Anzeige
Erschienen in:
2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel
8. Conclusion and Recommendations
verfasst von : Eric Marland, Grant Domke, Jason Hoyle, Gregg Marland, Laurel Bates, Alex Helms, Benjamin Jones, Tamara Kowalczyk, Tatyana B. Ruseva, Celina Szymanski
Erschienen in: Understanding and Analysis: The California Air Resources Board Forest Offset Protocol
Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.
Wählen Sie Textabschnitte aus um mit Künstlicher Intelligenz passenden Patente zu finden. powered by
Markieren Sie Textabschnitte, um KI-gestützt weitere passende Inhalte zu finden. powered by
Abstract
There are many ideas presented in this document but here we highlight some of the major points. There is much still to be learned for implementing a forest offset program and what works for one market is likely to be emulated or adapted in other markets. Goldstein and Nayland (2015) note that “there are a few key compliance carbon-pricing policies to watch” and “California represents the most certain source of demand for forest carbon in the next few years.” Challenges that are met can be modified and improved in other markets and in new iterations of existing markets. A key objective is to maintain fungibility among markets and between emissions and offsets (Lee et al. 2013).