nach oben

Erschienen in:

10.09.2015

Comparison of interactive voice response (IVR) with paper administration of instruments to assess functional status, sexual function, and quality of life in elderly men

verfasst von: Raymond C. Rosen, Alisa J. Stephens-Shields, Glenn R. Cunningham, Denise Cifelli, David Cella, John T. Farrar, Elizabeth Barrett-Connor, Cora E. Lewis, Marco Pahor, Xiaoling Hou, Peter J. Snyder

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 4/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Purpose

Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are essential for assessing subjective patient experiences. Interactive voice response (IVR) data collection provides advantages for clinical trial design by standardizing and centralizing the assessment. Prior to adoption of IVR as a mode of PRO administration in the Testosterone Trials (TTrials), we compared IVR to paper versions of the instruments to be used.

Methods

IVR versions of the FACIT-Fatigue scale and Psychosexual Daily Questionnaire, Question 4, were developed. In one pilot study, IVR versions of these scales were compared to paper versions in 25 men ≥ 65 years at each of two clinical sites. In another study, IVR versions of the SF-36 Vitality Scale (SF-36), Positive and Negative Affect Scale, and Patient Health Questionnaire were evaluated in comparison with previously validated paper versions in 25 men at two clinical sites. Both paper and IVR versions of each instrument were administered in counterbalanced order, and test–retest reliability was evaluated by repeated administration of the test. Bland–Altman plots were used to assess the degree of agreement. Test–retest correlations for each measure were also determined.

Results

Satisfactory agreement was observed between IVR and paper versions of each study measure. Specifically, linear and highly positive associations were observed consistently across the study for IVR and paper versions of all study measures. These ranged from r = 0.91–0.99. Test–retest reliability for all measures was acceptable or better (r = 0.70–0.90).

Conclusions

The IVR versions of TTrials endpoints in these two studies performed consistently well in comparison with paper versions.

Vorheriger Artikel Erratum to: Distilling the essence of appraisal: a mixed methods study of people with multiple sclerosis

Nächster Artikel Linkage between the PROMIS® pediatric and adult emotional distress measures

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Kobak, K. A., Greist, J. H., Jefferson, J. W., Katzelnick, D. J., & Mundt, J. C. (2001). New technologies to improve clinical trials. Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, 21(3), 255–256.CrossRefPubMed

Piette, J. D. (2000). Interactive voice response systems in the diagnosis and management of chronic disease. American Journal of Managed Care, 6(7), 817–827.PubMed

Corkrey, R., & Parkinson, L. (2002). Interactive voice response: Review of studies 1989–2000. Behave Research Methods Instruments & Computers, 34(3), 342–353.CrossRef

Midanik, L. T., & Greenfield, T. K. (2008). Interactive voice response versus computer-assisted telephone interviewing (CATI) surveys and sensitive questions: The 2005 National Alcohol Survey. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 69(4), 580–588.CrossRefPubMed

Mundt, J. C., Kobak, K. A., Taylor, L. V., Mantle, J. M., Jefferson, J. W., Katzelnick, D. J., et al. (1998). Administration of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale using interactive voice response technology. MD Computing, 15(1), 31–39.PubMed

Wang-Weigand, S., Watissee, M., & Roth, T. (2011). Use of a post-sleep questionnaire-interactive voice response system (PSQ-IVRS) to evaluate the subjective sleep effects of Ramelteon in adults with chronic insomnia. Sleep Medicine, 12(9), 920–923. doi:10.1016/j.sleep.2011.06.008.CrossRefPubMed

Calloway, M., Bharmal, M., Hill-Zabala, C., & Allen, R. (2011). Development and validation of a subjective post sleep diary (SPSD) to assess sleep status in subjects with restless legs syndrome. Sleep Medicine, 12(7), 704–710. doi:10.1016/j.sleep.2010.09.020.CrossRefPubMed

DeRogatis, L. R., Allgood, A., Auerbach, P., Eubank, D., Greist, J., Bharmal, M., et al. (2010). Validation of a Women’s Sexual Interest Diagnostic Interview-Short Form (WSID-SF) and a Daily Log of Sexual Activities (DLSA) in postmenopausal women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 7(2 Pt 2), 917–927. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01528.x.CrossRefPubMed

Osborn, C. Y., & Mulvaney, S. A. (2013). Development and feasibility of a text messaging and interactive voice response intervention for low-income, diverse adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 7(3), 612–622.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Tucker, J. A., Simpson, C. A., Huang, J., Roth, D. L., & Stewart, K. E. (2013). Utility of an interactive voice response system to assess antiretroviral pharmacotherapy adherence among substance users living with HIV/AIDS in the rural South. AIDS Patient Care STDS, 27(5), 280–286. doi:10.1089/apc.2012.0322.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Simpson, C. A., Xie, L., Blum, E. R., & Tucker, J. A. (2011). Agreement between prospective interactive voice response telephone reporting and structured recall reports of risk behaviors in rural substance users living with HIV/AIDS. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 25(1), 185–190. doi:10.1037/a0022725.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Hettema, J. E., Hosseinbor, S., & Ingersoll, K. S. (2012). Feasibility and reliability of interactive voice response assessment of HIV medication adherence: Research and clinical implications. HIV Clinical Trials, 13(5), 271–277. doi:10.1310/hct1305-271.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Dalal, A. A., Nelson, L., Gilligan, T., McLeod, L., Lewis, S., & DeMuro-Mercon, C. (2011). Evaluating patient-reported outcome measurement comparability between paper and alternate versions, using the lung function questionnaire as an example. Value Health, 14(5), 712–720. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2010.12.007.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Skolarus, T. A., Holmes-Rovner, M., Hawley, S. T., Dunn, R. L., Barr, K. L., Willard, N. R., et al. (2012). Monitoring quality of life among prostate cancer survivors: The feasibility of automated telephone assessment. Urology, 80(5), 1021–1026. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2012.07.038.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Snyder, P. J., Ellenberg, S. S., Cunningham, G. R., Matsumoto, A. M., Bhasin, S., Barrett-Connor, E., et al. (2014). The Testosterone Trials: Seven coordinated trials of testosterone treatment in elderly men. Clinical Trials, 11(3), 362–375. doi:10.1177/1740774514524032.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Lee, K. K., Berman, N., Alexander, G. M., Hull, L., Swerdloff, R. S., & Wang, C. (2003). A simple self-report diary for assessing psychosexual function in hypogonadal men. Journal of Andrology, 24(5), 688–698.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Cella, D., Yount, S., Sorensen, M., Chartash, E., Sengupta, N., & Grober, J. (2005). Validation of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Scale relative to other instrumentation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Journal of Rheumatology, 32, 811–819.PubMed

18.

Ware, J., & Kosinski, M. (2005). SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales: A manual for users of version 1 (2nd ed.). Lincoln, RI: Quality Metric Inc.

19.

Ware, J., Snow, K., & Kosinski, M. (1993, 2000). SF-36 Health survey: Manual and interpretation guide. Lincoln, RI: Quality Metric Inc.

20.

Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. (2001). The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16(9), 606–613.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1986). Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet, 1(8476), 307–310.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.CrossRef

Titel: Comparison of interactive voice response (IVR) with paper administration of instruments to assess functional status, sexual function, and quality of life in elderly men
verfasst von: Raymond C. Rosen
Alisa J. Stephens-Shields
Glenn R. Cunningham
Denise Cifelli
David Cella
John T. Farrar
Elizabeth Barrett-Connor
Cora E. Lewis
Marco Pahor
Xiaoling Hou
Peter J. Snyder
Publikationsdatum: 10.09.2015
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 4/2016
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1133-1

Springer Professional

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2016

Mapping the EORTC QLQ-C30 onto the EQ-5D-3L: assessing the external validity of existing mapping algorithms

Indicators of resilience and healthcare outcomes: findings from the 2010 health and retirement survey

A new internet-based tool for reporting and analysing patient-reported outcomes and the feasibility of repeated data collection from patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms

Linkage between the PROMIS® pediatric and adult emotional distress measures

Predictive models to estimate utility from clinical questionnaires in schizophrenia: findings from EuroSC

Erratum to: Distilling the essence of appraisal: a mixed methods study of people with multiple sclerosis