Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen
This chapter investigates the patterns of emission efficiency growth of 23 manufacturing sectors in 12 European countries with a focus on five emissions (CO2, NOx, NMVOC, SOx and CO). Emission efficiency growth is expected to be triggered by an improvement in the efficiency of frontier countries through the diffusion of better technologies to laggard countries. This effect is likely to differ according to the distance from the frontier country. Finally, the role of productivity patterns (total factor productivity) and energy price dynamics is assessed. Results based on the European NAMEA (National Accounting Matrix including Environmental Accounts) further merged with sector accounts highlight significant spillovers from leaders in emission efficiency and a general tendency to converge for laggard countries and sectors (except for NMVOC emission efficiency). Energy prices induce substantial improvements in emission efficiency, with the effect being generally stronger for sectors and countries farther away from the emission efficiency frontier. Finally, total factor productivity (TFP) is strongly correlated with emission efficiency, while the distance from TFP frontier significantly harms emission efficiency growth.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Carrión-Flores, C. E., & Innes, R. (2010). Environmental innovation and environmental performance. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 59, 27–42. CrossRef
Cole, M. A., Elliott, R. J. R., & Shimamoto, K. (2005). Industrial characteristics, environmental regulations and air pollution: An analysis of the UK manufacturing sector. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 50, 121–143. CrossRef
Corradini, M., Costantini, V., Mancinelli, S., & Mazzanti, M. (2011). Environmental and innovation performance in a dynamic impure public good framework (Departmental Working Papers of Economics, No. 0141). Università ‘Roma Tre’.
Costantini, V., & Mazzanti, M. (2012). On the green side of trade competitiveness? The impact of environmental policies and innovation on EU exports. Research Policy, 41(1), 132–153.
Jaffe, A., Newell, R. G., & Stavins, R. N. (2005). A tale of two market failures: Technology and environmental policy. Ecological Economics, 50(2–3), 164–174. CrossRef
Lanjouw, J. O., & Mody, A. (1996). Innovation and the international diffusion of environmentally responsive technology. Research Policy, 25, 549–571. CrossRef
Lovely, M. & Popp, D. (2011). Trade, technology, and the environment: Does access to technology promote environmental regulation? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 61(1), 16–35.
Marin, G., & Mazzanti, M. (2010). The evolution of environmental and labour productivity dynamics – Sector analyses and decoupling/recoupling trends on a 1990–2007 Italian NAMEA. Journal of Evolutionary Economics.
Mazzanti, M., & Musolesi, A. (2010). Carbon abatement leaders and laggards – Non parametric analyses of policy oriented Kuznets curves. Nota di Lavoro FEEM 149.2010. Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Milan.
Mazzanti, M., & Zoboli, R. (2009). Environmental efficiency and labour productivity: Trade-off or joint dynamics? A theoretical investigation and empirical evidence from Italy using NAMEA. Ecological Economics, 68(4), 1182–1194. CrossRef
Moomaw, W. R., & Unruh, G. C. (1997). Are environmental Kuznets curves misleading us? The case of CO 2 emissions. Environment and Development Economics, 2, 451–463. CrossRef
Newell, R. G., Jaffe, A. B., & Stavins, R. N. (1999). The induced innovation hypothesis and energy-saving technological change. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 941–975. CrossRef
Nicoletti, G., & Scarpetta, S. (2003). Regulation, productivity and growth: OECD evidence. Economic Policy, 18(36), 9–72. CrossRef
Popp, D. (2002). Induced innovation and energy prices. The American Economic Review, 92(1), 160–180. CrossRef
Popp, D. (2006). International innovation and diffusion of air pollution control technologies: The effects of NOx and SO 2 regulation in the US, Japan and Germany. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 51, 46–71. CrossRef
Popp, D., Newell, R. G., & Jaffe, A. B. (2009). Energy, the environment and technological change (NBER Working Papers 14832). National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
Porter, M. E., & Van Der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118. CrossRef
Scarpetta, S., & Tressel, T. (2002). Productivity and convergence in a panel of OECD industries: do regulations and institutions matter? (OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 342). Paris: OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787.004581482564.
- Closing the Gap? Dynamic Analyses of Emission Efficiency and Sector Productivity in Europe
- Springer Netherlands
- Chapter 9
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, digitale Transformation/© Maksym Yemelyanov | Fotolia