Abstract
Competing for Capital concluded that the EU’s state aid policy was largely successful in its goals of controlling subsidies in general, and subsidies likely to go to mobile investment in particular. One then-recent development was the adoption of the Multi-Sectoral Framework, which for the first time specifically addressed investment incentives. Now over ten years old and incorporated into the EU’s regional aid guidelines, it is necessary to ask if it really has affected the incentives received by large investors. The strategy of this chapter will be to compare both the largest incentives and aggregate incentives (to the extent it can be estimated) in the EU and the US. Preliminary work (Wishlade, 2008a) suggests that the EU has indeed lowered incentives relative to those in the US, but I propose to calculate US incentives on a net present value basis as the EU does, and to compare the aid intensities (incentive as percentage of investment, incentive per job) in both regions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2011 Kenneth P. Thomas
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Thomas, K.P. (2011). Who Provides the Most Investment Incentives: EU vs. US. In: Investment Incentives and the Global Competition for Capital. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230302396_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230302396_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-31041-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-30239-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)