nach oben

Erschienen in:

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

2. Critiques of Ostrom’s Approach: A View from Fisheries Governance

verfasst von : Hoang Viet Thang

Erschienen in: Rethinking Fisheries Governance

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This chapter provides a review of the eight institutional conditions outlined by Ostrom. By analysing these, it shows that they are society-centric and underestimate the capacity of the state in working with resource users. The chapter presents its central argument that the state is an important contributory factor in fostering the success of collective action in common pool resource management and concludes that it is necessary to bring the state back in. Therefore it is widely relevant to introduce the concept of meta-governance into managing common pool resources in association with Ostrom’s conditions.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Introduction

Nächstes Kapitel The Fisheries Co-management Approach: Critiques and Theoretical Framework of the Research

Agrawal, A. 2003. Sustainable Governance of Common-Pool Resources: Context, Methods, and Politics. Annual Review of Anthropology 32: 243–262.CrossRef

Agrawal, A., and A. Chhatre. 2006. Explaining Success in the Commons: Community Forest Governance in the Indian Himalaya. World Development 34 (1): 149–166.CrossRef

Agrawal, Arun, and Gautam N. Yadama. 1997. How Do Local Institutions Mediate Market and Population Pressures on Resources? Forest Panchayats in Kumaon, India. Development and Change 28 (3): 435–465.CrossRef

Anthony, Denise L., and John L. Campbell. 2011. States, Social Capital and Cooperation: Looking Back on Governing the Commons. International Journal of the Commons 5 (2): 284–302.CrossRef

Bardhan, P. 2000. Irrigation and Cooperation: An Empirical Analysis of 48 Irrigation Communities in South India. Economic Development and Cultural Change 48 (4): 847–865.CrossRef

Bell, Stephen, and Andrew Hindmoor. 2009. Rethinking Governance. Cambridge: University Press.CrossRef

Berkes, Fikret. 1994. Co-management: Bridging the Two Solitudes. Northern Perspect 22 (2–3): 18–20.

Blaikie, P. 2006. Is Small Really Beautiful? Community-based Natural Resource Management in Malawi and Botswana. World Development 34 (11): 1942–1957.CrossRef

Carnaje, Gideon P., and Auraleen Mae S. Harina. 2009. Gerschenkron’s Perspective on Backwardness and the Role of Government and Nongovernmental Organizations in the Development of Local Capacity for Collective Action in Coastal Fisheries. http://www.cemuplb.net/Working%20Papers/2009-03-Carnaje.pdf. Accessed 25 July 2012.

Carpenter, S.R., and L.H. Gunderson. 2001. Coping with Collapse: Ecological and Social Dynamics in Ecosystem Management. BioScience 6: 451–457.CrossRef

Cinner, J.E., and T.R. McClanahan. 2006. Socioeconomic Factors that Lead to Overfishing in Small-Scale Coral Reef Fisheries of Papua New Guinea. Environmental Conservation 33 (1): 73–80.CrossRef

Cleaver, F. 1999. Paradoxes of Participation: Questioning Participatory Approaches to Development. Journal of International Development 11: 597–612.CrossRef

Clement, F. 2010. Analysing Decentralised Natural Resource Governance: Proposition for a “Politicised” Institutional Analysis and Development Framework. Policy Sciences 43 (2): 129–156.CrossRef

Clement, Floriane, and Jaime M. Amezaga. 2013. Conceptualising Context in Institutional Reforms of Land and Natural Resource Management: The Case of Vietnam. International Journal of the Commons 7 (1): 140–163.CrossRef

Delaney, Alyne Elizabeth. 2015. Japanese Fishing Cooperative Associations: Governance in an Era of Consolidation. In Interactive Governance for Small-Scale Fisheries, ed. S. Jentoft and R. Chuenpagdee. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

Dietz, T.E., Elinor Ostrom, and Paul C. Stern. 2003. The Struggle to Govern the Commons. Science 302: 1907–1912.CrossRef

Fennell, D., R. Plummer, and M. Marschke. 2008. Is Adaptive Co-management Ethical? Journal of Environmental Management 88: 62–75.CrossRef

Gibson, Clark C., Elinor Ostrom, and T.K. Ahn. 2000. The Concept of Scale and the Human Dimensions of Global Change: A Survey. Ecological Economics 32: 217–239.CrossRef

Guillet, David W. 1992. Covering Ground: Communal Water Management and the State in the Peruvian Highlands. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRef

Hardin, Garrett. 1968. The Tragedy of the Common. Science 162: 1243–1248.CrossRef

Jentoft, Svein. 1989. Fisheries Co-management: Delegating Government Responsibility to Fishers’s Organisations. Marine Policy 13 (2): 137–154.CrossRef

Jentoft, Svein, and T. Kristofferson. 1998. Fishers’s Co-management: The Case of the Lofoten Fisheries. Human Organization 48 (4): 355–365.CrossRef

Jentoft, Svein, Bonnie J. McCay, and Douglas C. Wilson. 1998. Social Theory and Fisheries Co-management. Marine Policy 22 (4–5): 423–436.CrossRef

Jentoft, Svein, and Knut H. Mikalsen. 2014. Do National Resources Have to Be Centrally Managed? Vested Interests and Institutional Reform in Norwegian Fisheries Governance. Maritime Studies 13 (5): 1–16.

Johnsen, Petter Jahn, and Bjørn Hersoug. 2014. Local Empowerment Through the Creation of Coastal Space? Ecology and Society 19 (2): 60–66.CrossRef

Klooster, D. 2000. Institutional Choice, Community, and Struggle: A Case Study of Forest Co-management in Mexico. World Development 28 (1): 1–20.CrossRef

Knapp, Gunna. 2008. The Chignik Salmon Cooperative. In Case Studies in Fisheries Self-Governance, ed. R. Townsend, R. Shotton, and H. Uchida. Rome: FAO.

Kosamu, Ishmael B.M. 2015. Conditions for Sustainability of Small-scale Fisheries in Developing Countries. Fisheries Research 161: 365–373.CrossRef

Lim, Cristina P., Yoshiaki Matsuda, and Yukio Shigemi. 1995. Co‐management in Marine Fisheries: The Japanese Experience. Coastal Management 23: 195–221.CrossRef

Makino, Mitsutaku 2008. Marine Protected Areas for the Snow Crab Bottom Fishery Off Kyoto Prefecture, Japan. http://www.fao.org/docrep/010/a1497e/a1497e00.htm. Accessed 6 May 2013.

Marschke, Melissa, Derek Armitage, Le Van An, Truong Van Tuyen, and Hein Mallee. 2012. Do Collective Property Rights Make Sense? Insights from Central Vietnam. International Journal of the Commons 6 (1): 1–27.CrossRef

Mosse, David. 1997. The Symbolic Making of a Common Property Resource: History, Ecology and Locality in a Tank-Irrigated Landscape in South India. Development and Change 28 (3): 467–504.CrossRef

Olsson, O., C. Folke, and F. Berkes. 2004. Adaptive Co-management for Building Resilience in Social-Ecological Systems. Environmental Management 34: 75–90.CrossRef

Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institution for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

———. 2005. Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

———. 2010. Polycentric Systems for Coping with Collective Action and Global Environmental Change. Global Environmental Change 29: 550–557.CrossRef

Pinkerton, Evelyn. 2003. Toward Specificity in Complexity: Understanding Comanagement from a Social Science Perspective. In The Fisheries Co-management Experience, ed. D.C. Wilson, J.R. Nielson, and P. Degnbol. http://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/dlc/bitstream/handle/10535/70/TOWARDSPECIFICITYINCOMPLEXI.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed 5 August 2014.

Pinkerton, E., and M. Weinstein. 1995. Fisheries That Work: Sustainability Through Community-based Management. http://www.davidsuzuki.org/publications/reports/1995/fisheries-that-work. Accessed 5 May 2014.

Pomeroy, Robert S., and Fikret Berkes. 1997. Two to Tango: The Role of Government in Fisheries Co-management. Marine Policy 21 (5): 465–480.CrossRef

Scharpf, Fritz W. 1994. Games Real Actors Could Play: Positive and Negative Coordination in Embedded Negotiation. Journal of Theoretical Politics 6: 27–53.CrossRef

Schlager, E., W. Blomquist, and S.Y. Tang. 1994. Mobile Flows, Storage, and Self-Organized Institutions for Governing Common-Pool Resources. Land Economics 70 (3): 294–317.CrossRef

Searle, J.R. 2005. What Is an Institution? Journal of Institutional Economics 1 (1): 1–22.CrossRef

Shelley, P., and T. van Rijn. 2014. The Role of Courts in Fisheries Management and Marine Biodiversity Protection. In Governance of Marine Fisheries and Biodiversity Conservation: Interaction and Coevolution, ed. Serge M. Garcia, Jake Rice, and Anthony Charles. Online Book.

Steins, N.A., and V.M. Edwards. 1999. Collective Action in Common-Pool Resource Management: The Contribution of a Social Constructivist Perspective to Existing Theory. Society and Natural Resources 12 (6): 539–557.CrossRef

Suenaga, Satoshi. 2008. Sandfish Resource Co-management in Akita Prefecture, Japan. In Case Studies in Fisheries Self-Governance, ed. R. Townsend, R. Shotton, and H. Uchida. ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/010/a1497e/a1497e01.pdf. Accessed 15 Mar 2014.

Tarko, Vlad. 2012. Elinor Ostrom: Life and Work. In The Future of the Commons. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2267381. Accessed 5 May 2013.

Tucker, C.M., J.C. Randolph, and E.J. Castellanos. 2007. Institutions, Biophysical Factors and History: An Integrative Analysis of Private and Common Property Forests in Guatemala and Honduras. Human Ecology 35 (3): 259–274.CrossRef

Turner, M.D. 1999. Conflict, Environmental Change, and Social Institutions in Dryland Africa: Limitations of the Community Resource Management Approach. Society and Natural Resources 12 (7): 643–657.CrossRef

Uchida, Hirotsugu. 2010. Community-based Management for Sustainable Fishery: Lessons from Japan. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/download/5309071ec013.pdf?expires=1413261137&id=id&accname=ocid177546&checksum=A0F2C8B8D39FDA9D0178E3DBA174D4C9. Accessed 5 Sept 2012.

Titel: Critiques of Ostrom’s Approach: A View from Fisheries Governance
verfasst von: Hoang Viet Thang
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Rethinking Fisheries Governance
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61054-2

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-61055-9

Copyright-Jahr: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61055-9_2