Skip to main content
Erschienen in:
Buchtitelbild

Open Access 2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

46. Crafting a Knowledge Management Results Framework

verfasst von : Olivier Serrat

Erschienen in: Knowledge Solutions

Verlag: Springer Singapore

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
insite
SUCHEN
loading …

Abstract

Managing for results requires a coherent framework for strategic planning, management, and communications based on continuous learning and accountability. Results frameworks improve management effectiveness by defining realistic expected results, monitoring progress toward their achievement, integrating lessons into decisions, and reporting on performance.
In a Word Managing for results requires a coherent framework for strategic planning, management, and communications based on continuous learning and accountability. Results frameworks improve management effectiveness by defining realistic expected results, monitoring progress toward their achievement, integrating lessons into decisions, and reporting on performance.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/chp%3A10.1007%2F978-981-10-0983-9_46/MediaObjects/372422_1_En_46_Figa_HTML.gif

Background

On May 4, 2009, at the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Board of Governors of ADB, Haruhiko Kuroda—ADB President and concurrent Chairperson of ADB’s Board of Directors—stressed the importance of knowledge to that organization:
To be fully effective, we must also consciously and actively blend knowledge with financing. We will focus on developing, capturing, and sharing knowledge in all our work, ensuring that ADB serves an intermediary role for both financing and knowledge.

Enhancing Knowledge Management Under ADB’s Strategy 2020

Bite off more than you can chew, then chew it.
—Ella Williams
When it comes to getting things done, we need fewer architects and more bricklayers.
—Colleen Barrett
On July 31, 2009, President Kuroda then approved Enhancing Knowledge Management under Strategy 2020: Plan of Action for 20092011 (2009) to advance the knowledge management agenda under Strategy 2020: The Long-Term Strategic Framework of the Asian Development Bank (20082020) (2008). Four pillars support the plan of action: (i) sharpening the knowledge focus in ADB’s operations—to add value at regional, country, and project levels, (ii) empowering the communities of practice—to collaborate for knowledge generation and sharing, (iii) strengthening external knowledge partnerships—to align and leverage external knowledge, and (iv) further enhancing staff learning and skills development—to enhance opportunities for staff to learn. The four pillars are closely related: the set of actions/outputs that make up the first focuses on adding value to ADB’s operations in its developing member countries; the other three sets deal with how that might be achieved.
ADB’s plan of action for knowledge management connotes a pragmatic, step-by-step approach: the initial actions/outputs are for a 3-year time frame; in October 2009, measures for their implementation were incorporated into ADB’s Work Program and Budget Framework (2010–2012); and progress is to be monitored and reviewed at the time of ADB’s annual budget review by the Regional and Sustainable Development Department in ADB, in consultation with ADB’s Budget, Personnel, and Management Systems Department and Strategy and Policy Department.

Crafting a Knowledge Management Results Framework

ADB’s plan of action does not discuss but flags aspects that support and facilitate knowledge management practices, viz., budgetary allocations, business process improvements, and information technology. These Knowledge Solutions showcase the expected outcomes, useful results indicators, specific activity indicators, targets, and sources of verification that comprise the knowledge management results framework for ADB’s plan of action. The framework was prepared after extensive internal consultations. It is an important instrument used to assess and improve performance and help identify problems and their solutions. It is the basis for reporting. (These Knowledge Solutions also disclose the approach to progress reporting and what will condition ratings of progress in adoption.) The framework is expected to promote a stronger culture of results and performance for knowledge management in ADB.
Box 1: Enhancing Knowledge Management under Strategy 2020: Plan of Action for 2009–2011—Knowledge Management Results Framework
Impact: The capacity of ADB and its DMCs to reduce poverty is enhanced
Outcome
Monitoring indicator
Targeta
Source of verification
First Pillar Statement: The Knowledge Focus in ADB’s Operations is Sharpened
At the regional level, ADB is increasingly recognized as a lead policy advisor, notably through the knowledge agenda that its TA for research and development advances
Useful Results Indicators
• Number of staff assessing the commitment and maturity of ADB’s knowledge management framework favorably. Baseline year: 2008
10% more every year
• Annual Knowledge Management Survey. RSDD-KM
• The number and outreach of ADB stand-alone flagship publications, facilitated by enhanced marketing and dissemination efforts. Baseline year: 2008
10% more every year
• DER
• The number of references to ADB knowledge products in research, press, and policy reports. Baseline year: 2008
5% more every year
• DER
• Views of web pages and downloads of PDF files from knowledge and operations departments. Baseline year: 2009
10% more every year
• DER
Specific Activity Indicators
• An E-library hosting knowledge products that are indexed and searchable is launched
Done: 2011
• DER
• TA reports contain information on knowledge management and communication
More, every year
• Special study by national consultant. RSDD-KM
• Taxonomies, templates, and guidelines for branding and publishing, as well as use of metadata, are prepared or finalized, then disseminated through the knowledge coordinators, for use by authors
Done: 2010
• DER
• A timetable for digitization of publications, e.g., books, significant papers, from 1966 is established and the process is launched, with care to add metadata to increase searchability, make intellectual patrimony more widely available, and enhance its intellectual equity
Done: 2010
• DER
• Channels for marketing and distribution of knowledge products are expanded, enhanced, and monitored to build additional relationships and help increase exposure among key stakeholders, opinion makers, and academic institutions
More, every year
• DER
• A world-class translation system is adopted and introduced with associated training to retool, upgrade, and expand current practices, with emphasis on flow management of journalistically written summaries that where possible coincide with book releases
Done: 2011
• DER
At the country level, CPSs guide medium-term operational programming with a focus on results and development effectiveness
Useful Results Indicators
• Number of instances on record when CPSs led to DMC studies that were used to support policy development and decision-making. Baseline year: 2010
1 more every year
• Annual questionnaire to RMs. RSDD-KM
Specific Activity Indicators
• RRPs contain information on knowledge management and communication
More, every year
• Special study by national consultant. RSDD-KM
• CPSs contain information on knowledge management and communication
More, every year
• Special study by national consultant. RSDD-KM
• CPSs state in which sector(s) ADB considers itself a key knowledge partner in the donor community.
More, every year
• Special study by national consultant. RSDD-KM
• ADB organizes (i) ADB-wide, and (ii) in-country forums, workshops, seminars, conferences, media events, etc. Baseline year: 2010
5 more every year
• Annual questionnaire to RMs. RSDD-KM
At the project or TA level, key documents embody quality, knowledge, and innovation
Useful Results Indicators
• Downloads of TA reports from internal and external users. Baseline year: 2009
More, every year
• DER, ODs
• The number of TA consultant reports posted on ADB.org. Baseline year: 2009
More, every year
• DER, ODs
• The number of books, reports, journals, briefs, working papers, training and instructive materials, and awareness raising and multimedia materials posted on ADB.org. Baseline year: 2009
More, every year
• DER, ODs
• The number of landing pages on ADB.org for ADB projects and studies. Baseline year: 2009
More, every year
• DER, ODs
Specific Activity Indicators
• TA reports contain information on knowledge management and communication
More, every year
• Offices and departments
• New sector peer review process implemented in ADB for the preparation of RRPs and TAs
Done: 2010
• SPPI, RSDD
Second Pillar Statement: The Communities of Practice are Empowered
CoPs become an integral part of ADB’s business processes
Useful Results Indicators
• CoPs are resourced with dedicated staff. Baseline year: 2009
Done: 2010–2011
• BPOD
• The number of work plans and PDPs in which participation in CoPs is mentioned. Baseline year: 2009
More, every year
• BPHR
• The number of meetings and events organized by CoPs. Baseline year: 2010
More, every year
• RSDD-KM, CoPs
• The number of early informal peer reviews by CoP members, to help staff conceptualize projects and TA. Baseline year: 2010
More, every year
• Annual questionnaire to CoPs. RSDD-KM
Specific Activity Indicators
• The capacity of CoPs in terms of staff positions in direct support of their operational and administrative activities. Baseline year: 2009
Done: 2010–2011
• BPOD
• CoPs conduct regular self-assessments of effectiveness, including assessments of the CoP convenor, as part of annual sector and thematic reports. Baseline year: 2010
All, every year
• CoPs
• A Forum on Learning and ADB’s CoPs: Learning, Sharing, and Doing Together is held
Every year
• RSOD, RSDD-KM
• Sector and thematic websites are revamped and updated with links to relevant information in ADB.
Done: 2010–2011
• RSDD-KM
• Supervisors are instructed and ensure that institutional initiatives in CoPs are assessed in PDPs and included in work planning.
Every year, at the start
• BPHR
• Revised Guidelines for sector and thematic reporting are prepared and approved
Done: 2009
• RSDD-KM, RSOD
Output-based financing recognizes CoPs that generate and share useful and usable knowledge
Useful Results Indicators
• The budgets of CoPs support expanding activities and are complemented through TAs
Done: 2010
• BPBM, CoPs
• Annual CoP work plans are based on triennial sector and thematic reports
80% in 2010, 100% afterwards
• RSDD-KM
Specific Activity Indicators
• Budget allocations are devolved through relevant divisions to heads of CoPs responsible for managing funds.
Done: 2011
• BPBM, CoPs
• A CoP Accomplishment Report is generated.
Every year, in September
• RSDD-KM
The CoPs engage more purposefully in external knowledge partnerships
Useful Results Indicators
• The number of formal and informal knowledge partnerships with other organizations for knowledge generation and sharing. Baseline year: 2010
More, every year
• Annual questionnaire to CoPs. RSDD-KM
• Knowledge networking and collaboration is recognized by ADB with mention of this in PDPs
Done: 2010
• Offices and departments, BPHR
Specific Activity Indicators
• CoPs engage in formal and informal knowledge partnerships that result in joint activities. Baseline year: 2010
More, every year
• Annual questionnaire to CoPs. RSDD-KM
The contributions of the knowledge coordinators in ADB are enhanced
Useful Results Indicators
• The activities of the knowledge coordinators are reviewed, harmonized, and managed for efficiency and effectiveness
Done: 2010–2011
• RSDD-KM
Specific Activity Indicators
• Meetings, facilitated by RSDD-KM, are held with the knowledge coordinators to structure their contributions and to identify and discuss opportunities to ramp these up. Baseline year: 2010
Every quarter
• RSDD-KM, DER
• Meetings, facilitated by DER, are held with the knowledge coordinators to identify and discuss marketing and dissemination opportunities to enhance knowledge products and increase their outreach with emphasis on relevance, accuracy, objectivity, and timeliness. Baseline year: 2010
Every quarter
• DER, RSDD-KM
Third Pillar Statement: External Knowledge Partnerships are Strengthened
The design, implementation, and monitoring of external knowledge partnerships with global, regional, and national institutions are improved
Useful Results Indicators
• The design, implementation, and monitoring of strategic partnerships in key sectors and themes are informed by the Guidelines on Designing Knowledge Partnerships to be finalized in 2010
Done: 2010
• SPPI, RSDD-KM
• A database of strategic partnerships affords greater transparency and synergies are achieved where institutions are involved in more than one strategic partnership arrangement with ADB
Done: 2010
• SPPI, OIST, RSDD-KM
Specific Activity Indicators
• A resource document, Guidelines on Designing Knowledge Partnerships, is drafted that informs the design, implementation, and monitoring of knowledge components in strategic partnerships
Done: 2010
• RSDD-KM, SPPI
• Midterm review processes for memorandums of understanding with strategic partners are adapted to include review of knowledge generation and sharing components
Done: 2010
• SPPI, RSDD-KM
• A database of strategic partnerships for use across ADB, including resident missions, is established and managed continuously thereafter.
Done: 2010
• SPPI, OIST, RSDD-KM
External knowledge partnerships generate and share knowledge proactively
Useful Results Indicators
• External stakeholders perceiving ADB as a source of knowledge on development issues. Baseline year: 2006
10% more
• ADB Stakeholder Perceptions Survey, 2009. DER
Specific Activity Indicators
• ADB.org offers improved information on knowledge partnerships and profiles their products and services
Done: 2010
• DER
• The dissemination and visibility of ADB’s knowledge products are expanded and enhanced through ADB’s depository library program and multi-donor public information center network
More, every year
• DER
Fourth Pillar Statement: Staff Learning and Skills Development are Enhanced Further
Staff skills in knowledge management and learning are developed and captured
Useful Results Indicators
• Staff perceiving that ADB is becoming a learning organization that generates and shares knowledge better. Baseline year: 2008
10% more every year
• Annual KM Survey. RSDD-KM
• Staff participation in learning and development activities for knowledge management and learning
More, every year
• RSDD-KM, BPDB
Specific Activity Indicators
• A training needs assessment is conducted to identify the learning programs CoPs need and their preferred learning modes, and recommend learning opportunities to support their activities in 2010–2011.
Done: 2010
• RSDD-KM, BPDB
• RSDD-KM and BPMSD collaborate on the design and conduct of learning and development activities
Done: 2010–2011
• RSDD-KM, BPDB
• RSDD-KM holds awareness and capacity building sessions on knowledge management and learning. Start in 2010
Continuously, every year
• RSDD-KM, BPDB
• The awareness, outreach, and impact of the Knowledge Solutions and Knowledge Showcase series are assessed in the baseline year and annually thereafter.
Done: 2010
• RSDD-KM
• Expanded staff profile pages are developed in 2010 and made available externally in 2011.
Done: 2010
• OISTb
Staff pursue external learning opportunities
Useful Results Indicators
• The number of staff who express interest in external learning opportunities and apply for competitive sabbatical leave increases. Baseline year: 2007
More, every year
• BPDB
Specific Activity Indicators
• ADB encourages staff exchanges with strategic partners. Baseline year: 2007
Done: 2010
• BPDB
• The budget for external training expands opportunities. Baseline year: 2007
Done: 2010
• BPDB
Research in priority areas of Strategy 2020 is boosted
Useful Results Indicators
• The number of senior researchers invited under the Eminent Speakers’ Forum, Distinguished Speakers Program, and Distinguished Speaker Seminar Series. Baseline year: 2009
More, every year
• ADBI, ERD, RSDD-KM
• Demand-driven studies are undertaken by senior and junior researchers. Baseline year: 2009
More, every year
• Knowledge Departments
• Knowledge departments produce books, reports, journals, briefs, working papers, training and instructive materials, and awareness raising and multimedia materials. Baseline year: 2009
More, every year
• RSDD, Knowledge Departments
Specific Activity Indicator
• Knowledge departments seize opportunities to research priority areas of Strategy 2020. Baseline year: 2009
One per department, every year
• RSDD, Knowledge Departments
The tacit knowledge of departing staff is captured to drive organizational performance improvement
Useful Results Indicator
• ADB retains critical knowledge from departing staff through exit interview summaries
All departing staff, from 2010
• Offices and departments
Specific Activity Indicator
• Exit interviews, initially for professional staff, are introduced in every department with assistance from RSDD-KM and mainstreamed from 2011
Done: 2010
• RSDD-KM, BPHR, Offices and departments
aBaseline values are available in all instances. Their provision, and subsequent reporting on changes, is the responsibility of the source of verification identified
bOIST will play supportive roles, as required, in actions toward several other results, including those mentioned herein
Notes• The impact targeted is that indicated in ADB (2004)
• The primary outcomes, listed in Knowledge Management in ADB, that the plan of action supports are (i) an improved management system; (ii) improved business processes and information technology solutions for knowledge capture, enrichment, storage, and retrieval; (iii) improved organizational culture for knowledge sharing; (iv) well-functioning communities of practice; and (v) expanded knowledge sharing, learning, and dissemination through external relations and networking
• From 2010, the annual knowledge management survey will be augmented by an annual survey gauging staff perceptions of competencies to learn for change in ADB
• The annual Forum on Learning is expected to focus on CoPs—yet cut across the other three pillars—and focus on what was learned in the preceding year in practical ways with measurable outcomes that leverage multipliers
Source ADB (2009)
Box 2: Enhancing Knowledge Management under Strategy 2020: Plan of Action for 2009–2011—Assumptions and Risks
Pillar Statement
Assumptions and Risks
First pillar: The knowledge focus in ADB’s operations is sharpened
(i) Strong commitment by ADB’s Senior Management Team; (ii) ADB values adjust in support of knowledge management and learning; (iii) close coordination among offices and departments; and (iv) availability of adequate resources
Second pillar: The communities of practice are empowered
(i) Strong commitment by ADB’s Senior Management Team; (ii) availability of staff capabilities (experience, competencies, and technical and professional skills); (iii) staff attitudes (values and beliefs about innovation, commitment, and flexibility) adjust in support of knowledge management and learning; (iv) close coordination among offices and departments; and (v) availability of adequate resources
Third pillar: External knowledge partnerships are strengthened
(i) Strong commitment by ADB’s Senior Management Team; (ii) close coordination among offices and departments; and (iii) availability of adequate resources
Fourth pillar: Staff learning and skills development are enhanced further
(i) Strong commitment by ADB’s Senior Management Team; (ii) staff attitudes (values and beliefs about innovation, commitment, and flexibility) adjust in support of knowledge management and learning; (iii) staff behaviors (performance, productivity, teamwork, and cooperation) adjust in support of knowledge management and learning; and (iv) availability of adequate resources
Source ADB (2009)
Box 3: Enhancing Knowledge Management under Strategy 2020: Plan of Action for 2009–2011—Progress Reports
https://static-content.springer.com/image/chp%3A10.1007%2F978-981-10-0983-9_46/MediaObjects/372422_1_En_46_Tabc_HTML.gif
Notes • Progress reports on Enhancing Knowledge Management under Strategy 2020: Plan of Action for 20092011 will be drafted in 2010 and 2011
• The following four ratings will present quantitative and qualitative assessments on action: (i) fully adopted; (ii) largely adopted; (iii) partly adopted; and (iv) not adopted
Legend ADBI Asian Development Bank Institute; BPBM Budget and Management Services Division, BPMSD; BPDB Staff Development and Benefits Division, BPMSD; BPHR Human Resources Division, BPMSD; BPOD Office of the Director General, BPMSD; BPMSD Budget, Personnel, and Management Systems Department; CoP Community of Practice; CPS Country Partnership Strategy; DER Department of External Relations; DMC developing member country; ERD Economics and Research Department; OD Operations Department; OIST Office of Information Systems and Technology; PDF Portable Document Format; PDP Performance and Development Plan; RM Resident Mission; RRP Report and Recommendation of the President; RSDD Regional and Sustainable Development Department; RSDD-KM Knowledge Management Center, RSDD; RSOD Office of the Director General, RSDD; SPD Strategy and Policy Department; SPPI Strategy, Policy, and Interagency Relations Division, SPD; TA Technical Assistance
Source ADB (2009)
The opinions expressed in this chapter are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Asian Development Bank, its Board of Directors, or the countries they represent.
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 IGO license (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by-nc/​3.​0/​igo/​) which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the Asian Development Bank, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
Any dispute related to the use of the works of the Asian Development Bank that cannot be settled amicably shall be submitted to arbitration pursuant to the UNCITRAL rules. The use of the Asian Development Bank’s name for any purpose other than for attribution, and the use of the Asian Development Bank’s logo, shall be subject to a separate written license agreement between the Asian Development Bank and the user and is not authorized as part of this CC-IGO license. Note that the link provided above includes additional terms and conditions of the license.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat ADB (2004) Knowledge management in ADB. Manila ADB (2004) Knowledge management in ADB. Manila
Zurück zum Zitat ADB (2008) Strategy 2020: the long-term strategic framework of the Asian development bank (2008–2020). Manila ADB (2008) Strategy 2020: the long-term strategic framework of the Asian development bank (2008–2020). Manila
Zurück zum Zitat ADB (2009) Enhancing knowledge management under strategy 2020: plan of action for 2009–2011. Manila ADB (2009) Enhancing knowledge management under strategy 2020: plan of action for 2009–2011. Manila
Metadaten
Titel
Crafting a Knowledge Management Results Framework
verfasst von
Olivier Serrat
Copyright-Jahr
2017
Verlag
Springer Singapore
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0983-9_46