Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Why Do Practices Change and Why Do They Persist? Models of Explanations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Practice, Learning and Change

Part of the book series: Professional and Practice-based Learning ((PPBL,volume 8))

Abstract

Whilst mainstream innovation literature assumes knowledge as an object, a new resource for innovation, a practice-based approach to innovation, conceptualizes it in processual, incremental and continuous terms. Innovative processes will consequently be analyzed as situated in the everyday activities of a community of practitioners, such that innovation is conceptualized as neither separate nor separable from learning, working and organizing.

From this perspective derives a specific dynamics of innovation as the constant refinement of practice within a texture of practices. When work practices are viewed from the standpoint of the practitioners, what is of interest is the attachment that ties subjects to objects, technologies, the places of practices and other practitioners.

The continuous innovation of practice springs from the constant elaboration of the canons with which the community appraises and judges the object of the practice. Dissent is therefore an element that drives the constant endeavour to refine the methods and meaning of the practice for those who derive identity from it. The pleasure of practising and sharing that pleasure, passion as attachment to the object of the practice and mediation with the tools of the practice are the elements that sustain the reproduction of practices and which make it possible to answer the questions as to why a practice continues to be practised and how it changes by being practised.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agterberg, M., van den Hoof, B., Huysman, M., & Soekijad, M. (2010). Keeping the wheels turning: The dynamics of managing networks of practice. Journal of Management Studies, 47(1), 85–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amin, A., & Cohendet, P. (2004). Architectures of knowledge. Firms, capabilities, and communities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai, A. (1986). The social life of things. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Béguin, P., & Clot, Y. (2004). L’action située dans le development de l’activité. @ctivites, 1(2), 27–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackler, F. (1995). Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: An overview and interpretation. Organization Studies, 16, 1021–1046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities of practice: Towards a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organizational Science, 2, 40–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2001). Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organization Science, 12(2), 198–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M. (1999). Le reseau comme forme émergente et comme modalité de coordination. In M. Callon, P. Cohendet, Dalle J-M, F. Eymard-Duvernay, D. Foray, & E. Schenk (Eds.), Reseau et Coordination (pp. 13–64). Paris: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlile, P. R. (2004). Transferring, translating and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science, 15, 558–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, S. D. N., & Brown, J. S. (1999). Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organization Science, 10(4), 381–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowen, R., David, P. A., & Foray, D. (2000). The explicit economics of knowledge codification and tacitness. Industry and Corporate Change, 9(2), 211–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cozzens, S., Gatchair, S., Kim, K., Ordonez, G., & Supnithadnaporn, A. (2008). Knowledge and development. In J. Wajcman, M. Lynch, O. Amsterdamska, & E. Hackett (Eds.), The handbook of science and technology studies. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, A., Lank, E., & Maher, J. (2005). Making the invisible visible: How a voluntary organization is learning from its work with groups and communities. Journal of Change Management, 5(2), 191–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G., & Marengo, L. (1994). Toward a theory of organizational competencies. In R. W. England (Ed.), Evolutionary concepts in contemporary economics (pp. 157–178). Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. C., & Nelson, R. (2005). The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faraj, S., & Sproull, L. (2000). Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Science, 46(12), 1554–1568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferlie, E., Fitzgerald, L., Wood, M., & Hawkins, C. (2005). The non spread of innovations: The mediating role of professionals. Academy of Management Journal, 48(1), 117–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C. (1982). The economics of industrial innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi, S. (2000). Practice-based theorizing on learning and knowing in organizations: An introduction. Organization, 7(2), 211–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi, S. (2001). From organizational learning to practice-based knowing. Human Relations, 54(1), 131–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi, S. (2009a). Community of practice or practices of a community? In S. Armstrong & C. Fukami (Eds.), Handbook of management learning, education and development (pp. 514–530). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi, S. (2009b). Practice? It’s a matter of taste! Management Learning, 40(5), 535–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi, S. (2011). Organizational learning: The sociology of practice. In M. Easterby-Smith & M. Lyles (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management (pp. 43–65). Malden/Oxford/Melbourne/Berlin: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi, S., Nicolini, D., & Odella, F. (1998). Towards a social understanding of how people learn in organizations. Management Learning, 29(3), 273–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi, S., Nicolini, D., & Strati, A. (2007). The passion for knowing. Organization, 14(3), 309–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomart, E., & Hennion, A. (1999). A sociology of attachment: Music, amateurs, drug users. In J. Law & J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor network and after (pp. 220–247). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handley, K., Sturdy, A., Fincham, R., & Clark, T. (2006). Within and beyond communities of practice: Making sense of learning through participation, identity and practice. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 641–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasu, M. (2001). Critical transitions from developers to users. Helsinki: University of Helsinki Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1927). Sein und Zeit [Being and Time] (J. Stambaugh, Engl Trans. 1996). Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyysalo, S. (2010). Health technology development and use. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1996). What firms do? Coordination, identity and knowledge. Organization Science, 7(5), 502–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langley, A., & Tsoukas, H. (2010). Introducing perspectives on process organization studies. In T. Hernes & S. Maitlis (Eds.), Process, sense-making and organizing (pp. 1–26). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. C., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard-Barton, D. (1995). Wellsprings of knowledge: Building and sustaining the sources of innovation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B. (1992). National systems of innovation. Toward a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Printer Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malerba, F. (2004). Sectorial systems of innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organisational learning. Organization Science, 2, 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R. (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolini, D. (2011). Practice as the site of knowing: Insights from the field of telemedicine. Organization Science, 22, 602–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolini, D., Gherardi, S., & Yanow, D. (Eds.). (2003). Knowing in organizations: A practice-based approach. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. J. (2002). Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science, 13(3), 249–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435–1448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orr, J. E. (1996). Talking about machines: An ethnography of a modern job. Ithaca/London: IRL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Østerlund, C., & Carlile, P. (2005). Relations in practice: Sorting through practice theories on knowledge sharing in complex organizations. The Information Society, 21, 91–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen-Smith, J., & Powell, W. W. (2004). Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: the effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. Organization Science, 15, 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J. (2006). Limits to communities of practice. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 623–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, B., & Gross, N. (1943). The diffusion of hybrid seed corn in two Iowa communities. Rural Sociology, 8, 15–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, T. R., Knorr-Cetina, K., & von Savigny, W. (Eds.). (2001). The practice turn in ­contemporary theory. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, S. L. (1995). Ecologies of knowledge. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strati, A. (2000). Theory and method in organization studies: Paradigms and choices. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan, J., Scarbrough, H., & Robertson, M. (2002). The construction of ‘communities of practice’ in the management of innovation. Management Learning, 33, 477–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tagliaventi, M. R., & Mattarelli, E. (2006). The role of networks of practice, value sharing, and operational proximity in knowledge flows between professional groups. Human Relations, 59(3), 291–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas, H. (2003). Do we really understand tacit knowledge? In M. Easterby-Smith & M. A. Lyles (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management (pp. 410–427). Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A. H., Polley, D. E., Garud, R., & Venkataraman, S. (1999). The innovation journey. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanow, D. (2004). Translating local knowledge at organizational peripheries. British Journal of Management, 15, S9–S25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Sociology, University of Trento, Trento, Italy

    Silvia Gherardi

Authors
  1. Silvia Gherardi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Silvia Gherardi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of Technology, Sydney, Broadway 15, Ultimo, NSW, 2007, Australia

    Paul Hager

  2. , Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of Technology, Sydney, Broadway 15, Ultimo, NSW, 2007, Australia

    Alison Lee

  3. , Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of Technology, Sydney, Broadway 15, Ultimo, NSW, 2007, Australia

    Ann Reich

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gherardi, S. (2012). Why Do Practices Change and Why Do They Persist? Models of Explanations. In: Hager, P., Lee, A., Reich, A. (eds) Practice, Learning and Change. Professional and Practice-based Learning, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4774-6_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation