Skip to main content

2021 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

9. Contesting Concentrated Scientific Power: The Case of the European Commission’s Chief Scientific Adviser

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter explores the public contestation of the scientific advisory institution the Chief Scientific Adviser (CSA) that was established by the European Commission from 2012–2014. Several non-governmental organisations collectively challenged the legitimacy of the position by pointing to two problematic issues: first, the concentration of power in a single adviser to deliver policy advice to the Commission President, and second, the lack of transparency on the contents, documentation, and public disclosure of the delivered policy advice. The controversy is argued to be part of a broader trend of re-evaluating the relationship between scientific advice and policy-making, specifically on the EU’s decision-making processes about how such experts are appointed, how their advice should be used and shared with the public. As such, through investigating the public controversy of the CSA, competing perspectives on how science and policy-making nexus is understood by the European Commission and the public are revealed. This is relevant especially in light of increasing demand for democratising decision-making, and for transparency and accountability of expert advisory bodies in the EU’s policy-making infrastructure.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
The views of the CSA do not necessarily reflect that of the European Commission unless specified otherwise.
 
2
Nine NGOs signed the (first) letter, including influential organizations such as Greenpeace European Unit, Fondation Sciences Citoyennes, and Pesticide Action Network.
 
3
A full list of signatories can be found in the source (Van der Meer et al. 2014) in the list of references.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Alemanno, Alberto. “What Role—If any—For a Chief Scientist in the European Union System for Scientific Advice?” European Journal of Risk Regulation 5, no. 3 (2014): 286–292. Alemanno, Alberto. “What Role—If any—For a Chief Scientist in the European Union System for Scientific Advice?” European Journal of Risk Regulation 5, no. 3 (2014): 286–292.
Zurück zum Zitat Bijker, Wiebe E., Roland Bal, and Ruud Hendriks. The Paradox of Scientific Authority: The Role of Scientific Advice in Democracies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2009. Bijker, Wiebe E., Roland Bal, and Ruud Hendriks. The Paradox of Scientific Authority: The Role of Scientific Advice in Democracies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2009.
Zurück zum Zitat Bijker, Wiebe E., Trevor Pinch, and Thomas Hughes. The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1987. Bijker, Wiebe E., Trevor Pinch, and Thomas Hughes. The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1987.
Zurück zum Zitat Douglas, Heather E. Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2009. Douglas, Heather E. Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2009.
Zurück zum Zitat Ezrahi, Yaron. The Descent of Icarus: Science and the Transformation of Contemporary Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990. Ezrahi, Yaron. The Descent of Icarus: Science and the Transformation of Contemporary Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.
Zurück zum Zitat Hilgartner, Stephen. Science on Stage: Expert Advice as Public Drama. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2000. Hilgartner, Stephen. Science on Stage: Expert Advice as Public Drama. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2000.
Zurück zum Zitat Jasanoff, Sheila. The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990. Jasanoff, Sheila. The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.
Zurück zum Zitat Jasanoff, S. Designs on Nature: Science in Europe and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton; Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2005. Jasanoff, S. Designs on Nature: Science in Europe and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton; Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2005.
Zurück zum Zitat Kabat, Geoffrey C. “Taking Distrust of Science Seriously.” Science and Society, EMBO Reports 18, no. 7 (2017): 1052–1055. Kabat, Geoffrey C. “Taking Distrust of Science Seriously.” Science and Society, EMBO Reports 18, no. 7 (2017): 1052–1055.
Zurück zum Zitat Weingart, Peter. “Scientific Expertise and Political Accountability: Paradoxes of Science in Politics.” Science and Public Policy 26, no. 3 (1999): 151–161. Weingart, Peter. “Scientific Expertise and Political Accountability: Paradoxes of Science in Politics.” Science and Public Policy 26, no. 3 (1999): 151–161.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilsdon, James. “The Past, Present and Future of the Chief Scientific Advisor.” European Journal of Risk Regulation 5, no. 3 (2014): 293–299. Wilsdon, James. “The Past, Present and Future of the Chief Scientific Advisor.” European Journal of Risk Regulation 5, no. 3 (2014): 293–299.
Metadaten
Titel
Contesting Concentrated Scientific Power: The Case of the European Commission’s Chief Scientific Adviser
verfasst von
Shelly Tsui
Copyright-Jahr
2021
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54367-9_9