Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Introduction Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2013 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

5. Co-evolution of Legal and Voluntary Standards: Development of Energy Efficiency in Swiss Residential Building Codes

verfasst von : Stefan N. Grösser

Erschienen in: Co-Evolution of Standards in Innovation Systems

Verlag: Physica-Verlag HD

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The residential building sector contributes significantly to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Improving the level of energy efficiency required by building codes for refurbishments and new construction is a powerful lever for GHG reductions. The purpose of this chapter is to explore how technological, social, political, and economic factors interact and shape the evolution of the energy efficiency in building codes. Existing approaches to the evolution of standards focus primarily on adopting individual or multiple technologies or products, but only peripherally explore the feedback dynamics between innovation, diffusion, and standardization (IDS). To fill this void, I draw on the revelatory case of Switzerland, because in that country the standards have continuously improved since 1970, whereas in many other countries improvements have stalled after the recovery from peaks in energy prices. The chapters contribution is, first, a qualitative, structural model which endogenously formalizes the IDS-dynamics of standard improvement. I find that the co-evolution of voluntary and legal building codes enabled a continuous improvement of the standards even in the absence of economic pressures. And second, I use the model for prospective policy analysis, which indicates that several obvious policies might cause policy resistance and could result in uneconomical, counter-intuitive outcomes. Policy interventions have to balance the speed of innovation and the ability of system agents to change.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Swiss Residential Built Environment
Nächstes Kapitel Cascade of Building Codes: Analysis of Scenarios for Energy Efficiency
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
The Minergie® Association was inaugurated in 1998. It defines, publishes, and promotes the voluntary, innovative energy efficiency standard Minergie®. It is a registered trademark and quality label for new and refurbished buildings. Today, Minergie® builds an umbrella for four standards. The webpage http://​www.​minergie.​com provides the latest information about the requirements.
 
Literatur
Abrahamson, E., & Rosenkopf, L. (1997). Social network effects on the extent of innovation diffusion: A computer simulation. Organization Science, 8(3), 289–309.
Acker, R. H., & Kammen, D. M. (1996). The quiet (energy) revolution—Analysing the dissemination of photovoltaic power systems in Kenya. Energy Policy, 24(1), 81–111.
Alberth, S. (2008). Forecasting technology costs via the experience curve: Myth or magic? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75(7), 952–983.
Amstalden, R. W., Kost, M., Nathani, C., & Imboden, D. M. (2007). Economic potential of energy-efficient retrofitting in the Swiss residential building sector: The effects of policy instruments and energy price expectations. Energy Policy, 35(3), 1819–1829.
Andersen, D. F., & Richardson, G. P. (1997). Scripts for group model building. System Dynamics Review, 13(2), 107–129.
Ansar, J., & Sparks, R. (2009). The experience curve, option value, and the energy paradox. Energy Policy, 37(3), 1012–1020.
Arkesteijn, K., & Oerlemans, L. (2005). The early adoption of green power by Dutch households: An empirical exploration of factors influencing the early adoption of green electricity for domestic purposes. Energy Policy, 33(2), 183–196.
Audenaert, A., De Cleyn, S. H., & Vankerckhove, B. (2008). Economic analysis of passive houses and low-energy houses compared with standard houses. Energy Policy, 36(1), 47–55.
AWEL. (2007). Energieplanungsbericht 2006: Bericht des Regierungsrates über die Energieplanung des Kantons Zürich. Zurich, Switzerland: AWEL, Abteilung Energie.
Azar, C., & Dowlatabadi, H. (1999). A review of technical change in assessment of climate policy. Annual Review Energy and Environment, 24, 513–544.
Bass, F. M. (1969). New product growth for model consumer durables. Management Science, 15(5), 215–227.
Bass, F. M. (1980). The relationship between diffusion rates, experience curves, and demand elasticities for consumer durable technological innovations. Journal of Business, 53(3), S51–S67.
Beerepoot, M., & Beerepoot, N. (2007). Government regulation as an impetus for innovation: Evidence from energy performance regulation in the Dutch residential building sector. Energy Policy, 35(10), 4812–4825.
BFE. (2001). Energie Schweiz: Das Nachfolgeprogramm von Energie 2000. Berne, Switzerland: Swiss Federal Office of Energy.
BFE. (2002). Rationelle Energienutzung in Gebäuden: Aktivitäten und Projekte 2002. Berne, Switzerland: Swiss Federal Office of Energy.
BFE. (2005). Nachbefragung und Erfolgskontrolle Investitionsprogramm Energie 2000: Schlussbericht. Berne, Switzerland: Swiss Federal Office of Energy.
Biermayr, P., Baumann, B., Schriefl, E., Skopetz, H., Stieldorf, K., Zelenka, H., et al. (2001). Analyse fördernder und hemmender Faktoren bei der Markteinführung von innovativen Wohnbauten: Endbericht. Wien, Austria: Institut für Energiewirtschaft.
Biermayr, P., Schriefl, E., Baumann, B., & Sturm, A. (2002). Hemmnisse und fördernde Faktoren bei der Markteinführung innovativer Wohnbauten: eine Informationsoffensive für Planer, Wohnbauträger und Technologieproduzenten. Wien, Austria: Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Innovation und Technologie.
Bucklin, L. P., & Sengupta, S. (1993). The co-diffusion of complementary innovations: Supermarket scanners and UPC symbols. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 10(2), 148–160.
Cantono, S., & Silverberg, G. (2009). A percolation model of eco-innovation diffusion: The relationship between diffusion, learning economies and subsidies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(4), 487–496.
Chatterjee, K., & Xu, S. H. (2004). Technology diffusion by learning from neighbours. Advances in Applied Probability, 36(2), 355–376.
Clayton, M. C. (2003). The innovator’s dilemma: The revolutionary book that will change the way you do business. Cambridge, MA: Harper Paperbacks.
Consoli, D. (2008). Co-evolution of capabilities and preferences in the adoption of new technologies. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 20(4), 409–425.
Coyle, R. G. (1984). A systems approach to the management of a hospital for short-term patients. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 18(4), 219–226.
Coyle, R. G. (1996). System dynamics modelling: A practical approach. London: Chapman and Hall.
Coyle, R. G. (2000). Qualitative and quantitative modelling in system dynamics: Some research questions. System Dynamics Review, 16(3), 225–244.
Dattée, B., & Weil, H. B. (2007). Dynamics of social factors in technological substitutions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(5), 579–607.
de Vries, H. J., de Ruijter, J. P. M., & Argam, N. (2011). Dominant design or multiple designs: The flash memory card case. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 23(3), 249–262.
Delley, J. D., & Mader, L. (1986). L’état face auf defi energetique, études et pratique. Lausanne: Payot.
Deming, W. E. (2000). The new economics for industry, government, education. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Dijk, M., & Yarime, M. (2010). The emergence of hybrid-electric cars: Innovation path creation through co-evolution of supply and demand. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(8), 1371–1390.
Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, 11(3), 147–162.
Dowlatabadi, H., & Oravetz, M. A. (2006). US long-term energy intensity: Backcast and projection. Energy Policy, 34(17), 3245–3256.
Edenhofer, O., Pichs-Madruga, R., Sokona, Y., Seyboth, K., Arvizu, D., Bruckner, T., et al. (2011). Summary for policy makers. In IPCC special report on renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation. Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge University Press.
Edquist, C. (2006). The systemic nature of innovation. Oxford: Oxford Handbooks Online.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case-study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.
Elias, A. A. (2008). Energy efficiency in New Zealand’s residential sector: A systemic analysis. Energy Policy, 36(9), 3278–3285.
Fisher, J. C., & Pry, R. H. (1971). A simple substitution model of technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 3(2), 75–88.
Forrester, J. W. (1961). Industrial dynamics. Cambridge, MA: Productivity Press.
Forrester, J. W. (1971). Counterintuitive behavior of social systems. Technology Review, 73(3), 52–68.
FSO. (2008). Swiss environmental statistics: A brief guide 2008. Berne, Switzerland: Federal Office of Statistics.
Gann, D. M., Wang, Y. S., & Hawkins, R. (1998). Do regulations encourage innovation? The case of energy efficiency in housing. Building Research and Information, 26(5), 280–296.
Gantenbein, K. (2009). Building for the 2000-watt society: The state of affairs. Zurich, Switzerland.
Geels, F. W. (2004). From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Research Policy, 33(6–7), 897–920.
Geels, F. W. (2005a). Processes and patterns in transitions and system innovations: Refining the co-evolutionary multi-level perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72(6), 681–696.
Geels, F. W. (2005b). The dynamics of transitions in socio-technical systems: A multi-level analysis of the transition pathway from horse-drawn carriages to automobiles (1860–1930). Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 17(4), 445–476.
Geels, F. W., Hekkert, M. P., & Jacobsson, S. (2008). The dynamics of sustainable innovation journeys. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 20(5), 521–536.
Groesser, S. N., & Schaffernicht, M. (2012). Mental models of dynamic systems: Taking stock and looking ahead. System Dynamics Review.
Groesser, S. N., & Schwaninger, M. (2012, in press). Contributions to model validation: hierarchy, process, and cessation. System Dynamics Review.
Groesser, S. N., & Ulli-Beer, S. (2007). Structure and dynamics of the residential building environment: What mechanisms determine the development of the building stock? Paper presented at the 25th international conference of the System Dynamics Society, Boston.
Groesser, S. N., & Ulli-Beer, S. (2008). Long-term innovation diffusion in the building construction industry: Empirically-based theory building. Paper presented at the 26th international conference of the System Dynamics Society, Athens, Greece.
Gyberg, P., & Palm, J. (2009). Influencing households’ energy behaviour: How is this done and on what premises? Energy Policy, 37(7), 2807–2813.
Hekkert, M. P., & Negro, S. O. (2009). Functions of innovation systems as a framework to understand sustainable technological change: Empirical evidence for earlier claims. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(4), 584–594.
Hekkert, M. P., Suurs, R. A. A., Negro, S. O., Kuhlmann, S., & Smits, R. E. H. M. (2007). Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(4), 413–432.
Henderson, R. (1995). Of life-cycles real and imaginary: The unexpectedly long old-age of optical lithography. Research Policy, 24(4), 631–643.
Hens, H., Verbeeck, G., & Verdonck, B. (2001). Impact of energy efficiency measures on the CO2-emissions in the residential sector: A large-scale analysis. Energy and Buildings, 33(3), 275–281.
Higgins, A., Foliente, G., & McNamara, C. (2011). Modelling intervention options to reduce GHG-emissions in housing stock: A diffusion approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(4), 621–634.
Ho, T. H., Savin, S., & Terwiesch, C. (2002). Managing demand and sales dynamics in new product diffusion under supply constraint. Management Science, 48(2), 187–206.
Hung, S. C. (2002). The co-evolution of technologies and institutions: A comparison of Taiwanese hard disk drive and liquid crystal display industries. R and D Management, 32(3), 179–190.
Inoue, Y., & Miyazaki, K. (2008). Technological innovation and diffusion of wind power in Japan. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75(8), 1303–1323.
IPCC. (2001). Climate change 2001: Synthesis report: Summary for policymakers. Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge University Press.
IPCC. (2007). Summary for policymakers, in climate change 2007: The physical science basis. In S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K. B. Averyt, M. Tignor, & H. L. Miller (Eds.), Contribution of Working Group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge University Press.
Islam, T., & Meade, N. (1997). The diffusion of successive generations of a technology: A more general model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 56(1), 49–60.
Jaffe, A. B., & Stavins, R. N. (1994a). The energy paradox and the diffusion of conservation technology. Resource and Energy Economics, 16(2), 91–122.
Jaffe, A. B., & Stavins, R. N. (1994b). The energy-efficiency gap: What does it mean. Energy Policy, 22(10), 804–810.
Jakob, M. (2006). Marginal costs and co-benefits of energy efficiency investments: The case of the Swiss residential sector. Energy Policy, 34(2), 172–187.
Jakob, M. (2008). Grundlagen zur Wirkungsabschätzung der Energiepolitik der Kantone im Gebäudebereich. Berne, Switzerland: Swiss Federal Office of Energy.
Kägi, W., Schäfli, M., Siegrist, S., & Hässig, W. (2004). Best practice: Marktordnung, Markttransparenz und Marktregelung zugunsten der Durchsetzung energieeffizienter Lösungen am Markt. Berne, Switzerland: Swiss Federal Office of Energy.
Kapur, S. (1995). Technological diffusion with social-learning. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 43(2), 173–195.
Kaufmann, M., & Nützi, H.-P. (2005). EnergieSchweiz in der 2. Etappe—mehr Wirkung, mehr Nutzen. Berne, Switzerland: Swiss Federal Office of Energy.
Koetse, M. J., van der Vlist, A. J., & de Groot, H. L. F. (2006). The impact of perceived expectations and uncertainty on firm investment. Small Business Economics, 26(4), 365–376.
Koschenz, M., & Pfeiffer, A. (2005). Potenzial Wohngebäude: Energie- und Gebäudetechnik für die 2000-Watt-Gesellschaft. Zürich, Switzerland: Faktor-Verlag.
Lee, J. R., Oneal, D. E., Pruett, M. W., & Thomas, H. (1995). Planning for dominance: A strategic perspective on the emergence of a dominant design. R and D Management, 25(1), 3–15.
Levine, M., Uerge-Vorsatz, D., Blok, K., Geng, L., Harvey, D., Lang, S., et al. (2007). Residental and commercial buildings: Contribution of Working Group III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climage change. In B. Metz, O. R. Davidson, P. R. Bosch, R. Dave, & L. A. Meyer (Eds.), Climate change 2007: Mitigation. Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lockwood, C. (2006). Building the green way. Harvard Business Review, 84(6), 129–136.
Lundvall, B. A., Johnson, B., Andersen, E. S., & Dalum, B. (2002). National systems of production, innovation and competence building. Research Policy, 31(2), 213–231.
MacKerron, G. J., Egerton, C., Gaskell, C., Parpia, A., & Mourato, S. (2009). Willingness to pay for carbon offset certification and co-benefits among (high-) flying young adults in the UK. Energy Policy, 37(4), 1372–1381.
Marechal, F., Favrat, D., & Jochem, E. (2005). Energy in the perspective of the sustainable development: The 2000-watt society challenge. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 44(3), 245–262.
McDonald, A., & Schrattenholzer, L. (2001). Learning rates for energy technologies. Energy Policy, 29(4), 255–261.
McKinsey & Company. (2009). Swiss greenhouse gas cost abatement curve. Zurich, Switzerland: Author.
McKinsey & Company. (2010). Impact of the financial crisis on carbon economics: Version 2.1 of the global greenhouse gas abatement cost curve. Zurich, Switzerland: Author.
Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. W., III. (1972). The limits to growth. New York: Universe Books.
Meier, R., & Ott, W. (2005). Grundlagen für eine Strategie Gebäudepark Schweiz. Bern, Switzerland: Swiss Federal Office of Energy.
Meijer, F., Itard, L., & Sunikka-Blank, M. (2009). Comparing European residential building stocks: Performance, renovation, and policy opportunities. Building Research and Information, 37(5–6), 533–551.
Merito, M., & Bonaccorsi, A. (2007). Co-evolution of physical and social technologies in clinical practice: The case of HIV-treatments. Research Policy, 36(7), 1070–1087.
Müller, M. O., Groesser, S. N., & Ulli-Beer, S. (2012). How do we know who to include in transdisciplinary research? Toward a method for the identification of experts. European Journal of Operational Research, 216(2), 495–502.
Murray, F. (2002). Innovation as co-evolution of scientific and technological networks: Exploring tissue engineering. Research Policy, 31(8–9), 1389–1403.
Nassen, J., & Holmberg, J. (2005). Energy efficiency—A forgotten goal in the Swedish building sector? Energy Policy, 33(8), 1037–1051.
Nassen, J., Sprei, F., & Holmberg, J. (2008). Stagnating energy efficiency in the Swedish building sector-economic and organisational explanations. Energy Policy, 36(10), 3814–3822.
Negro, S. O., & Hekkert, M. P. (2008). Explaining the success of emerging technologies by innovation system functioning: The case of biomass digestion in Germany. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 20(4), 465–482.
Nemet, G. F. (2009). Demand-pull, technology-push, and government-led incentives for non-incremental technical change. Research Policy, 38(5), 700–709.
OECD/IEA. (1997). IAE energy technology R&D statistics 1975–1995. Paris Cedex: Author.
Pfeiffer, A., & Koschenz, M. (2005). Energy and building technology for the 2000-watt society: Potential of residential buildings in Switzerland. Energy and Buildings, 37, 1158–1174.
Ravetz, J. (2008). State of the stock-what do we know about existing buildings and their future prospects? Energy Policy, 36(12), 4462–4470.
Roberts, S. (2008). Altering existing buildings in the UK. Energy Policy, 36(12), 4482–4486.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). The diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.
Schnieders, E., & Hermelink, A. (2006). CEPHEUS results: Measurements and occupants’ satisfaction provide evidence for passive houses being an option for sustainable building. Energy Policy, 34(2), 151–171.
Schulz, T. F. (2007). Intermediate steps towards the 2000-watt society in Switzerland: An energy-economic scenario analysis. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich: Dissertation.
Schwaninger, M., & Groesser, S. N. (2008). Model-based theory-building with system dynamics. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 25(4), 447–465.
SFOE. (2005). Internationaler Vergleich von Energiestandards im Baubereich. Berne, Switzerland: Author.
SFOE. (2007). Vorstudie zur Erhebung von Energiekennzahlen von Wohnbauten. Berne, Switzerland: Author.
Siller, T., Kost, M., & Imboden, D. (2007). Long-term energy savings and greenhouse gas emission reductions in the Swiss residential sector. Energy Policy, 35(1), 529–539.
Sokolov, A. P., Stone, P. H., Prinn, R., Sarofim, M. C., Webster, M., Paltsev, S., et al. (2009). Probabilistic forecast for 21st century climate based on uncertainties in emission (without policy) and climate parameters, Report Series of the MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change. Boston: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Sorrell, S., Dimitropoulos, J., & Sommerville, M. (2009). Empirical estimates of the direct rebound effect: A review. Energy Policy, 37(4), 1356–1371.
Sterman, J. D. (1994). Learning in and about complex-systems. System Dynamics Review, 10(2–3), 291–330.
Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Stern, P. C. (2005). Understanding individual’s environmentally significant behavior. ELR News and Analysis, 35(11), 10785–10790.
Stoneman, P. (2002). The economics of technical diffusion. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Stoneman, P., & Diederen, P. (1994). Technology diffusion and public policy. The Economic Journal, 104(11), 918–930.
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Suarez, F. F., & Utterback, J. M. (1995). Dominant designs and the survival of firms. Strategic Management Journal, 16(6), 415–430.
Sunikka, M. (2006). Energy efficiency and low-carbon technologies in Urban renewal. Building Research and Information, 34(6), 521–533.
Sweeney, J. C., Soutar, G. N., & Mazzarol, T. (2008). Factors influencing word of mouth effectiveness: Receiver perspectives. European Journal of Marketing, 42(3–4), 344–364.
Urge-Vorsatz, D., & Novikova, A. (2008). Potentials and costs of carbon dioxide mitigation in the world’s buildings. Energy Policy, 36(2), 642–661.
Utterback, J. M. (1994). Mastering the dynamics of innovation: How companies can seize opportunities in the face of technological change. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.
Vennix, J. A. M. (1996). Group model building: Facilitating team learning using system dynamics. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Vermeulen, W. J. V., & Hovens, J. (2006). Competing explanations for adopting energy innovations for new office buildings. Energy Policy, 34(17), 2719–2735.
Weber, L. (1997). Some reflections on barriers to the efficient use of energy. Energy Policy, 25(10), 833–835.
Weil, H. B. (2010). Why markets make mistakes. Kybernetes, 39(9/10), 1429–1451.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Young, H. P. (2005). The spread of innovations through social learning. Washington, DC: Johns Hopkins University.
Yücel, G. & van Daalen, C. E. (2011). Exploratory analysis of the impact of information dynamics on innovation diffusion. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(2):358–372.
Metadaten
Titel
Co-evolution of Legal and Voluntary Standards: Development of Energy Efficiency in Swiss Residential Building Codes
verfasst von
Stefan N. Grösser
Copyright-Jahr
2013
Verlag
Physica-Verlag HD
Buch
Co-Evolution of Standards in Innovation Systems

Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-2857-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-7908-2858-0

Copyright-Jahr: 2013

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2858-0_5