Skip to main content

Language Teacher Autonomy and Social Censure

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Autonomy in Language Learning and Teaching

Abstract

Teacher autonomy has been acknowledged as central to teachers’ efforts to promote learner autonomy. However, language teachers’ exercise of autonomy has been increasingly undermined by shifting sociocultural conditions and educational reforms. Drawing on data collected in studies on teachers’ professional vulnerability, this chapter explores how language teachers’ autonomy and professional practices are undermined by bureaucratic management and marketization of education that drove various educational reform initiatives. These findings indicate that it has become critical for language teachers to address the challenge of social censure in pursuit of being autonomous language teachers. Further research is needed to collect teachers’ experiential narratives and deconstruct the sources of professional vulnerability in these narratives with them so that they can be better prepared for the challenge of being autonomous.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, P. (2010). Teacher education and teacher autonomy: Creating spaces for experimentation in secondary school English language teaching. Language Teaching Research, 14(3), 259–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, J. (2000). Education for teachers of English in China. Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy, 26(2), 147–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Codd, J. (2005). Teachers as ‘managed professionals’ in the global education industry: The New Zealand experience. Educational Review, 57(2), 193–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deters, P., Gao, X., Miller, E. R., & Vitanova, G. (2014). Theorizing and analyzing agency in second language learning: Interdisciplinary approaches. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, J. (2004). Making teachers more accountable: Models, methods, and processes. Research Papers in Education, 19(1), 7–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, X. (2006). Strategies used by Chinese parents to support English language learning: Voices of “elite” university students. RELC Journal, 37(3), 285–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, X. (2008). Teachers’ professional vulnerability and cultural tradition: A Chinese paradox. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 154–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, X. (2010). Strategic language learning: The roles of agency and context. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao, X. (2011). The ‘falling’ language standards and teachers’ professional vulnerability in Hong Kong. Research Papers in Education, 26(4), 485–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, X. (2012). Parental strategies in supporting Chinese children’s learning of English vocabulary. Research Papers in Education, 27(5), 581–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, X., & Trent, J. (2009). Understanding mainland Chinese students’ motivations for choosing teacher education programmes in Hong Kong. Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy, 35(2), 145–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, X., & Xu, H. (2014). The dilemma of being English language teachers: Interpreting teachers’ motivation to teach and professional commitment in China’s hinterland regions. Language Teaching Research, 18(1), 152–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, J. A. (2005). The crumbling pedestal: Changing images of Japanese teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 56(5), 459–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, M. (2002). A narrative inquiry of cross-cultural lives: Lives in China. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34(3), 301–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, G. (2002). Potential cultural resistance to pedagogical imports: The case of communicative language teaching in China. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 15(2), 93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelchtermans, G. (2005). Teachers’ emotions in educational reforms: Self-understanding, vulnerable commitment and micropolitical literacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 995–1006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, T. (2008). Learner autonomy and teacher autonomy: Synthesising an agenda. In T. Lamb & H. Reinders (Eds.), Learner and teacher autonomy: Concepts, realities, and responses (pp. 269–284). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, T., & Reinders, H. (Eds.). (2008). Learner and teacher autonomy: Concepts, realities, and responses. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, D. (1995). Learning as dialogue: The dependence of learner autonomy on teacher autonomy. System, 23(2), 175–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, G., Gao, X., & Lamb, T. (Eds.). (2011). Identity, motivation and autonomy in language learning. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang, H. (2003). Resistance to the communicative method of language instruction within a progressive Chinese University. In K. M. Anderson-Levitt (Ed.), Local meanings, global schooling: Anthropology and world culture theory (pp. 121–140). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J. (2001). Teacher professional identity: Competing discourses, competing outcomes. Journal of Education Policy, 16(2), 149–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenhals, M. (1993). The paradox of power in a people’s Republic of China middle school. New York: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. C. (2003). Teacher education for teacher-learner autonomy. In J. Gollin, G. Ferguson, & H. Trappes-Lomax (Eds.), Symposium for language teacher educators: Papers from three IALS symposia (CD-ROM). Edinburgh, UK: IALS, University of Edinburgh. Retrieved March 21, 2015, from http://www.warwick.ac.uk/~elsdr/Teacher_autonomy.pdf

  • Troman, G. (2000). Teacher stress in the low-trust society. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 21(3), 331–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, K. (2001). Chinese culture and leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 4, 309–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, L. (2004). School autonomy in China: A comparison between government and private schools with the context of decentralization. International Studies in Educational Administration, 32(3), 58–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Z. (2006). Understanding practitioner research as a form of life: An Eastern interpretation of exploratory practice. Language Teaching Research, 10(3), 331–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, D. (2004). Corruptness in education. Chinese Education and Society, 37(1), 89–100.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gao, X. (2018). Language Teacher Autonomy and Social Censure. In: Chik, A., Aoki, N., Smith, R. (eds) Autonomy in Language Learning and Teaching. Palgrave Pivot, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52998-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52998-5_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-52997-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-52998-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics