nach oben

Erschienen in:

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

5. Computational Compressible Aerodynamics

verfasst von : Tapan K. Sengupta, Yogesh G. Bhumkar

Erschienen in: Computational Aerodynamics and Aeroacoustics

Verlag: Springer Singapore

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

In the previous chapter, we kept our attention focused on incompressible flow problems in aerodynamics for low and high Reynolds numbers.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Computational Incompressible Aerodynamics

Nächstes Kapitel Acoustic Wave Equation

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Abhishek, A. Analysis, Validation, Prediction and Fundamental Understanding of Rotor Blade Loads in an Unsteady Maneuver. PhD dissertation, Dept. of Aerospace Engg., Univ. of Maryland (2010)

A. Alshabu, H. Olivier, I. Klioutchnikov, Investigation of upstream moving pressure waves on a supercritical airfoil. Aero. Sci. Tech. 10, 465–473 (2006)CrossRef

Y. Andreopoulos, J.H. Agui, G. Briassulis, Shock-wave turbulence interactions. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 32, 309–345 (2000)MathSciNetMATHCrossRef

H. Babinsky, J.K. Harvey, Shock Wave-Boundary-Layer Interactions (Cambridge Univ, Press, 2011)MATHCrossRef

P.M. Bagade, Y.G. Bhumkar, T.K. Sengupta, An improved orthogonal grid generation method for solving flows past highly cambered aerofoils with and without roughness elements. Comput. Fluids 103, 275–289 (2014)MathSciNetMATHCrossRef

Bagade, P. M., Laurendeau, E., Bhole, A., Sharma, N. and Sengupta, T. K. Comparison of RANS and DNS for transitional flow over WTEA-TE1 airfoil. In proc. of IUTAM Symp. on Advances in Computation, Modeling and Control of Transitional and Turbulent Flows, (Editors: Profs. T. K. Sengupta, S. K. Lele, K. R. Sreenivasan and P. A. Davidson) World Scientific Publishing Company, Singapore, 349–357 (2015)

B.S. Baldwin, H. Lomax, Thin layer approximation and algebraic model for separated turbulent flows. AIAA Paper 78–257, (1978)

R.W. Barnwell, A similarity rule for sidewall-boundary-layer effect in two-dimensional wind tunnels. AIAA Paper 79–0108, (1979)

Berton, E., Allain, C., Favier, D. and Maresca, C. Experimental methods for subsonic flow measurements. Notes on Numer. Fluid Mech. and Multidiscip. Des., 81, 97–104 (2002)

10.

Bhole, A. Direct Numerical Simulation of Transonic flow over Airfoils. M.S. thesis, Dept. of Aerospace Engg., IIT Kanpur (2013)

11.

Y.G. Bhumkar, T.K. Sengupta, Adaptive multi-dimensional filters. Comput. Fluids 49, 128–140 (2011)MathSciNetMATHCrossRef

12.

Binion, T. W. Limitations of Available Data. AGARD-AR-138, May (1979)

13.

C. Bogey, C. Bailly, On the application of explicit spatial filtering to the variables or fluxes of linear equations. J. Comput. Phys. 225, 1211–7 (2007)MATHCrossRef

14.

Bowles, P. O. Wind Tunnel Experiments on the Effect of Compressibility on the Attributes of Dynamic Stall. Univ. of Notre Dame (2012)

15.

M.S. Chandrasekhara, L.W. Carr, Flow visualization studies of the Mach number effects on dynamic stall of an oscillating airfoil. J. Aircraft 27(6), 516–522 (1990)CrossRef

16.

M.S. Chandrasekhara, L.W. Carr, M.C. Wilder, Interferometric investigations of compressible dynamic stall over a transiently pitching airfoil. AIAA J. 32(3), 586–593 (1994)CrossRef

17.

L. Chen, C. Xu, X. Lu, Numerical investigation of the compressible flow past an airfoil. J. Fluid Mech. 643, 97–126 (2010)MATHCrossRef

18.

J. Chen, X.-T. Shi, T.-J. Wang, Z.-S. She, Wavy structures in compressible mixing layers. Acta Mech. Sin. 29, 633–640 (2013)CrossRef

19.

A. Choudhry, R. Leknys, M. Arjomandi, R. Kelso, An insight into the dynamic stall lift characteristics. Exp. Therm. and Fluid Sci. 58, 188–208 (2014)CrossRef

20.

T.C. Corke, P.O. Bowles, C. He, E.C. Matlis, Sensing and control of flow separation using plasma actuators. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 369, 1459–1475 (2011)CrossRef

21.

T.C. Corke, O.F. Thomas, Dynamic stall in pitching airfoils: aerodynamic damping and compressibility effects. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 47, 479–505 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRef

22.

Crimi, P. Dynamic stall Technical Report No. AGARD-AG-172 (1973)

23.

Datta, A. and Chopra, I. Prediction of UH-60A dynamic stall loads in high altitude level flight using CFD/CSD coupling. In \(61^{st}\) Annual Forum Proceedings-American Helicopter Society, Grapevine, Texas, June 1–3 (2005)

24.

S. Deck, Numerical simulation of transonic buffet over a supercritical airfoil. AIAA J. 43(7), 1556–1565 (2005)CrossRef

25.

A. Dipankar, T.K. Sengupta, Symmetrized compact schemes for receptivity study of 2D channel flow. J. Comput. Phys. 215, 245–273 (2006)MATHCrossRef

26.

J.A. Ekaterinaris, M.F. Platzer, Computational prediction of airfoil dynamic stall. Prog. in Aerosp. Sci. 33(11), 759–846 (1998)CrossRef

27.

M. Fujino, Y. Yoshizaki, Y. Kawamura, Natural-laminar-flow airfoil development for a lightweight business jet. J. Aircraft 40(4), 609–615 (2003)CrossRef

28.

Fukushima, T. and Dadone, L. U. Comparison of dynamic stall phenomena for pitching and vertical translation motions. NASA CR-2793 (1977)

29.

Garner, H. C., Rogers, E., Acum, W. and Maskell, E. Subsonic Wind Tunnel Wall corrections. AGARDograph, AG-109 (1966)

30.

Gad-el-Hak, M. and Ho, C-M. Unsteady vortical flow around three-dimensional lifting surfaces. AIAA J., 24(5), 713–721 (1986)

31.

A. Garbaruk, M. Shur, M. Strelets, P. Spalart, Numerical study of wind tunnel wall effects on transonic airfoil flow. AIAA J. 41, 1046–1054 (2003)CrossRef

32.

D.V. Gaitonde, J.S. Shang, J.L. Young, Practical aspects of higher-order numerical schemes for wave propagation phenomena. Int. J. Num. Methods in Engg. 45(12), 1849–1869 (1999)MATHCrossRef

33.

D.V. Gaitonde, M.R. Visbal, Further development of a Navier-Stokes solution procedure based on higher-order formulas. AIAA J. 99–0557, (1999)

34.

D.V. Gaitonde, M.R. Visbal, Pad\({\acute{e}}\)-Type Higher-Order Boundary Filters for the Navier-Stokes equations. AIAA J. 38(11), 2103–2112 (2000)CrossRef

35.

L. Gray, J. Liiva, Wind Tunnel Tests of Thin Airfoils Oscillating Near Stall, vol. II (Data Report. Boeing Vertol Co, Philadelphia PA, 1969)

36.

G. Grötzbach, Spatial resolution requirements for direct numerical simulation of the Rayleigh-Bénard convection. J. Comput. Phys. 49(2), 241–264 (1983)CrossRef

37.

Ham, N. D. and Young, M. I. Limit cycle torsional motion of helicopter blades due to stall. J. Sound and Vibration, 4(3), 431IN17433–432444 (1966)

38.

C.D. Harris, Two-dimensional Aerodynamic Characteristics of the NACA0012 airfoil in the Langley 8-foot Transonic Pressure Tunnel. NASA Report-TM 81927, (1981)

39.

V. Hermes, I. Klioutchnikov, H. Oliver, Numerical investigation of unsteady wave phenomena for transonic airfoil flow. Aero. Sci. Tech. 25, 224–233 (2013)CrossRef

40.

Hirsch, C. Numerical Computation of Internal and External Flows. 1, Fundamentals of Numerical Discretization, Wiley-Interscience Publication, New York, USA (1994)

41.

Hoffmann, K. A. and Chiang, S. T. Computational Fluid Dynamics.II, \(4^{th}\) Ed., Engineering Education System, Wichita, Kansas, USA (2000)

42.

Houghton, E. L., Carpenter, P. W., Collicott, S. and Valentine, D. Aerodynamics for Engineering Students. \(6^{th}\) Ed., Butterworth-Heinemann (2013)

43.

J.L. Jacocks, An Investigation of the Aerodynamic Characteristics of Ventilated Test Section Walls for Transonic Wind Tunnel: PhD Dissertation (Univ, Tennessee, 1976)

44.

A. Jameson, K. Ou, 50 years of transonic aircraft design. Prog. Aero. Sci. 47(5), 308–318 (2011)CrossRef

45.

Jameson A., Schmidt W. and Turkel E., Numerical Solution of the Euler Equations by Finite Volume Methods Using Runge-Kutta Time-Stepping Schemes,AIAA 1981–1259, AIAA 14th Fluid and Plasma Dynamic Conf., June 23–25, (1981) Palo Alto, California

46.

Jones, W. P. (Ed.) AGARD Manual on Aeroelasticity. AGARD, (1961)

47.

Kemp, L. D. An Analytic Study for the Design of Advanced Rotor Airfoils. NASA Report CR-112, 297 (1973)

48.

R. Langtry, F.R. Menter, Correlation based transition modeling for unstructured parallelized computational fluid dynamics codes. AIAA J. 47(12), 2894–2906 (2009)CrossRef

49.

Langtry R. and Menter F. R. Transition modeling for general CFD applications in aeronautics. AIAA, \(43^{rd}\) AIAA Aerospace Sciences Metting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, 522 (2005)

50.

P.D. Lax, Weak solutions of nonlinear hyperbolic equations and their numerical computation. Commun. Pure and Appl. Math. 7, 159–193 (1954)MathSciNetMATHCrossRef

51.

B.H.K. Lee, Oscillatory shock motion caused by transonic shock boundary-layer interaction. AIAA J. 28, 942–944 (1990)CrossRef

52.

B.H.K. Lee, Self-sustained shock oscillations on airfoils at transonic speeds. Prog. Aero. Sci. 37, 147–196 (2001)CrossRef

53.

B.H.K. Lee, H. Murty, H. Jiang, Role of Kutta waves on oscillatory shock motion on an airfoil. AIAA J. 32, 789–796 (1994)MATHCrossRef

54.

S.K. Lele, T. Poinsot, Boundary conditions for direct simulations of compressible viscous flows. J. Comp. Phys. 101, 104–129 (1992)MathSciNetMATHCrossRef

55.

Leishman, J. G. Principles of Helicopter Aerodynamics. \(2^{nd}\) Ed., Cambridge Univ. Press (2006)

56.

J.G. Leishman, T.S. Beddoes, A Semi-Empirical Model for Dynamic Stall. J. American Helicopter society 34(3), 3–17 (1989)

57.

H. Liepmann, A. Roshko, Elements of Gasdynamics (Dover Publications, Inc., Mineola, New York, 1956)MATH

58.

M.S. Loginov, N.A. Adams, A.A. Zheltovodov, Large-eddy simulations of shock-wave/turbulent-boundaty-layer interaction. J. Fluid Mech. 565, 135–169 (2006)MATHCrossRef

59.

P.F. Lorber, F.O. Carta, Airfoil dynamic stall at constant pitch rate and high Reynolds number. J. Aircraft 25(6), 548–556 (1988)CrossRef

60.

Mamou M., M\(\acute{e}\)barki, Y., Khalid M., Genest M., Coutu D., Popov A. V., Sainmont C., Georges T., Grigorie L., Botez R. M., Brailovski V., Terriault P., Paraschivoiu I. and Laurendeau E. Aerodynamic Performance Optimization of a Wind Ttunnel Morphing wing Model Subject to Various Cruise Flow Conditions.\(27^{th}\) International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences, ICAS (2010)

61.

J.G. Marvin, L.L. Lewy, H.L. Seegmiller, Turbulence modelling for unsteady transonic flows. AIAA J. 18, 489–496 (1980)CrossRef

62.

G. Martinat, M. Braza, Y. Hoarau, G. Harran, Turbulence modelling of the flow past a pitching NACA0012 airfoil at \(10^5\) and \(10^6\) Reynolds numbers. J. Fluids and Struct. 24(8), 1294–1303 (2008)CrossRef

63.

Maybey, D. G. Physical Phenomena Associated with Unsteady Transonic Flows, in Unsteady Transonic Aerodynamics, vol. 120, Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, AIAA Series. AIAA, Washington, DC, USA (1989)

64.

Maybey, D. G. Some remarks on the design of transonic tunnels with low levels of flow unsteadiness. NASA CR-2722 (1976)

65.

McAlister, K. W., Pucci, S. L., McCroskey, W. J. and Carr, L. W. An experimental study of dynamic stall on advanced airfoil sections: Vol. 2: Pressure and Force Data. NASA Technical Memorandum, 84245 (1982)

66.

McCroskey, W. J., McAlister, K. W., Carr, L. W., Pucci, S. L., Lambert, O. and Indergrand, R. F. Dynamic stall on advanced airfoil sections. \(36^{th}\) Annual National Forum of the American Helicopter Society (1980)

67.

W.J. McCroskey, K.W. McAlister, L.W. Carr, S.L. Pucci, O. Lambert, R.F. Indergrand, Dynamic stall on advanced airfoil sections. J. Am Helicopter Soc. 26(3), 40–50 (1981)CrossRef

68.

McCroskey, W. J., McAlister, K. W., Carr, L. W. and Pucci, S. L. An experimental study of dynamic stall on advanced airfoil sections: Vol. 1: Summary of the Experiment. NASA Technical Memorandum, 84245 (1982)

69.

F.R. Menter, Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA J. 32(8), 1598–1605 (1994)CrossRef

70.

J.E. Mercer, E.W. Geller, M.L. Johnson, A. Jameson, Transonic flow calculations for a wing in a wind tunnel. AIAA J. 18(9), 707–711 (1981)

71.

Maybey, D. G. Flow unsteadiness and model vibration in wind tunnels at subsonic and transonic speeds. Aeronautical Research Council, ARC CP-1155 (1971)

72.

M.T. Nair, T.K. Sengupta, Orthogonal grid generation for Navier-Stokes computations. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 28, 215–224 (1998)MATHCrossRef

73.

T.H. Moulden, Fundamentals of Transonic Flow (Wiley-Interscience Publication, Canada, 1984)MATH

74.

D. Nixon, Unsteady Transonic Aerodynamics, Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics Series (120) (AIAA, Washington, DC, 1989)CrossRef

75.

K. Ohmi, M. Coutanceau, T.P. Loc, A. Dulieu, Vortex formation around an oscillating and translating airfoil at large incidences. J. Fluid Mech. 211, 37–60 (1990)CrossRef

76.

H. Otto, Systematical investigation of the influence of wind tunnel turbulence on the results of force measurements. AGARD CP 174, (1976)

77.

J. Panda, K.B.M.Q. Zaman, Experimental investigation of the flow field of an oscillating airfoil and estimation of lift from wake survey. J. Fluid Mech 265, 65–95 (1994)CrossRef

78.

S.R. Pate, C.J. Schueler, Radiated aerodynamic noise effects on boundary layer transition in supersonic and hypersonic wind tunnels. AIAA J. 7, 450–457 (1968)CrossRef

79.

H.H. Pearcy, Shock induced Separation and Its Prevention by Design and Boundary Layer Control, Boundary Layer and Flow Control, vol. 2 (Pergamon, Oxford, UK, 1961)

80.

Pearcey, H. H., Wilby, P. G., Riley, M. J. and Brotherhood, P. The Derivation and Verification of a New Rotor Profile on the Basis of flow Phenomena; Aerofoil Research and Flight Tests. Aerodynamics of Rotary wings, AGARD CP–111 (1972)

81.

S. Pirozzoli, M. Bernardini, F. Grasso, Direct numerical simulation of transonic shock/boundary layer interaction under conditions of incipient separation. J. Fluid Mech. 657, 361–393 (2010)MATHCrossRef

82.

Pirozzoli, S. and Grasso, F. Direct numerical simulation of impinging shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction at M \(=\)\(2.25\). Phys. Fluids, 18, 065113 (2006)

83.

Popov, A. V., Botez, R. M. and Labib, M. Transition point detection from the surface pressure distribution for controller design. J. Aircraft, 45(1) (2008)

84.

Popov, A. V., Grigorie, L. T., Botez, R. M., M\(\acute{e}\)barki, Y. and Mamou, M. Modeling and testing of a morphing wing in open-loop architecture. J. Aircraft, 47(3) (2010)

85.

Popov, A. V., Grigorie, L. T., Botez, R. M., M\(\acute{e}\)barki, Y. and Mamou, M. Closed-loop control validation of a morphing wing using wind tunnel tests. J. Aircraft, 47(4) (2010)

86.

M.K. Rajpoot, T.K. Sengupta, P.K. Dutt, Optimal time advancing dispersion relation preserving schemes. J. Comput. Phys 229, 3623–3651 (2010)MathSciNetMATHCrossRef

87.

MJWu Ringuette, M. and Martin, M. P., Coherent structures in direct numerical simulation of turbulent boundary layers at Mach 3. J. Fluid Mech. 594, 59–69 (2008)

88.

D.P. Rizzetta, M.R. Visbal, G.A. Blaisdell, A time-implicit high-order compact differencing and filtering scheme for large-eddy simulation Int. J. Num. Methods Fluids 42, 665–693 (2003)MATHCrossRef

89.

M. Robitaille, A. Mosahebi, E. Laurendeau, Verification and Validation of the NSCODE Implementation of the\(\gamma -Re_{\theta }\) Transition Model (Design and Operations, conf. Royal Aero. Soc., Bristol, UK, In Advanced Aero Concepts, 2014)

90.

C.L. Rumsey, M.D. Sanetrik, R.T. Biedron, N.D. Melson, E.B. Parlette, Efficiency and accuracy of time-accurate turbulent Navier-Stokes computations. Comput. Fluids 25, 217–236 (1996)MATHCrossRef

91.

J. Sangwan, T.K. Sengupta, P. Suchandra, Investigation of compressibility effects on dynamic stall of pitching airfoil. Phys. Fluids 29, 076104 (2017)CrossRef

92.

T.K. Sengupta, Fundamentals of Computational Fluid Dynamics (Univ. Press, Hyderabad, India, 2004)

93.

T.K. Sengupta, High Accuracy Computing Methods: Fluid Flows and Wave Phenomena (Cambridge Univ. Press, USA, 2013)MATHCrossRef

94.

T.K. Sengupta, A. Bhole, N.A. Sreejith, Direct numerical simulation of 2D transonic flows around airfoils. Comput. Fluids 88, 19–37 (2013)MathSciNetMATHCrossRef

95.

Sengupta, T. K. and Bhumkar, Y. G. Physical and spurious disturbances in computing and bypass transition (manuscript under preparation). (2009)

96.

T.K. Sengupta, Y.G. Bhumkar, Direct numerical simulation of transition over a natural laminar flow airfoil. Frontiers in Aerospace Engineering 2(1), 39–52 (2013)

97.

T.K. Sengupta, S. Bhaumik, Y.G. Bhumkar, Direct numerical simulation of two-dimensional wall-bounded turbulent flows from receptivity stage. Phys. Rev. E 85(2), 026308 (2012)CrossRef

98.

T.K. Sengupta, Y.G. Bhumkar, New explicit two-dimensional higher order filters. Comput. Fluids 39(10), 1848–1863 (2010)MATHCrossRef

99.

T.K. Sengupta, Y. Bhumkar, V. Lakshmanan, Design and analysis of a new filter for LES and DES. Comput. Struct. 87, 735–750 (2009)CrossRef

100.

T.K. Sengupta, A. Dipankar, A.K. Rao, A new compact scheme for parallel computing using domain decomposition. J. Comput. Phys. 220, 654–677 (2007)MATHCrossRef

101.

T.K. Sengupta, A. Dipankar, P. Sagaut, Error dynamics: beyond von neumann analysis. J. Comput. Phys. 226, 1211–1218 (2007)MathSciNetMATHCrossRef

102.

T.K. Sengupta, G. Ganeriwal, S. De, Analysis of central and upwind compact schemes. J. Comp. Phys. 192, 677–694 (2003)MATHCrossRef

103.

T.K. Sengupta, T.T. Lim, S.V. Sajjan, S. Ganesh, J. Soria, Accelerated flow past a symmetric aerofoil: experiments and computations. J. Fluid Mech. 591, 255–288 (2007)MATHCrossRef

104.

T.K. Sengupta, M.K. Rajpoot, Y.G. Bhumkar, Space-time discretizing optimal DRP schemes for flow and wave propagation problems. Comput. Fluids 47, 144–154 (2011)MathSciNetMATHCrossRef

105.

T.K. Sengupta, S.K. Sirkar, A. Dipankar, High accuracy schemes for DNS and acoustics. J. Sci. Comput. 26, 151–193 (2006)MathSciNetMATHCrossRef

106.

T.K. Sengupta, V. Vikas, A. Johri, An improved method for calculating flow past flapping and hovering airfoils. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 19(6), 417–440 (2005)MATHCrossRef

107.

A.Y.N. Sofla, S.A. Meguid, K.T. Tan, W.K. Yea, Shape morphing of aircraft wing: status and challenges. J. Mater. Desg. 31, 1284–1292 (2010)CrossRef

108.

P.R. Spalart, S.R. Allmaras, A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. AIAA J. 92–0439, (1992)

109.

G.R. Srinivasan, J.D. Baeder, S. Obayashi, W.J. McCroskey, Flowfield of a lifting rotor in hover - A Navier-Stokes simulation. AIAA J. 30(10), 2371–2378 (1992)MATHCrossRef

110.

Srinivasan, G. R. and Baeder, J. D. TURNS: A free-wake Euler/Navier-Stokes numerical method for helicopter rotors. “Technical Notes”, AIAA J., 31(5), 959–962 (1993)

111.

E. Stanewsky, Adaptive wing and flow control technology. Progress in Aerospace Sciences 37, 583–667 (2001)CrossRef

112.

Suchandra, P. Direct Simulation of 2D Compressible Flow around Airfoil undergoing Pitching Oscillation. M. S. thesis, Department of Aerospace Engineering, IIT Kanpur (2015)

113.

S. Teramoto, Large-eddy simulations of transitional boundary layer with impinging shock wave. AIAA J. 43, 2354–2364 (2005)CrossRef

114.

Tijdeman, H. Investigation of the transonic flow around oscillating airfoils. National Aerospace Lab. Amsterdam, Netherlands, TR–77-090U (1977)

115.

H. Tijdeman, R. Seebass, Transonic flow past oscillating airfoils. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 12, 181–222 (1980)MATHCrossRef

116.

Thu, A. M., Jeon, S. E., Byun, Y. H. and Park, S. H. Dynamic stall vortex formation of OA-209 airfoil at low Reynolds number. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, Int. J. Mech., Aerospace, Industrial and Mechatronics Engineering, 8(2) (2014)

117.

Visbal, M. R. Dynamic stall of a constant-rate pitching airfoil. AIAA 26th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 88–0132 (1988)

118.

M.R. Visbal, D.V. Gaitonde, On the use of higher-order finite-difference schemes on curvilinear and deforming meshes. J. Comput. Phys. 181, 155–85 (2002)MathSciNetMATHCrossRef

119.

Xiao, Q., Tsai, H. M. and Liu, F. Computation of shock induced separated flow with a lagged \(k-\omega \) turbulence model. AIAA 2003–3464, AIAA (2003)

120.

Q. Xiao, H.M. Tsai, F. Liu, Numerical study of transonic buffet over a supercritical airfoil. AIAA J. 44, 620–628 (2006)CrossRef

Titel: Computational Compressible Aerodynamics
verfasst von: Tapan K. Sengupta
Yogesh G. Bhumkar
Verlag: Springer Singapore
Buch: Computational Aerodynamics and Aeroacoustics
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-4283-1

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-15-4284-8

Copyright-Jahr: 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4284-8_5

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht