Skip to main content

Metaphor in the History of Ideas and Discourses: How Can We Interpret a Medieval Version of the Body-State Analogy?

  • Chapter
Metaphor and Discourse

Abstract

The use of political body and illness metaphors in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance has been portrayed in the history of ideas as a preliminary stage to ‘modern’ uses, due to its alleged grounding in ‘humoral’ medicine and micro-/macrocosm cosmology. This chapter reviews these claims through analysing the use of the body—state metaphor in the twelfth-century cleric John of Salisbury’s treatise Policraticus. The analysis shows that John’s metaphor use is highly rhetorical and that his scenario of medical treatment for a diseased state even resembles present-day usage in some respects. In conclusion, we discuss ways in which a discourse-oriented perspective can link cognitive and historical approaches to metaphor analysis.l

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bass, A. M. (1997). ‘The metaphor of the human body in the political theory of John of Salisbury: context and innovation’. In B. Debatin, T. R. Jackson and D. Steuer (eds.), Metaphor and Rational Discourse ( pp. 201–13) (Tübingen: Niemeyer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer’s Dictionary of Phrase and Fable (1999), ed. by Adrian Room (London: Cassell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coker, F. W. (1967). Organismic Theories of the State. Nineteenth-Century Interpretations of the State as Organism or Person (New York: AMS Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Croft, W. and Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive Linguistics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Deignan, A. (1995). COBUILD English Guides. Vol. 7: Metaphor Dictionary (London: HarperCollins).

    Google Scholar 

  • Geeraerts, D. and Grondelaars, S. (1995). ‘Looking back at anger: cultural traditions and metaphorical patterns’. In J. R. Taylor and R. E. MacLaury (eds.), Language and the Cognitive Construal of the World (pp. 153–79) (Berlin: de Gruyter).

    Google Scholar 

  • Guldin, R. (2000). Körpermetaphern: Zum Verhältnis von Politik und Medizin (Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, D. (1971). The Body Politic: A Political Metaphor in Renaissance English Literature (The Hague: Mouton).

    Google Scholar 

  • John of Salisbury (1909). Policraticus sive De nugis Curialium et vestigiis philosophorum, ed. by C. C. I. Webb. 2 vols (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • John of Salisbury (1990). Policraticus. Of the Frivolities of Courtiers and the Footprints of Philosophers. ed. and trans. by C. J. Nederman (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kantorowicz, E. H. (1997). The King’s Two Bodies: A Study in Mediaeval Political Theology. With a new Preface by William Chester Jordan. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Koschorke, A., Lüdemann, S., Frank, T. and Matala de Mazza, E. (2007). Der fiktive Staat. Konstruktionen des politischen Körpers in der Geschichte Europas. (Frankfurt/Main: Fischer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kövecses, Z. (1995). ‘Anger: its language, conceptualization, and physiology in the light of cross-cultural evidence’. In J. R. Taylor and R. E. MacLaury (eds.), Language and the Cognitive Construal of the World (pp. 181–96) (Berlin: de Gruyter).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor. A Practical Introduction. (Oxford : Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. (Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh. The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. (New York: Basic Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebeschütz, H. (1950). Mediaeval Humanism in the Life and Writings of John of Salisbury (London: The Warburg Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy, A. O. (1936). The Great Chain of Being. A Study of the History of an Idea (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Musolff, A. (2004). ‘The heart of the European body politic. British and German perspectives on Europe’s central organ’, Journal of Multilingual & Multicultural Development, 25, 5 & 6, 437–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musolff, A. (2007). ‘Which role do metaphors play in racial prejudice? The function of anti-Semitic imagery in Hitler’s “Mein Kampf” ’, Patterns of Prejudice, 41, 1, 21–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nederman, C. J. (1990). ‘Editor’s introduction’. In John of Salisbury, Policraticus. Of the Frivolities of Courtiers and the Footprints of Philosophers (pp. xv–xxviii), ed. and trans. by C.J. Nederman (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pizan, C. de (1994). The Book of the Body Politic, trans. by K. Langdon Forhan (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rash, F. (2006). The Language of Violence. Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf (New York: Peter Lang).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope, M. (1983). ‘Shakespeare’s medical imagination’, Shakespeare Survey, 38, 175–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare, W. (1983). Coriolanus. In The Complete Works of William Shakespeare (pp. 758–97), ed. with a glossary by W. J. Craig (London: Pordes).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sontag, S. (1991). Illness as Metaphor. Aids and its Metaphors (London: Penguin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Spurgeon, C. F. E. (1993). Shakespeare’s Imagery and What It Tells Us. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Struve, T. (1984). ‘The importance of the organism in the political theory of John of Salisbury’. In M. Wilks (ed.), The World of John of Salisbury (pp. 303–17) (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillyard, E. M. W. (1982). The Elizabethan World Picture (Harmondsworth: Penguin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilks, M. (ed.) (1984). The World of John of Salisbury (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. W. (1984). ‘Shakespeare’s metaphors of health: food, sport and life-preserving rest’, Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies, 14, 187–202.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2009 Andreas Musolff

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Musolff, A. (2009). Metaphor in the History of Ideas and Discourses: How Can We Interpret a Medieval Version of the Body-State Analogy?. In: Musolff, A., Zinken, J. (eds) Metaphor and Discourse. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230594647_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics