Zum Inhalt

Comparison between cold incremental and stretch forming of flax fiber-reinforced polypropylene composites

  • Open Access
  • 17.12.2025
  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Erschienen in:

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In diesem Artikel wird der Vergleich zwischen kalter, inkrementeller Blechumformung (ISF) und Stretchumformung (SF) zur Herstellung sphärischer Kappen unter Verwendung von flachsfaserverstärkten Polypropylen-Verbundwerkstoffen vertieft. Die Studie bewertet die geometrische Genauigkeit, die Formkräfte, die Leistung und den Energieverbrauch dieser Prozesse, mit und ohne den Einsatz eines teilweisen Gegenstempels. Die Ergebnisse deuten darauf hin, dass ISF effektiver dabei ist, die gewünschten geometrischen Profile zu erreichen, insbesondere wenn ein teilweiser Gegenstempel verwendet wird, während SF sich aufgrund der Häufigkeit elastischer Verformungen als unwirksam erweist. Die Umformkräfte für ISF sind deutlich geringer, was auf nicht schwerwiegende Arbeitsbedingungen und geringere Risiken für die Ausrüstung hindeutet. Beide Prozesse erfordern eine geringe Leistung, aber ISF hat aufgrund seiner längeren Prozesszeit einen höheren Energieverbrauch. Der Artikel hebt auch die höhere mechanische Leistung von nachgeformten Laminaten im Vergleich zu unverformten hervor, was potenzielle Anwendungen zur Versteifung von Rippen in verschiedenen Industriebereichen nahelegt. Die Studie schließt mit der Diskussion des Potenzials für die Umformung von Platten nach inkrementeller Umformung und der Machbarkeit der Verwendung vollständig natürlicher Verbundwerkstoffe in der zukünftigen Forschung.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

1 Introduction

Incremental sheet forming (ISF) is a technique that, in its simplest variant, known as negative incremental forming (NIF), involves the incremental deformation of a clamped sheet through the progressive action of a simple and non-dedicated forming tool, driven by a CNC machine to obtain the desired final shape [1]. Its layered manufacturing strategy matches well with the production of customized and free-form parts [2], finding application in several industrial fields such as aerospace [3], automotive [4, 5], and medical [6, 7] applications, and so on. Many studies have been conducted to compare ISF with other conventional sheet forming processes. They have highlighted some unique ISF characteristics, such as reduced tooling, cost-effectiveness, short setup time, high formability and flexibility, low environmental impact, but also high process time and geometric inaccuracies due to the absence of counter dies [811].
ISF has been originally conceived and subsequently developed for metal and metal alloy sheets, as evidenced by several works [1215]. Recently, research on ISF has shown increased interest in non-metallic materials like thermoplastic polymers and composites. While ISF of thermoplastics, whose properties make them widely used for mass production [16], has been investigated in several studies [1719], demonstrating its potential to replace the traditional processes based on repetitive heating, shaping, and cooling actions [20, 21], research on the ISF of composite materials remains limited. Starting from preliminary works [22, 23] and arriving at advances in ISF of polymer-based composites reinforced with glass [24] and carbon fibers [25], it is clear that ISF can represent a sustainable and cost-effective way for composite forming [26].
An area of significant interest in recent years, both in research and on an industrial scale, is the use of natural fibers (from seeds, stems or roots) as reinforcements for polymer composites [27]. These fibers represent a low-cost, biodegradable, renewable, and nontoxic alternative to the most common synthetic reinforcements (glass and carbon fibers) [28]. They enhance certain properties of commercial polymers, may contribute to lowering the energy demand during processing, and make them semi-biodegradable [29]. Hemp and flax are the strongest and stiffest natural fibers [30], as well as two of the most popular and widely available fibers in European countries. They are composed of a complex microstructure consisting of bundles of twisted elementary fibers that are glued together by an amorphous matrix of pectin, hemicelluloses, and lignin [31, 32]. These fibers exhibit excellent vibration damping properties, as well as low density and high specific stiffness compared to glass or aramid fibers, and are commonly used for the manufacture of biocomposites [33].
Thermoplastics as composite matrices are used in many fields, such as automotive [34], aeronautics [35], and biomedical [36] applications; they show some significant advantages compared to thermosets, in terms of short process time, potential recyclability, and the possibility to be remodeled at high temperatures [37, 38]. Polypropylene (PP) is the world’s second-most widely produced synthetic polymer. Thanks to its high chemical and wear resistance, excellent mechanical properties, ease of processing, and cost-effectiveness [39], it finds application in automotive parts, reusable containers, packaging, and laboratory equipment [40], as well as for advanced composites in aerospace, civil, and automotive fields [41]. In addition, along with polyethylene and polyvinyl chloride, PP currently dominates as a matrix for natural composites [42].
The adhesion between the matrix and fibers plays an essential role in the stress transfer of composites. Poor adhesion in natural fiber-reinforced polymers can be improved by chemical fiber pretreatments; the most common are alkaline and silane treatments, but isocyanate, peroxide, acetylation and maleic treatments have also been analyzed [4345]. Alternatively, another chemical solution involves adding a coupling agent to the matrix; the most common agent for natural fiber-reinforced PP composites is maleic anhydride-grafted polypropylene [46]. Together with chemical treatments, another viable way to improve the natural fibers/polymer matrix interaction is the use of reinforcements in the form of fabrics to generate a mechanical coupling. This solution, already considered for metal foams [47] and sandwich structures [48], can be considered for thermoplastics reinforced with natural fibers in the form of fabric by using the compression molding technique [49]; the main process parameters that influence the composite performance are the temperature, the dwelling time, and the molding pressure.
This work presents an experimental campaign based on ISF and stretch forming (SF) tests, with and without a partial counter die, for the manufacture of spherical caps, starting from natural fiber-reinforced PP composites. The laminates were manufactured by compression molding using flax woven fabrics, but without fiber treatments or coupling agents; these further production steps would have increased the manufacturing process time and costs, as well as decreased the environmental benefits associated with the use of flax fibers. The forming processes were conducted without localized heating [50]. With particular reference to ISF process, this choice does not prejudice the formability, much less the forming forces (due to its incremental nature); in addition, also considering the absence of full counter dies, it preserves the flexibility and ease of use of the process because it does not provide for the implementation of heating systems. Despite not allowing for very high wall angles [51], this process can be used for applications such as shaping stiffening ribs for panels in the automotive, aviation, and naval fields [52]; consequently, a component like a spherical cap, with decreasing wall angle and deformation states, was chosen. Through the acquisition of the cap profiles and the evaluation of formability, thicknesses, forming forces, power, energy consumption and postforming mechanical performance, the experimental campaign highlights the benefits and drawbacks of using ISF, compared to SF process, for these biobased composites.

2 Materials and methods

This section describes the manufacturing process of the composite laminates, the forming of the spherical caps, and the features evaluated for comparing between the two forming procedures.

2.1 Manufacture of the laminates

The composite laminates used in this study (area of 200 × 150 mm2, thickness of 2.2 mm) were manufactured using neat PP films (supplied by GDC S.r.l.; thickness of 0.5 mm and density of 0.92 g/cm3) and a woven fabric of flax, supplied by FIDIA S.r.l. - Technical Global Services. The fabric had a mass per unit area of 320 g/cm2, a tex number of 324 g/km, and was safely stored in a polymeric bag under vacuum at 20 °C and 45% humidity. As previously mentioned, it was not subjected to any previous chemical or surface treatment. Before the molding process, it was dried at 60 °C for 12 h to eliminate any trace of humidity. A figure of the fabric and a magnification of a single yarn constituted by the winding of filaments are shown in [53], while their main properties are summarized in [51].
The laminates were produced using a conventional compression molding press, considering the stacking sequence (five layers with a symmetric layup; the first two and the last two layers were PP films, while the central layer was flax fabric) and following the operations schematized in Fig. 1. Specifically, the molding temperature was 200 °C, and the total molding time was 300 s, with the first 120 s being the dwelling time, a waiting period after which the plates were closed, applying a pressure of 4 MPa for the remaining 180 s. The choice of a woven fabric with a large mesh size and the process parameters mentioned above proved to be an effective solution for the manufacture of flax and hemp fiber-reinforced PP composites, even with a different stacking sequence; compared to unreinforced PP, these composites showed notable improvements in tensile and bending properties, as well as higher bearing capacities and service temperatures [53]. Tensile tests according to ASTM D3039 standard were performed using an MTS Alliance RT/50 universal testing machine, equipped with a 5 kN load cell and an MTS 634.31 F-24 extensometer (five replications for both reinforced and unreinforced laminates). The reinforced laminates showed increased tensile properties, with strength and elastic modulus equal to 37.3 MPa and 2.3 GPa (the corresponding values for the unreinforced PP were 27.1 MPa and 1.2 GPa, respectively). The laminates exhibited bilinear behaviour [54], which is attributed to the complex structure of the flax fibres. These fibers consist of cellulose microfibrils helicoidally wound along the fibre axis and embedded within an amorphous hemicellulose matrix. Under loading, the microfibrils tend to realign in the direction of the applied load, while the surrounding matrix exhibits a viscous response. As a result of this structural reorganization, combined with the inherent PP matrix viscoplasticity, the composite displays a similarly viscous and nonlinear mechanical response [55].
Fig. 1
Operations for the manufacture of composite laminates
Bild vergrößern

2.2 Forming tests

Spherical caps (see the schematization in Fig. 2a, where a and θ denote the base radius and the polar angle, respectively) were manufactured using cold NIF and SF processes (see Figs. 2b and 3 for a schematization and the actual equipment of the tests); the forming tests were conducted using a C.B. Ferrari high-speed four-axis vertical machining center.
The laminates were secured using a clamping frame with a square working area of 100 × 100 mm2. To reduce the sheet bending defect close to the base of the cap, the tests were also conducted using a hollow cylinder as a partial counter die; differently from a full counter die, it only supports the essential areas of the sheet, allowing to manufacture components with some similarities and preserving the process flexibility. Additionally, the probability of failures and defects was reduced by carrying out the tests under lubricated conditions, using Boelube 70,104 (100 A) synthetic lubricant, developed by Boeing and supplied by Orelube.
The incremental and stretch forming tests without partial counter die are labelled as NIF0 and SF0, respectively, while the corresponding ones with partial counter die as NIFPD and SFPD, respectively. Two tests for each different case were performed.
Fig. 2
Schematic of spherical caps (a) and of the forming processes (b)
Bild vergrößern
For the NIF tests (see Fig. 3a), a non-rotating stainless-steel stylus with a hemispherical head, 10 mm in diameter, was driven by the CNC machine at a nominal speed vNIF = 1000 mm/min to impose progressive deformation on the laminate. The tool followed a path with helical turns that alternated in anticlockwise and clockwise directions. This approach, based on observations from metal [12] and polycarbonate ISF parts [56], significantly reduced the probability of twisting, a defect caused by the uncontrolled pivoting of the formed component around the clamping frame due to in-plane forces exerted by the tool. Notably, the twist generated in one turn is almost entirely recovered in the subsequent one [57]. Figure 4 shows a not-to-scale representation of some turns of the toolpath; θs = 1° is the angular step down, i.e., the angular distance described after one complete turn.
For the SF tests (see Fig. 3b), the machine simply imposed on the die a vertical displacement, equal to the cap height (equal to 18.65 mm), at a nominal speed vSF = 60 mm/min.
Fig. 3
Equipment for NIF (a) and SF tests (b)
Bild vergrößern
Fig. 4
Representation of the toolpath for the NIF processes
Bild vergrößern

2.3 Measured features

To evaluate the geometrical accuracy of the processes, the shape of the caps was measured using a Zeiss DuraMax coordinate measuring machine (measurement accuracy of 2.4 μm) and Calypso software and then compared to the target geometry. A ruby sphere stylus with a diameter of 3.0 mm was used for the measurements. Each measurement involved 450 individual points evenly distributed across the diagonals AC and BD (see Fig. 2a).
The wall thickness was measured by a 0.01 mm resolution micrometer (five measurements for each case), while observations of failure zones were made by a Hirox RX-100 digital microscope.
To estimate the magnitude of the forming loads, FX, FY, and FZ forces were acquired at 50 Hz by the K-MCS10 multicomponent sensor (fixed between the clamping fixture and the base plate of the CNC machine, see Fig. 3), equipped with the QuantumX MX840B data acquisition system and the Catman Easy AP software. From their combination, the magnitudes of the force in the XY plane and of the total forming force (labelled as FXY and FTOT, respectively) were also obtained.
The forces also enabled the measurement of power (P) and energy consumption (E). Unlike the evaluation of the electrical energy, the use of forces allows for the estimation of the actual energy required for the process, which represents only a small fraction of the total energy consumed, as most of the energy demand is associated with auxiliary functions of the equipment [58].
For the NIF tests, P was obtained by only considering the contribution of FXY, according to the following equation:
$$P\approx P_{XY}=F_{XY}\cdot\nu_{NIF}$$
(1)
This simplification is possible because, for the NIF processes, vNIF can be approximated with the speed in the XY plane, due to the low θs value that makes the path almost horizontal, while the speed along the Z axis is very low and does not significantly contribute to the total power and energy. This was observed in a previous study by the authors on NIF of cones and spherical caps starting from laminates of flax and hemp fiber-reinforced PP composites [59]; the simplification resulted in an underestimation in terms of energy of less than 2.5% in the worst case.
For the SF tests, P was determined by:
$$P=F_Z\cdot\nu_{SF}$$
(2)
E trends were determined as time-integrals of the P curves. The Riemann integral was used, with a regular partition of the time interval equal to 0.02 s, i.e. the period of acquisition of the forces.

3 Results and discussion

This section summarizes and discusses the main results of the experimental campaign. The first part addresses the feasibility and geometric accuracy of the processes, while the second part analyzes the forming forces, power, and energy. Given the limited variability observed among repetitions, only representative curves and average values of the investigated features are reported for the sake of conciseness.

3.1 Feasibility and geometrical accuracy

Spherical caps with a = 40 mm and θ = 50° were manufactured using NIF and SF processes, with and without a partial die (with internal and external diameters of 80 and 100 mm, respectively); an NIFPD cap is reported in Fig. 5.
Fig. 5
Spherical cap (a = 40 mm and θ = 50°) by NIFPD test
Bild vergrößern
In all cases, the parts were sound and had good surface quality. Figure 6 shows the actual and the target cap shapes (for easy reading, only half of the experimental profiles are reported). Two features were evaluated to estimate the geometrical accuracy of the forming processes, i.e. the difference in maximum height (dh1) and the gap in correspondence of the intersection between the base of the cap and the flange (dh2); Table 1 summarizes these values.
Fig. 6
Experimental and designed profiles of the spherical caps
Bild vergrößern
Table 1
dh1 and dh2 values for the geometrical accuracy of the forming processes
Feature
Test
NIF0
NIFPD
SF0
SFPD
dh1 [mm]
3.4
2.8
13.5
12.8
dh2 [mm]
3.6
2.2
1.9
2.6
The NIF process guaranteed a more accurate geometrical quality due to the incremental and localized nature of the deformation mechanism, and the use of the partial die improved it, particularly near the clamped zone. Moreover, non-severe working conditions in terms of forces and moments and limited thinning were predictable, in view of the lack of instabilities and wrinkling [60]. Additionally, the selected toolpath strategy proved effective in preventing twisting. Concerning the thinning, from wall thickness measures it ranged between 0.02 mm on the top of the caps and 0.09 mm, in line with the above.
In contrast, the SF process proved to be completely ineffective, in both the variants. The stretching mechanism proved to be unsuitable for these geometries when starting from cold laminates, resulting primarily inelastic deformations that were almost entirely recovered after processing. The low formability efficiency of the SF processes was further confirmed by more severe forming tests to obtain spherical caps with a = 20 mm and θ = 70° (see Fig. 7). While the NIF tests were concluded without incurring failures (Fig. 7a), the SF tests failed, as highlighted in Fig. 7b; the laminates experienced localized cracking, as a result of excessive matrix loading after fibers breakage [61].
Fig. 7
Spherical cap (a = 20 mm and θ = 70°) manufactured by NIF0 test (a) and failures from SF0 test (b)
Bild vergrößern

3.2 Forces, power, energy and postforming performance

Figure 8 reports the trends of FTOT. Concerning the NIF tests (Fig. 8a), the fluctuations of the trends reflected the alternating nature of the toolpath. The initial part of the NIFPD curve had a higher slope, due to the contact of the laminate with both the tool and the counter die, which made the system highly stiff. This resulted in reduced dh1 and dh2 values, as the flange acted as a weak constraint in NIF0, compared to the more effective action provided by the counter die in NIFPD. The curves reached their maximum value, corresponding to the condition of maximum tool/sheet contact, during which the processes exhibited their most effective incremental deformation of the laminates. The final part of the curves showed a decreasing trend, as a consequence of the less severe working conditions encountered when the tool reached the top of the caps, due to the decreasing wall angle. Figure 8b reports FTOT trends when using the SF processes. The forces continuously increased, because of the increasing contact area between the die and the laminate as the tool displacement increased. But they did not result effective in terms of formability, as observed by Fig. 6.
Figure 9 reports the power curves. They obviously followed the same trend of the forming forces, both for NIF (Fig. 9a) and SF tests (Fig. 9b), since they were obtained by multiplying them and constant values of velocity.
Finally, Fig. 10 reports the energy curves. They showed an increasing trend, because they were obtained by integrating the power curves.
Fig. 8
FTOT trends for NIF (a) and SF tests (b)
Bild vergrößern
Fig. 9
P trends for NIF (a) and SF tests (b)
Bild vergrößern
Fig. 10
E trends for NIF (a) and SF tests (b)
Bild vergrößern
Table 2 summarizes the results of this subsection, reporting the maximum values of FTOT, P and E. In all cases, higher values were recorded when using the partial counter die, because of a higher stiffness of the system. The low forming forces for NIF processes confirmed the above predicted non-severe working conditions and the usability of non-dedicated tools and machines. This was not true for SF processes, for which the higher values of forces reached did not guarantee forming efficiency. Both NIF and SF processes required low and similar power levels, while the energy for NIF processes, compared to SF, was higher due to the high process time but guaranteed a good formability.
Table 2
Maximum values of FTOT, P and E
Feature
Test
NIF0
NIFPD
SF0
SFPD
FTOT, MAX [N]
473
536
3621
6313
PMAX [W]
1.9
2.0
3.6
6.3
EMAX [J]
441.0
563.1
21.3
34.2
The forming test shown in Fig. 7b was also considered as a penetration test to compare the mechanical performance of undeformed and postformed laminates. For the second ones, NIFPD caps were clamped with the concave side up. Figure 11 clearly highlights the increased strength of the spherical caps, with a penetration force (the maximum value of FTOT) more than doubled, compared to the undeformed laminate.
Figure 12 reports the 30× magnification failure surfaces from a penetration test on a postformed laminate (but they are similar for the undeformed ones). The failures at the end of the tests were perpendicular to the yarns (Fig. 12, up); then, the fibers played the role of PP reinforcement. The figure highlights that stress transfer was primarily governed by mechanical interlocking, promoted by the large mesh size, rather than by fiber/matrix adhesion. The latter is weak in this composite system (Fig. 12, down) due to the contrasting chemical natures of flax fiber and the PP matrix, hydrophilic and hydrophobic respectively [62], especially in the absence of fiber treatments and coupling agents [43].
Fig. 11
FTOT trends from penetration tests for undeformed and postformed laminates (NIFPD caps)
Bild vergrößern
Fig. 12
Failure surfaces from a penetration test on a postformed laminate
Bild vergrößern

4 Conclusions

This work compares the incremental and the stretch forming applied to laminates of flax woven fabric-reinforced polypropylene composites, obtained by compression molding and without fiber treatments or coupling agents; the processes for the manufacture of spherical caps were carried out at room temperature, without and with a partial counter die.
From the comparison of the geometric profiles, the incremental forming process results effective for obtaining the designed components, especially when using the partial counter die, due to the incremental and localized approach that guarantees good deformation levels also under cold working conditions; on the other hand, stretch forming proves to be highly ineffective, while using the partial counter die, with the prevalence of the elastic response of the laminates.
The forming force levels for the incremental forming are extremely limited, and this translates into non-severe working conditions and reduced risks for the equipment, differently from what observed for the stretch forming.
Both the processes require very low power, even more so considering that they are carried out at room temperature; the higher but however limited energy levels for the incremental forming process reflect the high process time, one of the main cons of this technique.
The comparison between undeformed and postformed laminates by penetration tests highlights the notably increased performance of the caps and their possible use as stiffening ribs for panels in different industrial fields.
Future research could consider the feasibility of remolding panels after incremental forming. In addition, and according to a sustainable manufacturing perspective, it could be of interest to investigate the incremental forming of completely natural composite laminates.

Declarations

Declaration of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process

During the preparation of this work the author(s) used Copilot in order to improve its readability. After using this tool/service, the author(s) reviewed and edited the content as needed and take(s) full responsibility for the content of the publication.

Competing interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Download
Titel
Comparison between cold incremental and stretch forming of flax fiber-reinforced polypropylene composites
Verfasst von
Antonio Formisano
Dario De Fazio
Antonio Langella
Martina Panico
Massimo Durante
Publikationsdatum
17.12.2025
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology / Ausgabe 3-4/2026
Print ISSN: 0268-3768
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3015
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-025-17158-3
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Formisano A, Boccarusso L, Capece Minutolo F et al (2017) Negative and positive incremental forming: comparison by geometrical, experimental, and FEM considerations. Mater Manuf Process 32:530–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2016.1232810CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Formisano A, Astarita A, Boccarusso L et al (2022) Formability and surface quality of non-conventional material sheets for the manufacture of highly customized components. Int J Mater Form 15:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12289-022-01663-xCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Hussain G, Khan HR, Gao L, Hayat N (2013) Guidelines for tool-size selection for single-point incremental forming of an aerospace alloy. Mater Manuf Process 28:324–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2012.700151CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Liuru Z, Yinmei Z, Zhongmin L (2015) Study on incremental forming for the fender of the car. Mater Res Innov 19:S6105–S6107. https://doi.org/10.1179/1432891715Z.0000000001435CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Scheffler S, Pierer A, Scholz P et al (2019) Incremental sheet metal forming on the example of car exterior skin parts. Procedia Manuf 29:105–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.112CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Lu B, Ou H, Shi SQ et al (2016) Titanium based cranial reconstruction using incremental sheet forming. Int J Mater Form 9:361–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-014-1205-8CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Centeno G, Morales-Palma D, Gonzalez-Perez-Somarriba B et al (2017) A functional methodology on the manufacturing of customized polymeric cranial prostheses from CAT using SPIF. Rapid Prototyp J 23:771–780. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-02-2016-0031CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Seyyedi SE, Gorji H, Bakhshi-Jooybari M, Mirnia MJ (2023) Comparison between conventional press-working and incremental forming in hole-flanging of AA6061-T6 sheets using a ductile fracture model. Int J Solids Struct 270:112225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2023.112225CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Melania T, Cristina-Maria B (2019) Comparison between deep-drawing and incremental forming processes from an environmental point of view. Materials science forum. Trans Tech Publications Ltd, pp 120–129
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Besong LI, Buhl J, Bambach M (2019) Investigations on hole-flanging by paddle forming and a comparison with single point incremental forming. Int J Mech Sci 164:105143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.105143CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Al-Ghamdi KA, Hussain G (2016) On the comparison of formability of roll-bonded steel-Cu composite sheet metal in incremental forming and stamping processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 87:267–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8488-5CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Jeswiet J, Micari F, Hirt G et al (2005) Asymmetric single point incremental forming of sheet metal. CIRP Ann 54:88–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60021-3CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Trzepieciński T, Oleksik V, Pepelnjak T et al (2021) Emerging trends in single point incremental sheet forming of lightweight metals. Metals 11(8):1188. https://doi.org/10.3390/MET11081188CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Mandaloi G, Nagargoje A, Gupta AK et al (2022) A comprehensive review on experimental conditions, strategies, performance, and applications of incremental forming for deformation machining. J Manuf Sci Eng 144:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4054683CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Agrawal MK, Singh P, Mishra P et al (2024) A brief review on the perspective of a newer incremental sheet forming technique and its usefulness. Advances in Materials and Processing Technologies 10:506–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/2374068X.2023.2168288CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosa-Sainz A, Centeno G, Silva MB, Vallellano C (2021) Experimental failure analysis in polycarbonate sheet deformed by Spif. J Manuf Process 64:1153–1168. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMAPRO.2021.01.047CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Franzen V, Kwiatkowski L, Martins PAF, Tekkaya AE (2009) Single point incremental forming of PVC. J Mater Process Technol 209:462–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.02.013CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Marques TA, Silva MB, Martins PAF (2012) On the potential of single point incremental forming of sheet polymer parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 60:75–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3585-yCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhu H, Ou H, Popov A (2020) Incremental sheet forming of thermoplastics: a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 111:565–587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06056-5CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Das A (2024) A comprehensive review on incremental sheet forming and its associated aspects. J Eng Sci Technol Rev 17:159–178. https://doi.org/10.25103/jestr.173.19CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Durante M, Formisano A, Boccarusso L, Langella A (2020) Influence of cold-rolling on incremental sheet forming of polycarbonate. Mater Manuf Process 35:328–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2020.1726946CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Jackson KP, Allwood JM, Landert M (2008) Incremental forming of sandwich panels. J Mater Process Technol 204:290–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.11.117CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Fiorotto M, Sorgente M, Lucchetta G (2010) Preliminary studies on single point incremental forming for composite materials. Int J Mater Form 3:951–954. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-010-0926-6CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Emami R, Mirnia MJ, Elyasi M, Zolfaghari A (2023) An experimental investigation into single point incremental forming of glass fiber-reinforced polyamide sheet with different fiber orientations and volume fractions at elevated temperatures. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 36:1893–1917. https://doi.org/10.1177/08927057221074266CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Ikari T, Tanaka H (2024) Feasibility study of Single-Point incremental forming for Discontinuous-Fiber CFRP using Oil-Bath heating. Int J Autom Technol 18:433–443. https://doi.org/10.20965/ijat.2024.p0433CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Hussain G, Hassan M, Wei H et al (2023) Advances on incremental forming of composite materials. Alex Eng J 79:308–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2023.07.045CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Taha I, El-Sabbagh A, Ziegmann G (2008) Modelling of strength and stiffness behaviour of natural fibre reinforced polypropylene composites. Polym Polym Compos 16:295–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/096739110801600502CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Alhijazi M, Safaei B, Zeeshan Q et al (2023) Prediction of elastic properties of thermoplastic composites with natural fibers. J Text Inst 114:1488–1496. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2022.2131352CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Luthra P, Vimal KK, Goel V et al (2020) Biodegradation studies of polypropylene/natural fiber composites. SN Appl Sci 2:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-2287-1CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Manaia JP, Manaia AT, Rodriges L (2019) Industrial hemp fibers: an overview. Fibers 7:106. https://doi.org/10.3390/fib7120106CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Pil L, Bensadoun F, Pariset J, Verpoest I (2016) Why are designers fascinated by flax and hemp fibre composites? Compos Part Appl Sci Manuf 83:193–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.11.004CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Väisänen T, Kilpeläinen P, Kitunen V et al (2019) Effect of steam treatment on the chemical composition of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) and identification of the extracted carbohydrates and other compounds. Ind Crops Prod 131:224–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INDCROP.2019.01.055CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Frącz W, Janowski G, Bąk Ł (2021) Influence of the alkali treatment of flax and hemp fibers on the properties of PHBV based biocomposites. Polymers 13:1965. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13121965CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Ning H, Janowski GM, Vaidya UK, Husman G (2007) Thermoplastic sandwich structure design and manufacturing for the body panel of mass transit vehicle. Compos Struct 80:82–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.04.090CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Vieille B, Albouy W, Chevalier L, Taleb L (2013) About the influence of stamping on thermoplastic-based composites for aeronautical applications. Compos Part B Eng 45:821–834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.07.047CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramakrishna S, Mayer J, Wintermantel E, Leong KW (2001) Biomedical applications of polymer-composite materials: a review. Compos Sci Technol 61:1189–1224. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(00)00241-4CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Zorer E, Özdemir O, Öztoprak N (2020) An experimental study on low velocity impact behavior of thermoplastic composites repaired by composite patches. J Compos Mater 54:4515–4524. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998320935159CrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Erartsın O, Drongelen Mvan, Govaert LE (2021) Identification of plasticity-controlled creep and fatigue failure mechanisms in transversely loaded unidirectional thermoplastic composites. J Compos Mater 55:1947–1965. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998320964252CrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Formisano A, Papa I, Lopresto V, Langella A (2019) Influence of the manufacturing technology on impact and flexural properties of GF/PP commingled twill fabric laminates. J Mater Process Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.116275CrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Al-Ghamdi KA (2018) Spring back analysis in incremental forming of polypropylene sheet: an experimental study. J Mech Sci Technol 32:4859–4869. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-018-0934-xCrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang Z, Zhu G (2023) Development of the temperature-dependent constitutive model of glass fiber reinforced polypropylene composites. Mater Manuf Process 38:295–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2021.2016817CrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Arinze RU, Oramah E, Chukwuma EC et al (2023) Reinforcement of polypropylene with natural fibers: mitigation of environmental pollution. Environ Challenges 11:100688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2023.100688CrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Sisti L, Totaro G, Vannini M et al (2016) Evaluation of the retting process as a pre-treatment of vegetable fibers for the preparation of high-performance polymer biocomposites. Ind Crops Prod 81:56–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.11.045CrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Sepe R, Bollino F, Boccarusso L, Caputo F (2018) Influence of chemical treatments on mechanical properties of hemp fiber reinforced composites. Compos Part B Eng 133:210–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.09.030CrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Mittal V, Sinha S (2017) Effect of alkali treatment on the thermal properties of wheat straw fiber reinforced epoxy composites. J Compos Mater 51:323–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998316646168CrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Baykus O, Mutlu A, Dogan M (2016) The effect of pre-impregnation with maleated coupling agents on mechanical and water absorption properties of jute fabric reinforced polypropylene and polyethylene biocomposites. J Compos Mater 50:257–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998315573288CrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Formisano A, Durante M, Viscusi A, Carrino L (2021) Mechanical behavior and collapse mechanisms of innovative aluminum foam-based sandwich panels under three-point bending. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 112:1631–1639. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00170-020-06564-4CrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Uzay Ç, Geren N (2020) Effect of stainless-steel wire mesh embedded into fibre-reinforced polymer facings on flexural characteristics of sandwich structures. J Reinf Plast Compos 39:613–633. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684420921952CrossRef
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Dobah Y, Zampetakis I, Ward C, Scarpa F (2020) Thermoformability characterisation of flax reinforced polypropylene composite materials. Compos Part B Eng 184:107727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107727CrossRef
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Torres S, Ortega R, Acosta P, Calderón E (2021) Hot incremental forming of biocomposites developed from linen fibres and a thermoplastic matrix. Stroj Vestnik/Journal Mech Eng 67:123–132. https://doi.org/10.5545/sv-jme.2020.6936CrossRef
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Formisano A, Boccarusso L, De Fazio D et al (2025) Considerations on the incremental forming of natural fibre-reinforced polypropylene composites. Mater Res Proc 54:2238–2245. https://doi.org/10.21741/9781644903599-241CrossRef
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Hariprasad K, Ravichandran K, Jayaseelan V, Muthuramalingam T (2020) Acoustic and mechanical characterisation of polypropylene composites reinforced by natural fibres for automotive applications. J Mater Res Technol 9:14029–14035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.09.112CrossRef
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Boccarusso L, De Fazio D, Durante M (2022) Production of PP composites reinforced with flax and hemp woven mesh fabrics via compression molding. Inventions 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/inventions7010005
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Chabot A, Motteu T, Chevalier J, Godet S (2025) In situ characterization of the damage mechanisms during tensile deformation in sustainable flax-PP spread-tow woven composites. J Mater Sci Mater Eng. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40712-025-00319-3
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu CM, Lai WY, Wang CY (2016) Effects of surface modification on the mechanical properties of flax/β-polypropylene composites. Materials. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9050314CrossRef
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Durante M, Formisano A, Lambiase F (2018) Incremental forming of polycarbonate sheets. J Mater Process Technol 253:57–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.11.005CrossRef
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Formisano A, Boccarusso L, De Fazio D, Durante M (2024) Effects of toolpath on defect phenomena in the incremental forming of thin polycarbonate sheets. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 133:4957–4966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-024-14047-zCrossRef
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Bagudanch I, Garcia-Romeu ML, Sabater M (2016) Incremental forming of polymers: process parameters selection from the perspective of electric energy consumption and cost. J Clean Prod 112:1013–1024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.087CrossRef
59.
Zurück zum Zitat Formisano A, Fazio D De, Irace G, Durante M (2025) Incremental forming of natural fiber-reinforced polypropylene composites: considerations on formability limits and energy consumption. Mater 2025:2688. https://doi.org/10.3390/MA18122688CrossRef
60.
Zurück zum Zitat Durante M, Formisano A, Lambiase F (2019) Formability of polycarbonate sheets in single-point incremental forming. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 102:2049–2062. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03298-wCrossRef
61.
Zurück zum Zitat Mehdikhani M, Gorbatikh L, Verpoest I, Lomov SV (2019) Voids in fiber-reinforced polymer composites: a review on their formation, characteristics, and effects on mechanical performance. J Compos Mater 53:1579–1669. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998318772152CrossRef
62.
Zurück zum Zitat Rahman MZ (2021) Mechanical and damping performances of flax fibre composites – a review. Composites Part C: Open Access 4:100081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomc.2020.100081CrossRef

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen. 

    Bildnachweise
    MKVS GbR/© MKVS GbR, Nordson/© Nordson, ViscoTec/© ViscoTec, BCD Chemie GmbH, Merz+Benteli/© Merz+Benteli, Robatech/© Robatech, Ruderer Klebetechnik GmbH, Xometry Europe GmbH/© Xometry Europe GmbH, Atlas Copco/© Atlas Copco, Sika/© Sika, Medmix/© Medmix, Kisling AG/© Kisling AG, Dosmatix GmbH/© Dosmatix GmbH, Innotech GmbH/© Innotech GmbH, Hilger u. Kern GmbH, VDI Logo/© VDI Wissensforum GmbH, Dr. Fritz Faulhaber GmbH & Co. KG/© Dr. Fritz Faulhaber GmbH & Co. KG, ECHTERHAGE HOLDING GMBH&CO.KG - VSE, mta robotics AG/© mta robotics AG, Bühnen, The MathWorks Deutschland GmbH/© The MathWorks Deutschland GmbH, Spie Rodia/© Spie Rodia, Schenker Hydraulik AG/© Schenker Hydraulik AG