Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen
Intellectual property rights protection is one of the major strategies of publishing, printing, and packaging companies. It strengthens competitive advantages in a highly competitive environment, particularly, in the digital age. New packaging structure, and packaging content and visual design are valuable targets to be protected under IPR mechanisms. Under IPR mechanisms, not only IPR costs are high for R&D but also the high risk being charged with IPR infringement. For small and mid-size design service companies, it is too complicate to treat IPR issues and difficult to reduce IPR costs. Is there any IPR mechanism that small and mid-size design companies could follow to reduce intellectual property costs and the cost of being charged with IPR infringement? “Technology and knowledge sharing” has developed since the last decade of the 20th century. The open-source movement philosophy has developed to several mechanisms, such as, Open Design, Science Commons, and Creative Commons. This paper is focused on “Creative Commons and IP sharing”, to discuss the value of IP sharing for design fields. “Increasing marginal utility” is a major economic theory in this paper used to describe what benefits Open Design And Creative Commons could contribute to the design, publishing, printing, and packaging industries. Expert interviews and case studies are major research methods of this article.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
CC. (2015). Frequently asked questions: what is creative commons and what do you do? https://wiki.creativecommons.org/FAQ#What_is_Creative_Commons_and_what_do_you_do.3F. Cited May 15, 2015.
CC. (2015). Creative commons: History. https://creativecommons.org/about/history. Cited May 15, 2015.
CC. (2015). State of the commons. https://stateof.creativecommons.org/report/. Cited May 15, 2015
Flicker. (2015). Explore creative commons. https://www.flickr.com/creativecommons. Cited May 25, 2015
CC. (2015). About the licenses. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/?lang=en. Cited May 25, 2015
Nieh, K. (2009). A-Cube package design. https://www.flickr.com/photos/dlgarden/3787256775/in/photolist-6LEFuB-5XeFY5-E4x5H-5qhV2y-5qhUp7-4Y59dC-5qhVwW-9sC9Ae-AEpQF-oabnZ-5Xa9Mp-4Y597y-4Y58Rb-4VomK2-8MfWHb-5qdBn6-bXCS5Y-rxR7p2-27Bfcb-2x6tGj-5CbrwM-7wyiYk-7wC8jq-9dT2SC-9dT2Mo-ea7xyc-eXE6iS-7RBq7C-9rsNsV-7Tq5A6-6f1trm-6f1v2G-6eWkzn-6f1udd-6eWiQH-6f1uum-6f1tX1-6eWisi-4GDeeU-57WwYV-a1HJNU-a1ESrK-biaEk-9unSJG-c3Lz7u-a9J2pU-qNjzcU-6LJQ71-cbHDz-7wyiLB. Cited June 2, 2015
Designer-WG. (2006). Show-the-packaging-works. https://www.flickr.com/photos/spliffx/261374735/in/photolist-p6BAX-9rFsf-spiYUX-7wyiXx-Dqfin-9Hk35c-a58XeU-5tYxQW-eaQtW4-p5zhb-7qvSVc-eaW6LA-6F1EAj-eaW6SJ-eDNvNT-7QsfN-7wt7Hw-5abg2Y-afDQaC-56DYQT-9GgH7D-9HnUfJ-5QST-nuCp4-9gY6fG-5YiGdK-D4rpR-fWhZfY-MUzya-eG5c42-eGb7Uw-eG5aNZ-eGbd9A-eGbjfC-eG544p-eGb68q-eG57hp-eG53fp-eGb3Ky-eG53Fa-eGb7uU-eGb9os-eG4Wcg-eGbhK9-eG4X1t-eGbi5S-eGb3hj-eG4Ykv-eGbe2C-eGbet3. Cited June 2, 2015
CC. (2012). Case study/ABC pool. https://wiki.creativecommons.org/wiki/Case_Studies/ABC_Pool. Cited June 2, 2015
Nuvolari, A. (2004). Collective invention during the British industrial revolution: The case of the cornish pumping engine. Cambridge Journal of Economics,28(3), 347–363. CrossRef
Allen, R. C. (1983). Collective invention. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,4(1), 1–24. CrossRef
Vallance, R., Kiani, S., & Nayfeh, S. (2001). Open design of manufacturing equipment. In CIRP 1st International Conference on Agile, 2001.
Vallance, R. (2000). Bazaar design of nano and micro manufacturing equipment. Paper presented at Nanotechnology Workshop, July 14, University of Kentucky
Thakur, D. (2010). Open access nanotechnology for developing countries: lessons from open source software. Nanotechnology and the Challenges of Equity, Equality and Development Yearbook of Nanotechnology in Society,2, 331–347. CrossRef
Open Designs. (2015). 2057 open source web design templates, Open Designs. http://www.opendesigns.org/. Cited June 20, 2015
Kadushin, R. (2010), Open design manifesto. http://www.ronen-kadushin.com/files/4613/4530/1263/Open_Design_Manifesto-Ronen_Kadushin_pdf. Cited June 20, 2015
Cole, V. J., Michael O. M., & Jeffrey B. J. (2014). Assumption: Diminishing marginal utility from consumption, Pennsylvania State University. https://www.e-education.psu.edu/eme444/node/216. Cited March 3, 2015
Latzko, D. A. (2015). Lecture 15: Marginal utility, lecture material of introductory microeconomic, Business and Economics Division, Pennsylvania State University. http://www2.yk.psu.edu/~dxl31/econ2/2lecture15.html. Cited March 3, 2015
Christiansen, J. K., Gasparin, M., Claus. J., & Varnes, C. J. (2013). Improving design with open innovation: A flexible management technology. Research-Technology Management, March/April, pp. 36–44.
Simmonds, T. (2010). Common knowledge? The rise of creative commons licensing. Legal Information Management,10(2010), 162–165. CrossRef
Bloemsaat, B., & Kleve, P. (2009). Creative commons: A business model for products nobody wants to buy. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology,23(3), 237–249. CrossRef
Jones, R., & Cameron, E. (2005). Full fat, semi-skimmed or no milk today—creative commons licences and English folk music. International Review of Law Computers & Technology,19(3), 259–275. CrossRef
Liu, C. C., Tao, S. Y., Chen, W. H., Chen, S. Y., & Liu, B. J. (2013). The effects of a creative commons approach on collaborative learning. Behaviour & Information Technology,32(1), 37–51. CrossRef
Liu, C. C., Lin, C. C., Chang, C. Y., & Chao, P. Y. (2014). Knowledge sharing among university students facilitated with a creative commons licensing mechanism: A case study in a programming course. Educational Technology & Society,17(3), 154–167.
Ches brough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press.
Ches brough, H. W. (2004). Managing open innovation: Chess and poker. Research-Technology Management,47(1), 23–26.
- “Creative Commons” Public Licensing for the Competitive Markets of the Publishing, Printing, and Packaging Industries
- Springer Singapore
- Chapter 46