nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.02.2019 | Originalbeitrag / Original article

Contributions to the sustainable development goals in life cycle sustainability assessment: Insights from the Handprint research project

verfasst von: Michael Kühnen, Samanthi Silva, Janpeter Beckmann, Ulrike Eberle, Rüdiger Hahn, Christoph Hermann, Stefan Schaltegger, Marianne Schmid

Erschienen in: Sustainability Nexus Forum | Ausgabe 1/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) represent consensual, global scale targets, encouraging not only the fight against unsustainable aspects in society (e. g., poverty or hunger) but also positive contributions to sustainable development (e. g., renewable energy use or human well-being). The SDGs are, however, not per se designed as a performance measurement system for businesses and products. Consequently, research is challenged to develop convincing approaches and indicator systems that capture how businesses contribute to the SDGs.

Against this background, the Handprint approach was developed. This paper documents methodological developments of a respective research project and extends the focus from reducing unsustainable, negative business practices toward striving for positive contributions to sustainable development in sustainability assessment and management. We first summarize the status quo of assessing positive contributions to sustainable development in research and practice. While a “Footprint” approach primarily measures negative environmental and/or social impacts, the “Handprint” approach focuses on positive contributions to sustainable development. Second, we illustrate and prioritize core assessment categories and indicators. Third, we describe how a sustainability assessment approach to evaluate positive contributions to sustainable development at the product level was developed and demonstrate its feasibility in a pilot case study.

Vorheriger Artikel Bewertung der Rohstoffkritikalitäts-Methode nach VDI 4800 im Produktentwicklungsprozess: Fallstudie eines elektrischen Fahrzeugantriebssystems

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Arcese G, Lucchetti MC, Massa I, Valente C (2016) State of the art in S‑LCA: Integrating literature review and automatic text analysis. Int J Life Cycle Assess. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1082-0 CrossRef

Bansal P (2005) Evolving sustainably: a longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strateg Manage J 26(3):197–218. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.441 CrossRef

Baumann H, Arvidsson R, Tong H, Wang Y (2013) Does the production of an airbag injure more people than the airbag saves in traffic? J Ind Ecol 17(4):517–527. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12016 CrossRef

Baumgartner RJ, Ebner D (2010) Corporate sustainability strategies: sustainability profiles and maturity levels. Sust Dev 18(2):76–89. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.447 CrossRef

Benoît C, Norris GA, Valdivia S, Ciroth A, Moberg A, Bos U, Prakash S, Ugaya C, Beck T (2010) The guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products: Just in time! Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(2):156–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-009-0147-8 CrossRef

Beske-Janssen P, Johnson MP, Schaltegger S (2015) 20 years of performance measurement in sustainable supply chain management: what has been achieved? Supply Chain Manag 20(6):664–680. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-06-2015-0216 CrossRef

Blass V, Corbett CJ (2018) Same supply chain, different models: Integrating perspectives from life cycle assessment and supply chain management. J Ind Ecol 22(1):18–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12550 CrossRef

Burks SV, Krupka EL (2012) A multimethod approach to identifying norms and normative expectations within a corporate hierarchy: evidence from the financial services industry. Manage Sci 58(1):203–217. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1478 CrossRef

Burritt R, Schaltegger S (2014) Accounting towards sustainability in production and supply chains. Br Account Rev 46(4):327–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.10.001 CrossRef

Corona B, Bozhilova-Kisheva KP, Olsen SI, San Miguel G (2017) Social life cycle assessment of a concentrated solar power plant in Spain: a methodological proposal. J Ind Ecol 21(5):1566–1577. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12541 CrossRef

Curran MA (2013) Life cycle assessment: a review of the methodology and its application to sustainability. Curr Opin Chem Eng 2(3):273–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2013.02.002 CrossRef

Denyer D, Tranfield D (2009) Producing a systematic review. In: Buchanan DA, Bryman A (eds) The sage handbook of organizational research methods. SAGE, London, pp 671–689

Di Cesare S, Silveri F, Sala S, Petti L (2018) Positive impacts in social life cycle assessment: State of the art and the way forward. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23(3):406–421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1169-7 CrossRef

Dhingra AK, Rao SS, Kumar V (1992) Nonlinear membership functions in multiobjective fuzzy optimization of mechanical and structural systems. AIAA J 30(1):251–260. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.10906 CrossRef

Doran GT (1981) There’s a SMART way to write management’s goals and objectives. Manage Rev 70(11):35–36

Dreyer L, Hauschild M, Schierbeck J (2006) A framework for social life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(2):88–97. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2005.08.223 CrossRef

Eberle U, Schmid M (2016) A preliminary methodological framework to assess potential contributions of food to sustainable transformation. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Life Cycle Assessment of Food 2016, pp 328–333

Ekener E, Hansson J, Gustavsson M (2018) Addressing positive impacts in social LCA: Discussing current and new approaches exemplified by the case of vehicle fuels. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23(3):556–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1058-0 CrossRef

Ekener-Petersen E, Moberg Å (2013) Potential hotspots identified by social LCA: part 2 - reflections on a study of a complex product. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(1):144–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0443-6 CrossRef

Finkbeiner M, Schau EM, Lehmann A, Traverso M (2010) Towards life cycle sustainability assessment. Sustainability 2(10):3309–3322. https://doi.org/10.3390/su2103309 CrossRef

Fontes J, Tarne P, Traverso M, Bernstein P (2018) Product social impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23(3):547–555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1125-6 CrossRef

Freidberg S (2018) From behind the curtain: talking about values in LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23(7):1410–1414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0879-6 CrossRef

George C (2001) Sustainability appraisal for sustainable development: Integrating everything from jobs to climate change. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 19(2):95–106. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154601781767104 CrossRef

Gibson RB (2013) Avoiding sustainability trade-offs in environmental assessment. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 31(1):2–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2013.764633 CrossRef

Govindan K, Khodaverdi R, Jafarian A (2013) A fuzzy multi criteria approach for measuring sustainability performance of a supplier based on triple bottom line approach. J Clean Prod 47:345–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.04.014 CrossRef

Grießhammer R, Buchert M, Gensch C-O, Hochfeld C, Manhart A, Rüdenauer I (2007) PROSA: Product Sustainability Assessment. Öko-Institut, Freiburg

Guenther E, Schneidewind U (2017) Sustainability management: Integrating the multiple dimensions of an interdisciplinary research discipline. Umw Wirtsch Forum 25(1-2):1–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00550-017-0460-9 CrossRef

Hacking T, Guthrie P (2008) A framework for clarifying the meaning of triple bottom-line, integrated, and sustainability assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev 28(2-3):73–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2007.03.002 CrossRef

Hart SL, Milstein MB (2003) Creating sustainable value. Acad Manage Exec 17(2):56–67. https://doi.org/10.5465/AME.2003.10025194 CrossRef

Haupt M, Vadenbo C, Hellweg S (2017) Do we have the right performance indicators for the circular economy? Insight into the Swiss waste management system. J Ind Ecol 21(3):615–627. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12506 CrossRef

ISO (2006) ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework. ISO, Geneva

Kloepffer W (2008) Life cycle sustainability assessment of products: with comments by Helias A. Udo de Haes. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(2):89–95. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2008.02.376 CrossRef

Kroeger A, Weber C (2015) Developing a conceptual framework for comparing social value creation. Acad Manage Rev 40(1):43–70. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2012.0344.test CrossRef

Kühnen M, Hahn R (2017) Indicators in social life cycle assessment: a review of frameworks, theories, and empirical experience. J Ind Ecol 21(6):1547–1565. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12663 CrossRef

Kühnen M, Hahn R (2018a) From SLCA to positive Sustainability performance measurement: a two-tier Delphi study. J Ind Ecol:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12762 CrossRef

Kühnen M, Hahn R (2018b) Systemic social performance measurement: systematic literature review and explanations on the academic status quo from a product life-cycle perspective. J Clean Prod 205:690–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.201 CrossRef

Lindner JP (2015) Quantitative Darstellung der Wirkungen landnutzender Prozesse auf die Biodiversität in Ökobilanzen. Universität Stuttgart, Stuttgart (Dissertation)

Linstone HA, Turoff M, Helmer O (eds) (2002) The Delphi method: techniques and applications. Addison-Wesley, Reading (Online edition of the original published in 1975)

Maas K, Schaltegger S, Crutzen N (2016) Integrating corporate sustainability assessment, management accounting, control, and reporting. J Clean Prod 136:237–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.008 CrossRef

Martínez-Blanco J, Lehmann A, Chang Y‑J, Finkbeiner M (2015) Social organizational LCA (SOLCA): A new approach for implementing social LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20(11):1586–1599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0960-1 CrossRef

Mayring P (2010) Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken, 11th edn. Beltz Pädagogik. Beltz, Weinheim

Neugebauer S, Traverso M, Scheumann R, Chang Y‑J, Wolf K, Finkbeiner M (2014) Impact pathways to address social well-being and social justice in SLCA: Fair wage and level of education. Sustainability 6(8):4839–4857. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6084839 CrossRef

Norris GA (2006) Social impacts in product life cycles: towards life cycle attribute assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(S1):97–104. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2006.04.017 CrossRef

OECD (2017a) Better life index. http://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org/de/#/11111111111. Accessed 9 Nov 2017

OECD (2017b) Green growth. http://www.oecd.org/greengrowth/. Accessed 9 Nov 2017

Pauw IC, Kandachar P, Karana E (2014) Assessing sustainability in nature-inspired design. Int J Sust Eng 8(1):5–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2014.977373 CrossRef

Pavláková Dočekalová M, Doubravský K, Dohnal M, Kocmanová A (2017) Evaluations of corporate sustainability indicators based on fuzzy similarity graphs. Ecol Indic 78:108–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.02.038 CrossRef

Reisch L, Eberle U, Lorek S (2013) Sustainable food consumption: an overview of contemporary issues and policies. Sustain Sci Pract Policy 9(2):7–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2013.11908111 CrossRef

Rieckhof R (2017) The life cycle metaphor: Its emergence, understanding, and conceptualisation in business research. Umw Wirtsch Forum 25(1-2):91–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00550-017-0455-6 CrossRef

Rost Z (2015) The increasing relevance of product responsibility. Umw Wirtsch Forum 23(4):299–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00550-015-0369-0 CrossRef

Sala S, Farioli F, Zamagni A (2013a) Life cycle sustainability assessment in the context of sustainability science progress: part 2. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(9):1686–1697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0509-5 CrossRef

Sala S, Farioli F, Zamagni A (2013b) Progress in sustainability science: lessons learnt from current methodologies for sustainability assessment: part 1. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(9):1653–1672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0508-6 CrossRef

Saling P (2017) Sustainability management in strategic decision-making processes. Umw Wirtsch Forum 11(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00550-017-0461-8 CrossRef

Schaltegger S, Burritt R (2005) Corporate sustainability. The International Yearbook of Environmental and Resource Economics, pp 185–222

Schaltegger S, Burritt R (2006) Corporate sustainability accounting: a nightmare or a dream coming true? Bus Strategy Environ 15(5):293–295. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.537 CrossRef

Schaltegger S, Burritt R (2014) Measuring and managing sustainability performance of supply chains: review and sustainability supply chain management framework. J Supply Chain Manag 19(3):232–241. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-02-2014-0061 CrossRef

Schaltegger S, Lüdeke-Freund F, Hansen EG (2016) Business models for sustainability. A co-evolutionary analysis of sustainable entrepreneurship, innovation and transformation. Organ Environ 29(3):264–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026616633272 CrossRef

Schaltegger S, Beckmann M, Hockerts K (2018) Collaborative entrepreneurship for sustainability. Creating solutions in light of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Int J Entrep Ventur 10(2):131–151CrossRef

Schaubroeck T, Rugani B (2017) A revision of what life cycle sustainability assessment should entail: towards modeling the net impact on human well-being. J Ind Ecol 21(6):1464–1477. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12653 CrossRef

Schmidt RC (1997) Managing Delphi Surveys using nonparametric statistical techniques. Decis Sci J 28(3):763–774. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01330.x CrossRef

Seuring S, Gold S (2012) Conducting content-analysis based literature reviews in supply chain management. Supply Chain Manag 17(5):544–555. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541211258609 CrossRef

Silva S, Guenther E (2018) Setting the research agenda for measuring sustainability performance—systematic application of the world café method. Sustain Acc Manag Policy J 24(4):277. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-06-2017-0060 CrossRef

The Economics of Ecosystems of Biodiversity (2017) Home. http://www.teebweb.org/. Accessed 9 Nov 2017

Timmermans S, Tavory I (2012) Theory construction in qualitative research: from grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociol Theory 30(3):167–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275112457914 CrossRef

Toumi O, Le Gallo J, Rejeb BJ (2017) Assessment of Latin American sustainability. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 78:878–885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.013 CrossRef

Tranfield D, Denyer D, Smart P (2003) Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. Br J Manag 14(3):207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375 CrossRef

UN (2015) Sustainable development goals: 17 goals to transform our world. http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/. Accessed 28 July 2017

UNEP, SETAC (2009) Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. UNEP, Paris

UNEP, SETAC (2013) The methodological sheets for subcategories in social life cycle assessment (S-LCA). UNEP, Paris

Verboven H, Vanherck L (2016) Sustainability management of SMes and the UN sustainable development goals. Umw Wirtsch Forum 24(2):165–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00550-016-0407-6 CrossRef

Wackernagel M, Rees WE (1996) Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the earth. New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island

Wilhelm M, Hutchins M, Mars C, Benoit-Norris C (2015) An overview of social impacts and their corresponding improvement implications: A mobile phone case study. J Clean Prod 102:302–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.025 CrossRef

World Business Council for Sustainable Development (2010) Vision 2050. https://www.wbcsd.org/contentwbc/download/1746/21728. Accessed 9 November 2017

World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) (1987) Our common future. WCED, Oxford

World Resources Institute (2012) The corporate ecosystems services review. http://www.wri.org/sites/default/files/corporate_ecosystem_services_review_1.pdf. Accessed 9 November 2017

Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X CrossRef

Zellmer-Bruhn M, Gibson C (2006) Multinational organization context: Implications for team learning and performance. Acad Manage J 49(3):501–518CrossRef

Zimmermann H‑J (2010) Fuzzy set theory. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Stat 2(3):317–332. https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.82 CrossRef

Titel: Contributions to the sustainable development goals in life cycle sustainability assessment: Insights from the Handprint research project
verfasst von: Michael Kühnen
Samanthi Silva
Janpeter Beckmann
Ulrike Eberle
Rüdiger Hahn
Christoph Hermann
Stefan Schaltegger
Marianne Schmid
Publikationsdatum: 01.02.2019
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Sustainability Nexus Forum / Ausgabe 1/2019
Print ISSN: 2948-1619
Elektronische ISSN: 2948-1627
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00550-019-00484-y

Unternehmen zwischen Digitalisierung und Nachhaltigkeit – eine empirische Untersuchung

Originalbeitrag / Original article

Bewertung der Rohstoffkritikalitäts-Methode nach VDI 4800 im Produktentwicklungsprozess: Fallstudie eines elektrischen Fahrzeugantriebssystems

Originalbeitrag / Original article

Technologie- und Standortwahl beim Ausbau erneuerbarer Energien – Eine empirische Analyse zum unternehmerischen Verhalten von Anlagenbetreibern

Originalbeitrag / Original article

Digital platforms as market places for the circular economy—requirements and challenges

Originalbeitrag / Original article

Transport carbon footprint in the german courier, express and parcel industry (CEP industry)

Originalbeitrag / Original article