Skip to main content

2019 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

7. Conclusions

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In this chapter, I revisit the research question. I discuss the empirical and theoretical approach of the book. I conclude that interest group activities can be classified into equivalence classes. The choice of strategies can be explained by the distance to the constraining political actor (private communication) or the expected policy outcome (public communication). These effects are still valid when controlling for group type, which has been one of the main explanatory factors for strategy choice. I demonstrate that it is necessary to think beyond group type.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Baumgartner, F. R., Berry, J. M., Hojnacki, M., Kimball, D. C., & Lech, B. L. (2009). Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef Baumgartner, F. R., Berry, J. M., Hojnacki, M., Kimball, D. C., & Lech, B. L. (2009). Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Braumoeller, B. F. (2006). Explaining Variance; Or Stuck in a Moment We Can’t Get Out Of. Political Analysis, 14(1), 268–290.CrossRef Braumoeller, B. F. (2006). Explaining Variance; Or Stuck in a Moment We Can’t Get Out Of. Political Analysis, 14(1), 268–290.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Crawford, V. P., & Sobel, J. (1982). Strategic Information Transmission. Econometrica, 50(6), 1431–1451.CrossRef Crawford, V. P., & Sobel, J. (1982). Strategic Information Transmission. Econometrica, 50(6), 1431–1451.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Esterling, K. M. (2004). The Political Economy of Expertise: Information and Efficiency in American National Politics. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.CrossRef Esterling, K. M. (2004). The Political Economy of Expertise: Information and Efficiency in American National Politics. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kollman, K. (1997). Inviting Friends to Lobby: Interest Groups, Ideological Bias, and Congressional Committees. American Journal of Political Science, 41(2), 519–544.CrossRef Kollman, K. (1997). Inviting Friends to Lobby: Interest Groups, Ideological Bias, and Congressional Committees. American Journal of Political Science, 41(2), 519–544.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kollman, K. (1998). Outside Lobbying. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Kollman, K. (1998). Outside Lobbying. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Potters, J., & van Winden, F. (1992). Lobbying and Asymmetric Information. Public Choice, 74(3), 269–292.CrossRef Potters, J., & van Winden, F. (1992). Lobbying and Asymmetric Information. Public Choice, 74(3), 269–292.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Truman, D. B. (1971). The Governmental Process. Political Interests and Public Opinion (2nd ed.). New York: Knopf. Truman, D. B. (1971). The Governmental Process. Political Interests and Public Opinion (2nd ed.). New York: Knopf.
Metadaten
Titel
Conclusions
verfasst von
Sebastian Koehler
Copyright-Jahr
2019
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97055-4_7