Skip to main content

Integrating by Design: Multimodality, 21st Century Skills and Subject Area Knowledge

  • Chapter
A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies

Abstract

A renewed focus on pedagogy is a pressing need as too often the incorporation of digital tools and multimodal texts into classroom programs is through traditional pedagogies. Limited pedagogical choices can fail to engage students actively in ways that foreground agency and enhance learning through maximising the affordances of the digital tools and texts. This chapter explores the use of Learning by Design as a means of integrating both multimodality and 21st century skills into subject area curriculum offerings. Foregrounding the rise of multimodality and 21st century skills and the challenges they pose for pedagogy, the chapter considers approaches to curriculum integration and positions Learning by Design as a pedagogically driven means of curriculum integration. Drawing on a case study, it then discusses one teacher’s renewed design and implementation of a unit of work in which multimodality and ‘21st century skills’ were integrated into literacy and subject area learning through Learning by Design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA) (2012). The Shape of the Australian Curriculum Version 3. Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, E. (2010). The New Literacies: Multiple Perspectives on Research and Practice. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beane, J. (1997). Curriculum Integration: Designing the Core of Democratic Education. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beavis, C. (2007). Writing, digital culture and English curriculum. L1—Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 7(4), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U., Giddens, A., & Lash, S. (1994). Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (1971). Class, Codes and Control. Volume 1: Theoretical Studies Towards a Sociology of Language. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1986). Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Mass: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cazden, C. (2000). Four innovative programmes: A postcript from Alice Springs. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures (pp. 321–332). Melbourne: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloonan, A. (2015) The feasibility of cross-curricula studies of Asia, In Halse, C. (Ed.) Asia Literate Schooling in the Asian Century (pp. 133–150). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloonan, A., Hutchison, K. & Paatsch, L. (2014). Teacher and student agency in contemporary literacy classrooms. In B. Doecke, G. Auld & M. Wells, (Eds.) Becoming a Teacher of Language and Literacy (pp. 157–176). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coiro, J., Knobel, M., Lankshear, C. & Leu, D. (2007). Handbook of Research on New Literacies. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope, B. & Kalantzis, M. (2009). ‘Multiliteracies’: New literacies, new learning. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 4(3), 164–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (2007). Experience and Education. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. (2000) ‘The New Literacy Studies; form “socially situated” to the work of the social’ in Barton, D., Hamilton, M. and Ivanic, R. (2000) Situated Literacies: reading and writing in context. Routledge: London. pp. 180–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. A. (1988). Schooling and the Struggle for Public Life: Critical Pedagogy in the Modern Age. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godinho, S. (2007). A re-visioning of curriculum integration for the 21st century: Creating spaces for conversation and dialogue. Curriculum Perspectives, 27(1), 61–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, G. & Nelson, M. (2005). Locating the semiotic power of multimodality. Written Communication, 22(2), 224–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology: An introduction to phenomenological philosophy. Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ito, M., Baumer, S., Bittanti, M., Boyd, D., Cody, R., Herr-Stephenson, B., Horst, H. A., Lange, P. G., Mahendran, D., Martínez, K. Z., Pascoe, C. J., Perkel, D., Robinson, L., Sims, C., & Tripp, L. (2010). Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out: Kids living and learning with new media. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, H. H. (1989a) Design options for an integrated curriculum. In H.H. Jacobs (Ed.) Interdisciplinary Curriculum: Design and Implementation (pp. 13–24). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, H.H. (1989b) The Growing need for interdisciplinary curriculum content. In H.H. Jacobs (Ed.) Interdisciplinary Curriculum: Design and Implementation (pp. 1–12). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewitt, C. (2014). A multimodal lens on the school classroom. In D. Machin (Ed.), Visual Communication (pp. 387–416). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalantzis, M., Cope, B. & Cloonan, A. (2010). A multiliteracies perspective on the new literacies. In Baker, E. (Eds.), The New Literacies: Multiple Perspectives on Research and Practice (pp. 61–87). New York: The Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalantzis, M., Cope, B., and the Learning by Design Project Group. (2005). Learning by Design. Melbourne: Victorian Schools Innovation Commission in association with Common Ground Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S. & McTaggart, R. (2005). Participatory action research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. (2000). Design and Transformation: New theories of meaning. In B. Cope and M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures (pp. 153–161). South Yarra: MacMillan Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London, Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lankshear, C. & Bigum, C. (1999). Literacies and new technologies in school settings. Curriculum Studies, 7(3), 445–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, F. & Murnane, R. J. (2005). The New Division of Labor: How Computers are Creating the Next Job Market. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loepp, F. (1999). Models of Curriculum Integration. The Journal of Technology Studies, Summer–Fall 1999. Available at http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JOTS/ Summer-Fall-1999/Loepp.html.

  • Luke, A., Graham, L., Weir, K., Sanderson, D. & Voncina, V. (2007) Curriculum and Equity: An International Review. South Australia: Department of Education and Community Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luria, A. (1976). Cognitive Development: Its Cultural and Social Foundations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macken-Horarik, M. (2009). Navigational metalanguages for new territory in English: The potential of grammatics. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 8(3), 55–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansilla, V. B. & Gardner, H. (2009) Disciplining the mind. Challenging the Whole Child: Reflections on Best Practices in Learning, Teaching, and Leadership (pp. 97–107). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, L. & Olson, J. (1994). Putting the computer in its place: A study of teaching with technology. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 26, 121–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministerial Council for Education, Early Childhood Development and Youth Affairs (MCEEDYA) (2008). National (Melbourne) Declaration on Education Goals for Young Children. http://www.mceecdya.edu.au/mceecdya/melbourne_declaration,25979.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Murnane, R. & Levy, F. (1996) Teaching the New Basic Skills. Principles for Educating Children To Thrive in a Changing Economy. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • New London Group. (2000). A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Designing Social Futures. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures (pp. 182–202). Melbourne: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennie, L. & Wallace, J. (2009). Disciplinary versus integrated curriculum. Issue 10. The New Critic, The University of Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizvi, F. & Lingard, B. (2010). Globalizing Education Policy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, I. (1997). Page to Screen: Taking Literacy into the Electronic Era. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, I. (2007). Literacy, Learning and Technology Studies. In R. Andrews and C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of E-Learning Research (pp. 394–415). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trilling, B. & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in our Times. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unsworth L. (2006). E-literature for Children: Enhancing Digital Literacy Learning. Oxford: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority (2014). English and English as an Additional Language (EAL). Victoria, Australia: State Government of Victoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, J., Sheffield, R., Rennie, L. & Venville, G. (2007). Looking back, looking forward: Re-searching the conditions for curriculum integration in the middle years of schooling. Australian Educational Researcher, 34(2), 29–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, M. (2010). Multimodal Literacy: Researching Classroom Practice. Newtown, NSW: Primary English Teaching Association (PETA).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Anne Cloonan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cloonan, A. (2015). Integrating by Design: Multimodality, 21st Century Skills and Subject Area Knowledge. In: Cope, B., Kalantzis, M. (eds) A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137539724_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics