Skip to main content

Privileging and Affecting Agency

  • Chapter
Privilege, Agency and Affect

Abstract

In a welcome move away from the ‘romance of resistance’, as Lila Abu-Lughod (1990) termed the urge many scholars feel to study the oppressed and their efforts to resist their own subjugation, the contributors to this volume have chosen to study the privileged and the workings of their power. In particular, writers have pointed to the important interconnections among privilege, affect and agency. In the brief remarks that follow, I will comment on each of these three concepts in turn, as I believe that one of our most essential, if difficult, tasks as scholars is to define our key terms. While there is some variation in how the contributors to this volume use and link the concepts of privilege, affect and agency, these comments will, I hope, help readers situate these contributions in a larger body of theoretical scholarship. Following the discussions about each of the three terms, I will raise a few final questions for readers to ponder in reference to the volume’s chapters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abu-Lughod, L. (1990) The romance of resistance: Tracing transformations of power through Bedouin women. American Ethnologist, 17 (1), 41–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahearn, L. M. (2001) Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 109–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahearn, L. M. (2010) Agency and language. In Verschueren, J., Ostman, J-O. & Japsers, J. (eds) Handbook of Pragmarics (pp. 28–48). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahearn, L. M. (2012) Living Language: An Introduction to Linguistic Anthropology. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, S.(2010)The Promise of Happiness. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J.(1999[1990]) Gender Trouble. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duranti, A. (2004) Agency in language. In Duranti, A. (ed.) A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology (pp. 451–473). Oxford:Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1966) The Complete Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis. (trans. Strachey, J.) New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, P. (2007) Language socialization and the (re)production of bilingual subjectivities. In Heller, M. (ed.) Bilingualism: A Social Approach (pp. 233–256). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kockelman, P. (2007) Agency: The relation between meaning, power, and knowledge. Current Anthropology, 48 (3), 388–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leys, R. (2011) The turn to affect: A critique. Critical Inquiry, 37 (3), 434–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, A. E. (1992) Hegemonic relations and gender resistance: The new veiling asaccommodating protest in Cairo. Signs, 17 (3), 533–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mertz, E. (2007) The Language ofLaw School:Learning To Think Like a Lawyer. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Messer-Davidow, E. (1995) Acting otherwise. In Gardiner, J. K.(ed.) Provoking Agents: Gender and Agency in Theory and Practice (pp. 23–51). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochs, E. & Schieffelin, B. B. (2001[1984]) Language acquisition and socialization: Three developmental stories and their implications. In Duranti, A. (ed.) Linguistic Anthropology: A Reader (pp. 263–301). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortner, S. B. (2006) Power and projects: Reflections on agency. In Ortner, S. B. (ed.) Anthropology and Social Theory: Culture, Power, and the Acting Subject (pp. 129–153). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rymes, B. (2008) Language Socialization and the Linguistic Anthropology of Education. Encyclopedia of Language and Education(2nd revised ed.). Hornberger, N. & Duff, P. (eds). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seigworth, G. J. & Gregg, M.(2010) An inventory of shimmers. In Gregg, M. & Seigworth, G. J. (eds) The Affect Theory Reader (pp. 1–25.). Durham, NC: Duke University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetherell, M. (2012) Affect and Emotion: A New Social Science Understanding. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (1977) Marxism and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wortham, S. E. F. & Rymes, B. R. (eds) (2003)The Linguistic Anthropology of Education. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2013 Laura M. Ahearn

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ahearn, L.M. (2013). Privileging and Affecting Agency. In: Privilege, Agency and Affect. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137292636_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics