Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
…we’ll be asking about the role of proxy advisory firms in corporate voting. Given the influence that these firms’ recommendations have on corporate voting outcomes, we’ll probe the need for rules to ensure that advisory firms are basing their research and recommendations on accurate and reliable information. And, that they are providing adequate disclosure of any conflicts of interest they may have in providing voting recommendations.
Mary Schapiro, Chair, Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Nov. 2009
The current proxy voting system in the United States has become the subject of considerable controversy. Because institutional investment managers have the authority to vote their clients’ proxies, they have a fiduciary obligation to those clients. Frequently, in an attempt to fulfill that obligation, these institutional investors employ proxy advisory services to manage the thousands of votes they must cast. However, many proxy advisory services have conflicts of interest that inhibit their utility to those seeking to discharge their fiduciary duties. In this article, we describe the current proxy advisory network as an example of how current notions of conflicts of interest fall short when explaining the behavior of an interconnected set of market players whose remit is to act in the best interests of their investors. We discuss what participants in this system should do to bring transparency and accuracy to the proxy advice industry.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Aguilar, L. A. (2009). The power of the shareholder & the rise of corporate democracy. Speech by U.S. Securities and Exchange Commissioner, New America Alliance Latino Economic Forum, Waldorf Astoria Hotel, New York, New York. October 29. http://www.sec.gov/news/speech/2009/spch102909laa.htm. Accessed February 27, 2011.
Alexander, C. R., Chen, M. A., Seppi, D. J., & Spatt, C. S. (2009). The role of advisory services in proxy voting In N. W. P. Series (Ed.) Working Paper 15143. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Anabtawi, I., & Stout, L. (2008). Fiduciary duties for activist shareholders. Stanford Law Review, 60(5), 1255–1308.
Barr A., Burton J. (2007). Controversy ignites competition among proxy firms. http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/controversy-ignites-competition-among-proxy/story.aspx?guid=BD711286-71DE-4D3B-939F-9C6B9F1BC100. Accessed October 14, 2010.
Bebchuk, L. (2006). Pay without performance: The unfulfilled promise of executive compensation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bebchuk, L. (2007). The myth of the shareholder franchise. Virginia Law Review, 93(3), 676–732.
Berle, A. A., & Means, G. C. (1932). The modern corporation and private property. New York: McMillan.
Bethel, J. E., & Gillan, S. L. (2002). The impact of the institutional and regulatory environment on shareholder voting. Financial Management, 31(4), 29–54. CrossRef
Boatright, J. R. (2001). Financial services. In M. Davis & A. Stark (Eds.), Conflict of interest in the professions (pp. 217–236). New York: Oxford University Press.
Boatright, J. R. (2009). Conflicts of interest in financial services. Business and Society Review, 105, 201–219. CrossRef
Carruthers, B. G. (2010). Knowledge and liquidity: Institutional and cognitive foundations of the subprime crisis. In M. Lounsbury & P. M. Hirsch (Eds.), Markets on trial: The economic sociology of the U.S. financial crisis: Part A (pp. 157–182). Bingley: Emerald. CrossRef
Carson, T. L. (1994). Conflicts of interest. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(5), 387–404. CrossRef
Carson, T. L. (2004). Conflicts of interest and self-dealing in the professions: A review. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14(2), 161–182. CrossRef
Chatterji, A. K., & Toffel, M. W. (2010). How firms respond to being rated. Strategic Management Journal, 31(9), 917–945.
Choi, S., Fisch, J., & Kahan, M. (2010). The power of proxy advisors: Myth or reality? Emory Law Journal, 59, 870–918.
Corporate Library. (2010). Company information. http://www.thecorporatelibrary.com/info.php?id=239. Accessed October 12, 2010.
Davis, G. F., & Kim, E. H. (2007). Business ties and proxy voting by mutual funds. Journal of Financial Economics, 85(2), 552–570. CrossRef
Eaglesham J., & Newmann J. (2011, June 17). Raters draw SEC scrutiny. Wall Street Journal, C1.
Easterbrook, F. H., & Fischel, D. R. (1983). Voting in corporate law. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 395–427. CrossRef
Egan–Jones. (2011). Company information. http://www.ejproxy.com/. Accessed September 15, 2011.
Fairfax, L. M. (2008). Shareholder democracy on trial: An international perspective on the effectiveness of shareholder power. Virginia Law and Business Review, 3(1), 2–33.
Federal Register. (2010). Securities and Exchange Commission. 17 CFR Parts 240, 270, 274, et al. Concept Release on the U.S. Proxy System; Proposed Rule. Release Nos. 34–62495; IA–3052; IC–29340; File No. S7–14–10.
General Accounting Office (GAO). (2007). Issues relating to firms that advise institutional investors on proxy voting. Report No. GAO-07-765 http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d07765.pdf. Accessed June 12, 2011.
Glass Lewis. (2011). Company information. http://www.glasslewis.com/solutions/proxyanalysis.php. Accessed September 18, 2011.
GMI Ratings. (Undated). http://www.gmiratings.com/RatingProcess.aspx. Accessed September 9, 2010.
Greene, E. F. (2011a). Dodd–Frank: A lesson in decision avoidance. Capital Markets Law Journal, 6(1), 29–79.
Greene, E. F. (2011b). Dodd-Frank and the future of financial regulation. Harvard Business Law Review. http://www.hblr.org/2011/10/greene-symposium-dfa/. Accessed 17 Mar 2012.
Harbrecht, P. P. (1964). The modern corporation revisited. Columbia Law Review, 64(8), 1410–1426. CrossRef
Hasnas, J. (1998). The normative theories of business ethics: A guide for the perplexed. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8(1), 19–43. CrossRef
Hayward, M. L. A., & Boeker, W. (1998). Power and conflicts of interest in professional firms: Evidence from investment banking. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(1), 1–22. CrossRef
Hyatt, J. (2010). Proxy advisors find themselves in the spotlight. http://business-ethics.com/2010/05/17/243-proxy-advisors-find-themselves-in-the-spotlight/. Accessed August 23, 2010.
Ingley, C., & Van der Walt, N. T. (2004). Corporate governance, institutional investors and conflicts of interest. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(4), 534–551. CrossRef
Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility. (2011). Proxy voting guide. New York: ICCR.
Investment Company Institute (ICI). (2011). ICI Fact Book. Overview of US Registered Investment Companies. http://www.icifactbook.org/fb_ch1.html. Accessed July 17, 2011.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 260–305.
Kropp R. (2011). Ernst & Young buys assets of Proxy Governance. Institutional Shareowner.com. http://www.institutionalshareowner.com/article.mpl?sfArticleId=3227. Accessed, September 18, 2011.
Lang, W. W., & Jagtiani, J. A. (2010). The mortgage and financial crises: The role of credit risk management and corporate governance. Atlantic Economic Journal, 38(2), 123–144. CrossRef
Langley, M. (2003, June 6). Making the grade: Want to lift your firm’s rating on governance? Buy the test. Wall Street Journal, A1.
Lewis, M. (2011). The big short. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Liu, L.-L., Raghunandan, K., & Rama, D. (2009). Financial restatements and shareholder ratifications of the auditor. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 28(1), 225–240. CrossRef
Logsdon, J. M., & Van Buren, H. J. (2009). Beyond the proxy vote: Dialogues between shareholder activists and corporations. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(Supplement 1), 353–365. CrossRef
Loomis, P. A. (1959). The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. George Washington Law Review, 28(1), 214–249.
Marcoux, A. M. (2003). A fiduciary argument against stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(1), 1–24. CrossRef
RiskMetrics Inc. (2008). Disclosure on Form ADV (Uniform Application for Investment Adviser Registration). http://www.riskmetrics.com/sites/default/files/adv.pdf. Accessed October 25, 2010.
RiskMetrics/ISS. (2011). http://www.issgovernance.com/. Accessed March 12, 2011.
Rose, P. (2007). The corporate governance industry. Journal of Corporation Law, 32(4), 887–926.
Sah, S., Lowenstein, G., & Cain, D. (2010). The burden of disclosure. Paper presented at the Society for Business Ethics, Montreal, Canada.
Schapiro, M. (2009). Speech by SEC Chairman: Address to the Practicing Law Institute’s 41st Annual Institute on Securities Regulation. http://www.sec.gov/news/speech/2009/spch110409mls.htm. Accessed August 5, 2011.
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). (2003). 17 CFR Part 275. Concept release on Proxy Voting by Investment Advisors. Release No. IA-2106; File No. S7-38-02.
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). (2010). 17 CFR Parts 240, 270, 274, and 275. Concept release on the U.S. proxy system. Release Nos. 34-62495; IA-3052; IC-29340; File No. S7-14-10.
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). (2011). Testimony on management and structural reforms at the SEC: A progress report. http://www.sec.gov/news/testimony/2011/ts111611rk.htm. Accessed May 14, 2012.
Securities Industry Association. (2008). Securities industry fact book. New York: Securities Industry Association.
Shareholder Communications Coalition. (2008). Coalition views on shareholder communications. http://www.shareholdercoalition.com/statement.html. Accessed February 27, 2011.
Stout, L. A. (2006, January 4). Why should ISS be the new master of the corporate governance universe? Dow Jones Corporate Governance Guest Column, 14–15.
Strine, L. E. (2005). The Delaware way: How we do corporate law and some of the new challenges we (and Europe) face. Delaware Journal of Corporate Law, 30(3), 673–688.
Sundaram, A. K., & Inkpen, A. C. (2004). The corporate objective revisited. Organization Science, 15(3), 350–363. CrossRef
Thompson, R. B. (2008). Defining the shareholder’s role, defining a role for state law: Folk at 40. Delaware Journal of Corporate Law, 33(3), 771–788.
Useem, M. (1996). Investor capitalism. New York: Basic Books.
Vaughan, D. (1983). Controlling unlawful organization behavior: Social structure and corporate misconduct. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Vo, T. T. (2008). Rating management behavior and ethics: A proposal to upgrade the corporate governance rating criteria. Journal of Corporation Law, 34(1), 1–41.
Williams, C. C., & Ryan, L. V. (2007). Courting shareholders: The ethical implications of altering corporate ownership structures. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17(4), 669–688. CrossRef
Wong, S. C. Y. (2011). How conflicts of interest thwart institutional investor stewardship. Butterworths Journal of International Banking and Financial Law, September, 481–482.
- Compound Conflicts of Interest in the US Proxy System
Cynthia E. Clark
Harry J. Van Buren III
- Springer Netherlands
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta