Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13280-014-0602-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Knowledge of how species interactions are influenced by climate warming is paramount to understand current biodiversity changes. We review phenological changes of Swedish butterflies during the latest decades and explore potential climate effects on butterfly–host plant interactions using the Orange tip butterfly Anthocharis cardamines and its host plants as a model system. This butterfly has advanced its appearance dates substantially, and its mean flight date shows a positive correlation with latitude. We show that there is a large latitudinal variation in host use and that butterfly populations select plant individuals based on their flowering phenology. We conclude that A. cardamines is a phenological specialist but a host species generalist. This implies that thermal plasticity for spring development influences host utilization of the butterfly through effects on the phenological matching with its host plants. However, the host utilization strategy of A. cardamines appears to render it resilient to relatively large variation in climate.
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 137 kb)13280_2014_602_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
Altermatt, F. 2010. Tell me what you eat and I’ll tell you when you fly: Diet can predict phenological changes in response to climate change. Ecology Letters 13: 1475–1484. CrossRef
Altermatt, F. 2012. Temperature-related shifts in butterfly phenology depend on the habitat. Global Change Biology 18: 2429–2438. CrossRef
Arvanitis, L., C. Wiklund, and J. Ehrlén. 2007. Butterfly seed predation: Effects of landscape characteristics, plant ploidy level and population structure. Oecologia 152: 275–285. CrossRef
Arvanitis, L., C. Wiklund, and J. Ehrlén. 2008. Plant ploidy level influences selection by butterfly seed predators. Oikos 117: 1020–1025. CrossRef
Dennis, R.L.H. 1993. Butterflies and climate change. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Dewar, R.C., and A.D. Watt. 1992. Predicted changes in the synchrony of larval emergence and budburst under climatic warming. Oecologia 89: 557–559. CrossRef
Doi, H., and M. Takahashi. 2008. Latitudinal patterns in the phenological response of leaf colouring and leaf fall to climate change in Japan. Global Ecology and Biogeography 17: 556–561. CrossRef
Diamond, S.E., A.M. Frame, R.A. Martin, and L.B. Buckley. 2011. Species’ traits predict phenological responses to climate change in butterflies. Ecology 92: 1005–1012. CrossRef
Eliasson, C.U., N. Ryrholm, M. Holmer, K. Jilg, and U. Gärdenfors. 2005. Nationalnyckeln till Sveriges flora och fauna. Fjärilar: Dagfjärilar. Hesperiidae- Nymphalidae. Uppsala: ArtDatabanken, SLU.
Gienapp, P., C. Teplitsky, J.S. Alho, J.A. Mills, and J. Merilä. 2008. Climate change and evolution: disentangling environmental and genetic responses. Molecular Ecology 17: 167–178. CrossRef
Harrington, R., I. Woiwod, and T. Sparks. 1999. Climate change and trophic interactions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 14: 146–150. CrossRef
Hodgson, J.A., C.D. Thomas, T.H. Oliver, B.J. Anderson, T.M. Brereton, and E.E. Crone. 2011. Predicting insect phenology across space and time. Global Change Biology 17: 1289–1300. CrossRef
Hothorn, T., F. Bretz, and P. Westfall. 2008. Multcomp: simultaneous inference for general linear hypotheses. R Package Version 1.0- 3. http://CRAN.R-project.org.
Illán, J.G., D. Gutiérrez, S.B. Díez, and R.J. Wilson. 2012. Elevational trends in butterfly phenology: Implications for species responses to climate change. Ecological Entomology 37: 134–144. CrossRef
Karlsen, S.R., I. Solheim, P.S.A. Beck, K.A. Høgda, F.E. Wielgolaski, and H. Tømmervik. 2007. Variability of the start of the growing season in Fennoscandia, 1982–2002. International Journal of Biometeorology 51: 513–524. CrossRef
Karlsson, B. 2013. Extended season for northern butterflies. International Journal of Biometeorology 58: 691–701. CrossRef
Karlsson, B., and C. Wiklund. 2005. Butterfly life history and temperature adaptations; dry open habitats select for increased fecundity and longevity. Journal of Animal Ecology 74: 99–104. CrossRef
König, M. 2014. Context-dependency of plant–animal interactions. PhD Thesis, Stockholm University, Stockholm.
Lavergne, S., N. Mouquet, W. Thuiller, and O. Ronce. 2010. Biodiversity and climate change: Integrating evolutionary and ecological responses of species and communities. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 41: 321–350. CrossRef
Menzel, A., N. Estrella, and P. Fabian. 2001. Spatial and temporal variability of the phenological seasons in Germany from 1951 to 1996. Global Change Biology 7: 657–666. CrossRef
Menzel, A., T.H. Sparks, N. Estrella, E. Koch, A. Aasa, R. Ahas, K. Alm-Kuebler, P. Bissolli, et al. 2006. European phenological response to climate change matches the warming pattern. Global Change Biology 12: 1969–1976. CrossRef
Merilä, J., and A.P. Hendry. 2014. Climate change, adaptation, and phenotypic plasticity: The problem and the evidence. Evolutionary Applications 7: 1–14. CrossRef
Myneni, R.B., C.D. Keeling, C.J. Tucker, G. Asrar, and R.R. Nemani. 1997. Increased plant growth in the northern high latitudes from 1981 to 1991. Nature 386: 698–702. CrossRef
Mossberg, B., and L. Stenberg. 2010. Den nya nordiska floran. Stockholm: Wahlström and Widstrand.
Nylin, S., and K. Gotthard. 1998. Plasticity in life-history traits. Annual Review of Entomology 43: 63–83. CrossRef
Parmesan, C. 2006. Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 37: 637–669. CrossRef
Parmesan, C. 2007. Influences of species, latitudes and methodologies on estimates of phenological response to global warming. Global Change Biology 13: 1860–1872. CrossRef
Posledovich, D., T. Toftegaard, J.A. Navarro-Cano, C. Wiklund, J. Ehrlén, and K. Gotthard. 2014. Latitudinal variation in thermal reaction norms of post-winter pupal development in two butterflies differing in phenological specialization. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. doi: 10.1111/bij.12371.
R Core Team. 2008. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/.
Rathcke, B., and E.P. Lacey. 1985. Phenological patterns of terrestrial plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 16: 179–214. CrossRef
Roy, D.B., and J. Asher. 2003. Spatial trends in the sighting dates of British butterflies. International Journal of Biometeorology 47: 188–192. CrossRef
Rötzer, T., and F.M. Chmielewski. 2001. Phenological maps of Europe. Climate Research 18: 249–257. CrossRef
Schweiger, O., J. Settele, O. Kudrna, S. Klotz, and I. Kühn. 2008. Climate change can cause spatial mismatch of trophically interacting species. Ecology 89: 3472–3479. CrossRef
Singer, M., and C. Parmesan. 2010. Phenological asynchrony between herbivorous insects and their hosts: signal of climate change or pre-existing adaptive strategy? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 365: 3161–3176. CrossRef
Sjörs, H. 1999. The background: Geology, climate and zonation. In Swedish plant geography, eds. H. Rydin, P. Snoeijs, and M. Diekman, pp. 5–14. Uppsala: Acta Phytogeographica Suecica 84.
Sparks, T.H., and T.J. Yates. 1997. The Effect of spring temperature on the appearance dates of British butterflies 1883–1993. Ecography 20: 368–374. CrossRef
Stefanescu, C., J. Penuelas, and I. Filella. 2003. Effects of climatic change on the phenology of butterflies in the northwest Mediterranean Basin. Global Change Biology 9: 1494–1506. CrossRef
Ståhandske, S., K. Gotthard, D. Posledovich, and O. Leimar. 2014. Variation in two phases of post-winter development of a butterfly. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12519.
Tauber, M.J., C.A. Tauber, and S. Masaki. 1986. Seasonal adaptations of insects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Thomas, C.D., A. Cameron, R.E. Green, M. Bakkenes, L.J. Beaumont, Y.C. Collingham, B.F.N. Erasmus, M.F. de Siqueira, et al. 2004. Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427: 145–148. CrossRef
Walther, G.-R., E. Post, P. Convey, A. Menzel, C. Parmesan, T.J.C. Beebee, J.-M. Fromentin, O. Hoeg-Guldberg, et al. 2002. Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 416: 389–395. CrossRef
Wiklund, C., and C. Åhrberg. 1978. Host plants, nectar source plants, and habitat selection of males and females of Anthocharis cardamines. Oikos 31: 169–183. CrossRef
Wiklund, C., and M. Friberg. 2009. The evolutionary ecology of generalization: Among-year variation in host plant use and offspring survival in a butterfly. Ecology 90: 3406–3417. CrossRef
Visser, M.E. 2008. Keeping up with a warming world; assessing the rate of adaptation to climate change. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 275: 649–659. CrossRef
Visser, M.E., and C. Both. 2005. Shifts in phenology due to global climate change: The need for a yardstick. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 272: 2561–2569. CrossRef
- Climate change, phenology, and butterfly host plant utilization
Jose A. Navarro-Cano
- Springer Netherlands