Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
Communicated by Shabbir Gheewala
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Technologies with low environmental impacts and promoting renewable energy sources are required to meet the energetic demand while facing the increase of gas emissions associated to the greenhouse effect and the depletion of fossil fuels. CO2 methanation activated by magnetic heating has recently been reported as a highly efficient and innovative power-to-gas technology in a perspective of successful renewable energy storage and carbon dioxide valorisation. In this work, the life cycle assessment (LCA) of this process is performed, in order to highlight the environmental potential of the technology, and its competitivity with in respect to conventional heating technologies.
The IMPACT 2002+ was used for this LCA. The process studied integrates methanation, water electrolysis and CO2 capture and separation. This “cradle-to-gate” LCA study does not consider the use of methane, which is the reaction product. The functional unit used is the energy content of the produced CH4. The LCA was carried out using the energy mix data for the years 2020 and 2050 as given by the French Agency for Environment and Energy management (ADEME). Consumption data were either collected from literature or obtained from the LPCNO measurements as discussed by Marbaix (2019). The environmental impact of the CO2 methanation activated by magnetic heating was compared with the environmental impact of a power-to-gas plant using conventional heating (Helmeth) and considering the environmental impact of the natural gas extraction.
It is shown that the total flow rate of reactants, the source of CO2 and the energy mix play a major role on the environmental impact of sustainable CH4 production, whereas the lifetime of the considered catalyst has no significant influence. As a result of the possible improvements on the above-mentioned parameters, the whole process is expected to reduce by 75% in its environmental impact toward 2050. This illustrates the high environmental potential of the methanation activated by magnetic heating when coupled with industrial exhausts and renewable electricity production.
The technology is expected to be environmentally competitive compared with existing similar processes using external heating sources with the additional interest of being extremely dynamic in response, in line with the intermittency of renewable energy production.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
ADEME (2018) Trajectoires d’évolution du mix électrique 2020-2060, synthèse de l’étude
Bailera M, Lisbona P, Romeo LM, Espatolero S (2017) Power to gas projects review: lab, pilot and demo plants for storing renewable energy and CO 2. Renew Sust Energ Rev 69:292–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.130 CrossRef
Buttler A, Spliethoff H (2018) Current status of water electrolysis for energy storage, grid balancing and sector coupling via power-to-gas and power-to-liquids: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 82:2440–2454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.003 CrossRef
Chevalier B, Reyes-carrillo T, Laratte B (2011) Methodology for choosing life cycle impact assessment sector-specific indicators
Collet P, Flottes E, Favre A et al (2017) Techno-economic and life cycle assessment of methane production via biogas upgrading and power to gas technology. Appl Energy 192:282–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.08.181 CrossRef
Cuéllar-Franca RM, Azapagic A (2015) Carbon capture, storage and utilisation technologies: a critical analysis and comparison of their life cycle environmental impacts. J CO2 Util 9:82–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2014.12.001 CrossRef
Fasihi M, Efimova O, Breyer C (2019) Techno-economic assessment of CO2 direct air capture plants. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.086 CrossRef
Gale J, Metz B, Davidson O, de Coninck H, Loos M, Meyer L (eds) (2005) Carbon dioxide capture and storage. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 75–104
Götz M, Lefebvre J, Mörs F et al (2016) Renewable power-to-gas: a technological and economic review. Renew Energy 85:1371–1390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.07.066 CrossRef
Gruber M, Weinbrecht P, Biffar L et al (2018) Power-to-gas through thermal integration of high-temperature steam electrolysis and carbon dioxide methanation - experimental results. Fuel Process Technol 181:61–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2018.09.003 CrossRef
Hergt R, Dutz S, Müller R, Zeisberger M (2006) Magnetic particle hyperthermia: nanoparticle magnetism and materials development for cancer therapy. J Phys Condens Matter 18:S2919–S2934. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/18/38/S26 CrossRef
Leung DYC, Caramanna G, Maroto-Valer MM (2014) An overview of current status of carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies. Renew Sust Energ Rev 39:426–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.093 CrossRef
Marbaix J (2019) Etude multi-échelle de l’activation de réactions catalytiques par chauffage magnétique pour le stockage des énergies renouvelables PhD dissertation, Université de Toulouse
Meffre A, Mehdaoui B, Connord V, Carrey J, Fazzini PF, Lachaize S, Respaud M, Chaudret B (2015) Complex nano-objects displaying both magnetic and catalytic properties: a proof of concept for magnetically induced heterogeneous catalysis. Nano Lett 15:3241–3248. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00446 CrossRef
Meylan FD, Moreau V, Erkman S (2016) Material constraints related to storage of future European renewable electricity surpluses with CO2 methanation. Energy Policy 94:366–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.04.012 CrossRef
National Technical University of Athens, Sunfire, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (2017) Helmeth, Deliverable 5.2, Final LCA Report
Pérez-Camacho MN, Abu-Dahrieh J, Rooney D, Sun K (2015) Biogas reforming using renewable wind energy and induction heating. Catal Today 242:129–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2014.06.010 CrossRef
Peterson D, Miller E (2016) Hydrogen and fuel cells program record - hydrogen production cost from solid oxide electrolysis. In: US Department of Energy, pp 1–11
Rochelle GT (2016) Conventional amine scrubbing for CO2 capture. In: Absorption-based post-combustion capture of carbon dioxide. Elsevier, pp 35–67
Salunkhe AB, Khot VM, Pawar SH (2014) Magnetic hyperthermia with magnetic nanoparticles: a status review. Curr Top Med Chem 14:572–594. https://doi.org/10.2174/1568026614666140118203550 CrossRef
Socolow R, Desmond M, Aines R, Blackstock J (2011) Direct air capture of CO2 with chemicals. In: Direct air capture of co2 with chemicals. APS Physics
Varsano F, Bellusci M, La Barbera A et al (2019) Dry reforming of methane powered by magnetic induction. Int J Hydrog Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.02.055 CrossRef
Vilches Arenas LF, Alonso-Fariñas B, Navarrete B et al (2018) Carbon capture and utilization technologies: a literature review and recent advances. Energy Sour Part A 41:1403–1433. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2018.1548518 CrossRef
Wang W, Duong-Viet C, Xu Z et al (2019) CO2 methanation under dynamic operational mode using nickel nanoparticles decorated carbon felt (Ni/OCF) combined with inductive heating. Catal Today. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2019.02.050
- CO2 methanation activated by magnetic heating: life cycle assessment and perspectives for successful renewable energy storage
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Print ISSN: 0948-3349
Elektronische ISSN: 1614-7502