Skip to main content

Tocquevillian Analytics in Africa

  • Chapter
Democracy in Senegal
  • 86 Accesses

Abstract

In March 1957, Ghana became the first Black African country to gain its independence from a colonial power. To commemorate this momentous event, Life magazine featured a picture of Ghanaian judges grandly attired in powdered wigs and black robes on its cover. Democracy in Africa, in those days, seemed to be simply a matter of the new nations adopting Western models and forms of democracy.

A great democratic revolution is taking place in our midst; everybody sees it, but by no means everybody judges it in the same way.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Chapter One Tocquevillian Analytics in Africa

  1. Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America. Edited by J.P. Mayer (New York: Harper & Row Publishers, 1988), p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  2. For some of the rare examples of scholars systematically usingTocquevillc to understand democracy in the non-Western world see Vincent Ostrom, The Meaning of Democracy and the Vulnerability of Democracies: A Response to Tocqueville’s Challenge (Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 1997);

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carlos A. Forment, Democracy in Latin America, 1760–1900 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003); and

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sombat Chantornvong, “Tocqueville’s Democracy in America and the Third World,” in Vincent Ostrom, David Feeny, and Hartmut Picht (eds.), Rethinking Institutional Analysis and Development: Issues, Alternatives and Choices (San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies, 1988), pp. 69–99.

    Google Scholar 

  5. For a discussion of Tocqueville’s overturning of the prevalent European idea of the state and sovereignty, see Larry Siedentop, Tocqueville (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994), pp. 41–43.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Samuel P. Huntington, Political Order in Changing Societies (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1968), p. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  7. For a vigorous defense of Tocqueville’s approach affirming the importance of decentralized politics and local self-government in fostering freedom, see Michael Hereth, Alexis de Tocqueville: Threats to Freedom in Democracy (Durham: Duke University Press, 1986), pp. 39–44.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tocqueville, The Old Régime and the French Revolution (Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Company, Inc., 1955), pp. xiv–xv.

    Google Scholar 

  9. For the coining of the concept and its implication, see Mahmoud Mamdani, Citizen and Subject: Contemporary Africa and the Legacy of Colonialism (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996), pp. 62–108.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Scholars have described countries that hold free and fair elections but restrict civil rights and other basic freedoms as illiberal democracies. Fareed Zakaria, “The Rise of Illiberal Democracy,” Foreign Affairs,Vol. 76, No. 6 (1997), pp. 181–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. For critiques of the Western developmental model based on the nation-state, see Basil Davidson, The Black Man’s Burden: Africa and the Curse of the Nation-State 1992;

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sheldon Gellar,“State-Building and Nation-Building in West Africa,” Building States and Nations: Models, Analyses, and Data Across Three Worlds, Vol. 2 (Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1973), pp. 384–426.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gerti Hesseling, Histoire Politique du Sénégal (Paris: Karthala, 1985), p. 349.

    Google Scholar 

  14. In recent years, there has been a new literature arising that looks at local understandings of democracy in Africa. For example, see Maxwell Owusu, “Democracy and Africa—AView From the Village,” The Journal of Modern African Studies, Vol. 30, No. 3 (1992), pp. 369–396;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mikael Karlstrom, “Imagining Democracy: Political Culture and Democratization in Buganda,” Africa, Vol. 66, No. 4 (1996), pp. 485–505; and Davidson, The Black Man’s Burden.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2005 Sheldon Gellar

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gellar, S. (2005). Tocquevillian Analytics in Africa. In: Democracy in Senegal. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403982162_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics