Abstract
It is said, Sir, that poverty is the mother of invention — so is indolence the mother of imposture.1
Sociologist Dipankar Gupta perceptively summarizes that the period after India’s Independence was widely considered to be a move out of the ‘Dark Ages’ and ‘into the light’.2 This was most significantly a discoursal shift. For most of the twentieth century scholarship on India dwelled upon why India had not, and perhaps could not, industrialize. Now that India has definitively industrialized, and is celebrated as such, it is worth revisiting the inspirations for this scholarship and questioning the assumptions made in the construction of this discourse and consequent counter-discourse. In this chapter I shall deal specifically with binary oppositions. This polarization should not be interpreted as a lack of complexity of analysis, but rather indicates a purposeful strategy curated by key actors in order to maximize their gains in a global social imaginary. This polarization of discourse and counter-discourse has its roots in the extremeness of ideas about India in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
D. Gupta (2010) The Caged Phoenix: Can India Fly? (Chicago: Stanford University Press), p. 1.
M. Foucault (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (New York: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group).
J. Dickinson (1853) India: Its Government under a Bureaucracy (London: Saunders and Stanford), p. 169.
H. S. Cotton (1885) New India; or, India in Transition (London: K. Paul, Trench, Trübner, & Company Limited).
A. Duff (1839) India and India Missions: Including Sketches of the Gigantic System of Hinduism, Both in Theory and Practice; Also Notices Some of the Principal Agencies Employed in Conducting the Process of Indian Evangelization &C. &C (London: Whittaker and Co. and Nibbet and Co.), p. 191.
J. Urry (2007) Mobilities (London: Polity), p. 197.
P. Brown, H. Lauder and D. Ashton (2010) The Global Auction: The Broken Promises of Education, Jobs and Incomes (Oxford: Oxford University Press), p. 46.
B. Martin (1969) New India, 1885: British Official Policy and the Emergence of the Indian National Congress (London: University of California Press), p. 68.
H. W. Gunn (1910) ‘The Menace of Tropical Diseases to California’, California State Journal of Medicine, 8, 12, 409–11, p. 411.
R. Varma (2006) Harbingers of Global Change: India’s Techno-Immigrants in the United States (Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield), p. 18.
P. F. Hall (1913) ‘Immigration and Labor by Isaac A. Hourwich’, The American Economic Review, 3, 2, 422–7;
L. Stoddard (1921) ‘The Japanese Question in California’, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 93, 1, 42–7.
H. Hoyt (1916) ‘The Relation of the Literacy Test to a Constructive Immigration Problem’, The Journal of Political Economy, 24, 5, 445–73.
A. G. Burnett (1909) ‘Misunderstandings of Eastern and Western States Regarding Oriental Immigration’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 34, 2, 37–41, p. 35.
R. Spence (2004) ‘Englishmen in New York: The SIS American Station, 1915–21’, Intelligence and National Security, 19, 3, 511–37.
G. R. Hess (1969) ‘The “Hindu” in America: Immigration and Naturalization Policies and India 1917–1946’, The Pacific Historical Review, 38, 1, 59–79, p. 65.
B. Khadria (1999) ‘Of Dreams, Drain and Dams: Metaphors in the Indian Emigration of Talent’, India International Centre Quarterly, 26, 3, 79–90, p. 79.
H. A. Gould (2006) Sikhs, Swamis, Students, and Spies: The India Lobby in the United States 1900–1946 (New Delhi: Sage Publications).
J. Morgenstern (1928) ‘American Culture and Oriental Studies’, Journal of the American Oriental Society, 48, 97–108, p. 103.
R. Rocher (1976) ‘W. Norman Brown’, Journal of the American Oriental Society, 96, 1, 3–6.
S. Bayley (2004) ‘Imagining “Greater India”: French and Indian Visions of Colonialism in the Indic Mode’, Modern Asian Studies, 38, 3, 703–44, p. 706.
T. Das (1935) ‘Significance of Political Trends in the Far East’, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 180, 1, 14–25, p. 14.
M. Singleton (2010) Yoga Body: The Origins of Modern Posture Practice (New York: Oxford University Press), p. 4.
K. T. Behanan (2002) Yoga: Its Scientific Basis (Toronto: Dover Publications).
L. W. Hutchins (1923) ‘The Boy Who Would Educate India’, Boys’ Life: The Boy Scouts’ Magazine (New York: Boy Scouts of America) 13, 2, 7. http://www.google.co.uk/books?id=DsViKGMWJAEC, accessed on 5 August 2012.
K. S. Gupta (2005) The Philosophy of Rabindranath Tagore (Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited), p. 46.
R. Tagore (1921) Appeal for an International University Judical and Public Department of the India Office (London: British Library) Shelfmark: 2765.
C. F. Andrews (1928) Rabindranath Tagore: Letters to a Friend (London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.), p. 99.
N. Chatterjee (2011) The Making of Indian Secularism: Empire, Law and Christianity, 1830–1960 (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), p. 155.
R. Guha (2011) India after Gandhi: The History of the World’s Largest Democracy (London: Pan Macmillan).
A. Nandy (1980) At the Edge of Psychology: Essays in Politics and Culture (Delhi: Oxford University Press), p. 62.
H. Woolston (1924) ‘Wanted — An American Immigration Policy’, The Journal of Social Forces, 2, 5, 666–70, p. 668.
S. Chandrasekhar (1945) ‘The Emigration and Status of Indians in the British Empire’, Social Forces, 24, 2, 152–60, p. 152.
P. Kurien (1998) ‘Becoming American by Becoming Hindu: Indian Americans Take Their Place at the Multicultural Table’ in S. R. Warner and J. G. Wittner (eds), Gatherings in Diaspora: Religious Communities and the New Immigration (Philadelphia: Temple University Press), 37–69, p. 46.
N. G. Schiller (1997) ‘US Immigrants and the Global Narrative’, American Anthropologist, 99, 2, 404–8, p. 406.
M. P. Fisher (1980) The Indians of New York City: A Study of Immigrants from India (New Delhi: Heritage Publishers), p. 278.
A. J. Bhatt (2003) ‘Asian Indians and the Model Minority Narrative: A Neocolonial System’ in E. M. Kramer (ed.), The Emerging Monoculture: Assimilation and the Model Minority (Westport: Praeger Publishing), 203–20.
M. Fernandez (1998) ‘Asian Indian Americans in the Bay Area and the Glass Ceiling’, Sociological Perspectives, 41, 1, 119–49.
S. R. Shukla (2003) India Abroad: Diasporic Cultures of Postwar America and England (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
H. Miller (1945) The Air-Conditioned Nightmare (New York: New Directions Publishing), p. 68.
F. M. Hechinger (1962) ‘9 Universities Aid Institute in India; Join with US to Develop Technology School in New Form of Foreign Help’, The New York Times (New York: The New York Times) 15 April. http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F00D1EFB3F5910728DDDAC0994DC405B828AF1D3, accessed on 16 January 2012.
E. A. Albin (1955) ‘Oriental Culture and the West: The Need for a “Globalized” Curriculum’, College Art Journal, 14, 4, 340–6, pp. 345–6.
B. R. Nayar and T. V. Paul (2002) India in the World Order: Searching for Major-Power Status (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), p. 96.
D. Thorner (1980) Shaping of Modern India (Delhi: Allied Publishers Private Limited), p. xi.
J. Goheen et al. (1958) ‘India’s Cultural Values and Economic Development: A Discussion’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 7, 1, 1–12.
M. B. Singer (1956) ‘Cultural Values in India’s Economic Development’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 305, 81–91, p. 91.
M. B. Singer (1959) Traditional India: Structure and Change (Philadelphia: The American Folklore Society), p. xviii.
J. W. Woodard (1946) ‘Some Implications from Our Present Knowledge Concerning Prejudice’, American Sociological Review, 11, 3, 344–56, p. 356.
B. Moore (1966) Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World (Harmondsworth: Penguin Press), p. 315.
H. R. Isaacs (1958) Scratches On Our Minds: American Images of China and India (New York: John Day Company).
J. P. Lewis (1962) Quiet Crisis in India (Washington: Brookings Institution).
N. K. Chandra (1988) The Retarded Economies: Foreign Domination and Class Relations in India and Other Emerging Nations (Oxford: Sameeksha Trust, Oxford University Press).
I. Malhotra (1991) India: Trapped in Uncertainty (New Delhi: UBS Publishers’ Distributors).
J. Bimal (1991) India’s Economic Crisis (New Delhi: Oxford University Press).
D. Rothermund (2008) India: The Rise of an Asian Giant (New Haven: Yale University Press).
A. Panagriya (2010) India: The Emerging Giant (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
E. Luce (2007) In Spite of the Gods: The Strange Rise of Modern India (New York: Doubleday).
S. J. Tambiah (1973) ‘Buddhism and This-Worldly Activity’, Modern Asian Studies, 7, 1, 1–20.
S. Corbridge and J. Harriss (2000) Reinventing India: Liberalization, Hindu Nationalism and Popular Democracy (Cambridge: Polity Press), p. 3.
L. Post (1951) ‘Some Considerations on the New South Asia’, The Political Quarterly, 22, 2, 121–37, p. 137.
L. Lohmann (1997) ‘The Globalizers’ Dilemma: Contention and Resistance in Intercultural Space’ in C. Thomas and P. Wilkin (eds), Globalization and the South (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), 213–30.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Thomas Birtchnell
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Birtchnell, T. (2013). Austerity in the Dark Ages. In: Indovation. Critical Studies of the Asia Pacific Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137027412_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137027412_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-43957-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-02741-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)