Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen
An overview of the durability design requirements and substantiation approaches, with an emphasis on aerospace applications, is provided in this chapter. The service history of both commercial and military composite aircraft structures has provided numerous examples of both good and bad designs from which current design specification and guidance are derived. Issues to be considered in the design of composites used in primary and secondary composite structures including corrosion prevention measures associated with joining composite and metallic components are described. Design details, material selection, and demonstration that designs meet performance criteria are dependent on a structure’s thermal and mechanical loading environments, service and economic life requirements, manufacturing constraints, and inspectability requirements. Based on an assessment of the durability of composite materials at the coupon level through modeling and testing, a description of the building block approach used to validate durability predictions of elements, subcomponents, components, and full-scale structural testing is given. The unique requirements for developing load spectra for accelerated full-scale durability testing for both composite and combined composite/metallic structures are discussed.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Ransom JB, Glaessgen EH, Raju IS, Knight NF, and Reeder JR, 2008, ‘Lessons Learned from Recent Failure and Incident Investigations of Composite Structures,’ Proceedings of the 49 th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, 7 – 10 April 2008, Schaumburg, IL, AIAA 2008–2317.
MIL-STD-1530C, 2005, DOD Standard Practice, Aircraft Structural Integrity Program (ASIP).
Mohaghegh M, 2004,’Evolution of Structures Design Philosophy and Criteria,’ 45 th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics & materials Conference 19–22 April 2004, Palm Springs, CA, AIAA 2004–1785.
MIL-HDBK-17F, 2002, DOD Composite Materials Handbook Volume 3. Polymer Matrix Composites Materials Usage, Design, and Analysis.
ADS-13F-HDBK, 1997, Aeronautical Design Standard Handbook; Air Vehicle Materials and Processes, United States Army Aviation and Troop Command.
Tomblin JS, Ng YC, Raju KS, 2003,’Material Qualification and Equivalency for Polymer Matrix Composite Material Systems: Updated Procedure,’ DOT/FAA/AR-03/19
AC 20-107B, 2009, DOT Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circular on Composite Aircraft Structure.
Reddick HK, 1983,’Safe-Life and Damage-Tolerant Design Approaches for Helicopter Structures,’ In NASA. Langley Research Center Failure Analysis and Mechanics of Failure of Fibrous Composite Structures, pp 129–152.
Lieblein S, 1981,’Survey of Long-Term Durability of Fiberglass-Reinforced Plastic Structures,’ NASA CR-165320.
JSSG-2006, 1998, DOD Joint Service Specification Guidance, Aircraft Structures.
MIL-HDBK-310, 1997, DOD Handbook, Global Climatic Data for Developing Military Products.
Rousseau C, 2001, Test Program Planning, ASM Handbook, Volume 21 Composites, ASM International.
Wilkins DJ, 1983, A Preliminary Damage Tolerance Methodology for Composite Structures, In NASA. Langley Research Center Failure Analysis and Mechanics of Failure of Fibrous Composite Structures pp. 67–94.
Reddy DJ, 2006, Composites in Rotorcraft Industry & Damage Tolerance Requirements, Presented at the FAA Composites Workshop, Chicago, IL, July 19–21, 2006.
ADS-51-HDBK, 1996, Aeronautical Design Standard Handbook, Rotorcraft and Aircraft Qualification (Raq) Handbook.
Pagano NJ, Schoeppner GA, 2000, Delamination in Polymer Matrix Composites: Problems and Assessment’, Vol. 2 Polymer Matrix Composites, in series Comprehensive Composite Materials, Elsevier, New York.
Davis GW, Sakata IF, 1981, Design Considerations for Composite Fuselage Structure of Commercial Transport Aircraft, NASA CR-159296.
FAR PART 23—Airworthiness Standards: Normal, Utility, Acrobatic, And Commuter Category Airplanes, § 23.573 Damage tolerance and fatigue evaluation of structure.
Vosteen LF, Hadcock RN, 1994, Composite Chronicles: A Study of the Lessons Learned in the Development, Production, and Service of Composite Structures, NASA CR-4620.
MIL-STD-889B, 1993, DOD Standard Practice, Dissimilar Materials.
ASTM G82-98, 2009, Standard Guide for Development and Use of a Galvanic Series for Predicting Galvanic Corrosion Performance.
Aylor DM and Murray JN, 1992, The Effect of a Seawater Environment on the Galvanic Corrosion Behavior of Graphite/Epoxy Composite Coupled to Metals, Carderock Division Naval Surface Warfare Center, CDNSWC-SME-92/93.
’Corrosion Prevention and Control Planning Guidebook Spiral 3‘, 2007, Department of Defense, Principle Deputy Under Secretary of Defense, Acquisitions, Tech and Logistics, Washington DC.
Campbell FC, 2004, Manufacturing Processes for Advanced Composites, Elsevier Ltd.
Hoeckelman LA, 2001, “Environmental Protection and Sealing,“ ASM Handbook, Volume 21 Composites, ASM International.
MIL-HDBK-1568, 1996, DOD Standardization Handbook, Materials and Processes for Corrosion Prevention and Control in Aerospace Weapons Systems.
MIL-HDBK-729, 1983, DOD Standardization Handbook, Corrosion and Corrosion Prevention Metals.
Gintert LA, Hihara LH, 2002, ‘Corrosion Considerations for Military Applications of Composite Materials,’ CORROSION 2002, NACE International, Houston, Paper 02162.
Harris CE, Starnes JH, Shuart MJ, 2001, An Assessment of the State-of-the-Art in the Design and Manufacturing of Large Composite Structures for Aerospace Vehicles, NASA/TM-2001-210844.
Demuts E, Whitehead RS, and Deo RB, 1989, ‘Assessment of Damage Tolerance in Composites,’ Composite Structures, vol. 4, pp. 45–58. CrossRef
Baker AA; Jones R; Callinan RJ, 1985, ‘Damage Tolerance of Graphite/Epoxy Composites,’ Composite Structures, vol. 4, pp. 15–44. CrossRef
ARP-5414, 2005, Aircraft Lightning Zoning, Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc. (SAE) Aerospace Recommended Practice.
Gardiner, G, 2006, ‘Lightning Strike Protection for Composite Structures’ High Performance Composites, http://www.compositesworld.com/articles/lightning-strike-protection-for-composite-structures, Accessed in 2009.
AC 20-53B, 2006DOT Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circular on Protection of Aircraft Fuel Systems Against Fuel Vapor Ignition Caused by Lightning.
AC 20–136, 1990, DOT Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circular on Protection of Aircraft Electrical/Electronic Systems Against the Indirect Effects of Lightning.
MIL-STD-1795A, 1989, DOD Standard Practice, Lightning Protection of Aerospace Vehicles and Hardware.
MIL-STD-1757A, 1983, DOD Standard Practice, Lightning Qualification Test Techniques for Aerospace Vehicles and Hardware.
MIL-B-5087, 1964, DOD Specification, Bonding, Electrical, and Lightning Protection for Aerospace Systems.
Schoeppner GA, Curliss DB, 2002,’Model-Based Design for Composite Materials Life Management,’ Proceedings of the 9 th AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, 4–6 September 2002, Atlanta, GA, Paper number AIAA-2002-5516.
Tomblin J, Lacy T, Smith B, Hooper S, Vizzini A, Lee S, 1999, Review of Damage Tolerance for Composite Sandwich Airframe Structures, DOT/FAA/AR-99/49.
Lincoln JW, Yeh HC, 1999, Treatment of High-Cycle Vibratory Stress in Rotorcraft Damage Tolerance Design, RTO AVT Specialists’ Meeting on Application of Damage Tolerance Principles for Improved Airworthiness of Rotorcraft, held in Corfu, Greece, 21–22 April 1999, and published in RTO MP-24.
Lazzeri L, Mariani U, 2009 ‘Application of Damage Tolerance Principles to the Design of Helicopters,’ Int J, Fatigue, vol. 31, pp. 1039–1045. CrossRef
Miner MA, 1945, ‘Cumulative Damage in Fatigue,’ J. Appl. Mech., pp. A159 – A164.
FAA FAR Part 25, Airworthiness Standards: Transport Category Airplanes.
AC 35.37-1A, 2001, DOT Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circular on Guidance Material for Fatigue Limit Tests and Composite Blade Fatigue Substantiation.
AC 20-66A, 2001, DOT Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circular on Vibration and Fatigue Evaluation of Airplane Propellers.
Whitehead RS, Kan HP, Cordero R, Saether ES, 1986, ‘Certification Testing Methodology for Composite Structures, Volumes I and II,’ Report numbers NADC-87042-60 and DOT/FAA/CT-86/39.
Whitehead RS, 1991, Lessons learned for composite structures, NASA. Langley Research Center, The First NASA Advanced Composites Technology Conference, Part 1, pp. 399–415.
Kan HP, Cordero R, Whitehead RS, 1997, Advanced Certification Methodology for Composite Structures, DOT/FAA/AR-96/111.
Lincoln J, 1986, ‘Certification of Composites for Aircraft,’ Proceedings of the 1986 Aircraft Structural Integrity Conference.
Lincoln JW, 2000, ‘USAF Experience in the Qualification of Composite Structures,’ Composite Structures: Theory and Practice, ASTM STP 1383, P. Grant, Ed., American Society for Testing and Materials. West Conshohocken. PA, pp. 1–11.
AC 25.571 -1C, 1998, DOT Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circular on Damage Tolerance and Fatigue Evaluation of Structure.
CMH-17-3F, Composite Materials Handbook, Volume 3. Polymer Matrix Composites Materials Usage, Design, and Analysis.
AC 29-2C, 2003, DOT Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circular on Certification of Transport Category Rotorcraft.
Rouchon J, 2007, How, Over the Past 30 Years, “Part 25” Composite Structures Have Been Coping with Metal Minded Fatigue and Damage Tolerance Requirements, 24 th ICAF Symposium, Naples, Italy, 16 May 2007.
Tillman MS, 2009, Addendum to NAWCADPAX/TR-2009/139 – Evaluation of Flight Load Spectrum and Fatigue Test Spectrum Severity, Report No: NAWCADPAX/TM-2009-169, Naval Air Systems Command, Patuxent River, MD.
Tillman MS, Tsai HC, Peek M, 2009, An Investigation of the End-of-Life Residual Strength of the F/A-18A-D Inner Wing Step Lap Joint, Report No: NAWCADPAX/TR-2009/139, Naval Air Systems Command, Patuxent River, MD.
- Composite Structures Durability Design and Substantiation
Gregory A. Schoeppner
Matthew S. Tillman
- Springer US
- Chapter 11
in-adhesives, MKVS, Neuer Inhalt/© Zühlke, Technisches Interface Design/© scyther5 | Getty Images | iStock