Skip to main content

The Humanist Basis of African Communitarianism as Viable Third Alternative Theory of Developmentalism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
African Legal Theory and Contemporary Problems

Abstract

The complete failure of capitalism after the collapse of socialism has engendered a search for a new model of developmentalism, which will constitute a third alternative paradigm. Capitalism and socialism have both failed to redress the most critical issues of the human condition, which are debilitating poverty, hunger, disease, homelessness, unemployment, crippling inequality, lack of access to health care, inequitable distribution of income and resources allocative mechanisms that are calibrated and configured to allocate resources to economic production that would not generate wealth for the enhancement of the common good which appertains to all. Scholars and governments are equally confounded by the possible nature which the third alternative will assume. In this vein, this chapter will argue for a model of development based on African humanist egalitarian principles – the core value animating African socio-economic and political institutions – as an alternative to the capitalist and socialist models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    According to Fukuyama, history is directional and its end point is capitalist liberal democracy. This view, of course, is not novel. What engages the attention however is the simplicity of Fukuyama’s reformulation of this view point. It is an apologia by Fukuyama, a former U.S. State Department planner. He identifies two prime factors that supposedly push all societies toward this evolutionary goal.

    The first is modern natural science complemented by technology, which creates universal cultures. The second vehicle of history which he derived from Hegel is the desire for recognition, driving innovation and personal achievement. Fukuyama’s main concern seems to be whether in the coming of what he considers a capitalist utopia, humans will not become complacently self-absorbed ‘last men’ or, alternatively, revert to ‘first men’ embroiled in destructive wars. His argument that western democracies are not hegemonic is a historical in the light of world history and, particularly, the behaviour of the United States and its allies. He first articulated his thesis in the Foreign Policy Journal, National Interest, summer 1989, where he posited that most recent world history is punctuated by the collapse of absolutist regimes, and concomitantly, there is unprecedented ascendancy of liberal forces in these nations.

  2. 2.

    To create a legal framework for economic development, particularly when considering legal and judicial reforms developing countries should as a matter of priority create substantive and procedurally efficient rules for the husbandry of the economy. A rule could be regarded as substantively efficient if it sets forth a precept that internalizes an externality or compels the efficient allocation of resources. Concomitantly, a rule is procedurally efficient if it eliminates or reduces the cost of or increases the accuracy of using the legal system.

  3. 3.

    Lane (1999, p. 16) wrote ‘former Tanzanian dictator, Julius Nyerere, was single-handedly responsible for the economic destruction of his potentially wealthy nation’.

References

  • Adams M, Kalabamn F, White R (2003) Land tenure policy practice in Botswana – governance lessons for Southern Africa. Austrian J Dev Stud 19(1):55–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson ML (2005) Sociology: understanding a diverse society. Wadsworth, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Arkaide VB (1973) Planning in Tanzania. In: Cliff L, Saul J (eds) Socialism in Tanzania. East African Publishing House, Dar es Salaam

    Google Scholar 

  • Bienefeld MA (1998) Structural adjustment and the prospects of democracy in Southern Africa. IDS Bull, June

    Google Scholar 

  • Boesen J et al (1979) Ujamaa: socialism from above. Scandinavian Institute of African Studies, Uppsala, passim

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton D (1985) Nationalization – a road to socialism: the case of Tanzania. Zed Books, London, 154

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer A (1997) Marxist theories of imperialism: a critical survey. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Brym RJ (2005) Sociology: your compass for a new world. Wadsworth, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chilcote R (1983) Theories of development: mode of production or dependency? Sage, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulson A (1985) Tanzania: a political economy. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Cousins B (2007) More than socially embedded: the distinctive character of “communal tenure”. J Agrar Change 7(3):281–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis KE (2008) The relationship between law and development: optimist versus skeptics. Am J Comp Law 57:8–14

    Google Scholar 

  • De Kadt EJ (1974) Sociology and development. Tavistock Publications, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • de Soto H (2000) The mystery of capital: why capitalism triumphs in the west and fails everywhere. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Desai V (2008) The companion to development studies. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama F (2006) The end of history and the last man. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh BN (2001) Dependency theory revisited. Ashgate, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilman N (2004) Mandarins of the future: modernization theory in cold war America. The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermassi E (1978) Changing patterns in research on the third world. Annu Rev Sociol 4:239–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hettn B (1985) Development theory in transition: the dependency debate and beyond: third world reponses. Zed Book, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiung B (2006) Economic analysis of law: an inquiry of its underlying logic. Erasmus Law Econ Rev 2:1–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbell L (2008) Rethinking dependency theory: the case of Dominica, the rascal state. J Third World Stud 112

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington SP (1978) The change to change: modernization, development, and politics. In: Provizer NW (ed) Analyzing the third world: essays from comparative politics. Schenkman Publishing, Cambridge, pp 30–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington S (1996) Political order in changing societies. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart R (2005) Modernization, cultural change and democracy: the human development sequence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffee D (1998) Levels of socio-economic development theory. Praeger, Westport

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RW (2000) Nyerere: a flawed hero. The National Interest, 60, passim

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiely R (1995) Sociology of development: the impasse and beyond. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane C (1999) TRB from Washington: gone awry. The New Republic, November 8, p 16

    Google Scholar 

  • Larrain J (1991) Theories of development: capitalism, colonialism and dependency. Polity, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Latham ME (2000) Modernization as ideology: American social science and ‘nation building’ in the Kennedy era. The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill

    Google Scholar 

  • Leys C (1996) The rise and fall of development theory. Indiana University Press, Bloomington

    Google Scholar 

  • Ndulu J (2008) The political economy of economic growth in Africa, 1960–2000. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyerere J (1961) Scramble for Africa: address to the world assembly of youth. Government Printer, Dar es Salaam

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyerere J (1967) Freedom and unity. Oxford University Press, London/Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyerere J (1968) Freedom and socialism Dar es Salaam. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill D (2007) A modernization theory: economic growth, income equality and democratization. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, 12 April 2007. Available at http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p196991_index.html

  • Ouedrago HMG (2002) Legal conditions for the recognition of local land rights and local land tenure practices. In: Proceedings of the international workshop: making land rights more secure, Ouedrago

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer S (1975) Self-reliant development in an interdependent world. In: Erb GF, Kallab V (eds) Beyond dependency: the developing world speaks out. Over Seas Development Council, Washington, DC, pp 5–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Peet R (1999) Theories of development. The Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt C (1976) The critical phase in Tanzania, 1945–67: Nyerere and the emergence of a socialist strategy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahnevia M (1997) The post-development reader. Zed Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs J (1987) Trade and exchange rate policies in growth oriented adjustment policies. In: Corbo V (ed) Growth oriented adjustment programs. International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott JC (1999) Seeing like a state: how certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Shivji I (1973) The silent class struggle. Tanzania Publishing House, Dar es Salam, passim

    Google Scholar 

  • Shivji I (1974) The silent class struggle. Tanzania Publishing House, Dar es Salaam

    Google Scholar 

  • Tetreault MA (1986) Dependency theory and the return of high politics. Greenwood Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wily L (2005) The commons and customary law in modern times: rethinking the orthodoxies. In: Proceedings of the UNDP-ICC, workshop: land rights for African development: from knowledge to action, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis K (2007) Theories and practices of development. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeager R (1989) Tanzania: an African experiment. Westview Press, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adebisi Arewa BA, LL.B, BL, MBA, Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Arewa, A., Arewa, A., Arewa, A. (2014). The Humanist Basis of African Communitarianism as Viable Third Alternative Theory of Developmentalism. In: Onazi, O. (eds) African Legal Theory and Contemporary Problems. Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, vol 29. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7537-4_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics