Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
“It is more profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish. . . .” (Matthew 5:29).
How can we know whether we are punishing the same corporation that committed some past crime? Though central to corporate criminal justice, legal theorists and philosophers have yet to address the basic question of how corporate identity persists through time. Simple cases, where crime and punishment are close in time and the corporation has changed little, can mislead us into thinking an answer is always easy to come by. The issue becomes more complicated when corporate criminals undergo any number of transformations—rebranding, spinning-off a division, merging, changing ownership, changing management, swapping lines of business, etc. These changes are common among all corporations, including those trying to conceal or limit liability for past crimes. This article takes a first step toward developing a workable and philosophically satisfying theory of corporate personal identity and discusses its prospects for fulfilling the retributive, rehabilitative, and deterrent purposes of criminal law.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Alexander, C., & Cohen, M. (2011). The Causes of Corporate Crime: An Economic Perspective. In A. Barkow & R. Barkow (Eds.), Prosecutors in the Boardroom: Using Criminal Law to Regualte Corporate Conduct 11. New York: New York University Press.
Alschuler, A. (1991). Ancient law and the punishment of corporations: Of Frankdpledge and Deodand. Boston University Law Review, 71, 307.
Alschuler, A. (2009). Two ways to think about the punishment of corporations. American Criminal Review, 26, 1359.
Baer, M. (2009). Governing corporate compliance. Boston College Law Review, 50, 949.
Baer, M. (2012). Choosing punishment. Boston University Law Review, 92, 577–641.
Balmer, J. (1998). Corporate identity and the advent of corporate marketing. Journal of Marketing Management, 14, 963. CrossRef
Birmingham, R. (1998). From Odysseus to Capgras: Seven episodes of personal identity in law. Syracuse Law Review, 49, 99.
Blackstone, W. (1769). Commentaries on the Laws of England (p. 352). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Blok, S., et al. (2001). Inferences about personal identity. In J. D. Moore & K. Tenning (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahawa: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. http://csjarchive.cogsci.rpi.edu/proceedings/2001/cogsci01.pdf.
Braude, S. (1996). Multiple personality and moral responsibility. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Pscychology, 3, 37.
Bucy, P. (1991). Corporate Ethos: A standard for imposing corporate criminal liability. Minnesota Law Review, 75, 1095.
Buell, S. (2011). Potentially perverse effects of corporate civil liability. In A. Barkow & R. Barkow (Eds.), Prosecutors in the Boardroom: Using Criminal Law to Regualte Corporate Conduct 87. New York: New York University Press.
Butler, J. (1763). The analogy of religion, natural and revealed, to the constitution and course of nature. London: John James & Paul Knapton.
Cahill, M. (2011). Punishment pluralism. In M. White (Ed.), Retributivism: Essays on theory and policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carter, W. (1989). How to change your mind. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 19, 1–14. CrossRef
Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of social theory (p. 427). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Corneliessen, J., et al. (2007). Social Identity, organizational identity and corporate identity: Towards an integrated understanding of processes, patternings and products. British Journal of Management, 18, S1. CrossRef
De Freitas, J., et al. (2016). Normative judgments and individual essence, Cognitive Science, 2016, 1–21.
Dewey, J. (1926). The historic background of corporate legal personality. The Yale Law Journal, 35, 655–673. CrossRef
Diamantis, M. (2016). Corporate criminal minds. Notre Dame Law Review, 91, 2049–2090.
Diamantis, M. (2018). Clockwork corporations: A character theory of corporate punishment. Iowa Law Review, 102, 507–569.
Ermann, M., & Lundman, R. (1996). Corporate and governmental deviance: Origins, patterns, and reactions. In M. Erman & R. Lundman (Eds.), Corporate and governmental deviance: Problems of organizational behavior in contemporary society (p. 115). New York: Oxford University Press.
Fisse, B. (1991). The attribution of criminal liability to corporations: A statutory model. Sydney Law Review, 13, 277.
Fisse, B., & Braithwaite, J. (1988). The allocation of responsibility for corporate crime: Individualism, collectivism and accountability. Sydney Law Review, 11, 468.
Foerschler, A. (1990). Corporate criminal intent: Toward a better understanding of corporate misconduct. California Law Review, 78, 1287. CrossRef
French, P. (2016). Complicity: That moral monster, troubling matters. Criminal Law and Philosophy, 10, 575. CrossRef
Gallois, A. (2016). Identity over time. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/identity-time/.
Hacking, I. (1995). Rewriting the soul: Multiple personality and the sciences of memory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hall, G., et al. (2003). Preschoolers’ use of form class cues to learn descriptive proper names. Child Development, 71, 1547. CrossRef
Harlow, J. (1868). Recovery from the passage of an iron bar through the head. History of Psychology, 4, 274–281. CrossRef
Heenan, J. (2004). Graceful maneuvering: Corporate avoidance of liability through bankruptcy and corporate law. Montana Law Review, 65, 100–133.
Huigens, K. (2002). Street crime, corporate crime, and theories of punishment: A response to brown. Wake Forest Law Review, 37, 1.
Killoren, D. (2010). Moral intuitions, reliability and disagreement. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, 4, 1–35. CrossRef
Kiriakidou, O., & Millward, L. (2000). Corporate identity: External reality or internal fit. Corporate Communications, 5, 49. CrossRef
Lafave, E., & Scott, A. (1986) Criminal law. St. Paul: West Group.
Laufer, W. (1994). Corporate bodies and guilty minds. Emory Law Journal, 43, 647–730.
Laufer, W. (1999). Corporate liability, risk shifting, and the paradox of compliance. Vanderbilt Law Review, 52, 1343.
Laufer, W. (2017). The missing progressive account of corporate criminal law. New York University Journal of Law and Business, 14, 71.
Laufer, W., & Robertson, D. (1997). Corporate ethics initiatives as social control. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 1029. CrossRef
Lederman, M. (2000). Models for corporate liability. Buffalo Criminal Law Review, 4, 641. CrossRef
Lewis, D. (1971). Counterparts of persons and their bodies. Journal of Philosophy, 68, 203. CrossRef
Lewis, D. (1976). Survival and identity. In A. Rorty (Ed.), The identities of Person. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Lewis, D. (1986). On the plurality of worlds. Oxford: Wiley.
List, C., & Pettit, P. (2013). Group agency: The possibility, design, and status of corporate agents. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Locke, J. (1694). Of identity and diversity. In J. Locke (Ed.), An essay concerning human understanding. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Matthews, G. (1990). Aristotelian essentialism. Philosophical and Phenomenological Review, 50, 251. CrossRef
Melewar, T., & Karaosmanoglu, E. (2006). Seven dimensions of corporate identity: A categorization from the practitioner’s perspectives. European Journal of Marketing, 40, 846. CrossRef
Moore, J. (1992). Corporate culpability under the federal sentencing guidelines. Arizona Law Review, 34, 743–797.
Moore, M. (1987). The moral worth of retribution. In F. Schoeman (Ed.), Responsibility, character, and the emotions: New essays in moral psychology (p. 179).
Nagel, T. (1979). Brain bisection and the unity of consciousness. In T. Nagel (Ed.), Mortal questions (p. 147). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Needleman, M., & Needleman, C. (1979). Organizational crime: Two models of criminogenesis. Sociological Quarterly, 20, 517. CrossRef
Newman, G., et al. (2014). Value judgments and the true self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 203. CrossRef
Newman, G., et al. (2015). Beliefs about the true self explain asymmetries based on moral judgment. Cognitive Science, 39, 96. CrossRef
Noonan, H. (2003). Personal identity (pp. 139–142). London: Routledge.
O’Sullivan, J. (2016). Federal white collar crime. St. Paul: West Academic Publishing.
Olson, E. (1997). The human animal: Personal identity without psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Parfit, D. (1971). Personal identity. Philosophical Review, 80, 3–27. CrossRef
Perez, A., & del Bosque, I. (2012). The role of CSR in the corporate identity of banking service providers. Journal of Business Ethics, 108, 145. CrossRef
Pettit, P. (2007). Responsibility incorporated. Ethics, 117, 171–201. CrossRef
Plutarch. Life of Theseus. (1st Century A.D.).
Radden, J. (1996). Divided minds and successive selves: Ethical issues in disorders of identity and personality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rawls, J. (1971) A theory of justice. Cambridge :Harvard University Press.
Reckard, E. (2013). Wells Fargo’s pressure-cooker sales culture comes at a cost. Los Angeles Times. http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-wells-fargo-sale-pressure-20131222-story.html.
Reid, T. (1785). Of memory. In Essays on the intellectual powers of man. Edinburgh: G.G.J. & J. Robinson.
Rips, L., et al. (2006). Tracing the identity of objects. Psychology Review, 113, 1. CrossRef
Rips, L., & Hespos, S. (2015). Divisions of the physical world: Concepts of Objects and Substances. Psychology Bulletin, 141, 786. CrossRef
Robinson, P. (2013). Intuitions of justice and the utility of desert. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
Robinson, P., et al. (2017). Criminal law: Case studies and controversies (pp. 91–92). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.
Rostain, T. (2008). General counsel in the age of compliance: Preliminary findings and new research questions. Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics, 52, 465.
Rovane, C. (1998). The bounds of agency: An essay in revisionary metaphysics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Shaw, W. (1980). Intuition and moral philosophy. American Philosophical Quarterly, 18, 127–134.
Simoes, C., et al. (2005). Managing corporate identity: An internal perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33, 153. CrossRef
Solomon, S. (2013). In Spinoffs, a Chance to Jettison Liabilities. N.Y. Times. Retrieved from https://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/03/12/in-spinoffs-a-chance-to-jettison-undesirable-liabilities/?_r=0.
Stout, L. (2002). Bad and not-so-bad arguments for shareholder primacy lecture and commentary on the social responsibility of corporate entities. California Law Review, 75, 1189.
Strohminger, N., & Nichols, S. (2014). The essential moral self. Cognition, 131, 159. CrossRef
Theunissen, P. (2014). Co-creating corporate identity through dialogue: A pilot study. Public Relations Review, 40, 621. CrossRef
U.S. Department of Justice. (2008). United States attorneys’ manual. https://www.justice.gov/usam/usam-9-28000-principles-federal-prosecution-business-organizations.
van Reiel, C., & Balmer, J. (1997). Corporate Identity: The Concept, Its Measurement and Management. European Journal of Marketing, 31, 340. CrossRef
von Hirsch, A. (1993). Censure and sanctions (pp. 6–19). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wilkes, K. (1981). Multiplicity and personal identity. British Journal of the Philosophy of Science, 32, 331. CrossRef
Wringe, B. (2016). An expressive theory of punishment (p. 7). London: Palgrage Macmillan. CrossRef
- Corporate Essence and Identity in Criminal Law
Mihailis E. Diamantis
- Springer Netherlands
Journal of Business Ethics
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0697
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© BBL, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, Neuer Inhalt/© hww, So bewältigen Sie Stress im Fernstudium/© granata68 | stock.adobe.com | AdobeStock