • De Echave, J. (2007). Mining in Peru: Between the transformation of conflicts and the programmatic challenge. Resource document. Programme on Territories, Conflicts and Development of the University of Manchester. Retrieved August 1, 2011, from http://www.sed.manchester.ac.uk/research/andes/seminars/Jose_de_Echave_English.pdf

  • Della Porta, D., & Tarrow, S. (2005). Transnational protest and global activism. Lahman: Rowland and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dourojeanni, M., Barandiarán, A., & Dourojeanni, D. (2009). Amazonía Peruana en 2021. Lima: ProNaturaleza/Fundación Peruana para la Conservación de la Naturaleza.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobar, A. (2010). Latin America at the crossroads. Cultural Studies, 24(1), 1–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fundación Solón. (2007). Memoria. Cumbre social por la integración de los pueblos, 6 al 9 de diciembre de 2006 Cochabamba, Bolivia. La Paz: Fundación Solón.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaventa, J., & Tandon, R. (2010). Globalizing citizens: New dynamics of inclusion and exclusion. London/New York: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, S. (2003). The post-modern prince. Millennium: Journal of International Relations, 29(1), 131–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godnick, W., Klein, D., González-Posso, C., Mendoza, I., & Meneses, S. (2008). Conflict, economy, international cooperation and non-renewable natural resources. Brussels: The Initiative for Peacebuilding.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2003). The new imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Icaza, R., Newell, P., & Saguier, M. (2010). Citizenship and trade governance in the Americas. In J. Gaventa & R. Tandon (Eds.), Globalizing citizen: New dynamics of inclusion and exclusion (pp. 163–184). London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Work Group for International Affairs (IWGIA). (2010). Peru: A chronicle of deception – Attempts to transfer the Awajun border territory in the Cordillera del Condor to the Mining Industry. Report 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keck, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khagram, S. (2004). Dams and development: Transnational struggles for water and power. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘La nota que los lectores de Los Andes en San Juan no pudieron leer’. (2009). Los Andes On Line, 13 June. Retrieved February 3, 2011, from http://www.losandes.com.ar/notas/2009/6/14/politica-429770.asp

  • Malamud, A. (2008). Jefes de gobierno y procesos de integración: las experiencias de Europa y América Latina. In P. De Lombaerde, S. Kochi, & J. Briceño Ruiz (Eds.), Del regionalismo latinoamericano a la integración interregional (pp. 137–162). Madrid: Fundación Carolina/Siglo XXI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Alier, J. (2003). The environmentalism of the poor: A study of ecological conflicts and valuation. London: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, P., & Wheeler, J. (2006). Rights, resources and the politics of accountability. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleyers, G. (2010). Alter-globalization – Becoming actors in the global age. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, P., & Carruthers, D. (2008, October). Testing democracy’s promise: Indigenous mobilization and the Chilean State. European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies, 85, 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saguier, M. (2010a). TNCs in the dock: Corporate complicity in human rights abuses in Latin America. Corporate Social Responsibility in Latin America, UNCTAD/DTL/KTCD/2010/2, Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development/UNCTAD. Retrieved June 20, 2011, http://www.unctad.org/Templates/Download.asp?docid=14303%26lang=1%26intItemID=1397

  • Saguier, M. (2010b). Natural disasters: A fresh look at corporate accountability. Canada Watch, Fall, Robarts Centre for Canadian Studies, York University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saguier, M. (2007). The Hemispheric Social Alliance and the Free Trade Area of the Americas process: The challenges and opportunities of transnational coalitions against neo-liberalism. Globalizations, 2(4), 251–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seoane, J., & Taddei, E. (2002). From Seattle to Porto Alegre: The anti-neoliberal globalization movement. Current Sociology, 50(1), 99–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J., Chatfield, C., & Pagnucco, R. (1997). Transnational social movements and global politics. Solidarity beyond the states. New York: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svampa, M., & Antonelli, M. (2009). Minería Transnacional, Narrativas del Desarrollo y Resistencias Sociales. Buenos Aires: Editorial Biblos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarrow, S. (2005). The new transnational activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Theije, M., & Heemskerk, M. (2009, October). Moving frontiers in the Amazon: Brazilian small-scale gold miners in Suriname. European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies, 87, 5–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toledo Llancaqueo, V. (2005). Políticas indígenas y derechos territoriales en América Latina: 1990–2004. ¿Fronteras indígenas de la globalización? In P. Dávalos (Ed.), Pueblos indígenas, estado y democracia (pp. 67–102). Buenos Aires: CLACSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tussie, D. (2009). Regional projects in Latin America. Review of International Studies, 35(Special Issue), 169–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. (2007). World investment report 2007: Transnational corporations, extractive industries and development, UNCTAD/WIR/2007. Geneva: United Nations Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Human Rights Council. (2009). Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Situation of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of Indigenous People, James Anaya: addendum report on the situation of human rights of indigenous peoples in Brazil. A/HRC/12/34/Add.2. Retrieved June 19, 2011, from http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/docid/4ab0d5e52.html

  • Van Dijck, P. (2008, October). Troublesome construction: The rationale and risks of IIRSA. European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies, 85, 101–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijck, P. (2011). The impact of the IIRSA road infrastructure programme on Amazonia (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yashar, D. (2005). Contesting citizenship in Latin America: The rise of indigenous movements and the postliberal challenge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcelo Saguier .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Saguier, M. (2012). Socio-Environmental Regionalism in South America: Tensions in New Development Models. In: Riggirozzi, P., Tussie, D. (eds) The Rise of Post-Hegemonic Regionalism. United Nations University Series on Regionalism, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2694-9_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics