Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Kongresse
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Veranstaltungskalender Awards MyNewsletter Firmensuche
Kunden Login
Über Einzelzugang informieren
Über Unternehmenszugang informieren
Referenzkunden
Elektrische Antriebe und Energiesysteme 2025 | 26 + 27 März 2025

19. Internationaler MTZ-Fachkongress Zukunftsantriebe

Seien Sie bei der Konferenz dabei! Dort treffen Experten aus der Automobilindustrie, Energieerzeugung und Stromnetzbetrieb auf Vertreter aus Politik und Wissenschaft. Diskutiert werden wichtige Themen der Branche.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Corporate Knowledge Discovery and Organizational Learning: The Role, Importance, and Application of Semantic Business Process Management—The ProKEX Case

verfasst von : András Gábor, Andrea Kő, Zoltán Szabó, Péter Fehér

Erschienen in: Corporate Knowledge Discovery and Organizational Learning

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

One of the consequences of the changing regulatory social and economic environment is the growing demand to efficiently manage intellectual capital as corporate assets. Intellectual capital is closely coupled to knowledge that is embedded in business processes. The book provides an overview in a nutshell of ProKEX research. The goal of the ProKEX solution is to extract, organize, share and preserve knowledge embedded in organizational processes in order to (1) enrich organizational knowledge bases in a systematic and controlled way (2) support employees to be better able to acquire their job role specific knowledge, (3) and to help govern and plan human capital investment. The chapters provides deeper understanding the components, as semantic business process management, text mining, knowledge representation and transfer, adaptive testing, compliance checking.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Nächstes Kapitel Corporate Semantic Business Process Management
Fußnoten
1
El Sawy, Omar A., and Robert A. Josefek Jr. “Business process as nexus of knowledge.” in Holsapple, Clyde, ed Handbook on Knowledge Management 1: Knowledge matters. Vol. 1, pp. 425–436. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.
 
2
Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) is a method to support process improvement initiatives.
 
3
Detailed description of knowledge representation, namely domain ontology will be given in Chapter “STUDIO: ontology-centric knowledge-based system”.
 
4
See Chapter “Ontology tailoring for job role knowledge” for details.
 
5
STUDIO—e-learning platform developed by Corvinno Technology Transfer will be explained in detail in Chapter “STUDIO: ontology-centric knowledge-based system”.
 
6
ProMine will be explained in details in Chapter “ProMine: a text mining solution for concept extraction and filtering”.
 
7
See Sect. 5.4.2.
 
8
The EIT Governing Board defines the percentage of competitive funding yearly.
 
9
The business case took the 2014 Allocation of funding implemented in 2013 into consideration.
 
Literatur
Alexopoulos, P., & Gómez-Pérez, J. M. (2012, May 27–31). Dealing with vagueness in semantic business process management through fuzzy ontologies. In Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Semantic Business Process Management, Heraclion, Greece. http://​sbpm2012.​fzi.​de/​images/​SBPMp4.​pdf
Alves de Medeiros, A. K., & van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2009). Process mining towards semantics. In T. S. Dillon, E. Chang, R. Meersman, & K. Sycara (Eds.), Advances in web semantics I (Lecture notes in computer science, Vol. 4891, pp. 35–80). Berlin: Springer. http://​dx.​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-3-540-89784-2_​3.CrossRef
Argyris, C. (1992). On organisational learning. Oxford: Blackwell.
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1978). Organisation learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Child, J., Faulkner, D., & Tallman, S. (2005). Cooperative strategy—Managing alliances (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Child, J., Markóczy, L., & Cheung, T. (1994). Managerial adaptation in Chinese and Hungarian strategic alliances with culturally distinct foreign partners’. Advances in Chinese Industrial Studies, 4, 211–231.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.CrossRef
Davies, J. F., Grobelnik, M., & Mladenic, D. (Eds.). (2009). Semantic knowledge management. Integrating ontology management, knowledge discovery, and human language technologies. Berlin: Springer.
Dixon, N. (2000). Common knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Easterby-Smith, M. (1997). Disciplines of organizational learning: Contributions and critiques. Human Relations, 50(9), 1085–1113.
Easterby-Smith, M., & Lyles, M. A. (2011). Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management (2nd ed.). Chichester: Wiley.
El Sawy, O. A., & Josefek, R. A., Jr. (2013). Business process as nexus of knowledge. In C. Holsapple (Ed.), Handbook on knowledge management 1: Knowledge matters (Vol. 1, pp. 425–436). Berlin: Springer.
Fiol, C. M., & Lyles, M. A. (1985). Organizational learning. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 803–813.
Gábor, A., Kő, A., Szabó, I., Ternai, K., & Varga, K. (2013). Compliance check in semantic business process management. In Y. T. Demey & H. Panetto (Eds.), Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 8186, pp. 353–362). Berlin: Springer.
Gábor, A., & Szabó, Z. (2013). Semantic technologies in business process management. In M. Fathi (szerk.), Integration of practice-oriented knowledge technology: Trends and prospectives (pp. 17–28, 368 p.) Berlin: Springer. ISBN: 978-3-642-34470-1.
Gavin, D. A., Edmondson, A. C., & Gino, F. (2008). Is yours a learning organization. Harvard Business Review, March, 109–116.
Gold, A. H., & Arvind Malhotra, A. H. S. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185–214.
Hedlund, G. (1994). A model of knowledge management and the N-form corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 73–90. Special issue: Strategy: Search for new paradigms.CrossRef
Henderson, J. C., & Venkatraman, N. (1993). Strategic alignment: Leveraging information technology for transforming organisations. IBM Systems Journal, 32(1), 4–16.CrossRef
Hepp, M., Leymann, F., Domingue, J., Wahler, A., & Fensel, D. (2005, October 12–18). Semantic business process management: A vision towards using semantic Web services for business process management. ICEBE 2005. IEEE International Conference on e-Business Engineering, pp. 535, 540. doi: 10.​1109/​ICEBE.​2005.​110.
Hepp, M., & Roman, D. (2007). An ontology framework for semantic business process management. In Wirtschaftsinformatik Proceedings 2007 (Paper 27).
Hsu, I., & Sabherwal, R. (2012). Relationship between intellectual capital and knowledge management: An empirical investigation. Decision Sciences, 43(3), 489–524.CrossRef
Jain, A. K., & Moreno, A. (2015). Organizational learning, knowledge management practices and firm’s performance. The Learning Organization, 22(1), 14–39.CrossRef
Kamasheva, A. V., Valeev, E. R., Yagudin, R. K., & Maksimova, K. R. (2015). Usage of gamification theory for increase motivation of employees. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(1S3), 77.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, January–February, 71–79.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2004). Measuring the strategic readiness of intangible assets. Harvard Business Review, 82(2), 52–63.
Karastoyanova, D., Lessen, T., Leymann, F., Ma, Z., Nitzsche, J., Wetzstein, B., Bhiri, S., Hauswirth, M., & Zaremba, M. (2008). A reference architecture for semantic business process management systems. Multi konferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik, GITO-Verlag, Berlin.
Lee, H., & Choi, B. (2003). Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: An integrative view and empirical examination. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20(1), 179–228.
Lin, Y., & Krogstie, J. (2010). Semantic annotation of process models for facilitating process knowledge management. International Journal of Information System Modeling and Design (IJISMD), 1(3), 45–67. doi:10.​4018/​jismd.​2010070103.CrossRef
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.CrossRef
Marr, B., Schiuma, G., & Neely, A. (2004). Intellectual capital—Defining key performance indicators for organizational knowledge assets. Business Process Management Journal, 10(5), 551–569.CrossRef
Namiri, K., & Stojanovic, N. (2007). A formal approach for internal controls compliance in business processes. 8th Workshop on Business Process Modeling, Development, and Support (BPMDS07), Trondheim, Norway.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford university press.
Örtenblad, A. (2015). Towards increased relevance: Context-adapted models of the learning organization. The Learning Organization, 22(3), 163–181.CrossRef
Pawlowsky, P. (1992). Betriebliche Qualifikationsstrategien und Organisationales Lernen’. In W. H. Staehle & P. Conrad (Eds.), Managementforschung 2 (pp. 177–237). Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRef
Pemberton, J. D., & Stonehouse, G. H. (2000). Organisational learning and knowledge assets—An essential partnership. The Learning Organization, 7(4), 184–194.CrossRef
Petrash, G. (1996). Dow’s journey to a knowledge value management culture. European Management Journal, 14(4), 365–373.CrossRef
Rao, L., Mansingh, G., & Osei-Bryson, K. M. (2012). Building ontology based knowledge maps to assist business process re-engineering. Decision Support Systems, 52(3), 577–589.CrossRef
Scheer, A.-W., Abolhassan, F., Jost, W., & Kirchmer, M. (2002). Business process excellence—ARIS in practice. Berlin: Springer. http://​dx.​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-3-540-24705-0.CrossRef
Schiele, F., Laux, F., & Connolly, T. M. (2014). Applying a layered model for knowledge transfer to Business Process Modelling (BPM). International Journal on Advances in Intelligent Systems, 7(1 and 2), 156–166.
Senge, P. (1992). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organisation. London: Century Business.
Skyrme, D. J. (1999). From measurement myopia to knowledge leadership. Access Conference, London.
Stewart, T. A. (1997). Intellectual capital: The new wealth of organizations. New York: Doubleday/Currency.
Sveiby, K. E. (1989). The invisible balance sheet. Stockholm: Affarfgarblen.
Sydler, R., Haefliger, S., & Pruksa, R. (2014). Measuring intellectual capital with financial figures: Can we predict firm profitability? European Management Journal, 32(2), 244–259.CrossRef
Tanriverdi, H. (2005). Information technology relatedness, knowledge management capability, and performance of multibusiness firms. MIS Quarterly, 29(2), 311–334.
Ternai, K., Szabó, I., & Varga, K. (2013). Ontology-based compliance checking on higher education processes. In A. Kő et al. (Eds.), EGOVIS/EDEM 2013 (LNCS, Vol. 8061, pp. 58–71). Heidelberg: Springer.
Ternai, K., & Török, M. (2011, September 8–11). Semantic modeling for automated workflow software generation—An open model. 5th International Conference on Software, Knowledge Information, Industrial Management and Applications (SKIMA 2011), Benevento, Italy.
Tobin, J. (1969). A general equilibrium approach to monetary theory. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 1(1), 15–29.CrossRef
Volberda, H. W. (1996). Toward the flexible form: How to remain vital in hypercompetitive environments. Organization science, 7(4), 359–374.CrossRef
Warren, P., Davies, J., & Simperl, E. (Eds.). (2011). Context and semantics for knowledge management. Technologies for personal productivity. Berlin: Springer.
Wu, I., & Chen, J. (2014). Knowledge management driven firm performance: The roles of business process capabilities and organizational learning. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(6), 1141–1164.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Corporate Knowledge Discovery and Organizational Learning: The Role, Importance, and Application of Semantic Business Process Management—The ProKEX Case
verfasst von
András Gábor
Andrea Kő
Zoltán Szabó
Péter Fehér
Copyright-Jahr
2016
Buch
Corporate Knowledge Discovery and Organizational Learning

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28915-1

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-28917-5

Copyright-Jahr: 2016

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28917-5_1

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise