Skip to main content

Digital Resources, Reflexive Pedagogy, and Empowered Learning

  • Chapter
A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies

Abstract

This chapter looks closely at an online participatory learning environment that supported and layered experience and ideation, creating opportunities for early-career educators to articulate and contemplate evaluative norms, digital resources, and evolving practices. More specifically, flexible and contextualized approaches to learning deeply rooted in the knowledge processes (Kalantzis & Cope, 2010, 2012) empowered early-career educators to perceive themselves as agents of change, and the data provide insight into reflexive pedagogy that is sensitive to dynamic and shifting technologies, contexts, and cultures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abrams, S.S. (2012). Digital narratives by digital natives: Online inquiry and reflective practices in a third space. In R.W. Blake & B.E. Blake (Eds.), Becoming a Teacher: Using Narrative as Reflective Practice. A Cross-Disciplinary Approach (pp. 112–133). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beldarrain, Y. (2006). Distance education trends: Integrating new technologies to foster student interaction and collaboration. Distance Education, 27(2), 139–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cope, B. & Kalantzis, M. (2009). “Multiliteracies”: New literacies, new learning. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 4(3), 164–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crystal, D. (2006). Language and the Internet (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Danin, R. & Bacon, M.A. (1999). What teachers like (and don’t like) about mandated induction program. In M. Scherer (Ed.), A Better Beginning: Supporting and Mentoring New Teachers (pp. 202–209). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grisham, D.L. & Wolsey, T.D. (2006). Recentering the middle school classroom as a vibrant learning community: Students, literacy, and technology intersect. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 49(8), 648–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll, R.M. (2012). Beginning teacher induction: What the data tell us. Kappan, 93(8), 47–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalantzis, M. & Cope, B. (2005). Learning by design. Altona, Australia: Common Ground Publishing with the Victorian Schools Innovation Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalantzis, M. & Cope, B. (2010). The teacher as designer: Pedagogy in the new media age. e-Learning and Digital Media, 7, 200–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalantzis, M. & Cope, B. (2012). Literacies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Layder, D. (1998). Sociological Practice: Linking Theory and Research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olmanson, J.D., & Abrams, S.S. (2013). From partnership agreement to initial use: Multi-Sited qualitative inquiry into early implementation efforts. e-learning and Digital Media, 10(4), 357–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saldaña, J. (2012). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, K.T. (2010). Digitalk: A new literacy for a digital generation. Kappan, 92(1), 41–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, K.T. (2011). Digitalk: Community, convention, and self-expression. In S.S. Abrams & J. Rowsell (Eds.), Rethinking identity and literacy education in the 21st century. National Society for the Study of Education Yearbook. 110(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, K.H., Abrams, S.S., Katic, E., & Donavan, M.J. (2014). Demystifying digitalk: The what and why of the language teens use in digital writing. Journal of Literacy Research, 46(2), 157–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Sandra Schamroth Abrams

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Abrams, S.S. (2015). Digital Resources, Reflexive Pedagogy, and Empowered Learning. In: Cope, B., Kalantzis, M. (eds) A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137539724_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics