nach oben

Erschienen in:

2021 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Conclusions

verfasst von : Peter Hilpold

Erschienen in: European International Law Traditions

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

In the introductory chapter, it has been set out that this collective writing constitutes “work in progress”. As such, it might be awkward to come, at this stage, to “conclusions”, at least if this term is intended in a traditional sense, i.e. that such conclusions should give definite, comprehensive answers.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel German and European Ordo-Liberalism and Constitutionalism in the Postwar Development of International Economic Law

Nächstes Kapitel Correction to: What Are and to What Avail Do We Study European International Law Traditions?

Anthea Roberts et al. (eds.), Comparative International Law, OUP: New York 2018, 14.

The “sui generis” nature of the EU as a third category between a state and a confederation (famously called “Staatenverbund” by the German Constitutional Court in Case 89 BVerfGE 155 [12/10/1993], Bundesverfassungsgericht) is now widely uncontested. In the “Kadi” case the ECJ gave further strength to this emancipation process. See, for example, Peter Hilpold, ‘EU Law and UN Law in Conflict: The Kadi Case’ (2009), 13 Max Planck UNYB 141-182 and Gráinne de Búrca, ‘The EU, the European Court of Justice and the International Legal Order after Kadi’ (2010), 51 Harv.Int.L.J. 1-49.

See Arnulf Becker-Lorca, Mestizo International Law: A Global Intellectual History (1842-1933), CUP: Cambridge 2014, cited in the Introduction.

In the past, criticism was voiced that the claim of universality for basic human rights which had a visible European pedigree would hide “European” or “Western” International Law imperialism. This criticism is clearly wrong as these human rights principles are not European but universal because they correspond to the universal human nature. There are many studies arguing in this sense but the preferred one by this author is the one by Rein Müllerson, ‘From E Unum Pluribus to E Pluribus Unum in the journey from an African village to a global village?’, in Sienho Yee and Jacques-Yvan Morin (eds.), Multiculturalism and international law (Leiden/Boston: Brill 2009) 33-58.

And similar considerations could be made, by the way, as to the sovereigntist tendencies strictly concerning the European Union. All too often, the nationalists reclaiming sovereign competencies from the EU ignore the far-reaching contributions their own nation has given to the European integration process thereby not only endangering the future of their own nation but betraying its historic and cultural inheritance.

Anthea, Roberts et al. (eds.), Comparative International Law, OUP: New York 2018

Becker-Lorca, Arnulf, Mestizo International Law: A Global Intellectual History (1842-1933), CUP: Cambridge 2014

de Búrca, Gráinne, ‘The EU, the European Court of Justice and the International Legal Order after Kadi’ (2010), 51 Harv.Int.L.J. 1-49

Hilpold, Peter, ‘EU Law and UN Law in Conflict: The Kadi Case (2009), 13 Max Planck UNYB 141-182

Müllerson, Rein, ‘From E Unum Pluribus to E Pluribus Unum in the journey from an African village to a global village?’, in Sienho Yee and Jacques-Yvan Morin (eds.), Multiculturalism and international law (Leiden/Boston: Brill 2009) 33-5

Titel: Conclusions
verfasst von: Peter Hilpold
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: European International Law Traditions
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-52027-4

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-52028-1

Copyright-Jahr: 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52028-1_12