Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing 1/2019

23.02.2019 | Original Article

Come on feel the noise: the relationship between stakeholder engagement and viral messaging through an association’s Twitter use

verfasst von: Erin K. Nelson

Erschienen in: International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing | Ausgabe 1/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

How do nonprofits use Twitter to build relationships with online stakeholders, while cultivating new audiences through viral messaging? This paper examines the relationship between online stakeholder engagement and the role networks play in promoting an organization’s messages beyond its own follower base. Tweets from 3 years of a membership association’s advocacy campaign were analyzed to uncover what relationship, in any, exists between the online communication function employed and the amount of attention a tweet receives. Further analysis examines the marketing potential of other users’ tweets about the association. This research suggests that an agency’s own messaging in a campaign is the primary recipient of online attention, and the content most likely to be rebroadcast to new audiences. As such, organizations looking to curate viral content must focus on messaging compelling enough to share with stakeholders’ online networks. Additionally, tweets intended to create dialogue with online stakeholders are typically given more active forms of attention including @mentions and retweets with comment. In contrast, information-sharing tweets typically generated more passive forms of attention, like retweets and favorites.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Aaker, J., & Smith, A. (2010). The dragonfly effect: Quick, effective, and powerful ways to use social media to drive social change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Aaker, J., & Smith, A. (2010). The dragonfly effect: Quick, effective, and powerful ways to use social media to drive social change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Zurück zum Zitat Balser, D., & McClusky, J. (2005). Managing stakeholder relationships and nonprofit organization effectiveness. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 15(3), 295–315. Balser, D., & McClusky, J. (2005). Managing stakeholder relationships and nonprofit organization effectiveness. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 15(3), 295–315.
Zurück zum Zitat Bortree, D. S., & Seltzer, T. (2009). Dialogic strategies and outcomes: an analysis of environmental advocacy groups’ Facebook profiles. Public Relations Review, 35(3), 317–319.CrossRef Bortree, D. S., & Seltzer, T. (2009). Dialogic strategies and outcomes: an analysis of environmental advocacy groups’ Facebook profiles. Public Relations Review, 35(3), 317–319.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat boyd, D., Golder, S., & Lotan, G. (2010). Tweet, tweet, retweet: Conversational aspects of retweeting on Twitter. In Proceedings from HICSS-43: Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, Kauai, HI. boyd, D., Golder, S., & Lotan, G. (2010). Tweet, tweet, retweet: Conversational aspects of retweeting on Twitter. In Proceedings from HICSS-43: Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, Kauai, HI.
Zurück zum Zitat Briones, R. L., Kuch, B., Liu, B. F., & Jin, Y. (2010). Keeping up with the digital age: How the American Red Cross uses social media to build relationships. Public Relations Review, 37(1), 37–43.CrossRef Briones, R. L., Kuch, B., Liu, B. F., & Jin, Y. (2010). Keeping up with the digital age: How the American Red Cross uses social media to build relationships. Public Relations Review, 37(1), 37–43.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ciszek, E. (2013a). Advocacy and amplification: nonprofit outreach and empowerment through participatory media. The Public Relations Journal, 7(2), 187–213. Ciszek, E. (2013a). Advocacy and amplification: nonprofit outreach and empowerment through participatory media. The Public Relations Journal, 7(2), 187–213.
Zurück zum Zitat Ciszek, E. (2013b). LGBT advocacy in the digital age: Participatory media and the empowerment of an LGBT public. In N. T. Tindall & R. W. Waters (Eds.), Coming out of the closet: Exploring LGBT issues in strategic communication with theory and research (pp. 207–218). New York: Peter Lang Publishing. Ciszek, E. (2013b). LGBT advocacy in the digital age: Participatory media and the empowerment of an LGBT public. In N. T. Tindall & R. W. Waters (Eds.), Coming out of the closet: Exploring LGBT issues in strategic communication with theory and research (pp. 207–218). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
Zurück zum Zitat Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.CrossRef Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dixon, A. W., Martinez, J. M., & Martin, C. L. (2015). Employing social media as a marketing strategy in college sport: an examination of perceived effectiveness in accomplishing organizational objectives. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 12(2), 97–113.CrossRef Dixon, A. W., Martinez, J. M., & Martin, C. L. (2015). Employing social media as a marketing strategy in college sport: an examination of perceived effectiveness in accomplishing organizational objectives. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 12(2), 97–113.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Freeman, R. E., & Reed, D. L. (1983). Stockholders and stakeholders: A new perspective on corporate governance. California Management Review, 25(3), 88–106. Freeman, R. E., & Reed, D. L. (1983). Stockholders and stakeholders: A new perspective on corporate governance. California Management Review, 25(3), 88–106.
Zurück zum Zitat Guo, C., & Saxton, G. D. (2014). Tweeting social change: how social media are changing nonprofit advocacy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(1), 57–79.CrossRef Guo, C., & Saxton, G. D. (2014). Tweeting social change: how social media are changing nonprofit advocacy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(1), 57–79.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Guo, C., & Saxton, G. D. (2018). Speaking and being heard: How nonprofit advocacy organizations gain attention on social media. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47(1), 5–26.CrossRef Guo, C., & Saxton, G. D. (2018). Speaking and being heard: How nonprofit advocacy organizations gain attention on social media. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47(1), 5–26.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Honeycutt, C., & Herring, S. (2009). Beyond microblogging: Conversation and collaboration in Twitter. In Proceedings from HICSS-43: Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. Kauai, HI. Honeycutt, C., & Herring, S. (2009). Beyond microblogging: Conversation and collaboration in Twitter. In Proceedings from HICSS-43: Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. Kauai, HI.
Zurück zum Zitat Jahng, M. R., & Lee, N. (2018). When scientists tweet for social changes: dialogic communication and collective mobilization strategies by Flint water study scientists on Twitter. Science Communication, 40(1), 89–108.CrossRef Jahng, M. R., & Lee, N. (2018). When scientists tweet for social changes: dialogic communication and collective mobilization strategies by Flint water study scientists on Twitter. Science Communication, 40(1), 89–108.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jansen, B., Zhang, M., Sobel, K., & Chowdury, A. (2009). Twitter power: tweets as electronic word of mouth. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60, 2169–2188.CrossRef Jansen, B., Zhang, M., Sobel, K., & Chowdury, A. (2009). Twitter power: tweets as electronic word of mouth. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60, 2169–2188.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jo, S., & Kim, Y. (2003). The effect of web characteristics on relationship building. Journal of Public Relations Research, 15(3), 199–223. Jo, S., & Kim, Y. (2003). The effect of web characteristics on relationship building. Journal of Public Relations Research, 15(3), 199–223.
Zurück zum Zitat Kang, M. (2014). Understanding Public Engagement: Conceptualizing and Measuring its Influence on Supportive Behavioral Intentions. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26(5), 399–416. Kang, M. (2014). Understanding Public Engagement: Conceptualizing and Measuring its Influence on Supportive Behavioral Intentions. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26(5), 399–416.
Zurück zum Zitat Kelleher, T. (2009). Conversational Voice, Communicated Commitment, and Public Relations Outcomes in Interactive Online Communication. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 172–188. Kelleher, T. (2009). Conversational Voice, Communicated Commitment, and Public Relations Outcomes in Interactive Online Communication. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 172–188.
Zurück zum Zitat Kent, M. L., & Taylor, M. (1998). Building dialogic relationships through the world wide web. Public Relations Review, 24(3), 321–334.CrossRef Kent, M. L., & Taylor, M. (1998). Building dialogic relationships through the world wide web. Public Relations Review, 24(3), 321–334.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kent, M. L., & Taylor, M. (2002). Toward a dialogic theory of public relations. Public Relations Review, 28(1), 21–37.CrossRef Kent, M. L., & Taylor, M. (2002). Toward a dialogic theory of public relations. Public Relations Review, 28(1), 21–37.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kim, J.-N., & Rhee, Y. (2011). Strategic thinking about employee communication behavior (ECB) in public relations: testing the models of megaphoning and scouting effects in Korea. Journal of Public Relations Research, 23(3), 243–268.CrossRef Kim, J.-N., & Rhee, Y. (2011). Strategic thinking about employee communication behavior (ECB) in public relations: testing the models of megaphoning and scouting effects in Korea. Journal of Public Relations Research, 23(3), 243–268.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kim, Y. K., & Trail, G. (2011). A conceptual framework for understanding relationships between sport consumers and sport organizations: A relationship quality approach. Journal of Sport Management, 25(1), 57–69. Kim, Y. K., & Trail, G. (2011). A conceptual framework for understanding relationships between sport consumers and sport organizations: A relationship quality approach. Journal of Sport Management, 25(1), 57–69.
Zurück zum Zitat Lazzeretti, L., Sartori, A., & Innocenti, N. (2015). Museums and social media: the case of the Museum of Natural History of Florence. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 12(3), 267–283.CrossRef Lazzeretti, L., Sartori, A., & Innocenti, N. (2015). Museums and social media: the case of the Museum of Natural History of Florence. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 12(3), 267–283.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Li, Z., & Li, C. (2014). Tweet or “re-tweet”? An experiment of message strategy and interactivity on Twitter. Internet Research, 24(5), 648–667. Li, Z., & Li, C. (2014). Tweet or “re-tweet”? An experiment of message strategy and interactivity on Twitter. Internet Research, 24(5), 648–667.
Zurück zum Zitat Lovejoy, K., & Saxton, G. D. (2012). Information, community, and action: how nonprofit organizations use social media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 337–353.CrossRef Lovejoy, K., & Saxton, G. D. (2012). Information, community, and action: how nonprofit organizations use social media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 337–353.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lovejoy, K., Waters, R. D., & Saxton, G. D. (2012). Engaging stakeholders through Twitter: how nonprofit organizations are getting more out of 140 characters or less. Public Relations Review, 38(2), 313–318.CrossRef Lovejoy, K., Waters, R. D., & Saxton, G. D. (2012). Engaging stakeholders through Twitter: how nonprofit organizations are getting more out of 140 characters or less. Public Relations Review, 38(2), 313–318.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nah, S., & Saxton, G. D. (2013). Modeling the adoption and use of social media by nonprofit organizations. New Media & Society, 15(2), 294–313.CrossRef Nah, S., & Saxton, G. D. (2013). Modeling the adoption and use of social media by nonprofit organizations. New Media & Society, 15(2), 294–313.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ospina, S., Diaz, W., & O’Sullivan, J. F. (2002). Negotiating accountability: Managerial lessons from identity-based nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31(1), 5–31. Ospina, S., Diaz, W., & O’Sullivan, J. F. (2002). Negotiating accountability: Managerial lessons from identity-based nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31(1), 5–31.
Zurück zum Zitat Rybalko, S., & Seltzer, T. (2010). Dialogic communication in 140 characters or less: how Furtune 500 companies engage stakeholders using Twitter. Public Relations Review, 36(4), 336–341.CrossRef Rybalko, S., & Seltzer, T. (2010). Dialogic communication in 140 characters or less: how Furtune 500 companies engage stakeholders using Twitter. Public Relations Review, 36(4), 336–341.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Saffer, A. J., Sommerfeldt, E. J., & Taylor, M. (2013). The effects of organizational Twitter interactivity on organization–public relationships. Public Relations Review, 39(3), 213–215.CrossRef Saffer, A. J., Sommerfeldt, E. J., & Taylor, M. (2013). The effects of organizational Twitter interactivity on organization–public relationships. Public Relations Review, 39(3), 213–215.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Saxton, G. D., & Waters, R. D. (2014). What do stakeholders like on Facebook? Examining public reactions to nonprofit organizations’ informational, promotional, and community-building messages. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26(3), 280–299.CrossRef Saxton, G. D., & Waters, R. D. (2014). What do stakeholders like on Facebook? Examining public reactions to nonprofit organizations’ informational, promotional, and community-building messages. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26(3), 280–299.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Saxton, G. D., Guo, C., & Brown, W. (2007). New dimensions of nonprofit responsiveness: the application and promise of internet-based technologies. Public Performance and Management Review, 31(2), 144–173.CrossRef Saxton, G. D., Guo, C., & Brown, W. (2007). New dimensions of nonprofit responsiveness: the application and promise of internet-based technologies. Public Performance and Management Review, 31(2), 144–173.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schumann, S. (2015). How cause-related, advocacy, and social movement organizations use the internet to promote collective actions. In How the internet shapes collective actions (pp. 46–53). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Schumann, S. (2015). How cause-related, advocacy, and social movement organizations use the internet to promote collective actions. In How the internet shapes collective actions (pp. 46–53). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith, J. N. (2018). The social network?: Nonprofit constituent engagement through social media. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 30(3), 1–23.CrossRef Smith, J. N. (2018). The social network?: Nonprofit constituent engagement through social media. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 30(3), 1–23.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Smith, B. G., & Gallicano, T. D. (2015). Terms of engagement: analyzing public engagement with organizations through social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 82–90.CrossRef Smith, B. G., & Gallicano, T. D. (2015). Terms of engagement: analyzing public engagement with organizations through social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 82–90.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sundar, S. S., Kalyanaraman, S., & Brown, J. (2003). Explicating web site interactivity: impression formation effects in political campaign sites. Communication Research, 30(1), 30–59.CrossRef Sundar, S. S., Kalyanaraman, S., & Brown, J. (2003). Explicating web site interactivity: impression formation effects in political campaign sites. Communication Research, 30(1), 30–59.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Svensson, P. G., Mahoney, T. Q., & Hambrick, M. E. (2015). Twitter as a communication tool for nonprofits: a study of sport-for-development organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44(6), 1086–1106.CrossRef Svensson, P. G., Mahoney, T. Q., & Hambrick, M. E. (2015). Twitter as a communication tool for nonprofits: a study of sport-for-development organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44(6), 1086–1106.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Taylor, M., & Kent, M. L. (2014). Dialogic engagement: clarifying foundational concepts. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26(5), 384–398.CrossRef Taylor, M., & Kent, M. L. (2014). Dialogic engagement: clarifying foundational concepts. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26(5), 384–398.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Thackeray, R., Neiger, B. L., Hanson, C. L., & McKenzie, J. F. (2008). Enhancing promotional strategies within social marketing programs: use of Web 2.0 social media. Health Promotion Practice, 9(4), 338–343.CrossRef Thackeray, R., Neiger, B. L., Hanson, C. L., & McKenzie, J. F. (2008). Enhancing promotional strategies within social marketing programs: use of Web 2.0 social media. Health Promotion Practice, 9(4), 338–343.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tsimonis, G., & Dimitriadis, S. (2014). Brand strategies in social media. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 32(3), 328–344.CrossRef Tsimonis, G., & Dimitriadis, S. (2014). Brand strategies in social media. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 32(3), 328–344.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wang, Y., & Yang, Y. (2017). How do organizations use social media to build dialogic relationships? A comparison between nonprofit and for-profit organizations. In 20TH International Public Relations Research Conference (p. 390). Wang, Y., & Yang, Y. (2017). How do organizations use social media to build dialogic relationships? A comparison between nonprofit and for-profit organizations. In 20TH International Public Relations Research Conference (p. 390).
Zurück zum Zitat Waters, R. D. (2007). Nonprofit organizations’ use of the internet: A content analysis of communication trends on the internet sites of the organizations on the philanthropy 400. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 18(1), 59–76.CrossRef Waters, R. D. (2007). Nonprofit organizations’ use of the internet: A content analysis of communication trends on the internet sites of the organizations on the philanthropy 400. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 18(1), 59–76.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Waters, R. D., & Feneley, K. L. (2013). Virtual stewardship in the age of new media: have nonprofit organizations' moved beyond Web 1.0 strategies? International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 18(3), 216–230.CrossRef Waters, R. D., & Feneley, K. L. (2013). Virtual stewardship in the age of new media: have nonprofit organizations' moved beyond Web 1.0 strategies? International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 18(3), 216–230.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Waters, R. D., Burnett, E., Lamm, A., & Lucas, J. (2009). Engaging stakeholders through social networking: how nonprofit organizations are using Facebook. Public Relations Review, 35(2), 102–106.CrossRef Waters, R. D., Burnett, E., Lamm, A., & Lucas, J. (2009). Engaging stakeholders through social networking: how nonprofit organizations are using Facebook. Public Relations Review, 35(2), 102–106.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Watkins, B. A. (2017). Experimenting with dialogue on Twitter: an examination of the influence of the dialogic principles on engagement, interaction, and attitude. Public Relations Review, 43(1), 163–171.CrossRef Watkins, B. A. (2017). Experimenting with dialogue on Twitter: an examination of the influence of the dialogic principles on engagement, interaction, and attitude. Public Relations Review, 43(1), 163–171.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Come on feel the noise: the relationship between stakeholder engagement and viral messaging through an association’s Twitter use
verfasst von
Erin K. Nelson
Publikationsdatum
23.02.2019
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing / Ausgabe 1/2019
Print ISSN: 1865-1984
Elektronische ISSN: 1865-1992
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-019-00219-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2019

International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing 1/2019 Zur Ausgabe