Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards MyNewsletter Firmensuche
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
Automotive Acoustics Conference 2025

Call for Papers - Deadline: 13. Januar 2025.

Wir möchten Sie dazu einladen, Ihre Vorschläge für einen Vortrag auf der Automotive Acoustics Conference 2025 einzureichen und mit uns neue Verfahren der nachhaltigen Lärmminderung zu erforschen. Wir freuen uns auf Ihre Anregungen für innovative, umweltfreundliche und intelligente Verfahren zur Gestaltung der Zukunft der Fahrzeugakustik.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2025 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Classification of Parkinson’s and Control Subjects with Machine Learning

verfasst von : Ritu, Moumi Pandit, Akash Kumar Bhoi

Erschienen in: Advances in Communication, Devices and Networking

Verlag: Springer Nature Singapore

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Many debilitating, fatal disorders, like Parkinson's disease, which are becoming more common, exhibit neurodegeneration. Development of unique, more potent medicinal approaches is crucial in order to fight these deadly diseases. Commercial gait detection systems based on force plates and footprints have been effectively used in the clinical diagnosis of such diseases. The classification of model for old versus young subjects with and without neurodegenerative diseases was constructed using MATLAB software. The analysis with respect to stride interval is mentioned in this paper. The 15 subjects were taken for this experiment; among these, five healthy young as well as old individuals were considered and five older adults with Parkinson’s disease were taken. Therefore, the two classes were formed using SVM kernel modeling for the diseased and healthy subjects. The classification for stride length interval (0.95–1.5 s) for SVM modeling was providing 96.7% validation accuracy.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Direct Approach for Modelling a Class of Fractional-Order System Using Two Generating Functions
Nächstes Kapitel Utilizing the Power of Residual and Attention Properties with Binary Focal Loss Optimization for Underwater Image Segmentation Using UNet Architecture
Literatur
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Bohnen NI, Costa RM, Dauer WT, Factor SA, Giladi N, Hallett M, Lewis SJG, Nieuwboer A, Nutt JG, Takakusaki K, Kang UJ, Przedborski S, Papa SM, MDS-Scientific Issues Committee (2022) Discussion of research priorities for gait disorders in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord: Off J Mov Disord Soc, 37(2): 253–263. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​mds.​28883
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
A, M, Najarian K (2020) Radial basis function kernel optimization for support vector machine classifiers. ArXiv. /abs/2007.08233
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
Weintraub D, Simuni T, Caspell-Garcia C, Coffey C, Lasch S, Siderowf A, Aarsland D, Barone P, Burn D, Chahine LM, Eberling J, Espay AJ, Foster ED, Leverenz JB, Litvan I, Richard I, Troyer MD, Hawkins KA, Initiative PPM (2015) Cognitive performance and neuropsychiatric symptoms in early, untreated Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord: Off J Mov Disord Soc 30(7):919–927. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​mds.​26170CrossRef
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
Breiman L, Friedman J, Olshen R, Stone C, (eds) (1984) Classification and regression trees. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
31.
Gonzalo M, Brewer M, Anderson C, Sullivan D, Gray S, van der Knaap E (2009) Tomato fruit shape analysis using morphometric and morphology attributesimplemented in tomato analyzer software program. J Am Soc Hortic 134:77–87CrossRef
32.
Guyon I, Elisseeff A (2003) An introduction to variable and feature selection. J Mach Learn Res 3:1157–1182
33.
Jain A, Zongker D (1997) Feature selection: evaluation, application, and small sample performance. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 19(2):153–158CrossRef
34.
Kira K, Rendell L (1992) A practical approach to feature selection. In: international conference on machine learning, pp 368–377
35.
Kohavi R, John G (1997) Wrappers for features subset selection. Artif Intell 97:273–324CrossRef
36.
Kohavi R, Provost F (1998) On applied research in machine learning. in editorial for the special issue on applications of machine learning and the knowledge discovery process, Columbia University, New York, vol 30
37.
Pudil P, Novovicova J, Kittler J (1994) Floating search methods in feature selection. Pattern Recogn Lett 15(11):1119–1125CrossRef
38.
Rodriguez S, Moyseenko J, Robbins M, Huarachi Morejn N, Francis D, van der Knaap E (2010) Tomato analyzer: a useful software application to collect accurate and detailed morphological and colorimetric data from two-dimensional objects. J Vis Exp 37:e1856
39.
Sugeno M, Yasukawa T (1993) A fuzzy-logic-based approach to qualitative modeling. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 1(1):7–31CrossRef
40.
Xin E, Jordan M, Karp R (2001) Feature selection for high-dimensional genomic microarray data. In: Proceedings of the 18 international conference in machine learning ICML-2001, pp 601–608
41.
Visa S, Ramsay B, Ralescu A, Knaap E (2011) Confusion matrix-based feature selection. CEUR Workshop Proc 710:120–127
42.
43.
Bishop CM (2006) Pattern recognition and machine learning. I. M. De Diego et al 1 3
44.
45.
Bradley AP (1997) The use of the area under the roc curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms. Pattern Recogn 30(7):1145–1159CrossRef
46.
Chicco D, Jurman G (2020) The advantages of the matthews correlation coefcient (mcc) over f1 score and accuracy in binary classifcation evaluation. BMC Genom 21(1):6CrossRef
47.
Cohen P (1982) To be or not to be: control and balancing of type i and type ii errors. Eval Program Plann 5(3):247–253CrossRef
48.
Demšar J (2006) Statistical comparisons of classifers over multiple data sets. J Mach Learn Res 7:1–30MathSciNet
49.
50.
51.
Goodall DW (1967) The distribution of the matching coefficient. Biometrics, pp 647–656
52.
Gorodkin J (2004) Comparing two k-category assignments by a k-category correlation coefcient. Comput Biol Chem 28(5–6):367–374CrossRef
53.
Grandini M, Bagli E, Visani G (2020) Metrics for multi-class classification: an overview. arXiv:200805756
54.
Halkidi M, Batistakis Y, Vazirgiannis M (2001) On clustering validation techniques. J Intell Inf Syst 17(2–3):107–145CrossRef
55.
Halligan S, Altman DG, Mallett S (2015) Disadvantages of using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve to assess imaging tests: a discussion and proposal for an alternative approach. Eur Radiol 25(4):932–939CrossRef
56.
Hu C, Wang Y, Gu J (2020) Cross-domain intelligent fault classifcation of bearings based on tensor-aligned invariant subspace learning and two-dimensional convolutional neural networks. Knowl-Based Syst 209:106214CrossRef
57.
Hu C, He S, Wang Y (2021) A classifcation method to detect faults in a rotating machinery based on kernelled support tensor machine and multilinear principal component analysis. Appl Intell 51(4):2609–2621CrossRef
58.
Matthews BW (1975) Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of t4 phage lysozyme. Biochim et Biophys Acta (BBA)-Protein Struct. 405(2): 442–451
59.
Norris N (1940) The standard errors of the geometric and harmonic means and their application to index numbers. Ann Math Stat 11(4):445–448MathSciNetCrossRef
60.
Ogbi MSZ (2012) A mathematical property of the harmonic mean. in: the 6th international days of statistics and economics. Prague University of Economics and Business, pp 873–877
61.
Opitz J, Burst S (2019) Macro f1 and macro f1. arXiv: 191103347
62.
Powers DM (2020) Evaluation: from precision, recall and f-measure to roc, informedness, markedness and correlation. arXiv: 201016061
63.
Puthiya Parambath S, Usunier N, Grandvalet Y (2014) Optimizing f-measures by cost-sensitive classifcation. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 27:2123–2131
64.
Redondo AR, Navarro J, Fernández RR, de Diego IM, Moguerza JM, Fernández-Muñoz JJ (2020) Unifed performance measure for binary classifcation problems. In: International conference on intelligent data engineering and automated learning. Springer, pp 104–112
65.
Sasaki Y, Fellow R (2007) The truth of the f-measure, manchester: Mib-school of computer science. University of Manchester, p 25
66.
Sokolova M, Lapalme G (2009) A systematic analysis of performance measures for classifcation tasks. Inf Process Manag 45(4):427–437CrossRef
67.
Tharwat A (2020) Classifcation assessment methods. N Engl J Entrep
68.
Han S, Qubo C, Meng H (2012) Parameter selection in SVM with RBF kernel function. World Automation Congress 2012, Puerto Vallarta, Mexico, pp 1-4
69.
70.
71.
72.
Akbani R, Kwek S, Japkowicz N (2004) Applying support vector machines to imbalanced datasets. In; proceedings of European conference on machine learning, lecture notes in computer science 3201: 39–50
73.
74.
Ancona N, Cicirelli G, Branca A, Distante A (2001) Goal detection in football by using support vector machines for classification. In: proceedings of international joint conference on neural networks1: 611–616
75.
76.
77.
Azimi-Sadjadi MR, Zekavat SA (2000) Cloud classification using support vector machines. In Proceedings of IEEE geoscience and remote sensing symposium 2: 669–671
78.
Bennett K, Ji X, Hu J, Kunapuli G, Pang JS (2006) Model selection via bilevel optimization. In: Proceedings of IEEE world congress on computational intelligence, pp 1922–1929
79.
Bennett K, Parrado-Hernández E (2006) The interplay of optimization and machine learning research. J Mach Learn Res 7:1265–1281MathSciNet
80.
Borgwardt KM (2011) Kernel methods in bioinformatics. Handbook of statistical bioinformatics. Part 3, pp 317–334
81.
Boyd S, Vandenberghe L (2004) Convex optimization. Cambridge University PressCrossRef
82.
Bradley PS, Mangasarian OL, Street WN (1998) Feature selection via mathematical programming. INFORMS J Comput Spring 10(2):209–217MathSciNetCrossRef
83.
Bradley P, Mangasarian O (1998) Feature selection via concave minimization and support vector machines. In: Proceedings of international conference on machine learning, Morgan Kaufmann, pp 82–90
84.
85.
86.
87.
Chang KW, Hsieh CJ, Lin CJ (2008) Coordinate descent method for large-scale L2-loss linear SVM. J Mach Learn Res 9:1369–1398MathSciNet
88.
89.
90.
91.
Cortes C, Vapnik V (1995) Support vector networks. In: Proceedings of machine learning. 20: 273–297
92.
Crammer K, Singer Y (2001) On the algorithmic implementation of multi-class kernel based vector machines. J Mach Learn Res 2:265–292
93.
Cristianini N, Shawe-Taylor J (2000) An introduction to support vector machines and other kernel-based learning methods. Cambridge University PressCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Classification of Parkinson’s and Control Subjects with Machine Learning
verfasst von
Ritu
Moumi Pandit
Akash Kumar Bhoi
Copyright-Jahr
2025
Verlag
Springer Nature Singapore
Buch
Advances in Communication, Devices and Networking

Print ISBN: 978-981-9764-64-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-9764-65-5

Copyright-Jahr: 2025

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-6465-5_8