Skip to main content

2024 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Comparison of Methodologies for Seismic Fragility Analysis of Designed RC Frame Building as Per Indian Provisions

verfasst von : Kaushik Gondaliya, Jignesh Amin, Sandip Vasanwala, Atul Desai

Erschienen in: Sustainable Design and Eco Technologies for Infrastructure

Verlag: Springer Nature Singapore

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The seismic fragility analysis is widely used worldwide to compute the seismic collapse probability of structures since last two decades. The evaluation of fragility functions using nonlinear structural analysis is a crucial step in many seismic assessment techniques. In the present study, four-storey mid-rise RC frame building located in Surat city (seismic Zone-III) is designed as per IS 456, (BIS IS 1893. (2016). Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures, Part-1 General Provisions and Buildings. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards) provisions and detailed as per IS 13920 provisions. The designed RC frame is analysed using nonlinear static pushover analysis (NSPA) and incremental dynamic analysis (IDA). The response modification (R) factor is estimated for designed RC frame as per ATC-19 guidelines from the data obtained using NSPA. The results of the NSPA and IDA are used to derive the fragility curves based on assumed performance limit criteria. The fragility curves derived from the data of NSPA are fitted through approximation of the normal to binomial distribution, while in the case of IDA, the multiple stripes’ analysis is used and fragility function is fitted through maximum likelihood. The probability of various damage states is determined at performance point for seismic hazard corresponding to Zone-III, IV, and V. The R factor for RC frame is estimated as 5.72, which justifies and validates the provisions of Indian seismic code for R factor. The probability of occurrences for various damage states is ranged from 10 to 50% for study RC frame building. Comparison of NSPA and IDA approach reveals the efficiency of both approaches in estimating the probability of occurrence of various damage states and post-seismic response for RC frame.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat BIS IS 1893 (2016) Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures, Part-1 general provisions and buildings. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi BIS IS 1893 (2016) Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures, Part-1 general provisions and buildings. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi
5.
Zurück zum Zitat ATC (1996) Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings, report ATC-40 (also Report No. SSC 96–01. California Seismic Safety Commission). Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA, USA ATC (1996) Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings, report ATC-40 (also Report No. SSC 96–01. California Seismic Safety Commission). Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA, USA
7.
Zurück zum Zitat BIS IS 13920 (2016). Ductile detailing of reinforced Concrete-code of practice. Bureau of Indian Standards. New Delhi India, New Delhi BIS IS 13920 (2016). Ductile detailing of reinforced Concrete-code of practice. Bureau of Indian Standards. New Delhi India, New Delhi
8.
Zurück zum Zitat BIS 875 Part 1 (1987) Design loads (other than earthquake) for buildings and structures. Dead Loads—Code of Practice., Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi BIS 875 Part 1 (1987) Design loads (other than earthquake) for buildings and structures. Dead Loads—Code of Practice., Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi
9.
Zurück zum Zitat BIS 875 Part 2 (1987) Design loads (other than earthquake) for buildings and structures. Imposed loads—code of practice., Bureau of Indian standards, New Delhi BIS 875 Part 2 (1987) Design loads (other than earthquake) for buildings and structures. Imposed loads—code of practice., Bureau of Indian standards, New Delhi
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Prota A, Cicco F, Cosenza E (2009) Cyclic behavior of smooth steel reinforcing bars: experimental analysis and modeling issues. J Earthquake Eng 13(4):500–519CrossRef Prota A, Cicco F, Cosenza E (2009) Cyclic behavior of smooth steel reinforcing bars: experimental analysis and modeling issues. J Earthquake Eng 13(4):500–519CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Menegotto M (1973) Method of analysis for cyclically loaded RC plane frames including changes in geometry and non-elastic behavior of elements under combined normal force and bending. In: Procceding of IABSE symposium on resistance and ultimate deformability of structures acted on by well-defined repeated loads, pp 15–22 Menegotto M (1973) Method of analysis for cyclically loaded RC plane frames including changes in geometry and non-elastic behavior of elements under combined normal force and bending. In: Procceding of IABSE symposium on resistance and ultimate deformability of structures acted on by well-defined repeated loads, pp 15–22
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Priestley JMN, Seible F, Calvi GM (1996) Seismic design and retrofit of bridges. Wiley Interscience, New YorkCrossRef Priestley JMN, Seible F, Calvi GM (1996) Seismic design and retrofit of bridges. Wiley Interscience, New YorkCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Miranda E, Bertero VV (1994) (1994) Evaluation of strength reduction factors for earthquake resistant design. Earthq Spectra 10:357–379CrossRef Miranda E, Bertero VV (1994) (1994) Evaluation of strength reduction factors for earthquake resistant design. Earthq Spectra 10:357–379CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Anonymous: American Society of Civil Engineers (2017) Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings. Am Soc Civil Eng Anonymous: American Society of Civil Engineers (2017) Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings. Am Soc Civil Eng
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Sairam B, Singh AP, Patel V, Chopra S, Kumar MR (2019) VS30 mapping and site characterization in the seismically active intraplate region of Western India: implications for risk mitigation. Near Surf Geophys 17(5):533–546 Sairam B, Singh AP, Patel V, Chopra S, Kumar MR (2019) VS30 mapping and site characterization in the seismically active intraplate region of Western India: implications for risk mitigation. Near Surf Geophys 17(5):533–546
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Anonymous: FEMA (2009) Quantification of building seismic performance factors, federal emergency management agency. FEMA P695, Washington, DC Anonymous: FEMA (2009) Quantification of building seismic performance factors, federal emergency management agency. FEMA P695, Washington, DC
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Lantada N, Irizarry J, Barbat AH, Goula X, Roca AS, T and Pujades L.G. (2008) Seismic Hazard and risk scenarios for Barcelona, Spain, using the Risk-UE vulnerability index method. Bull Earthq Eng 8(2):201–229CrossRef Lantada N, Irizarry J, Barbat AH, Goula X, Roca AS, T and Pujades L.G. (2008) Seismic Hazard and risk scenarios for Barcelona, Spain, using the Risk-UE vulnerability index method. Bull Earthq Eng 8(2):201–229CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat ATC-19 (1996) Structural response modification factors. In: Applied technology council, report ATC-19. Redwood City ATC-19 (1996) Structural response modification factors. In: Applied technology council, report ATC-19. Redwood City
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison of Methodologies for Seismic Fragility Analysis of Designed RC Frame Building as Per Indian Provisions
verfasst von
Kaushik Gondaliya
Jignesh Amin
Sandip Vasanwala
Atul Desai
Copyright-Jahr
2024
Verlag
Springer Nature Singapore
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8465-7_8