Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Restoring and Sustaining Lands—Coordinating Science, Politics, and Community for Action Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2012 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

6. Collaborative Modelling as a Boundary Institution to Handle Institutional Complexities in Water Management

verfasst von : Olivier Barreteau, Géraldine Abrami, William’s Daré, Derrick Du Toit, Nils Ferrand, Patrice Garin, Véronique Souchère, Albena Popova, Caty Werey

Erschienen in: Restoring Lands - Coordinating Science, Politics and Action

Verlag: Springer Netherlands

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Water management is an area for several sources of institutional complexity, which have been extensively studied but are still poorly handled in practice. In this chapter we add to the family of boundary entities a concept of boundary institution, in order to re-visit the dynamics at stake in participatory modelling. On the basis of a few case studies, we show that participatory modelling, as a process, fits this concept of “boundary institution”. A boundary institution is a step above considering the model as a boundary object, because it provides rules for interaction among stakeholders without prior consensus among them. In addition, these institutions provide prototypes to develop other institutions that address complex water management issues or that could help in providing institutional infrastructure (rules, etc.) to existing boundary organizations. Boundary institutions have no tangible infrastructure. Because they are intangible, how boundary organizations actually function will require further research.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Social and Cultural Incentives and Obstacles to Adaptation to Increased Coastal Flooding in East Boston, MA USA
Nächstes Kapitel Challenge of Integrating Natural and Social Sciences to Better Inform Decisions: A Novel Proposal Review Process
Fußnoten
1
See Chap.​ 19 for a discussion of the importance of social and cultural boundaries.
 
2
See Chap.​ 10 for a discussion of boundary organizations.
 
3
The analogy is to an electrical circuit fuse. When the circuit is overloaded, the fuse breaks and protects the rest of the circuit.
 
5
As scheme is defined as the design of water distribution devices within an irrigated area.
 
6
See Chap.​ 11 for a discussion of deliberative democracy.
 
Literatur
Auray N (2006) Une autre façon de penser le lien entre technique et politique: Les technologies de l’internet et le réagencement de l’activité autour de l’exploration. Working Paper, série Economie Sciences Sociales. Telecom ParisTech, Paris
Barbier R, Riaux J, Barreteau O (2010) Science réglementaire et démocratie technique. Réflexion à partir de la gestion des pénuries d’eau. Nat Sci Soc 18(1):14–23CrossRef
Barreteau O, Von Korff Y (2007) Synthesis report on mid-term progress with stakeholder processes in case studies. NeWater report. Cemagref, Montpellier, France
Barreteau O, Garin P, Dumontier A, Abrami G, Cernesson F (2003) Agent-based facilitation of water allocation: case study in the Drome river valley. Group Decis Negot 12(5):441–461CrossRef
Barreteau O, Le Page C, Perez P (2007) Simulation and gaming in natural resource management. Simulat Gaming 38(2):181–184CrossRef
Barreteau O, Bots PWG, Daniell KA (2010a) A framework for clarifying “participation” in participatory research to prevent rejection of participation for bad reasons. Ecol Soc 15(2):art 1
Barreteau O, Bots PWG, Daniell KA, Etienne M, Perez P, Barnaud C, Bazile D, Becu N, Castella J-C, Daré W, Trebuil G (in press) Participatory approaches and simulation of social complexity. In: Edmonds B, Meyer R (eds) A handbook on: simulating social complexity. Springer (in press)
Barreteau O, Bousquet F, Etienne M, Souchère V, d’ Aquino, P (2011) Companion modelling: a method of adaptive and participatory research. In: Etienne M (ed) Companion Modelling. A participatory approach to support sustainable development. Versailles, France: QUAE, pp 21–44
Biggs SD (1989) Resource-poor farmer participation in research: a synthesis of experiences from national agricultural research systems, vol 3, OFCOR-Comparative study paper. International Service for National Agricultural Research, The Hague
Boltanski L, Thévenot L (1991) De la justification, les économies de la grandeur. Gallimard, Paris
Bots PWG, van Daalen CE (2008) Participatory model construction and model use in natural resource management: a framework for reflection. Syst Pract Action Res 21(6):381–515CrossRef
Bousquet F, Voinov A (2010) Preface to this thematic issue. Environ Model Software 25(11):1267CrossRef
Bousquet F, Barreteau O, D’Aquino P, Etienne M, Boissau S, Aubert S, Le Page C, Babin D, Castella J-C (2002) Multi-agent systems and role games: an approach for ecosystem co-management. In: Janssen M (ed) Complexity and ecosystem management: the theory and practice of multi-agent approaches. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp 248–285
Cornwall A, Jewkes R (1995) What is participatory research? Soc Sci Med 41(12):1667–1676CrossRef
Cowie GM, Borret SR (2005) Institutional perspectives on participation and information in water management. Environ Model Software 20:469–483CrossRef
Daalen CEv, Bots PWG (2006) Participatory model construction and model use in natural resource management. In: Workshop on formalised and non-formalised methods in resource management, Osnabrück, 21–22 September 2006, p 11
Etienne M (ed) (2010) La modélisation d’accompagnement: Une démarche participative en appui au développement durable. QUAE, Paris
Etienne M, Du Toit D, Pollard S (2008) Ardi: a co-construction method for participatory modelling in natural resources management. In: Sànchez-Marrè M, Béjar J, Comas J, Rizzoli A, Guariso G (eds) iEMSs 2008: International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software. Integrating Sciences and Information Technology for Environmental Assessment and Decision Making, Barcelona
Ferrand N, Farolfi S, Abrami G, Du Toit D (2009) WAT-A-GAME: sharing water and policies in your own basin. ISAGA conference, SSAGSG, Singapour
Fischer G, Giaccardi E, Eden H, Sugimoti M, Ye Y (2005) Beyond binary choices: integrating individual and social creativity. Int J Hum-Comput Stud 63:482–512CrossRef
Funtowicz SO, Ravetz JR (1993) Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25(7):739–755CrossRef
Hoppe R (2010) From “knowledge use” towards “boundary work”: sketch of an emerging new agenda for inquiry into science-policy interaction. In: In’t Veld R (ed) Knowledge democracy. Springer, Berlin, pp 169–186CrossRef
Le Page C, Abrami G, Barreteau O, Becu N, Bommel P, Botta A, Dray A, Monteil C, Souchère V (2011) Models for sharing representations. In: Etienne M (ed) Companion modelling. A participatory approach to support sustainable development QUAE, Versailles, France, pp 69–96.
Loucks DP, Kindler J, Fedra K (1985) Interactive water resources modeling and model use: an overview. Water Resour Res 21(2):95–102CrossRef
McKinnon J (2005) Mobile interactive gis: bringing indigenous knowledge and scientific information together. A narrative account. In: Neef A (ed) Participatory approaches for sustainable land use in Southeast Asia. White Lotus, Bangkok, pp 217–231
Moss S, Downing T, Rouchier J (2000) Demonstrating the role of stakeholder participation: an agent based social simulation model of water demand policy and response. CPM technical report. Centre for Policy Modelling, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester
Ostrom E (2005) Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Pahl-Wostl C, Hare M (2004) Processes of social learning in integrated resources management. J Community Appl Soc Psychol 14:193–206CrossRef
Pahl-Wostl C, Kabat P, Möltgen J (eds) (2007) Adaptive and integrated water management: coping with complexity and uncertainty. Springer, Berlin
Pahl-Wostl C, Mostert E, Tàbara D (2008) The growing importance of social learning in water resources management and sustainability science. Ecol Soc 13(1):24
Promburon P (2010) Companion modeling & watershed management in northern Thailand: the importance of local networks. Directeur de thèse: François Bousquet (Cirad), UCBL, Lyon
Reitsma R, Zigurs I, Lewis C, Wilson V, Sloane A (1996) Experiment with simulation models in water-resources negotiations. J Water Resour Plann Mgmt 122(1):64–70CrossRef
Richard-Ferroudji A, Barreteau O (2011) Assembling different forms of knowledge for participative water management. Insights from the Concert’eau game. In: Claeys C, Jacqué M (eds) Environment, knowledge and democracy. Bruxelles, Peter Lang. In Press
Ridoutt BG, Pfister S (2010) A revised approach to water footprinting to make transparent the impacts of consumption and production on global freshwater scarcity. Global Environ Change 20:113–120CrossRef
Salles D, Barraqué B, Busca D, Garin P (2006) L’eau des villes et l’eau des champs. Négociation territoriale et génie de l’environnement. Programme interdisciplinaire développement urbain durable- d2rt politiques territoriales et développement durable. Rapport final. CERTOP-Cemagref-LATTS, Toulouse
Schelling TC (1961) Experimental games and bargaining theory. World Polit 14(1):47–68CrossRef
Souchère V, Millair L, Echeverria J, Bousquet F, Le Page C, Etienne M (2010) Co-constructing with stakeholders a role-playing game to initiate collective management of erosive runoff risks at the watershed scale. Environ Model Software 25(11):1359–1370CrossRef
Star SL (2010) Ceci n’est pas un objet frontière! Réflexion sur l’origine d’un concept. Revue d’Anthropologie des connaissances 4(1):18–35
Star SL, Griesemer JR (1989) Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907-39. Soc Stud Sci 19(3):387–420CrossRef
Thévenot L (2001) Pragmatic regimes governing the engagement with the world. In: Knorr-Cetina K, Schatzki T, Savigny Eike V (eds) The practice turn in contemporary theory. Routledge, London, pp 56–73
Thévenot L (2006) L’action au pluriel. Sociologie des régimes d’engagement. La Découverte, Paris
Trompette P, Vinck D (2009) Retour sur la notion d’objet-frontière. Revue d’Anthropologie des connaissances 3(1):5–27CrossRef
Voinov A, Bousquet F (2010) Modelling with stakeholders. Environ Model Software 25(11):1268–1281CrossRef
Voinov A, Brown Gaddis EJ (2008) Lessons for successful participatory watershed modeling: a perspective from modeling practitioners. Ecol Model 216:197–207CrossRef
Webler T, Kastenholz H, Renn O (1995) Public participation in impact assessment: a social learning perspective. Environ Impact Assess Rev 15:443–463CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Collaborative Modelling as a Boundary Institution to Handle Institutional Complexities in Water Management
verfasst von
Olivier Barreteau
Géraldine Abrami
William’s Daré
Derrick Du Toit
Nils Ferrand
Patrice Garin
Véronique Souchère
Albena Popova
Caty Werey
Copyright-Jahr
2012
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Buch
Restoring Lands - Coordinating Science, Politics and Action

Print ISBN: 978-94-007-2548-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-94-007-2549-2

Copyright-Jahr: 2012

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2549-2_6