Introduction
Methods
Study Design
Site Selection
Study Procedures
Measures
Power Calculation
Data Analysis
Results
Participation
Sample Description
Total n (n = 586) | Total (n = 586) | Louisiana (n = 282) | Maryland (n = 304) | p value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age mean (SD) | 586 | 27.0 (5.8) | 26.9 (5.3) | 0.846 | |
Race | 585 | < 0.001 | |||
White | 45 (8%) | 24 (9%) | 21 (7%) | ||
Black | 461 (79%) | 201 (71%) | 260 (86%) | ||
Hispanic | 55 (9%) | 43 (15%) | 12 (4%) | ||
Other | 24 (4%) | 14 (5%) | 10 (3%) | ||
Education | 585 | 0.045 | |||
< high school | 120 (21%) | 70 (25%) | 50 (17%) | ||
High school or GED | 286 (49%) | 130 (46%) | 156 (51%) | ||
Some or completed college | 179 (31%) | 82 (29%) | 97 (32%) | ||
Parity | 585 | 0.032 | |||
0 | 184 (31%) | 103 (37%) | 81 (27%) | ||
1 | 148 (25%) | 69 (24%) | 79 (26%) | ||
2+ | 253 (43%) | 110 (39%) | 143 (47%) | ||
Previous abortion | 583 | 165 (28%) | 50 (18%) | 115 (38%) | < 0.001 |
Decisional conflict mean (SD) | 572 | 10.3 (13.8) | 11.2 (15.1) | 9.6 (12.5) | 0.166 |
LMUP mean (SD) | 582 | 7.0 (2.9) | 6.8 (2.9) | 7.1 (12.9) | 0.236 |
Trimester entered care | 578 | ||||
1st trimester | 417 (72%) | 203 (74%) | 214 (71%) | 0.109 | |
2nd trimester | 130 (22%) | 54 (20%) | 76 (25%) | ||
3rd trimester | 31 (5%) | 19 (7%) | 12 (4%) | ||
CPS involvement | 583 | 56 (10%) | 22 (8%) | 34 (11%) | 0.160 |
Binge drinking | 577 | 205 (36%) | 88 (32%) | 117 (39%) | 0.080 |
Audit C positive | 579 | 153 (26%) | 68 (24%) | 85 (28%) | 0.303 |
Drug use | 576 | 112 (19%) | 45 (16%) | 67 (22%) | 0.074 |
Tobacco use | 572 | 164 (29%) | 78 (28%) | 86 (29%) | 0.876 |
Anxiety | 580 | 78 (13%) | 33 (12%) | 45 (15%) | 0.271 |
Depression | 580 | 93 (16%) | 34 (13%) | 59 (20%) | 0.015 |
Employment | 584 | 0.009 | |||
Unemployed | 286 (49%) | 147 (52%) | 139 (46%) | ||
Employed part time | 122 (21%) | 66 (23%) | 56 (18%) | ||
Employed full time | 176 (30%) | 68 (24%) | 108 (36%) | ||
Food insecure | 578 | 271 (47%) | 134 (48%) | 137 (46%) | 0.491 |
Housing insecure | 578 | 172 (30%) | 93 (34%) | 79 (26%) | 0.054 |
Public assistance | 574 | 434 (76%) | 175 (64%) | 259 (86%) | < 0.001 |
Insurance | 578 | < 0.001 | |||
Uninsured | 88 (15%) | 73 (26%) | 15 (5%) | ||
Employment-based/other | 58 (10%) | 29 (10%) | 29 (10%) | ||
Medicaid | 432(75%) | 175 (63%) | 257 (85%) | ||
Relationship with MIP | 580 | 0.177 | |||
Husband/fiancé | 166 (29%) | 82 (29%) | 84 (28%) | ||
Boyfriend/partner | 315 (54%) | 142 (51%) | 173 (57%) | ||
Ex/friend/none/don’t know | 99 (17%) | 55 (20%) | 44 (15%) |
Considering and Seeking Abortion
Unadjusted | Adjusted | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LA (%) | MD (%) | p value |
n
| aOR | p value | 95% CI |
n
| |
Considered abortion for at least one second (iPad) | 22 | 30 | 0.034 | 581 | 1.15 | 0.265 | 0.90–1.48 | 570 |
Preferred abortion at pregnancy discovery | 13 | 17 | 0.204 | 583 | 1.24 | 0.379 | 0.77–1.99 | 571 |
Prefer abortion now | 2 | 1 | 0.421 | 583 | 0.70 | 0.496 | 0.26–1.94 | 572 |
Prefer abortion now among those who preferred abortion at pregnancy discovery | 11 | 2 | 0.078 | 90 | – | – | – | – |
Called an abortion clinic | 10 | 13 | 0.324 | 559 | 1.17 | 0.480 | 0.75–1.82 | 551 |
Visited an abortion clinic | 2 | 3 | 0.388 | 559 | 1.46 | 0.249 | 0.77–2.78 | 551 |
Self-induction | 3 | 1 | 0.060 | 581 | 0.20 | < 0.001 | 0.11–0.40 | 572 |
Self-induction among those who considered abortion for at least one second (iPad)a | 11 | 3 | 0.052 | 162 | – | – | – | – |
Preference for Abortion
Self-Induction
Reasons for Not Having an Abortion
Interpersonal reasons included instances of others swaying them as well as instances of women making joint decisions with another person, most typically the man involved in the pregnancy. They were typically based on actual interactions, but sometimes also included a perception of what others would think. Like personal reasons, they also included reasons related to affirmatively deciding to have the baby and/or parent as well as those related to deciding to not have an abortion.“Because I want a baby. I may not be ready, but you know whatever happens happens and it will all fall into place” – White, 22 yrs, 0 previous births, Louisiana“Cause in my damned mind I decided that I wanted to keep them” – Black, 31 yrs, 2 previous births, Maryland“I don’t believe in [abortion]” – Black, 26 yrs, 0 previous births, Maryland“I wouldn’t be able to live with myself” – Other/multiracial, 30 yrs, 2 previous births, Maryland“I just don’t see myself doing that again. It’s not a good experience” – Black, 25 yrs, 2 previous births, Maryland
Healthcare/other organizational reasons included interactions with a health care provider or other organization that swayed the participant away from having an abortion.“My kids, they want another sibling. They were excited to hear the news, even if I wasn’t as excited.” – Other/multiracial, 37 yrs, 2 previous births, Louisiana“My aunt, I asked her about it and she begged me not to do it. She told me to send my baby to her. I felt bad. She begged me and if she begged me, then I felt like this child was important. You shouldn’t abort your children. I said, well, I want my baby.” – Black, 22 yrs, 1 previous birth, Louisiana“Me and my husband talked about it and decided even though it was unplanned God had a plan” – Black, 28 yrs, 1 previous birth, Maryland“Cause my husband snatched the phone [when I was making the appointment for the abortion]. It wasn’t what he wanted” – Black, 25 yrs, 2 previous births, Maryland
Policy-related reasons women reported for not having an abortion included citing factors related to the policy and abortion service availability environment such as lack of money to pay for the abortion or insurance not covering abortion (due to legal restrictions on what Medicaid and private insurance plans can cover), running up against gestational limits (specified by law and law-related clinic policy), having to make—and pay for—two separate visits to the clinic (due to a two-visit legal requirement), and lack of local clinics (due to the complexity of opening and keeping open an abortion clinic in a complicated regulatory environment). One woman in Maryland reported that she had been unable to obtain an abortion earlier in her pregnancy because she was incarcerated and the jail/prison did not facilitate her abortion care. Policy-related reasons of difficulty paying for the abortion and exceeding gestational limits predominated in LA.“Because I had so many C sections, [having an abortion] was a health risk” –Black, 29 yrs, 2 previous births, Maryland“They told me that I would have to go to Shreveport for the pill and even after that ultrasound that they may decide that I can’t do the pill if they don’t like what they see…They also don’t…offer any kind of anesthesia or pain pills. The doctor also plays some pretty raunchy rap music while she does the procedures.” – White, 27 yrs, 0 previous births, Louisiana“Because I wanted to be put to sleep and they couldn’t do that.” – Black, 24 yrs, 2 previous births, Maryland
Among all women entering prenatal care and completing both the iPad survey and the in-clinic interview, personal reasons were the most common reason for not having an abortion across both settings [19% (n = 52) Louisiana and 28% (n = 81) Maryland, p < 0.001 in adjusted models]. There was no difference in invoking of interpersonal reasons [6% (n = 15) Louisiana, 5% (n = 14) Maryland] or healthcare/other organization reasons [3% (n = 7) Louisiana, 3% (n = 9) Maryland] across sites. Policy reasons were more common in Louisiana than in Maryland [6% (n = 15) Louisiana, 1% (n = 2) Maryland, p < 0.001 in adjusted models]. Restricting the denominator to those who reported considering abortion, the overall pattern of findings is similar, although the difference for personal reasons between states is no longer statistically significant. The difference in rates of reporting a policy-related reason for not having an abortion, however, is stark: almost one-fourth (22%, n = 15) of women who reported considering abortion in the in-clinic interview in Louisiana reported a policy reason for not having an abortion, as compared to 2% (n = 2) in Maryland (p < 0.001 in adjusted model).“…It was going to cost $2600.” – Black, 23 yrs, 0 previous births, Louisiana“My insurance wouldn’t cover it” –Black, 26 yrs, 2 previous births, Maryland“Because the lady said it was $125 [for the ultrasound to check my gestational age] and if I was over 18 weeks [and therefore couldn’t get the abortion], that it would be nonrefundable...Probably the only reason is because I was over the amount of days or weeks or whatever” – Black, 21 yrs, 1 previous birth, Louisiana“I went to the counseling session and left because I didn’t want to stay 6 hours and [pay] $50.” – Black, 35 yrs, 2 previous births, Louisiana
Unadjusted | Adjusted | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LA (%) | MD (%) | p value |
n
| aOR | p value | 95% CI |
n
| |
Among total sample who completed the in-clinic interview (n = 559) | ||||||||
Did not consider abortion | 72 | 66 | 0.075 | 559 | 0.94 | 0.764 | 0.64–1.38 | 551 |
Considered abortion | ||||||||
Personal reason | 19 | 28 | 0.017 | 559 | 1.34 | < 0.001 | 1.25–1.45 | 551 |
Interpersonal reason | 6 | 5 | 0.690 | 559 | 0.72 | 0.410 | 0.33–1.57 | 551 |
Healthcare/other org reason | 3 | 3 | 0.723 | 559 | 1.29 | 0.484 | 0.63–2.65 | 551 |
Policy reason | 6 | 1 | 0.001 | 559 | 0.08 | < 0.001 | 0.04–0.18 | 551 |
Among those who reported considering abortion in the in-clinic interview (n = 156) | ||||||||
Personal reason | 78 | 91 | 0.019 | 156 | 2.45 | 0.113 | 0.81–7.41 | 156 |
Interpersonal reason | 22 | 16 | 0.290 | 156 | 0.63 | 0.301 | 0.26–1.52 | 156 |
Healthcare/other org reason | 10 | 10 | 0.946 | 156 | 1.57 | 0.420 | 0.52–4.74 | 156 |
Policy reason | 22 | 2 | < 0.001 | 156 | 0.06 | < 0.001 | 0.04–0.10 | 156 |