Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Contemporary Islam 3/2017

06.04.2017

Clerical militia and securitization of seminary schools in Iran

verfasst von: Saeid Golkar

Erschienen in: Contemporary Islam | Ausgabe 3/2017

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The Clerical Basij Militia is an institution created and used by the Islamic Republic of Iran (IRI) to exert strict control over seminary students (tollab), silence dissident clergy, and nullify threats from seminarian scholars. The expansion of Clerical Basij in seminaries has led to regime control over clerics and the securitization of seminary schools. It has also resulted in the emergence of a new group among the clergy with a hybrid identity: part clergy, part security. The expansion and strengthening of this group could lead to the transformation of the Islamic Republic into a “theological security state.”

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
Based on Reza shah order Sepahsalar seminary school located in Sepahsalar mosque in Teheran has been changed to The Faculty of Theology of Tehran University on 21 January 1931.
 
2
About 60 of Iran’s seminary schools are Safiran-ye Hedyat schools, which focus on the short-term training of clerics for propaganda missions compared to traditional schools which focus on long-term training of Shia jurists.
 
3
While, before the revolution, Ayatollah was the title for a leading and more experienced Mujtahid, after the Iranian revolution all the mujtahid have been called Ayatollah. Fischer called this process as “The rapid inflation of religious titles” in which almost every senior clergy was called Ayatollah (Fischer 2003, p 216).
 
4
While the hierarchy system of seminary education (Muqaddamati), (Sateh) and Darseh-ye Kharej) was practiced in seminary schools for decades before the revolution, the Islamic Republic has regulated these levels based on modern education systems. For example, while the Muqaddamati level could take several years, students should now finish this level in 5–6 years.
 
5
For a better understanding of how Shi’ite reasoning works, see Fischer and Abedi 1990, Chaps. 2 and 3.
 
6
The other half is known as sahm-ye Sadat, belong to poor sadat (descendants of the Prophet Mohammad through the imams line).
 
7
There is a heated discussion among the Shia ulama on the possibility that a women became a source of emulation. According to many of ulama, women can only achieve the status of a mujtahideh, in the sense of being able to follow their own independent judgment but they cannot act as marja-ye taqlid (Momen 2012). According to Fischer, one of the main argument of ulama was the inherent difference between men and women, and the incapacity of women to achieve this position. They referred to the Imam Ali’s sermon when he said “[Women] are deficient in faith, deficient in shares, and deficient in intelligence.” (2003, pp 162–163). Almost many Shia maraji believe that women cannot be a source of emulation, and have muqalled because of their “inner weakness” the issues which was rejected by a few maraji such as Grand Ayatollahs Muhammad Hussein Fadlallah in Lebanon, and Grand Ayatollah Yousef Sanei. Just recently, Sanei in an Instagram post, has declared that, in his opinion, women can become a Marja. http://​www.​instagram.​com/​p/​BQsyO89DWbx/​?​taken-by=​ayatullah.​saanei&​hl=​en
 
8
According to Fischer in 1975, 6500 seminary students out of 10,000 studied in Qom seminary (Fischer 2003, p 77).
 
9
According to a new dissertation, defended in the social science department of Tehran University, the number of female seminarian students has incased from 32,000 in 2006 to 75,000 in 2016 (Mehrkhaneh 2016).
 
10
There is a long list of clerics, who was appointed as the head of these organizations, including Shahid Motahari School, headed by Ayatollah Imami Kashani or the Imam Khomeini Education and Research Institute (Moassesseh-ye Amuzeshi va Pezhuheshi-ye imam Khomeini) which is controlled by Ayatollah Mesbah Yazadi, which accept only the seminary students, who wants to have academic educations as well.
 
11
Even before the revolution, the term “aqa zadeh” had a negative connotation, especially in seminary schools. As Fischer wrote, sons of the major religious leaders (aqazada) are almost invariably intellectually lazy and morally corrupt. They are at best functionaries in their fathers’ establishments and rarely become leaders in their own right; Fischer 2003, p 88) However, its connotations has dramatically worsened after the revolution. Right now Aqa zadeh has a very negative connotation. Many use it as use it as Parasite to describe the children of wealthy religious, and even political figures who without any expertise or qualification enjoying their life only because of their parents’ status (mainly father).
 
12
The Department of Statistics and Investigation is one of the deputy of “the Council for the Management of Seminaries” and consisted of clergy and non-clergy personnel. This department is like the Harasat in civilian organization, which collaborates with the Ministry of Intelligence and Security to control the staff. According to regulation 671, which was passed by the Supreme Council of the Seminary (showra-ye ali-ye Howzeh-ye Elmiyeh) in 2009, this office is responsible for reviewing the ideological and general qualification of seminary students and clergy. It is also responsible for moral, social and political control of clergy and surveillance, and collecting and analyzing the information and intelligence in seminaries. For more information, see http://​www.​shorayeaali.​com/​laws/​law-content.​aspx?​id=​248
 
13
There is limited information about the socio-economic background of seminary students in pre-revolution Iran. For example, according to Eric Hooglund, about 80 belonged to lower class or peasant families (Hooglund 1986, p 79–80). Fischer presented a more detailed statics of seminary students in which over half of seminary students at the Madrasa Golpayegani in Qom for example, were of rural background, about one-quarter were of clergy background; nearly as many were from the bazaar (Fischer 2003, p 78).
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Abrahamian, E. (2008). A history of modern Iran. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Abrahamian, E. (2008). A history of modern Iran. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Akhavi, S. (1980). Religion and politics in contemporary Iran: Clergy-state relations in the Pahlavī period. Albany: State University of New York Press. Akhavi, S. (1980). Religion and politics in contemporary Iran: Clergy-state relations in the Pahlavī period. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Alamdari, K. (2005). The power structure of Islamic republic of Iran: transition from populism to clientelism, and militarization of the government. Third World Quarterly, 26, 1285–1301.CrossRef Alamdari, K. (2005). The power structure of Islamic republic of Iran: transition from populism to clientelism, and militarization of the government. Third World Quarterly, 26, 1285–1301.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Alef News. (2008). Membership of seven thousands of Sunni tollab at the Basij, Tehran, November 24. Alef News. (2008). Membership of seven thousands of Sunni tollab at the Basij, Tehran, November 24.
Zurück zum Zitat Arjomand, S. A. (2009). After Khomeini: Iran under his successors. Cary: Oxford University Press. Arjomand, S. A. (2009). After Khomeini: Iran under his successors. Cary: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Ashraf, A., & Banuazizi, A. (1985). The State, classes and modes of mobilization in the Iranian revolution. State, Culture, and Society, 1(Spring), 3–40. Ashraf, A., & Banuazizi, A. (1985). The State, classes and modes of mobilization in the Iranian revolution. State, Culture, and Society, 1(Spring), 3–40.
Zurück zum Zitat Aslani, M. We should define the neighborhood based on the mosque. Nam-ye Shora, No 80, March 2015, 65–67. Aslani, M. We should define the neighborhood based on the mosque. Nam-ye Shora, No 80, March 2015, 65–67.
Zurück zum Zitat Brumberg, D. (2001). Reinventing Khomeini: The struggle for reform in Iran. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Brumberg, D. (2001). Reinventing Khomeini: The struggle for reform in Iran. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Chehabi, H. E. (1991). Religion and politics in Iran: How theocratic is the Islamic republic? Daedalus, 120, 69–91. summer. Chehabi, H. E. (1991). Religion and politics in Iran: How theocratic is the Islamic republic? Daedalus, 120, 69–91. summer.
Zurück zum Zitat Davary, B. (2013). In search of female authority in Islam: a contemporary Shia Mojtahede. Pakistan Journal of Women’s Studies, 20, 19–33. Alam-ye-Niswan. Davary, B. (2013). In search of female authority in Islam: a contemporary Shia Mojtahede. Pakistan Journal of Women’s Studies, 20, 19–33. Alam-ye-Niswan.
Zurück zum Zitat Fischer, M. M. J. (2003). Iran: From religious dispute to revolution. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2003. EBook Collection (EBSCOhost), EBSCOhost (accessed 10 March 2017). Fischer, M. M. J. (2003). Iran: From religious dispute to revolution. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2003. EBook Collection (EBSCOhost), EBSCOhost (accessed 10 March 2017).
Zurück zum Zitat Fischer, M., & Abedi, M. (1990). Debating Muslims. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. Fischer, M., & Abedi, M. (1990). Debating Muslims. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Ghobadzadeh, N. (2015). Religious secularity: A theological challenge to the Islamic State. New York: Oxford University Press. Ghobadzadeh, N. (2015). Religious secularity: A theological challenge to the Islamic State. New York: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Golkar, S. (2013). The feminization of control: Iran’s women militia and social order in Iran. Hawwa: Journal of Women of the Middle East and the Islamic World, 11(1), 16–40.CrossRef Golkar, S. (2013). The feminization of control: Iran’s women militia and social order in Iran. Hawwa: Journal of Women of the Middle East and the Islamic World, 11(1), 16–40.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hooglund, E. J. (1986). Social origin of the revolutionary clergy. In N. R. Keddie & E. J. Hooglund (Eds.), The Iranian revolution & the Islamic republic (pp. 74–83). Syracuse: Syracuse University Press. Hooglund, E. J. (1986). Social origin of the revolutionary clergy. In N. R. Keddie & E. J. Hooglund (Eds.), The Iranian revolution & the Islamic republic (pp. 74–83). Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Kamrava, M., & Hassan-Yari, H. (2004). Suspended equilibrium in Iran’s political system. The Muslim World, 94, 495–524.CrossRef Kamrava, M., & Hassan-Yari, H. (2004). Suspended equilibrium in Iran’s political system. The Muslim World, 94, 495–524.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Keddie, N. R. (1983a). Is Shi’ism revolutionary? In N. R. Keddie (Ed.), Religion and politics in Iran: Shiʻism from quietism to revolution (pp. 113–126). New Haven: Yale University Press. Keddie, N. R. (1983a). Is Shi’ism revolutionary? In N. R. Keddie (Ed.), Religion and politics in Iran: Shiʻism from quietism to revolution (pp. 113–126). New Haven: Yale University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Keddie, N. R. (1983b). Iranian revolutions in comparative perspective. The American Historical Review, 88, 579–598.CrossRef Keddie, N. R. (1983b). Iranian revolutions in comparative perspective. The American Historical Review, 88, 579–598.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Keddie, N. R. (1995). Iran and the Muslim world: Resistance and revolution. New York: New York University Press. Keddie, N. R. (1995). Iran and the Muslim world: Resistance and revolution. New York: New York University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Khalaji, M. (2011). Iran’s Regime of Religion. Journal of International Affairs (Inside the Authoritarian State, Fall/Winter): 131–147. Khalaji, M. (2011). Iran’s Regime of Religion. Journal of International Affairs (Inside the Authoritarian State, Fall/Winter): 131–147.
Zurück zum Zitat Khalaji, M. (2015) The new order of the clerical establishment in Iran: Nazm-ye Novin-ye Rohaniat Dar Iran, mardomak Publication. Khalaji, M. (2015) The new order of the clerical establishment in Iran: Nazm-ye Novin-ye Rohaniat Dar Iran, mardomak Publication.
Zurück zum Zitat Kurzman, C. (2001). Critics within Islamic scholars’ protests against the Islamic State in Iran. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 15, 341–359. winter.CrossRef Kurzman, C. (2001). Critics within Islamic scholars’ protests against the Islamic State in Iran. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 15, 341–359. winter.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Moaddel, M. (1992). Ideology as episodic discourse: the case of the Iranian revolution. American Sociological Review, 57, 353–379.CrossRef Moaddel, M. (1992). Ideology as episodic discourse: the case of the Iranian revolution. American Sociological Review, 57, 353–379.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Moazami, B. (2013). State, religion, and revolution in Iran, 1796 to the present. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef Moazami, B. (2013). State, religion, and revolution in Iran, 1796 to the present. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mohammadi, M. (2010) Special court for the clergy: Raison d’être, Development, Structure and Function, Iran Human Rights Documentation Center, New Haven, Connecticut. Mohammadi, M. (2010) Special court for the clergy: Raison d’être, Development, Structure and Function, Iran Human Rights Documentation Center, New Haven, Connecticut.
Zurück zum Zitat Mottahedeh, R. P. (1986). The mantle of the prophet: Religion and politics in Iran. New York: Pantheon Books. Mottahedeh, R. P. (1986). The mantle of the prophet: Religion and politics in Iran. New York: Pantheon Books.
Zurück zum Zitat Nome, F. A., & Vogt, K. (2008). Islamic education in Qom: contemporary developments. Acta Orientalia, 69, 35–75. Annual. Nome, F. A., & Vogt, K. (2008). Islamic education in Qom: contemporary developments. Acta Orientalia, 69, 35–75. Annual.
Zurück zum Zitat Parsa, M. (2000). States, ideologies, and social revolutions: A comparative analysis of Iran, Nicaragua, and the Philippines. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Parsa, M. (2000). States, ideologies, and social revolutions: A comparative analysis of Iran, Nicaragua, and the Philippines. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Payam-ye Enghlab (2015). Interview with Hojatoleslam Haji, Sadeqi, Payam-ye Enghlan, No 90, April 2015, 30–33. Payam-ye Enghlab (2015). Interview with Hojatoleslam Haji, Sadeqi, Payam-ye Enghlan, No 90, April 2015, 30–33.
Zurück zum Zitat Rahimi, B. (2012). The sacred in fragments: Shi’i Iran since the 1979 revolution. In N. Nabavi (Ed.), Iran: from theocracy to the green movement (pp. 55–76). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef Rahimi, B. (2012). The sacred in fragments: Shi’i Iran since the 1979 revolution. In N. Nabavi (Ed.), Iran: from theocracy to the green movement (pp. 55–76). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rahnema, A. (2011). Superstition as ideology in Iranian politics: From Majlesi to Ahmadinejad. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Rahnema, A. (2011). Superstition as ideology in Iranian politics: From Majlesi to Ahmadinejad. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sakurai, K. (2011). Women’s empowerment and Iranian-style seminaries in Iran and Pakistan. In K. Sakurai & F. Adelkhah (Eds.), Moral economy of the Madrasa: Islam and education today (pp. 32–58). London: Routledge. Sakurai, K. (2011). Women’s empowerment and Iranian-style seminaries in Iran and Pakistan. In K. Sakurai & F. Adelkhah (Eds.), Moral economy of the Madrasa: Islam and education today (pp. 32–58). London: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Sakurai, K. (2012). Shi‘ite women’s seminaries (howzeh-ye ‘elmiyeh-ye khahran) in Iran: Possibilities and limitations. Iranian Studies, 45, 727–744.CrossRef Sakurai, K. (2012). Shi‘ite women’s seminaries (howzeh-ye ‘elmiyeh-ye khahran) in Iran: Possibilities and limitations. Iranian Studies, 45, 727–744.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shariati, S. M., & Foroughi, Y. (2013). The sociological factors and motivations for seminary students to enter the seminary schools [Jame shenasi Farhangi]. Cultural Sociology, 4(2), 43–74. Shariati, S. M., & Foroughi, Y. (2013). The sociological factors and motivations for seminary students to enter the seminary schools [Jame shenasi Farhangi]. Cultural Sociology, 4(2), 43–74.
Zurück zum Zitat Shariati, S. M., & Soleimanieh, M. (2013). A sociological research on the bureaucratization project in Qom seminary: a Weberian approach (Processes, challenges, and barriers). The Journal of Iranian Social Studies, 7, 81–112. Spring. Shariati, S. M., & Soleimanieh, M. (2013). A sociological research on the bureaucratization project in Qom seminary: a Weberian approach (Processes, challenges, and barriers). The Journal of Iranian Social Studies, 7, 81–112. Spring.
Zurück zum Zitat Sobeh-ye Sadeq Weekly (2014). IRGC weekly meeting [in Persian]. 7 March 2014. Sobeh-ye Sadeq Weekly (2014). IRGC weekly meeting [in Persian]. 7 March 2014.
Zurück zum Zitat Soleimanieh, M., Shariati, S. M., & Foroughi, Y. (2013). The sociological factors and motivations for seminary students to enter the seminary schools. Cultural Sociology, 4(2), 45–74. Soleimanieh, M., Shariati, S. M., & Foroughi, Y. (2013). The sociological factors and motivations for seminary students to enter the seminary schools. Cultural Sociology, 4(2), 45–74.
Zurück zum Zitat Thurfjell, D. (2006). Living Shiism: Instances of ritualisation among Islamist Men in contemporary Iran. Leiden: Brill. Thurfjell, D. (2006). Living Shiism: Instances of ritualisation among Islamist Men in contemporary Iran. Leiden: Brill.
Metadaten
Titel
Clerical militia and securitization of seminary schools in Iran
verfasst von
Saeid Golkar
Publikationsdatum
06.04.2017
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Contemporary Islam / Ausgabe 3/2017
Print ISSN: 1872-0218
Elektronische ISSN: 1872-0226
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11562-017-0384-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2017

Contemporary Islam 3/2017 Zur Ausgabe