Abstract
This chapter deploys a legal approach to the Northern Ireland question, by analysing the 1998 Belfast Agreement. The nature of that Agreement — which is firmly rooted in the 1920–22 partition settlement in Ireland — is defined below. Northern Ireland’s continuation as a part of the United Kingdom (which is not in doubt) is a matter of international law. The analysis here deals mainly with domestic law, because the Belfast Agreement principally reordered the internal constitution of Northern Ireland; devolution was restored to Belfast, when it was also being extended to Edinburgh and Cardiff. This discussion of the Belfast Agreement respects the legal text and considers two major questions. First, does the Belfast Agreement amount to a road map to a united Ireland? Second, did the St Andrews Agreement of 2006 effectively replace the Belfast Agreement? Both questions are answered in the negative, detailed reasons are given below. This is not law for lawyers; it is legal argument for scholars in Northern Ireland and elsewhere. The touchstone remains the principle of legality: namely, the rule of law internationally, binding states parties; and the rule of law domestically, binding public bodies and natural and legal persons.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2009 Austen Morgan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Morgan, A. (2009). The Belfast Agreement and the Constitutional Status of Northern Ireland. In: Barton, B., Roche, P.J. (eds) The Northern Ireland Question. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230594807_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230594807_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-30153-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59480-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)