Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Regional Development Based on Digital Driven Symbiosis Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2019 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Cross-cultural Difference and Cognitive Biases as Causes of Gap of Mindset Toward Safety Between Approach Based on Hazard Detection and that Based on Firm Safety Confirmation

verfasst von : Atsuo Murata

Erschienen in: Advances in Human Factors, Business Management and Society

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Japanese or eastern countries’ attitude toward safety was reviewed from mindset toward safety, approach for addressing safety, and attitude toward investing for safety. This was compared with that of U.S. or western countries. It was assumed that such a difference leads to a major gap between the safety approach based on hazard detection and that based on firm safety confirmation. An attempt was made to explain why the gap arises from the standpoint of cross-cultural difference, cognitive biases, and the relationship between scarcity and slack. Based on the discussion, we demonstrated that we should recognize and accept cross-cultural difference, cognitive biases, and the risk of the state with less slack for safety due to scarcity (especially, economic one). The attitude toward safety in line with such properties should be modified to control the unacceptable risk to a minimum so that we can further enhance safety and cut off the vicious circle of repetition of similar disasters, collisions, or crashes.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Crystal Cube: Multidisciplinary Approach to Disruptive Events Prediction
Nächstes Kapitel Characteristics of Problem Consciousness of Indonesian Returnee Nurses Who Experienced Intercultural Exchange in Foreign Countries
Literatur
1.
Murata, A.: Cultural influences on cognitive biases in judgment and decision making: on the need for new theory and models for accidents and safety. In: Cohn, J.V., Schatz, S., Freeman, H., Combs, D.J.Y. (eds.) Modeling Sociocultural Influences on Decision Making -Understanding Conflict, Enabling Stability-, pp. 103–109. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2017)
2.
Murata, A.: Cultural difference and cognitive biases as a trigger of critical crashes or disasters -evidence from case studies of human factors analysis-. J. Behav. Brain Sci. 7, 399–415 (2017)CrossRef
3.
Perrow, C.: Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1999)
4.
Mullainathan, S., Shafir, E.: Scarcity: The New Science of Having Less and How It Defines Our Lives. Picador, New York (2014)
5.
Gladwell, M.: Blowup. In: Gladwell, M. (ed.) What the Dog Saw, pp. 345–358. Little, Brown and Company, New York (2010)
6.
Dekker, S.: The Field Guide to Understanding Human Error. Ashgate Publishing, Farnham (2006)
7.
Reason, J.: Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents Revisited. Ashgate Publishing, Farnham (1997)
8.
Reason, J.: Organizational Accidents Revisited. Ashgate Publishing, Farnham (2016)CrossRef
9.
Perrow, C.: The Next Catastrophe: Reducing Our Vulnerabilities to Natural, Industrial, and Terrorist Disasters. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2011)CrossRef
10.
Perrow, C.: Fukushima and the Inevitability of accidents. Bull. At. Scientists 67(6), 44–52 (2011)CrossRef
11.
Perrow, C.: Fukushima, Risk and Probability: Expect the Unexpected. Bull. At. Scientists 67(4), 44–52 (2011)CrossRef
12.
Gladwell, M.: The Ethnic Theory of Plane Crash. In: Gradwell, M. (ed.) Outliers, pp. 206–261. Little, Brown and Company, New York (2008)
13.
Syed, M.: Black Box Thinking: Marginal Gains and the Secrets of High Performance. John Murray Publishers Ltd., New York (2016)
14.
Murata, A., Nakamura, T., Karwowski, W.: Influence of cognitive biases in distorting decision making and leading to critical unfavorable incidents. Safety 1(1), 44–58 (2015)CrossRef
15.
Bazerman, M.H., Moore, D.A.: Judgment in Managerial Decision Making. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2001)
16.
Bazerman, M.H., Watkins, M.D.: Predictable Surprises. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge (2008)
17.
Bazerman, M.H., Tenbrunsel, A.E.: Blind Spots: Why We Fail to Do What’s Right and What to Do About It. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2012)
18.
Kahneman, D.: Thinking, Fast and Slow. Penguin Books, London (2011)
19.
Dobelli, R.: The Art of Thinking Clearly. Harper, New York (2013)
20.
Murata, A., Moriwaka, M.: Anomaly in safety management: is it constantly possible to make safety compatible with economy? In: Arezes, P. (ed.) Advances in Safety Management and Human Factors. AISC, vol. 604, pp. 45–54. Springer, New York (2017)
21.
Thaler, R.A.: The Winner’s Curse-Paradoxes and Anomalies of Economic Life. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1994)
22.
Thaler, R.A., Sunstein, C.R.: Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Penguin, New York (2008)
23.
Thaler, R.A.: Misbehaving: The Making of Behavioural Economics. Penguin, New York (2016)
24.
Shiller, R.J.: Irrational Exuberance. Broadway Books, New York (2005)
25.
Murata, A.: Anchoring bias in relationship between objective and subjective probability. Psychol. Res. 4(12), 936–943 (2014)
26.
Murata, A., Matsushita, Y.: Hindsight bias in cause analysis of accident. Psychol. Res. 4(11), 843–851 (2014)
27.
Murata, A.: On verification of gradual escalation phenomenon of violation behavior using an experimental paradigm of diversification of risk. Psychol. Res. 5(3), 197–204 (2015)
28.
Murata, A.: Loss aversion underlying violation. Psychol. Res. 5(4), 225–231 (2015)
29.
Murata, A.: On persistency of endowment effect-relationship between affection and endowment effect. Psychol. Res. 5(5), 287–291 (2015)
30.
Murata, A., Nakamura, T.: Effect of intention on outcome bias in decision making: implications for safety management. J. Behav. Brain Sci. 5, 561–569 (2015)CrossRef
31.
Murata, A., Morinaga, T.: Unnoticed unethical behavior when gradually escalated: implications for management of safety. Int. J. Appl. Behav. Econ. 5(2), 1–10 (2016)CrossRef
32.
Murata, A., Matsushita, Y.: Insensitivity to unethical behavior in dictator game when indirectly intermediated: effect of instruction condition for evaluator on punishment to dictator. J. Behav. Brain Sci. 6, 199–208 (2016)CrossRef
33.
Sigurdsson, S.O., Taylor, M.A., Wirth, O.: Discounting the value of safety: effects of perceived risk and effort. J. Saf. Res. 46, 127–134 (2013)CrossRef
34.
Kirby, K.N., Petry, N.M., Bickel, W.K.: Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug-using controls. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 128(1), 78–87 (1999)CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Cross-cultural Difference and Cognitive Biases as Causes of Gap of Mindset Toward Safety Between Approach Based on Hazard Detection and that Based on Firm Safety Confirmation
verfasst von
Atsuo Murata
Copyright-Jahr
2019
Buch
Advances in Human Factors, Business Management and Society

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94708-2

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-94709-9

Copyright-Jahr: 2019

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94709-9_57