Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Journal of Business Ethics
Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics 3/2019

28.03.2017 | Original Paper

Coming Out of the Niche? Social Banking in Germany: An Empirical Analysis of Consumer Characteristics and Market Size

verfasst von: Kathleen Krause, Dirk Battenfeld

Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics | Ausgabe 3/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The social banking market constitutes a small but rapidly growing submarket of the global banking sector. Due to an explicit commitment to sustainability, social banking is a segment of banking services which is not exclusively focused on economic performance criteria, but pursues ecological and social goal dimensions on an equal footing. Information on the number and reachability of potential social banking customers is essential for social banks to further promote sustainable consumption in finance. In scientific research, social banking is considered a relatively new field, still lacking empirical analyses regarding the market size and specific consumer behaviour. This study addresses the research gap by generating first insights into the German social banking market. Based on an online survey using an adaptive conjoint analysis, a large data set covering 3537 respondents was compiled. Sample 1 comprises 2896 respondents who are customers of three major social banks in Germany. Sample 2 covers the remaining 641 respondents who represent the German adult population and exclusively buy from conventional banks. Logistic regression modelling reveals that social banking customers differ significantly from their conventional counterparts regarding several socio-demographic, behavioural and psychographic factors. In comparison with conventional banking customers, social banking customers tend to be younger, higher educated and located in larger places of residence. Contrary to existing research on socially responsible investors, they are male to a higher proportion than female. Moreover, social banking customers demonstrate stronger sustainable buying patterns and weaker preferences for financial, but stronger preferences for social return than conventional banking customers. The results further indicate a considerable untapped growth potential for social banks by uncovering a market size ranging between 10 and 26% of the German adult population. Finally, suggestions for marketing strategies and future research are given.
Vorheriger Artikel A Human Rights-Based Approach to the Social Good in Social Marketing

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
The number of customers of the three largest social banks in Germany (GLS Bank, UmweltBank and EthikBank) equalled 175,210 at the end of the first half of 2010 (Handelsblatt 2010). The number of German citizens aged 16 years and above amounted to 69,015 thousand in 2011 (Axel Springer and Bauer Media Group 2011).
 
2
In line with a shared understanding in consumer research, the terms ‘ethical’ and ‘sustainable’ are used interchangeably throughout this article.
 
3
According to a German comparison portal, the average interest rate for conventional instant access savings accounts with an investment amount of 5000 € stood at 2.2% at the beginning of October 2011 (Franke-Media.net 2015). The corresponding average interest rate offered by social banks stood at around 1.0% (Öko-Test 2010).
 
4
The German population covers not only conventional banking customers, but also a minor share of social banking customers. Since it can be assumed that this small group does not affect the fundamental population structure, it is reasonable to compare sample 2 with the German population.
 
5
Concerning education, it should be noted that the Chi-square test only just failed to reach significance (p value = 0.059). The respondents of sample 2 might be slightly higher educated on average than the population, indicated by a smaller share of people holding a secondary modern school qualification and larger shares in respect of the remaining higher educational levels. Such a difference could give rise to a selection bias, which should be kept in mind when appreciating the results of the study.
 
6
Generally, there are various techniques for market potential estimation (see Waheeduzzaman 2008, for a comparison of different methods). If causality between variables is important, regression modelling demonstrates an approach of good predictive power. In contrast to economists, marketers commonly focus on the consumer when estimating market potential (Waheeduzzaman 2008). It therefore seems appropriate to determine the demand for social banking products based on specific consumer characteristics.
 
7
Based on the concept of relative importance within conjoint analysis, a respondent’s values of all four preference variables always add up to 100%.
 
8
It should be noted that both classification rates successfully exceed the maximum random distribution probability of 81.9%.
 
9
Despite the prevalence of 95% confidence intervals in research, the choice of any confidence level remains arbitrary. Likewise, Cohen (1990) challenges the routine use of 95% confidence intervals and recommends the more frequent use of 80% confidence intervals. A confidence level of 95% (90%) indicates a market size ranging between 7% (8%) and 31% (28%). Thus, the higher the confidence level, the broader the confidence interval and the market size range. A confidence level of 80% appears to be a good compromise between a high level of statistical confidence and a narrow range of market size estimates.
 
Literatur
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action-control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11–39). Berlin: Springer.CrossRef
Allison, P. D. (1999). Logistic regression using the SAS ® system: Theory and application. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
Bauer, R., & Smeets, P. (2015). Social identification and investment decisions. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 117, 121–134.CrossRef
Beal, D. J., Goyen, M., & Phillips, P. (2005). Why do we invest ethically? Journal of Investing, 14(3), 66–78.CrossRef
Becker, J. (2012). Marketing-Konzeption – Grundlagen des ziel-strategischen und operativen Marketing-Managements (10th ed.). München: Vahlen.
Benedikter, R. (2011). Social banking and social finance. New York: Springer.CrossRef
Black, I. R., & Cherrier, H. (2010). Anti-consumption as part of living a sustainable lifestyle: Daily practices, contextual motivations and subjective values. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9(6), 437–453.CrossRef
Boatright, J. R. (2014). Ethics in finance (3rd ed.). West Sussex: Wiley Blackwell.
Bray, J., Johns, N., & Kilburn, D. (2011). An exploratory study into the factors impeding ethical consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(4), 597–608.CrossRef
Brécard, D., Hlaimi, B., Lucas, S., Perraudeau, Y., & Salladarré, F. (2009). Determinants of demand for green products: An application to eco-label demand for fish in Europe. Ecological Economics, 69(1), 115–125.CrossRef
Carrington, M. J., Neville, B. A., & Whitwell, G. J. (2010). Why ethical consumers don’t walk their talk: Towards a framework for understanding the gap between the ethical purchase intentions and actual buying behaviour of ethically minded consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(1), 139–158.CrossRef
Cohen, J. (1990). Things I have learned (so far). American Psychologist, 45(12), 1304–1312.CrossRef
Connell, K. Y. H. (2010). Internal and external barriers to eco-conscious apparel acquisition. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 34(3), 279–286.CrossRef
Cornée, S., Kalmi, P., & Szafarz, A. (2016). Selectivity and transparency in social banking: Evidence from Europe. Journal of Economic Issues, 50(2), 494–502.CrossRef
Diamantopoulos, A., Schlegelmilch, B. B., Sinkovics, R. R., & Bohlen, G. M. (2003). Can socio-demographics still play a role in profiling green consumers? A review of the evidence and an empirical investigation. Journal of Business Research, 56(6), 465–480.CrossRef
Dorfleitner, G., & Utz, S. (2014). Profiling German-speaking socially responsible investors. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 6(2), 118–156.CrossRef
Emerson, J. (2003). The blended value proposition: Integrating social and financial returns. California Management Review, 45(4), 35–51.CrossRef
Escrig-Olmedo, E., Muñoz-Torres, M. J., & Fernández-Izquierdo, M. Á. (2013). Sustainable development and the financial system: Society’s perceptions about socially responsible investing. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(6), 410–428.CrossRef
Freestone, O. M., & McGoldrick, P. J. (2008). Motivations of the ethical consumer. Journal of Business Ethics, 79(4), 445–467.CrossRef
German Institute for Economic Research (DIW Berlin) (2012). German socio-economic panel study (SOEP).
Gilg, A., Barr, S., & Ford, N. (2005). Green consumption or sustainable lifestyles? Identifying the sustainable consumer. Futures, 37(6), 481–504.
Green, P. E., & Rao, V. R. (1971). Conjoint measurement of quantifying judgmental data. Journal of Marketing Research, 8(3), 355–363.
Haigh, M. (2007). What counts in social managed investments: Evidence from an international survey. Advances in Public Interest Accounting, 13, 35–62.CrossRef
Hampl, N., & Loock, M. (2013). Sustainable development in retailing: What is the impact on store choice? Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(3), 202–216.CrossRef
Heinzle, S. L., & Wüstenhagen, R. (2012). Dynamic adjustment of eco-labeling schemes and consumer choice—The revision of the EU energy label as a missed opportunity? Business Strategy and the Environment, 21(1), 60–70.CrossRef
Hofmann, E., Hoelzl, E., & Kirchler, E. (2008). A comparison of models describing the impact of moral decision making on investment decisions. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(1), 171–187.CrossRef
Homer, P. M., & Kahle, L. R. (1988). A structural equation test of the value-attitude-behavior hierarchy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(4), 638–646.CrossRef
Jackson, T. (2006). The Earthscan reader in sustainable consumption. London: Earthscan.
Johnson, R. M. (1987). Adaptive conjoint analysis. In M. Metegrano (ed.), Proceedings of the Sawtooth Software conference on perceptual mapping, conjoint analysis, and computer interviewing (pp. 253–265). Sawtooth Software, Ketchum, ID.
Junkus, J. C., & Berry, T. C. (2010). The demographic profile of socially responsible investors. Managerial Finance, 36(6), 474–481.CrossRef
Kara, A., Kaynak, E., & Kucukemiroglu, O. (1994). Credit card development strategies for the youth market. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 12(6), 30–36.CrossRef
Kilbourne, W. E., & Beckmann, S. C. (1998). Review and critical assessment of research on marketing and the environment. Journal of Marketing Management, 14(6), 513–532.CrossRef
Koellner, T., Weber, O., Fenchel, M., & Scholz, R. (2005). Principles for sustainability rating of investment funds. Business Strategy and the Environment, 14(1), 54–70.CrossRef
Koos, S. (2011). Varieties of environmental labelling, market structures, and sustainable consumption across Europe: A comparative analysis of organizational and market supply determinants of environmental-labelled goods. Journal of Consumer Policy, 34(1), 127–151.CrossRef
Kostakis, I., & Sardianou, E. (2012). Which factors affect the willingness of tourists to pay for renewable energy? Renewable Energy, 38(1), 169–172.CrossRef
Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2006). Marketing management (12th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Lancaster, K. J. (1966). A new approach to consumer theory. The Journal of Political Economy, 74(2), 132–157.CrossRef
Laukkanen, T. (2007). Customer preferred channel attributes in multi-channel electronic banking. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 35(5), 393–412.CrossRef
Laukkanen, T., & Pasanen, M. (2008). Mobile banking innovators and early adopters: How they differ from other online users. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 13(2), 86–94.CrossRef
Lewis, A. (2001). A focus group study of the motivation to invest: ‘ethical/green’ and ‘ordinary’ investors compared. Journal of Socio-Economics, 30(4), 331–341.CrossRef
Lewis, A., & Mackenzie, C. (2000). Morals, money, ethical investing and economic psychology. Human Relations, 53(2), 179–191.CrossRef
Ling, C. Y. (2013). Consumers’ purchase intention of green products: An investigation of the drivers and moderating variable. Marketing Management, 57(1), 14503–14509.
Liobikienė, G., Mandravickaitė, J., & Bernatonienė, J. (2016). Theory of planned behavior approach to understand the green purchasing behavior in the EU: A cross-cultural study. Ecological Economics, 125, 38–46.CrossRef
Luchs, M. G., & Mooradian, T. A. (2012). Sex, personality, and sustainable consumer behaviour: Elucidating the gender effect. Journal of Consumer Policy, 35(1), 127–144.CrossRef
Mackenzie, C., & Lewis, A. (1999). Morals and markets: The case of ethical investing. Business Ethics Quarterly, 9(3), 439–452.CrossRef
Maloney, M. P., Ward, M. P., & Braucht, G. N. (1975). A revised scale for the measurement of ecological attitudes and knowledge. American Psychologist, 30(7), 787–790.CrossRef
Mazman, S. G., Usluel, Y. K., & Çevik, V. (2009). Social influence in the adoption process and usage of innovation: Gender differences. International Journal of Behavioral, Cognitive, Educational and Psychological Sciences, 1(4), 229–232.
McDonald, S., Oates, C., Thyne, M., Alevizou, P., & McMorland, L. A. (2009). Comparing sustainable consumption patterns across product sectors. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33(2), 137–145.CrossRef
McEachern, M. G., & McClean, P. (2002). Organic purchasing motivations and attitudes: Are they ethical? International Journal of Consumer Studies, 26(2), 85–92.CrossRef
McLachlan, J., & Gardner, J. (2004). A comparison of socially responsible and conventional Investors. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(1), 11–25.CrossRef
Midi, H., Sarkar, S. K., & Rana, S. (2010). Collinearity diagnostics of binary logistic regression model. Journal of Interdisciplinary Mathematics, 13(3), 253–267.CrossRef
Morrison, D. G. (1969). On the interpretation of discriminant analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 6(2), 156–163.CrossRef
Newholm, T., & Shaw, D. (2007). Special issue Studying the ethical consumer: A review of research. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 6(5), 253–348.CrossRef
Nilsson, J. (2009). Segmenting socially responsible mutual fund investors. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 27(1), 5–31.CrossRef
Oppewal, H., & Vriens, M. (2000). Measuring perceived service quality using integrated conjoint experiments. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 18(4), 154–169.CrossRef
Padel, S., & Foster, C. (2005). Exploring the gap between attitudes and behaviour: Understanding why consumers buy or do not buy organic food. British Food Journal, 107(8), 606–625.CrossRef
Pampel, F. C. (2000). Logistic regression: A primer. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Science, series no. 07-132. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Pasewark, W. R., & Riley, M. E. (2010). It’s a matter of principle: The role of personal values in investment decisions. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(2), 237–253.CrossRef
Paulet, E., Parnaudeau, M., & Relano, F. (2015). Banking with ethics: Strategic moves and structural changes of the banking industry in the aftermath of the subprime mortgage crisis. Journal of Business Ethics, 131(1), 199–207.CrossRef
Reisch, L. A., & Thøgersen, J. (2015). Handbook of research on sustainable consumption. Cheltenham, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRef
Roberts, J. A. (1996). Green consumers in the 1990s: Profile and implications for advertising. Journal of Business Research, 36(3), 217–231.CrossRef
Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.
Rosen, B. N., Sandler, D. M., & Shani, D. (1991). Social issues and socially responsible investment behavior: A preliminary empirical investigation. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 25(2), 221–234.CrossRef
Sandberg, J., Juravle, C., Hedesström, T. M., & Hamilton, I. (2009). The heterogeneity of socially responsible investment. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(4), 519–533.CrossRef
San-Jose, L., Retolaza, J. L., & Gutierrez-Goiria, J. (2011). Are ethical banks different? A comparative analysis using the radical affinity index. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(1), 151–173.CrossRef
Schueth, S. (2003). Socially responsible investing in the United States. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(3), 189–194.CrossRef
Sreejesh, S., Mohaparta, S., & Anusree, M. R. (2014). Business research methods—An applied orientation. Cham: Springer.CrossRef
Starr, M. A. (2009). The social economics of ethical consumption: Theoretical considerations and empirical evidence. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38(6), 916–925.CrossRef
Steg, L., Bolderdijk, J. W., Keizer, K., & Perlaviciute, G. (2014). An integrated framework for encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: The role of values, situational factors and goals. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 104–115.CrossRef
Straughan, R. D., & Roberts, J. A. (1999). Environmental segmentation alternatives: A look at green consumer behavior in the new millennium. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 16(6), 558–575.CrossRef
Thøgersen, J., & Ölander, F. (2002). Human values and the emergence of a sustainable consumption pattern: A panel study. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23(5), 605–630.CrossRef
Thompson, D. W., Anderson, R. C., Hansen, E. N., & Kahle, L. R. (2010). Green segmentation and environmental certification: Insights from forest products. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(5), 319–334.
Thompson, P., & Cowton, C. J. (2004). Bringing the environment into bank lending: Implications for environmental reporting. The British Accounting Review, 36(2), 197–218.CrossRef
Tippet, J., & Leung, P. (2001). Defining ethical investment and its demography in Australia. Australian Accounting Review, 11(25), 44–55.CrossRef
Torgler, B., & Garcia-Valiñas, M. A. (2007). The determinants of individuals’ attitudes towards preventing environmental damage. Ecological Economics, 63(2–3), 536–552.CrossRef
Waheeduzzaman, A. N. M. (2008). Market potential estimation in international markets: A comparison of methods. Journal of Global Marketing, 12(4), 307–320.CrossRef
Weber, O. (2011). Products and services. In O. Weber & S. Remer (Eds.), Social banks and the future of sustainable finance (pp. 96–122). London: Routledge.CrossRef
Weber, O. (2013). Social banks and their profitability: Is social banking in line with business success? Prospective Innovation at Ethical Banking and Finance, 1(1), 1–19.
Weber, O. (2014a). The financial sector’s impact on sustainable development. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 4(1), 1–8.CrossRef
Weber, O. (2014b). Social banking: Concept, definitions and practice. Global Social Policy, 14(2), 265–281.CrossRef
Weber, O., Diaz, M., & Schwegler, R. (2014). Corporate social responsibility of the financial sector – Strengths, weaknesses and the impact on sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 22(5), 321–335.CrossRef
Weber, O., Mansfeld, M., & Schirrmann, E. (2011). The financial performance of RI funds after 2000. In W. Vandekerckhove, J. Leys, K. Alm, B. Scholtens, S. Signori, & H. Schäfer (Eds.), Responsible investment in times of turmoil (pp. 75–91). Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York: Springer.
Weber, O., & Remer, S. (2011). Social banks and the future of sustainable finance. London: Routledge.CrossRef
Wedel, M., & Kamakura, W. A. (2000). Market segmentation: Conceptual and methodological foundations (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.CrossRef
Wiek, A., & Weber, O. (2014). Sustainability challenges and the ambivalent role of the financial sector. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 4(1), 9–20.CrossRef
Wittink, D. R., Krishnamurthi, L., & Nutter, J. B. (1982). Comparing derived importance weights across attributes. Journal of Consumer Research, 8(March), 471–474.CrossRef
Wittink, D. R., Krishnamurthi, L., & Reibstein, D. J. (1989). The effect of differences in the number of attribute levels on conjoint results. Marketing Letters, 1(2), 113–123.CrossRef
Wu, M. W., & Shen, C. H. (2013). Corporate social responsibility in the banking industry: Motives and financial performance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(9), 3529–3547.CrossRef
Yiu, C. S., Grant, K., & Edgar, D. (2007). Factors affecting the adoption of internet banking in Hong Kong—Implications for the banking sector. International Journal of Information Management, 27(5), 336–351.CrossRef
Zuur, A. F., Ieno, E. N., & Elphick, C. S. (2010). A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 1(1), 3–14.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Coming Out of the Niche? Social Banking in Germany: An Empirical Analysis of Consumer Characteristics and Market Size
verfasst von
Kathleen Krause
Dirk Battenfeld
Publikationsdatum
28.03.2017
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Journal of Business Ethics / Ausgabe 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3491-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2019

Journal of Business Ethics 3/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Original Paper

Assessing and Improving the Quality of Sustainability Reports: The Auditors’ Perspective

Original Paper

Do Chief Sustainability Officers Make Companies Greener? The Moderating Role of Regulatory Pressures

Original Article

On the Role of Faith in Sustainability Management: A Conceptual Model and Research Agenda

Original Paper

The Co-evolution of Leaders’ Cognitive Complexity and Corporate Sustainability: The Case of the CEO of Puma

Original Paper

Analyzing Base-of-the-Pyramid Research from a (Sustainable) Supply Chain Perspective

Original Paper

Repairing Broken Trust Between Leaders and Followers: How Violation Characteristics Temper Apologies