Abstract
This chapter is intended to provoke reflection on the theoretical significance of a return to practice within the field of education. Here, a return to practice implies a reconsideration of the complexity of education in order to stand at a distance from the reductionism of the prevailing version of lifelong learning dominated by the culture of performativity and by a technical-rational interpretation of educational ‘practices’ (Magalhaes and Stoer, Glob Soc Educ 1:41–66, 2003; Edwards et al, Int J Lifelong Educ 21(1):525–536, 2002). Theories of practice(s) in social theory and organisation studies offer an interesting background for such reconsideration (Schatzki et al, The practice turn in contemporary theory. Routledge, London, 2001; Reckwitz, Eur J Soc Theory, 5(2):243–263, 2002; Gherardi, Manage Learn, 40(2):115–128, 2009; Miettinen et al, Organ Stud 30(12):1309–1327, 2010) and solicit renewed investigations into the multifarious aspects of education. This chapter presents an analytical framework with three possible trajectories of reflection and research to highlight the fruitfulness of such a return to practice: the body and sensible knowledge for an aesthetic understanding of learning and knowing, the sociomaterialities of education, and the analysis of local orders of education and training. The chapter finally discusses what is required in this ‘going back’ to practice and how to engage with practice-based studies of education without embracing a conservative view.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ball, S. J. (1998). Big policies/small world: An introduction to international perspectives in education policy. Comparative Education, 34(2), 119–130.
Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228.
Barton, D., & Tusting, K. (Eds.). (2005). Beyond communities of practice. Language, power, and social context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Beach, D. (2003). The politics, policy and ideology of school mathematics. In G. Walford (Ed.), Investigating educational policy through ethnography. Amsterdam/New York/Oxford: JAI Press.
Biesta, G. J. J. (2006). Beyond learning. Democratic education for a human future. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.
Biesta, G. J. J. (2007). Why “what works” won’t work: Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research. Educational Theory, 57(1), 1–22.
Bourdieu, P. (1980). Le sense pratique. Paris: Minuit.
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1970). La reproduction. Eléments pour une théorie du système d’enseignement. Paris: Minuit.
Butler, J. (2004). Undoing gender. London: Routledge.
Candlin, F. (2004). Don’t touch! Hands off! Art, blindness and the conservation of expertise. Body and Society, 10(1), 71–90.
Clegg, S. R. (1989). Frameworks of power. London: Sage.
Corradi, G., Gherardi, S., & Verzelloni, L. (2010). Through the practice lens: Where is the bandwagon of practice-based studies heading? Management Learning, 41(3), 265–283.
Coulon, A. (1993). Ethnométhodologie et education. Paris: PUF.
Csordas, T. J. (1994). Embodiment and experience: The existential ground of culture and self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Czarniawska-Joerges, B., & Sevón, G. (1996). Translating organizational change. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Derouet, J.-L. (2000). L’école dans plusieurs mondes. Bruxelles: De Boeck.
Dirkx, J. M. (2006). Studying the complicated matter of what works: Evidence-based-research and the problem of practice. Adult Education Quarterly, 56(4), 273–290.
Dunne, J., & Hogan, P. (Eds.). (2004). Education and practice: Upholding the integrity of teaching and learning. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Edwards, R. (1997). Changing places? Flexibility, lifelong learning and a learning society. London: Routledge.
Edwards, R. (2010). Lifelong learning: Emergent enactments. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 18(2), 145–157.
Edwards, R., Ranson, S., & Strain, M. (2002). Reflexivity: Towards a theory of lifelong learning. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 21(1), 525–536.
Edwards, R., Nicoll, K., Solomon, N., & Usher, R. (2004). Rhetoric and educational discourse. Persuasive texts? London: Routledge.
Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R. (2010). Actor-network theory and education. London: Routledge.
Field, J. (2000). Governing the ungovernable. Why lifelong learning policies promises so much yet deliver little. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 28(3), 249–261.
Foucault, M. (1976). Histoire de la sexualitè, Vol. 1, La Volontè de Savoir. Paris: Gallimard.
Freebody, P., & Freiberg, J. (2000). Public and pedagogic morality: The local orders of instructional and regulatory talk in classrooms. In S. Hester & D. Francis (Eds.), Local educational order: Ethnomethodological studies of knowledge in action. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Freire, P. (1971). La pedagogia degli oppressi. Milano: Mondadori.
Fuller, S. (1992). Social epistemology and the research agenda of science. In A. Pickering (Ed.), Science as practice and culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Fuller, S. (1989). Philosophy of science and its discontents. Boulder: Westview.
Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York: Basic Books.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Gee, J. P. (2000). Communities of practice in new capitalism. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(4), 515–523.
Geiger, D. (2009). Revisiting the concept of practice: Toward an argumentative understanding of practicing. Management Learning, 40(2), 129–144.
Gewirtz, S. (2008). Give us a break! A sceptical review of contemporary discourses of lifelong learning. European Educational Research Journal, 7(4), 414–424.
Gherardi, S. (2006). The texture of organizational knowledge. London: Routledge.
Gherardi, S. (2009). Introduction: The critical power of the ‘practice lens’. Management Learning, 40(2), 115–128.
Gherardi, S., Nicolini, D., & Yanow, D. (Eds.). (2003). Knowing in organization. A practice-based approach. Armonk: Sharpe.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity.
Gore, J. M. (2001). Disciplining bodies: On continuity of power relations in pedagogy. In C. Paechter, R. Edwards, R. Harrison, & P. Twining (Eds.), Learning, space and identity. London: Sage.
Guile, D. (2003). From credentialism to the ‘practice of learning’: Reconceptualizing learning for the knowledge economy. Policy Futures in Education, 1(1), 83–105.
Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature. New York/London: Routledge.
Hester, S., & Francis, D. (Eds.). (2000). Local educational order: Ethnomethodological studies of knowledge in action. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Jarzabkowski, P., Balogun, J., & Seidl, D. (2007). Strategizing: The challenges of a practice perspective. Human Relations, 60(1), 5–27.
Kuhn, M. (Ed.). (2007). New society models for a new millennium. New York: Peter Lang.
Landri, P. (2007). Tra comunità e pratica. Sociologia del lavoro, 105, 170–180.
Landri, P. (2008, July). Tracking. The dirty work of schools. Paper presented at EGOS conference, Amsterdam.
Landri, P. (2009). The fabrication of networked socialities. In F. Amoretti (Ed.), The electronic constitution. Social, cultural and political implications. Hershey: Information Age Publishers.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Law, J., & Urry, L. (2004). Enacting the social. Economy and Society, 33(3), 390–410.
Lawn, M. (2005). A pedagogy for the public: The place of objects, observation, mechanical production and cupboards. In M. Lawn & I. Grosvenor (Eds.), Materialities of schooling: Design, technology, objects, routines. Oxford: Symposium Book.
Lawn, M., & Grosvenor, I. (2005). Materialities of schooling: Design, technology, objects, routines. Oxford: Symposium Book.
Lindblad, S., & Popkewitz, T. S. (Eds.). (2004). Educational restructuring. International perspectives on traveling policies. Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
Lundahl, L., Hoppman, S., Simons, M., & Lawn, M. (Eds.). (2010). Mapping the European Educational Research Space: Policy, governance and cultures. European Educational Research Journal, 3(9), 304–430.
Lyotard, J. F. (1979). La condition postmoderne. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.
McGregor, J. (2004). Spatiality and the place of the material in schools. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 12(3), 347–372.
Magalhaes, A. M., & Stoer, S. R. (2003). Performance, citizenship and the knowledge society: A new mandate for European education policy. Globalization, Societies and Education, 1, 41–66.
Mehan, H., Hertwek, A., & Meihls, J. L. (1986). Handicapping the handicapped: Decision making in students’ careers. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Éditions Gallimard.
Miettinen, R., Samra-Fredericks, D., & Yanow, D. (2010). Re-turn to practice: An introductory essay. Organization Studies, 30(12), 1309–1327.
Nespor, J. (1994). Knowledge in motion: Space, time and curriculum in undergraduate physics and management. Philadelphia: Falmer.
Nespor, J. (1997). Tangled up in school: Politics, space, bodies, and signs in the educational process. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Nicolini, D. (2009). Zooming in and out: Studying practices by switching theoretical lenses and trailing connection. Organization Studies, 30(12), 1391–1418.
Orlikowski, W. J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11(4), 404–428.
Osberg, D. C., Biesta, G. J. J., & Cilliers, P. (2008). From representation to emergence: Complexity’s challenge to the epistemology of schooling. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40(1), 213–227.
Rouse, J. (2001). Two concepts of practice. In T. Schatzki, K. Knorr-Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory. London: Routledge.
Schatzki, T., Knorr-Cetina, K., & von Savigny, E. (2001). The practice turn in contemporary theory. London: Routledge.
Schwandt, T. A. (2005). The centrality of practice to evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 26(1), 95–105.
Smeyers, P., & Burbules, N. C. (2006). Education as initiation into practices. Educational Theory, 56(4), 439–449.
Sørensen, E. (2009). The materiality of learning: Technology and knowledge in educational practice. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
St. Pierre, E. A. (2006). Scientifically based research in education: Epistemology and ethics. Adult Education Quarterly, 56(4), 239–266.
Strati, A. (2007). Sensible knowledge and practice-based learning. Management Learning, 38(1), 61–77.
Turner, S. (1994). The social theory of practices: Tradition, tacit knowledge, and presuppositions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Varenne, H. (2007). Difficult collective deliberations: Anthropological notes toward a theory of education. Teacher College Record, 109(7), 1559–1588.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Landri, P. (2012). A Return to Practice: Practice-Based Studies of Education. In: Hager, P., Lee, A., Reich, A. (eds) Practice, Learning and Change. Professional and Practice-based Learning, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4774-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4774-6_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4773-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4774-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)