nach oben

Erschienen in:

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

2. Critical Theory and Resistance: On Antiphilosophy and the Philosophy of Praxis

verfasst von : Stephen Eric Bronner

Erschienen in: The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Theory

Verlag: Palgrave Macmillan US

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Much has been written about the lack of foundations for the critical method. In keeping with its original purpose, however, critical theory requires foundations very different from those demanded by traditional theory. This chapter begins by highlighting the transformative project of critical theory and the preconditions for privileging this kind of interpretation. Recent trends toward the metaphysics of “recognition” or insistence upon the “pragmatic universals” of language need to make way for a concern with uncovering the conflict-ridden constitution of the historical totality, or what Marx termed the “ensemble of social relations,” and how any transformative project rests on illuminating the ways in which freedom is linked with necessity.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Introduction: What Is Critical Theory?

Nächstes Kapitel Marx’s Influence on the Early Frankfurt School

This chapter complements an earlier study of mine, Bronner (2002).

Note the discussion in Bronner (2011, 1ff).

Note the excellent discussion in Krausz (2015, 306ff).

In 1917, when Trotsky joined the Bolsheviks, the tradeoff was clear: Trotsky embraced Lenin’s notion of the vanguard party while Lenin endorsed Trotsky’s idea of the permanent revolution that essentially fused the bourgeois with the proletarian stage in reference to the Revolution of 1905. See Trotsky (2014).

Affirming the claims of Karl Kautsky and his orthodox followers, Gramsci notes: “Events have exploded the critical schema determining how the history of Russia would unfold according to the canons of historical materialism. The Bolsheviks reject Karl Marx, and their explicit actions and conquests bear witness that the canons of historical materialism are not so rigid as might have been and has been thought.” Gramsci (1977, 34ff).

“The leap into the open air of history is the dialectical leap Marx understood as revolution” is noted approvingly while “For every second was the small gateway in time through which the Messiah might enter” is the concluding line of the famous aphorism of Benjamin (2003, Volume 4, 395, 397).

Intellectuals rather than workers were most drawn to radical political ideals according to the classic study of social democratic party organization by Michels (1963, 52ff, 167fff, and passim).

See the discussion in Wiggershaus (1994, 14ff).

Note the inaugural lecture by Horkheimer (1989, 25ff).

Note the new edition of Horkheimer and Adorno (2002).

Horkheimer (1989a, Volume 13, 571).

Nietzsche would later be termed by Horkheimer “the most radical enlightenment figure in all of philosophy.” And in the general indeterminate way in which Horkheimer used the term “enlightenment” that might even be true. In terms of the values and political ideas deriving from the actual movement, however, such a claim is nonsense. Here, the unfortunate consequences of using one term in two very different ways becomes apparent. Horkheimer (1989a, 574).

It is important to understand that this theme is ongoing in his thought and Leo Lowenthal, his close friend and associate, stated more than once that Adorno’s motto is “don’t participate.” Indeed, much like Kierkegaard, Adorno can claim: “The value of a thought is valued by its distance from the continuity of the familiar. It is objectively devalued as this distance is reduced … For the intellectual, inviolable isolation is now the only way of showing some measure of solidarity. All collaboration, all the human worth of social mixing and participation, merely masks a tacit acceptance of inhumanity.” Adorno (2006: 80, 26).

The justification for this category can be found in Pollock (1989, 95ff).

Originally written as an appendix to Negative Dialectics, it is Adorno’s critique of existentialism and particularly Heidegger for individuating rather than rendering the subject unique in his or her subjectivity. This is a questionable argument not only because Heidegger’s ontology rests on the claim that “Being unto Death” is always “mine” but because the same critique can be directed at Adorno himself. See Adorno (2003).

This is initially what led the young Herbert Marcuse to attempt formulating a “concrete philosophy” by grounding Marx’s historical materialism in Heidegger’s phenomenological category of “historicity.” Note the excellent compilation of essays in Marcuse (2005) and also the classic written (ironically) by Lenin’s philosophical mentor Plekahnov (1898).

This would lead Adorno to stress the uniqueness of his position on non-identity and subjectivity against those of possible competitors whose ultimate conclusions are not as different from his own as he and many of his followers would like to think. Note not only Adorno (1989) but also Adorno (1994) that might well be compared with Heidegger (1970).

To be fair, however, Adorno was insistent that “the less identity can be subsumed between subject and object, the more contradictory are the demands made upon the cognitive subject, upon its unfettered strength and candid reflection.” Adorno (1972, 31).

Theodor W. Adorno, Minima Moralia: Reflections from a Damaged Life trans. E.F.N Jephcott (London: New Left Books, 1974), 16.

Note the early complementary qualitative and quantitative studies by Adorno and then Pollock and Adorno (2010-2011).

Note the succinct formulation in Habermas (1989, 136ff).

This becomes clear from “The University in a Democracy” and “Student Protest in the Federal Republic of Germany” in Habermas (1987).

Note Bronner (2016).

There is an expanded discussion in Bronner (2012, 1ff, 145ff).

Unsurpassed remains what was probably the first review by Marcuse (1973).

Note the seminal work by Max Horkheimer, The Eclipse of Reason (London: Continuum, 2004)

“The chief defect of all hitherto existing materialism – that of Feuerbach included – is that the thing, reality, sensuousness, is conceived only in the form of the object or of contemplation but not as sensuous activity, practice, not subjectively. Hence it happened that the active side, in contradistinction to materialism, was developed by idealism – but only abstractly since, of course, idealism does not know real, sensuous activity as such … (Neither can—SEB) grasp the significance of ‘revolutionary,’ of ‘practical-critical’ activity.” See the first of Marx’s “Theses on Feuerbach” 1:13.

Note the collection edited by Michael J. Thompson, Rational Radicalism and Political Theory: Essays in Honor of Stephen Eric Bronner (Lanham Mass: Lexington, 2010).

“Three questions have to be faced in the analysis of the roots of political power: the conceptual framework has to be established; the institutional setting to be clarified; and the historical process to be understood which leads to a change in institutions and different attitudes toward power and to a different political behavior.” Neumann (1957, 11).

Adorno, Theodor. 1974. Minima Moralia: Reflections of a damaged life. London: New Left Books.

———. 1983. Cultural critique and society. In Theodor Adorno, prisms. Cambridge: MIT Press.

———. 1984. Negative dialectics. New York: Continuum.

———. 1989. Kierkegaard: Construction of an aesthetic theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

———. 1994. Three studies on Hegel. Cambridge: MIT Press.

———. 1998. Resignation. In Theodor Adorno, critical models. New York: Columbia University Press.

———. 2003. The Jargon of authenticity. New York: Routledge.

———. 2006. Minima Moralia: Reflections of a damaged life. New York: Verso.

Benjamin, Walter. 2003. On the concept of history. In Selected writings 4 volumes, ed. Howard Eiland, and Michael W. Jennings. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Bronner, Stephen. 1994. Of critical theory and its theorists. London: Basil Blackwell.

———. 2002. Sketching the lineage: The critical method and the idealist legacy. New Political Science 24(2): 265–292.CrossRef

———. 2011. Socialism unbound: Principles, practices and prospects, 2nd edn. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRef

———. 2012. Modernism at the barricades: Aesthetics, politics, Utopia. New York: Columbia University Press.

———. 2014. Moments of decision: Political history and the crises of radicalism, 2nd edn. New York: Bloomsbury.

———. 2016. One-dimensional man at 50. In The bitter taste of hope: Ideals, ideologies, and interests in the age of Obama. Albany: SUNY Press.

Dubiel, Helmut. 1985. Theory and politics: Studies in the development of critical theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Gramsci, Antonio. 1971. The prison notebooks. New York: International Publishers.

———. 1977. The revolution against ‘Capital’. In Selections from political writings, ed. Qintin Hoare, 1910–1920. New York: International.

Habermas, Jürgen. 1987. Toward a rational society. Cambridge: Polity Press.

———. 1989. The public sphere: An encyclopedia article. In Critical theory and society, ed. Stephen Eric Bronner, and Douglas Kellner. New York: Routledge.

———. 1998. The philosophical discourse of modernity: Twelve lectures. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Heidegger, Martin. 1970. Hegel’s critique of experience. New York: Harper.

Horkheimer, Max. 1989a. Die Aufklaerung. In Gesammelte Werke, ed. Max Horkheimer. Frankfurt: Fischer.

———. 1989b. Gesammelte Werke. Frankfurt: Fischer.

———. 1999. Traditional and critical theory. In Critical theory: Selected essays, ed. Matthew O’Connell. New York: Continuum.

Horkheimer, Max, and Theodor Adorno. 2002. Dialectic of enlightenment: Philosophical fragments. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Horkheimer, Max, and Theodor Adorno. 2006. Dialectic of enlightenment: Philosophical fragments. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Jones, William David. 1999. The lost debate: German socialist intellectuals and totalitarianism. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

Korsch, Karl. 1970. Marxism and philosophy. London: New Left Books.

Krausz, Tamas. 2015. Reconstructing Lenin: An intellectual biography. New York: Monthly Review.

Lukács, Georg. 1971. History and class consciousness: Studies in Marxist dialectics. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Lukács, G. 2009. Lenin: A study on the unity of his thought. New York: Verso.

Lukács, Georg. 2014. The moral mission of the communist party. In Tactics and ethics, ed. G. Lukács, 1919–1929. New York: Verso.

Marcuse, Herbert. 1972. Counter-revolution and revolt. Boston: Beacon Press.

———. 1973. The foundations of historical materialism. In Studies in critical philosophy. Boston: Beacon Press.

———. 2005. Heideggerian marxism. Omaha: University of Nebraska Press.

Marx, Karl. 1969. Theses on Feuerbach. In Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, selected works. Moscow: Progress.

Michels, Robert. 1963. Political parties: A sociological study of the oligarchical tendencies of modern democracy. New York: Crowell.

Neumann, Franz. 1957. Approaches to the study of political power. In The democratic and the authoritarian state: Essays in political and legal theory, ed. Herbert Marcuse. New York: Free Press.

Pollock, Frederic. 1989. State capitalism: Its possibilities and limitations. In Critical theory and society: A reader, ed. Stephen Eric Bronner, and Douglas Kellner. New York: Routledge.

Pollock, Friedrich, and Theodor Adorno. 2010–2011. Group experiment and other writings: The Frankfurt School on public opinion in postwar Germany. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Thompson, Michael. 2010. Rational radicalism and political theory: Essays in honor of Stephen Eric Bronner. Lanham: Lexington University Press.

Trotsky, Leon. 2014. Results and prospects. New York: The Perfect Library.

Walsh, Michael. 2015. The Devil’s pleasure palace: The cult of critical theory and the subversion of the west. New York: Encounter Books.

Wiggershaus, Rolf. 1994. The Frankfurt School: Its history, theories and political significance. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Titel: Critical Theory and Resistance: On Antiphilosophy and the Philosophy of Praxis
verfasst von: Stephen Eric Bronner
Verlag: Palgrave Macmillan US
Buch: The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Theory
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-55800-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-1-137-55801-5

Copyright-Jahr: 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55801-5_2